wtf, whats wrong with sony's ideal?!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for supermechakirby
supermechakirby

10677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 supermechakirby
Member since 2003 • 10677 Posts

"Cant we make a Good Game?! FINE THEN LETS ALLOW MOAR PLAYERS

MAOR PLAYERS WILL MAKE UP FOR CRAPPY GAMEPLAY RAWR"

example Resistance, GT5...

Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#2 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts
According to your logic all racers and FPS have crappy gameplay which simply isn't true.
Avatar image for monkeysrfat
monkeysrfat

1789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 monkeysrfat
Member since 2007 • 1789 Posts
I don't get it :(
Avatar image for supermechakirby
supermechakirby

10677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 supermechakirby
Member since 2003 • 10677 Posts

According to your logic all racers and FPS have crappy gameplay which simply isn't true.Tiefster

no I am just talking about GT and Resistance

Avatar image for martin_f
martin_f

2605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 martin_f
Member since 2005 • 2605 Posts
Hes got a point, in games where there is alot of players online they usually have poor single player. Games that are over 16 players online are usually dedicated multiplayer games such as Battlefield series and MMOs.
A good example would be Delta force Black Hawk Down on Xbox didn't that game have 50 players online?
Avatar image for amcallister902
amcallister902

1339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 amcallister902
Member since 2006 • 1339 Posts

i like resistance. alot. it has a solid single player with ALOT of replayablity and having 40 ppl online at one go in a big deathmatch is bad to you?

you clearly havnt played the game so why dont you just stfu?

Avatar image for NobuoMusicMaker
NobuoMusicMaker

6628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 NobuoMusicMaker
Member since 2005 • 6628 Posts

Uh Resistance single player experience was great.

Starcraft has a great single player experience and 8 players online was beyond its time.

Avatar image for no_submission
no_submission

961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 no_submission
Member since 2007 • 961 Posts

20 cars in one race..... since when did GT become Nascar?

Anyway, I like the idea of 20 players.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

There's no correlating relationship between more or fewer players making a game better or worse. It's just all fanboy spin.

Gears of War, StarCraft and Halo for example, are often great with 10 or less players.

CS or WoW are also great with a lot more players.

It matters not how many players you can fit in that matters most, it's all based on the gameplay. Of course, flexible allowances are a benefit.

Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts
A 20 player co-op game! :o
Avatar image for supermechakirby
supermechakirby

10677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 supermechakirby
Member since 2003 • 10677 Posts

A 20 player co-op game! :o wklzip

I'd rather have TOo Humans 4 player co-op

Avatar image for KAS3Y_JAM3Z
KAS3Y_JAM3Z

1699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 KAS3Y_JAM3Z
Member since 2006 • 1699 Posts

According to your logic all racers and FPS have crappy gameplay which simply isn't true.Tiefster

I don't think that's what his logic is...

he meant that resistance has so many players on online matches to make up for mediocre gameplay.

Avatar image for sneekite
sneekite

1599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 sneekite
Member since 2004 • 1599 Posts

So Gran Turismo's gameplay is suddenly crappy because it's missing a feature that its competitor has? It's disappointing, sure, but that doesn't mean it can't still be a great game. Also, in Resistance's case, last I checked an 8 in gameplay was not "crappy."

I was under the impression that more players was a good thing, at least in most cases. That addition doesn't have to mean that they're making up for something elsewhere, it's just a design choice on the part of the developers.

Avatar image for Shad0ki11
Shad0ki11

12576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Shad0ki11
Member since 2006 • 12576 Posts
MOAR PLAYERS! NAOO!!!!
Avatar image for htijerina10
htijerina10

283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 htijerina10
Member since 2006 • 283 Posts

So Gran Turismo's gameplay is suddenly crappy because it's missing a feature that its competitor has? It's disappointing, sure, but that doesn't mean it can't still be a great game. Also, in Resistance's case, last I checked an 8 in gameplay was not "crappy."

I was under the impression that more players was a good thing, at least in most cases. That addition doesn't have to mean that they're making up for something elsewhere, it's just a design choice on the part of the developers.

sneekite
i totally agree with you gt is a great game who cares about that feature its a racing sim not a destruction derby game plus ressistance was great
Avatar image for chutup
chutup

7656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#16 chutup
Member since 2005 • 7656 Posts
Since there is barely any info on GT5 other than ZOMFG NO CRASH DAMAGE!!1!!1, you can't say that it has bad gameplay. And nobody would argue that Resistance is a bad game. And besides, that's only two games. And to further destroy your silly argument, neither GT5 nor Resistance are developed by Sony. It's Polyphony Digital and Insomniac, respectively.
Avatar image for Davis092
Davis092

1449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Davis092
Member since 2006 • 1449 Posts
The PS3...It Hungers! For more! >_>
Avatar image for CossackNoodle
CossackNoodle

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 CossackNoodle
Member since 2004 • 232 Posts
Rfom is a war ffs why would mp be 4v4 and the SP is amazing with lots of replayability so to have a kick ass lag free 20v20 online is one hell of a game
Avatar image for ni6htmare01
ni6htmare01

3990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 ni6htmare01
Member since 2005 • 3990 Posts
Whats wrong with 20 Players CO-OP? FFXI dynamix are 64 Players CO-OP man!
Avatar image for ni6htmare01
ni6htmare01

3990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ni6htmare01
Member since 2005 • 3990 Posts
Whats wrong with 20 Players CO-OP? FFXI dynamix are 64 Players CO-OP man!
Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts

"Cant we make a Good Game?! FINE THEN LETS ALLOW MOAR PLAYERS

MAOR PLAYERS WILL MAKE UP FOR CRAPPY GAMEPLAY RAWR"

example Resistance, GT5...

supermechakirby

ya know, for a guy with a level 43 account and 9,000+ posts, you would think that someone like you would be a little more mature than this.

Avatar image for no_submission
no_submission

961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 no_submission
Member since 2007 • 961 Posts

MOAR PLAYERS! NAOO!!!!Shad0ki11

4chan?