WRPGs vs JRPGs?

  • 188 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#151 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="mitu123"] She isn't hot, which is the problem, I've seen 2D girls that look hotter.

Yandere

I liked her personality though.

She talks too much, my friend wanted to "get with" all the girls when we first started playing, but her stories bored us to death even when we skipped them.

I really like her stories,and when was the last time a woman singed for you,eh? :P
Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#152 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts
I love both Jrpgs and Wrpg's. But I prefer WRPG's. I think that it's mostly because it's really hard to find the trully original JRPG's because they are always sold in very few quantities in the west and a lot of the times they're not launched in the west at all.
Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"] I liked her personality though.Arach666

She talks too much, my friend wanted to "get with" all the girls when we first started playing, but her stories bored us to death even when we skipped them.

I really like her stories,and when was the last time a woman singed for you,eh? :P

For me? No clue, but I can listen to music and pretend like the woman is. Anyways she felt like the stereotypical woman that just talks way too much and likes you more if you listen (and spend money on her for gifts).

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#154 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

And another thing that I hated about Dragon Age:

Nerkcon

She isn't hot, which is the problem, I've seen 2D girls that look hotter.

Do all girls have to have exotic hair , bikini armor, big boobs, big buttocks, and act fragile and helpless to be hot? EDIT: Sorry for being off topic but neither the east or the west have good woman. They're always almost half their boyfriend's size and are usually dependent on them. If there are any dominate demanding woman with actual leadership skills they are usually portrayed as foolish, ugly, and/or evil. You know that one Futurama episode were they were on the planet with giant woman and they were all dominated , well built, and could kill you through sex because of the size difference? I want my woman like that... :blush:

No, they can even wear what girls usually wear in real life. And yes, Futurama and that episode rocked IMO, glad that show comes back.

Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#155 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts

And another thing that I hated about Dragon Age:

Yandere

You mean cause she's a female character over 10 years old?

LOL I kid... haha

Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

And another thing that I hated about Dragon Age:

Nerkcon

You know that one Futurama episode were they were on the planet with giant woman and they were all dominate, strongly built, and could kill you through sex because of the size difference? I want my woman like that... :oops:

Well the closest thing I have to a masochistic fantasy are about yandere girls.

If only I could find a good looking 2D yandere girl in real life, sigh.

Avatar image for XBebop
XBebop

1414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 XBebop
Member since 2003 • 1414 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="Yandere"]

She talks too much, my friend wanted to "get with" all the girls when we first started playing, but her stories bored us to death even when we skipped them.

Yandere

I really like her stories,and when was the last time a woman singed for you,eh? :P

For me? No clue, but I can listen to music and pretend like the woman is. Anyways she felt like the stereotypical woman that just talks way too much and likes you more if you listen (and spend money on her for gifts).

She was a really dull character. She wasn't useful in combat, she wasn't as interesting as Morrigan or Allister, she wasn't cute/fun like the dog, wasn't funny like the dwarf or golem...I think had her voice acting been better, she might have been more interesting. It simply wasn't up to par with the rest of the voices., I was willing to go through all the combat in DA the first playthrough. However, on my second time through, I get up to the combat-heavy segments and turn off the game. The combat, on the hardest difficulty, is truly challenging, and you have to strategize for every encounter. However, going through what would roughly be an hour FULL of combat on easy on the hardest difficulty can take 2-3 hours, depending on how many times you die...it really isn't worth it. I loved DA, but a second playthrough really reveals its shortcomings. Also, being an archer is a terrible idea. Be a mage--and if you aren't a mage, go melee.
Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"] I really like her stories,and when was the last time a woman singed for you,eh? :PXBebop

For me? No clue, but I can listen to music and pretend like the woman is. Anyways she felt like the stereotypical woman that just talks way too much and likes you more if you listen (and spend money on her for gifts).

I think had her voice acting been better, she might have been more interesting

I think the problem was the slur that she had in her voice, it kinda hurt my ears after a while.

Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#159 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="Yandere"]

Both of them are biased and ignorant.

mitu123

Oh,I just saw the other one. Indeed they are.

Greyfeld's is worse, he's only using Mass Effect, I didn't know Dragon Age, Jade Empire, etc., had guns, oh wait...

lol only WRPG fanboys would believe my list is worse than the one that inspired it. I purposely made my list as biased and generalizing as possible. The other one was made by somebody who actually believed his drivel.
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#160 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

And another thing that I hated about Dragon Age:

Yandere

You know that one Futurama episode were they were on the planet with giant woman and they were all dominate, strongly built, and could kill you through sex because of the size difference? I want my woman like that... :oops:

Well the closest thing I have to a masochistic fantasy are about yandere girls.

If only I could find a good looking 2D yandere girl in real life, sigh.

Damn,I didn´t even knew what Yandere girls were...ouch!

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#161 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"] Oh,I just saw the other one. Indeed they are.Greyfeld

Greyfeld's is worse, he's only using Mass Effect, I didn't know Dragon Age, Jade Empire, etc., had guns, oh wait...

lol only WRPG fanboys would believe my list is worse than the one that inspired it. I purposely made my list as biased and generalizing as possible. The other one was made by somebody who actually believed his drivel.

I'm not a WRPG fanboy, nice try though.

Avatar image for Androvinus
Androvinus

5796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#162 Androvinus
Member since 2008 • 5796 Posts
I prefer jrpgs because they are usually more emotional to me. And i really like their style and turn based gameplay. I also find them to have much more memorable music. like the persona and final fantasy series
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#163 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"] You know that one Futurama episode were they were on the planet with giant woman and they were all dominate, strongly built, and could kill you through sex because of the size difference? I want my woman like that... :oops:Arach666

Well the closest thing I have to a masochistic fantasy are about yandere girls.

If only I could find a good looking 2D yandere girl in real life, sigh.

Damn,I didn´t even knew what Yandere girls were...ouch!

Cute killers are awesome!:P

Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"] You know that one Futurama episode were they were on the planet with giant woman and they were all dominate, strongly built, and could kill you through sex because of the size difference? I want my woman like that... :oops:Arach666

Well the closest thing I have to a masochistic fantasy are about yandere girls.

If only I could find a good looking 2D yandere girl in real life, sigh.

Damn,I didn´t even knew what Yandere girls were...ouch!

It's too bad there are so little yandere girls right now, besides some the rare eroge I never see any new ones. I guess Oniichan Control is the newest manga centered around a yandere girl that I can think of.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510
deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510

17401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510
Member since 2007 • 17401 Posts

And another thing that I hated about Dragon Age:

Yandere

I hate Leliana too. :x She didn't affect my enjoyment of the game though, I just never used her in my party.

Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#166 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"][QUOTE="mitu123"] Greyfeld's is worse, he's only using Mass Effect, I didn't know Dragon Age, Jade Empire, etc., had guns, oh wait...

mitu123

lol only WRPG fanboys would believe my list is worse than the one that inspired it. I purposely made my list as biased and generalizing as possible. The other one was made by somebody who actually believed his drivel.

I'm not a WRPG fanboy, nice try though.

You're an FPS gamer, which is just as bad.
Avatar image for Mr_Cumberdale
Mr_Cumberdale

10189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#167 Mr_Cumberdale
Member since 2004 • 10189 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Cumberdale"]Mostly JRPG. The only WRPG I enjoyed was Oblivion. I tried ME, but I just didn't enjoy it. If I want a game that leaves an impact on me, I'd go with JRPG. The best RPG I've played was an JRPG.SgtKevali

This is offtopic, but who is that dude in your profile pic?

I was looking for hairstyles and saw his picture. :)
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#168 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="Lethalhazard"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

I've never been interested in WRPGs; the type of linear storytelling and gameplay conventions of JRPGs just appeal to me more. They're very different genres and aren't really meant to be compared with each other, although they are being compared to each other with more and more of a WRPG perspective lately.

hakanakumono

I definitely prefer most JRPG story-telling to WRPG. I don't like adventure novels and I don't like large branching stories :P.

I've never understood why linear storytelling comes under fire when it comes to videogames. There's nothing wrong with having a clear, artistic vision.

Linear story telling doesn't come under fire in video games... generally speaking. It does however come under fire when pertaining to the RPG genre, as it's the complete antithesis to role playing.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#169 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"] lol only WRPG fanboys would believe my list is worse than the one that inspired it. I purposely made my list as biased and generalizing as possible. The other one was made by somebody who actually believed his drivel. Greyfeld

I'm not a WRPG fanboy, nice try though.

You're an FPS gamer, which is just as bad.

What's wrong with FPSs? Hate em because they're popular?

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"][QUOTE="mitu123"] I'm not a WRPG fanboy, nice try though.

mitu123

You're an FPS gamer, which is just as bad.

What's wrong with FPSs? Hate em because they're popular?

I think its because they're linear and simple minded and the people who got nuts over them and imagined to be the same way, especially if you note what kind of shooters sell. When they were growing there were two very acclaimed shooters that were very different from each other; Doom and System Shock. Doom is a straight forward, mindless, kill all the demons linear shooter with a silly plot. System Shock however was a much slower pace, non linear shootrt with more exploration and vulnerability where you had to plan out your battles because life and ammo were hard to come by and it had a deeper story that was better represented. Guess which one lived on and inspired the rest of the games in the genre?
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#171 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"] You're an FPS gamer, which is just as bad.Nerkcon

What's wrong with FPSs? Hate em because they're popular?

I think its because they're linear and simple minded and the people who got nuts over them and imagined to be the same way, especially if you note what kind of shooters sell. When they were growing there were two very acclaimed shooters that were very different from each other; Doom and System Shock. Doom is a straight forward, mindless, kill all the demons linear shooter with a silly plot. System Shock however was a much slower pace, non linear shootrt with more exploration and vulnerability where you had to plan out your battles because life and ammo were hard to come by and it had a deeper story that was better represented. Guess which one lived on and inspired the rest of the games in the genre?

Doom FTW!:P Yes, they are linear and have no depth but is very fun and entertains me. Though I don't mind System Shock like FPSs as well.

Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#173 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"] You're an FPS gamer, which is just as bad.Nerkcon

What's wrong with FPSs? Hate em because they're popular?

I think its because they're linear and simple minded and the people who got nuts over them and imagined to be the same way, especially if you note what kind of shooters sell. When they were growing there were two very acclaimed shooters that were very different from each other; Doom and System Shock. Doom is a straight forward, mindless, kill all the demons linear shooter with a silly plot. System Shock however was a much slower pace, non linear shootrt with more exploration and vulnerability where you had to plan out your battles because life and ammo were hard to come by and it had a deeper story that was better represented. Guess which one lived on and inspired the rest of the games in the genre?

Dude, most games from every genre are pretty simple.

Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#174 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"] You know that one Futurama episode were they were on the planet with giant woman and they were all dominate, strongly built, and could kill you through sex because of the size difference? I want my woman like that... :oops:hakanakumono

Well the closest thing I have to a masochistic fantasy are about yandere girls.

If only I could find a good looking 2D yandere girl in real life, sigh.

Please don't transition to the real world; we don't need any more child molesters.

Hmmm, so this thread turned into a Yandere thread.

Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

Well the closest thing I have to a masochistic fantasy are about yandere girls.

If only I could find a good looking 2D yandere girl in real life, sigh.

SgtKevali

Please don't transition to the real world; we don't need any more child molesters.

Hmmm, so this thread turned into a Yandere thread.

Yandere as in the archetype or me?

If it's about me I have to disagree, it's just him insulting me.

Avatar image for IppoTenma
IppoTenma

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 IppoTenma
Member since 2009 • 2972 Posts
I don't think I've ever played a WRPG. So JRPG for now, though clearly biased.
Avatar image for Domobomb
Domobomb

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 Domobomb
Member since 2004 • 1914 Posts

West > East

Always.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#178 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"] You're an FPS gamer, which is just as bad.Nerkcon

What's wrong with FPSs? Hate em because they're popular?

I think its because they're linear and simple minded and the people who got nuts over them and imagined to be the same way, especially if you note what kind of shooters sell. When they were growing there were two very acclaimed shooters that were very different from each other; Doom and System Shock. Doom is a straight forward, mindless, kill all the demons linear shooter with a silly plot. System Shock however was a much slower pace, non linear shootrt with more exploration and vulnerability where you had to plan out your battles because life and ammo were hard to come by and it had a deeper story that was better represented. Guess which one lived on and inspired the rest of the games in the genre?

Considering DOOM basically created the genre as we know it.... What's the problem with that? DOOM was an excellent game, propelled by fantastic GAMEPLAY. DOOM is the ultimate shooter, so naturally it would inspire the genre.
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#179 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="mitu123"] What's wrong with FPSs? Hate em because they're popular?

DarkLink77

I think its because they're linear and simple minded and the people who got nuts over them and imagined to be the same way, especially if you note what kind of shooters sell. When they were growing there were two very acclaimed shooters that were very different from each other; Doom and System Shock. Doom is a straight forward, mindless, kill all the demons linear shooter with a silly plot. System Shock however was a much slower pace, non linear shootrt with more exploration and vulnerability where you had to plan out your battles because life and ammo were hard to come by and it had a deeper story that was better represented. Guess which one lived on and inspired the rest of the games in the genre?

Considering DOOM basically created the genre as we know it.... What's the problem with that? DOOM was an excellent game, propelled by fantastic GAMEPLAY. DOOM is the ultimate shooter, so naturally it would inspire the genre.

Correction. Doom was the ultimate shooter. For its time. And that success did spawn a lot of other titles to follow the genre, many of which has since surpassed it.

Also it wasn't Doom that created the genre, it was Wolfenstein 3D. Doom then came along and improved upon it, gaining it the new spotlight, as did those which followed after Doom.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#180 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"] I think its because they're linear and simple minded and the people who got nuts over them and imagined to be the same way, especially if you note what kind of shooters sell. When they were growing there were two very acclaimed shooters that were very different from each other; Doom and System Shock. Doom is a straight forward, mindless, kill all the demons linear shooter with a silly plot. System Shock however was a much slower pace, non linear shootrt with more exploration and vulnerability where you had to plan out your battles because life and ammo were hard to come by and it had a deeper story that was better represented. Guess which one lived on and inspired the rest of the games in the genre?AdobeArtist

Considering DOOM basically created the genre as we know it.... What's the problem with that? DOOM was an excellent game, propelled by fantastic GAMEPLAY. DOOM is the ultimate shooter, so naturally it would inspire the genre.

Correction. Doom was the ultimate shooter. For its time. And that success did spawn a lot of other titles to follow the genre, many of which has since surpassed it.

What has surpassed DOOM? I can't think of anything. I mean, when someone says shooter to me, I think DOOM. To me, it represents the epitome of the genre, when we're just talking pure shooter.

Obviously Wolfenstein 3D was really important, but DOOM refined it to a razor sharp edge. To me, Wolfenstein 3D is forgetable. DOOM isn't.

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#181 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Considering DOOM basically created the genre as we know it.... What's the problem with that? DOOM was an excellent game, propelled by fantastic GAMEPLAY. DOOM is the ultimate shooter, so naturally it would inspire the genre.DarkLink77

Correction. Doom was the ultimate shooter. For its time. And that success did spawn a lot of other titles to follow the genre, many of which has since surpassed it.

Also it wasn't Doom that created the genre, it was Wolfenstein 3D. Doom then came along and improved upon it, gaining it the new spotlight, as did those which followed after Doom.

What has surpassed DOOM? I can't think of anything. I mean, when someone says shooter to me, I think DOOM. To me, it represents the epitome of the genre, when we're just talking pure shooter.

Perfect Dark, Unreal series, Quake, Time Splitters, Deus Ex, Bioshock, and yes, even Halo. People gotta give up this mantle that outdated games are able to compete with newer games when they're unable to integrate the improvements which the newer games have the advantage of. Unfair maybe, but that's the way it is. The past is the past and the genre usually moves on.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#182 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

Correction. Doom was the ultimate shooter. For its time. And that success did spawn a lot of other titles to follow the genre, many of which has since surpassed it.

AdobeArtist

What has surpassed DOOM? I can't think of anything. I mean, when someone says shooter to me, I think DOOM. To me, it represents the epitome of the genre, when we're just talking pure shooter.

Perfect Dark, Unreal series, Quake, Time Splitters, Deus Ex, Bioshock, and yes, even Halo. People gotta give up this mantle that outdated games are able to compete with newer games when they're unable to integrate the improvements which the newer games have the advantage of. Unfair maybe, but that's the way it is. The past is the past and the genre usually moves on.

As much as I love all those games (and I do, trust me) it's just not the same. From a gameplay standpoint, yes they are better. From a story standpoint, yes. From a design standpoint, yes, in every way. None of them surpasses DOOM as the ultimate shooter, in my mind. I'm not going to be able to explain why I feel that way (it is not nostalgia, I only recently seriously played DOOM), but there's just something about it. I guess it's DOOM's purity, if that makes sense. DOOM is pure shooter. That's all it is, and that's all it has to fall back on. With the possible exceptions of Quake and Unreal, none of those other games have that.
Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] What has surpassed DOOM? I can't think of anything. I mean, when someone says shooter to me, I think DOOM. To me, it represents the epitome of the genre, when we're just talking pure shooter.DarkLink77

Perfect Dark, Unreal series, Quake, Time Splitters, Deus Ex, Bioshock, and yes, even Halo. People gotta give up this mantle that outdated games are able to compete with newer games when they're unable to integrate the improvements which the newer games have the advantage of. Unfair maybe, but that's the way it is. The past is the past and the genre usually moves on.

As much as I love all those games (and I do, trust me) it's just not the same. From a gameplay standpoint, yes they are better. From a story standpoint, yes. From a design standpoint, yes, in every way. None of them surpasses DOOM as the ultimate shooter, in my mind. I'm not going to be able to explain why I feel that way (it is not nostalgia, I only recently seriously played DOOM), but there's just something about it. I guess it's DOOM's purity, if that makes sense. DOOM is pure shooter. That's all it is, and that's all it has to fall back on. With the possible exceptions of Quake and Unreal, none of those other games have that.

Serious Sam and Painkiller. There two games that surpassed Doom.

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#184 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] What has surpassed DOOM? I can't think of anything. I mean, when someone says shooter to me, I think DOOM. To me, it represents the epitome of the genre, when we're just talking pure shooter.DarkLink77

Perfect Dark, Unreal series, Quake, Time Splitters, Deus Ex, Bioshock, and yes, even Halo. People gotta give up this mantle that outdated games are able to compete with newer games when they're unable to integrate the improvements which the newer games have the advantage of. Unfair maybe, but that's the way it is. The past is the past and the genre usually moves on.

As much as I love all those games (and I do, trust me) it's just not the same. From a gameplay standpoint, yes they are better. From a story standpoint, yes. From a design standpoint, yes, in every way. None of them surpasses DOOM as the ultimate shooter, in my mind. I'm not going to be able to explain why I feel that way (it is not nostalgia, I only recently seriously played DOOM), but there's just something about it. I guess it's DOOM's purity, if that makes sense. DOOM is pure shooter. That's all it is, and that's all it has to fall back on. With the possible exceptions of Quake and Unreal, none of those other games have that.

You ummm... seem to contradict yourself there. Severely :P If you admit that those other shooters are better in gameplay, design, story, or any other element you can think of, then by all criteria, they ARE better than Doom.

And this is not a slam against Doom either. Like I said it was amazing for its day. But it's simply part of the natural order of things, that newer games are made to implement advancements that move a given genre forward, so that we as gamers get better and better games to play.

The progenitors and predecessors should always be appreciated for what they contributed and how they set the foundation to pave the way for what is to come. But that doesn't mean they can hold their crown forever. That crown must eventually be passed on, so continues the cycle. As it should be. Its how we get to where we are today :)

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#185 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

Perfect Dark, Unreal series, Quake, Time Splitters, Deus Ex, Bioshock, and yes, even Halo. People gotta give up this mantle that outdated games are able to compete with newer games when they're unable to integrate the improvements which the newer games have the advantage of. Unfair maybe, but that's the way it is. The past is the past and the genre usually moves on.

AdobeArtist

As much as I love all those games (and I do, trust me) it's just not the same. From a gameplay standpoint, yes they are better. From a story standpoint, yes. From a design standpoint, yes, in every way. None of them surpasses DOOM as the ultimate shooter, in my mind. I'm not going to be able to explain why I feel that way (it is not nostalgia, I only recently seriously played DOOM), but there's just something about it. I guess it's DOOM's purity, if that makes sense. DOOM is pure shooter. That's all it is, and that's all it has to fall back on. With the possible exceptions of Quake and Unreal, none of those other games have that.

You ummm... seem to contradict yourself there. Severely :P If you admit that those other shooters are better in gameplay, design, story, or any other element you can think of, then by all criteria, they ARE better than Doom.

And this is not a slam against Doom either. Like I said it was amazing for its day. But it's simply part of the natural order of things, that newer games are made to implement advancements that move a given genre forward, so that we as gamers get better and better games to play.

The progenitors and predecessors should always be appreciated for what they contributed and how they set the foundation to pave the way for what is to come. But that doesn't mean they can hold their crown forever. That crown must eventually be passed on, so continues the cycle. As it should be. Its how we get to where we are today :)

Bah. Firstly, it's late, so I'm entitled to contradictions in my argument. :P I did say I wouldn't be able to explain it well. I dunno. You are right, the crown has been passed on, and I admitted as much, in a roundabout way. I guess I'll simply say that DOOM holds a special place in my heart, and leave it at that. Fair enough?
Avatar image for princemarth23
princemarth23

9229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 princemarth23
Member since 2005 • 9229 Posts

I vastly prefer JRPGs. Most WRPGs just aren't fun for me at all.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#187 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62015 Posts

This gen definately goes to WRPG's. However last gen, it was easily JRPG's.

Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#188 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts
This generation, WRPGs, hands down. Last gen, JRPGs due mainly to Sony and Square Enix's efforts with Final Fantasy of course.