WWE 2k15 may be coming to PC for the 1st time

  • 127 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

@lostrib:

You're telling me that fool does all of that PC championing, and he doesn't even own a gaming PC?

F*ing Fakeboys..

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@lostrib said:

@Cranler: I never questioned your source. You're the one that's wrong.

Please show me how I'm wrong.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#103 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

@Cranler: I never questioned your source. You're the one that's wrong.

Please show me how I'm wrong.

#85

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@lostrib said:

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

@Cranler: I never questioned your source. You're the one that's wrong.

Please show me how I'm wrong.

#85

Backtracking and grasping.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105  Edited By Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

@Cranler: false. It's against the rules to spread false information. You wouldn't want another strike would you ?

I'm quoting an article that was linked in this thread.

I see the article included games before 2009 when steam didn't track play time.

46% of games released after steam tracking began are played less than an hour. That's a shit ton of wasted money.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Making a big deal over a 4% possible discrepancy is incredibly petty.

Sure there's instances when people play offline and it may not track and there's also instances when you leave uplay open after finishing a game and it continues to track or something comes up and you have to pause the game. Just yesterday I was on a 20 minute call with a game paused, right now I'm running a game and alt tabbed out to post this.

@lostrib said:

@Cranler: still wrong

My post is #91 and yours is #92.

Please explain how I'm wrong.

Avatar image for Zelda187
Zelda187

1047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#106 Zelda187
Member since 2005 • 1047 Posts

@brane-games said:

@lawlessx said:

@OhSnapitz said:

Herms get WWE 15..

Consolers get The Witcher 3..

..seems like a fair trade.

Witcher 3 was never an exclusive..so this posts makes zero sense

not to mention comparing witcher 3 to this piece of crap fake wrestling game?? srsly?? LOL!!

I haven't watched wrestling in close to 15 years but the games are still fun as hell.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Cranler said:

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

@Cranler: false. It's against the rules to spread false information. You wouldn't want another strike would you ?

I'm quoting an article that was linked in this thread.

I see the article included games before 2009 when steam didn't track play time.

46% of games released after steam tracking began are played less than an hour. That's a shit ton of wasted money.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Making a big deal over a 4% possible discrepancy is incredibly petty.

Sure there's instances when people play offline and it may not track and there's also instances when you leave uplay open after finishing a game and it continues to track or something comes up and you have to pause the game. Just yesterday I was on a 20 minute call with a game paused, right now I'm running a game and alt tabbed out to post this.

@lostrib said:

@Cranler: still wrong

My post is #91 and yours is #92.

Please explain how I'm wrong.

Why? I never said any of that was wrong

And as your own quotes show, our exchange started before post 91, so obviously you were wrong before that post

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

Again, another thread continuing the same inane argument.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109  Edited By Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@lostrib said:

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

@Cranler: still wrong

My post is #91 and yours is #92.

Please explain how I'm wrong.

Why? I never said any of that was wrong

And as your own quotes show, our exchange started before post 91, so obviously you were wrong before that post

Still as vague as ever and can't explain where exactly I was wrong.

@clyde46 said:

Again, another thread continuing the same inane argument.

People wasting money on steam is an inane argument?

Avatar image for roler42
Roler42

1067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#110 Roler42
Member since 2013 • 1067 Posts

@Cranler: "wasting money"

So basically... People aren't allowed to do as they please with their money because for you that's a problem?

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@roler42 said:

@Cranler: "wasting money"

So basically... People aren't allowed to do as they please with their money because for you that's a problem?

So it's ok for hermits to denounce spending money on console hardware and software but the opposite is wrong?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

@Cranler said:

My post is #91 and yours is #92.

Please explain how I'm wrong.

Why? I never said any of that was wrong

And as your own quotes show, our exchange started before post 91, so obviously you were wrong before that post

Still as vague as ever and can't explain where exactly I was wrong.

I gave you the exact post number where you were wrong. Jeez, you are needy

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113  Edited By Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@lostrib said:

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

Why? I never said any of that was wrong

And as your own quotes show, our exchange started before post 91, so obviously you were wrong before that post

Still as vague as ever and can't explain where exactly I was wrong.

I gave you the exact post number where you were wrong. Jeez, you are needy

46% of games released after steam tracking began are played less than an hour. http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Do you think this wrong? If so, prove it.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

@Cranler said:

@lostrib said:

Why? I never said any of that was wrong

And as your own quotes show, our exchange started before post 91, so obviously you were wrong before that post

Still as vague as ever and can't explain where exactly I was wrong.

I gave you the exact post number where you were wrong. Jeez, you are needy

46% of games released after steam tracking began are played less than an hour. http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Do you think this wrong? If so, prove it.

No

Avatar image for bldgirsh
BldgIrsh

3044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

#115  Edited By BldgIrsh
Member since 2014 • 3044 Posts

@lostrib: You should know not to respond to cranler or any of his alts.

Avatar image for Dasein808
Dasein808

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116  Edited By Dasein808
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts
@Cranler said:

46% of games released after steam tracking began are played less than an hour. http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Do you think this wrong? If so, prove it.

No.

The author even admits that the stats are garbage and don't account for online gameplay, pre 2009 stats, the fact that the stats system has never been accurate + idle time, offline gaming, but I guess that's what Lostrib was implying when he referred to your lack of reading comprehension.

There's also the matter of you trying to combine two separate slices of the pie chart that extend well beyond one hour.

Pwned again.

Fail more.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Dasein808 said:
@Cranler said:

46% of games released after steam tracking began are played less than an hour. http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Do you think this wrong? If so, prove it.

No.

The author even admits that the stats are garbage and don't account for online gameplay, pre 2009 stats, the fact that the stats system has never been accurate + idle time, but I guess that's what Lostrib was implying when he referred to your lack of reading comprehension. There's also the matter of you trying to combine to separate slices of the pie chart that extend well beyond one hour.

Pwned again.

it's not

Avatar image for Dasein808
Dasein808

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#118  Edited By Dasein808
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts
@lostrib said:

it's not

Of course it's not.

Try explaining yourself beyond the bounds of a single sentence, bitch boy.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

with those improved gfx you will really get to see what wrestling is all about

just think pc dudes.

the shine of the oil!

the definition of the trunks!

two men!

grinding!

sweating!

grunting!

until in exhaustion one holds the other down and he can no longer resist the iron hard will of the other!

wrestling!

the most manly sport!

you can't deny it!

Avatar image for roler42
Roler42

1067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#120 Roler42
Member since 2013 • 1067 Posts

@Cranler: So you're preety much doing all of this out of spite? Allright then :) at least now I know your intentions whenever you argue

Avatar image for bldgirsh
BldgIrsh

3044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

#121 BldgIrsh
Member since 2014 • 3044 Posts

@Riverwolf007 said:

with those improved gfx you will really get to see what wrestling is all about

just think pc dudes.

the shine of the oil!

the definition of the trunks!

two men!

grinding!

sweating!

grunting!

until in exhaustion one holds the other down and he can no longer resist the iron hard will of the other!

wrestling!

the most manly sport!

you can't deny it!

Such a bad misconception of wrestling... (The actual sport.)

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122  Edited By Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

@bldgirsh said:

@Riverwolf007 said:

with those improved gfx you will really get to see what wrestling is all about

just think pc dudes.

the shine of the oil!

the definition of the trunks!

two men!

grinding!

sweating!

grunting!

until in exhaustion one holds the other down and he can no longer resist the iron hard will of the other!

wrestling!

the most manly sport!

you can't deny it!

Such a bad misconception of wrestling... (The actual sport.)

well i'm not talking about the collegiate sport.

i'm talkin bout wrasslin!

it's totally not homoerotic at all!

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123  Edited By Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@Dasein808 said:
@Cranler said:

46% of games released after steam tracking began are played less than an hour. http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Do you think this wrong? If so, prove it.

No.

The author even admits that the stats are garbage and don't account for online gameplay, pre 2009 stats, the fact that the stats system has never been accurate + idle time, offline gaming, but I guess that's what Lostrib was implying when he referred to your lack of reading comprehension.

There's also the matter of you trying to combine to separate slices of the pie chart that extend well beyond one hour.

Pwned again.

Fail more.

Did you even read that link? That link doesn't have the pre 2009 stats.

That link shows 46% of games bought on steam AFTER play tracking began have been played for 1 hour or less, that's from March 2009 when steam tracking began to to April 2014.

From the link http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Restricting these charts to games with a release date after March of 2009 (i.e. the ones we have a "complete" gameplay picture of) shows that 26.1 percent of registered copies are sitting unplayed,

I will say that, in my personal experience, the hourly reporting from Steam seems to match up with real world gameplay time in most, if not all, cases.

With over a dozen "real world" spot checks in hand now, we have yet to see an instance where the error in our numbers is more than 10 percent off from the actual numbers developers have access to. Sometimes our error is much less than that, of course, and the error can go in either direction (though so far our numbers seem to over-estimate slightly more often than under-estimating).

Pwnd again? When did you ever pwn me? You lost the 2005 pc debate and you lost that debate from a few days ago.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

@roler42 said:

@Cranler: So you're preety much doing all of this out of spite? Allright then :) at least now I know your intentions whenever you argue

????????????????

What ever brought you to this conclusion?

Avatar image for ps4hasnogames
PS4hasNOgames

2620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#125 PS4hasNOgames
Member since 2014 • 2620 Posts

@deadline-zero0 said:

I still remember playign Smackdown vs Raw on the PS2 when i was younger. Haven't played any WWE games in ages.

I haven't even followed them to know if they have or not come to PC. But hosnetly, what isn't on PC nowadays?

I think i need a list

console exclusives are always the best games.

Avatar image for Dasein808
Dasein808

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#128  Edited By Dasein808
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts
@Cranler said:

Did you even read that link? That link doesn't have the pre 2009 stats.

That link shows 46% of games bought on steam AFTER play tracking began have been played for 1 hour or less, that's from March 2009 when steam tracking began to to April 2014.

From the link http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Restricting these charts to games with a release date after March of 2009 (i.e. the ones we have a "complete" gameplay picture of) shows that 26.1 percent of registered copies are sitting unplayed,

I will say that, in my personal experience, the hourly reporting from Steam seems to match up with real world gameplay time in most, if not all, cases.

Yes, I did.

You didn't.

So you admit that the stats are worthless and invalid since they don't account for pre-2009, idle time, or offline play, and the first two segments of the pie chart have to do with 1-10 hours of gameplay and not one hour or less?

Good, glad we're clear on the fact that you're wrong and lying, AGAIN.

Hourly reporting does not match up and never has.

You mean those "debates," where, like this one, you couldn't prove your point?

You could not prove that consoles would be producing more gaming revenue than PCs if only consoles had been for sale in China for the past 14 years, nor could you prove your moronic 360 claim ("Dur, here's Skyrim played at 720p with more fps than the PC version played at 1080p with maxed detail. Xbox360 are win. I am master debater.")

Keep losing.

Avatar image for Dasein808
Dasein808

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#129  Edited By Dasein808
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts

Also, /flagged for spreading misinformed lies and derailing.

Avatar image for timster20
timster20

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#130 timster20
Member since 2014 • 399 Posts

@Dasein808 said:
@Cranler said:

Did you even read that link? That link doesn't have the pre 2009 stats.

That link shows 46% of games bought on steam AFTER play tracking began have been played for 1 hour or less, that's from March 2009 when steam tracking began to to April 2014.

From the link http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-addressing-your-questions-and-concerns/

Restricting these charts to games with a release date after March of 2009 (i.e. the ones we have a "complete" gameplay picture of) shows that 26.1 percent of registered copies are sitting unplayed,

I will say that, in my personal experience, the hourly reporting from Steam seems to match up with real world gameplay time in most, if not all, cases.

Yes, I did.

You didn't.

So you admit that the stats are worthless and invalid since they don't account for pre-2009, idle time, or offline play, and the first two segments of the pie chart have to do with 1-10 hours of gameplay and not one hour or less?

Good, glad we're clear on the fact that you're wrong and lying, AGAIN.

Hourly reporting does not match up and never has.

You mean those "debates," where, like this one, you couldn't prove your point?

You could not prove that consoles would be producing more gaming revenue than PCs if only consoles had been for sale in China for the past 14 years, nor could you prove your moronic 360 claim ("Dur, here's Skyrim played at 720p with more fps than the PC version played at 1080p with maxed detail. Xbox360 are win. I am master debater.")

Keep losing.

How do the stats being from 2009 to date make them worthless?

Idle time inflates stats which would offset the few people who play in offline mode.

What do the first two segments of the pie chart have to do with my point? The chart shows 46% of games are played for less than an hour. In the chart, less than an hour is 18.9% and never played is 26.1%.

Where your source on your hourly reporting claim? My playtime looks correct except for uplay games where I sometimes exit the game but leave uplay open which inflates the playtime.

He originally said China and other countries where consoles are expensive and people can only afford to play in internet cafes.

Skyrim on a 7800 gtx with a cpu that's twice as fast as AMD's $1000 cpus from 2005. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPIuTOm6flc

Avatar image for Dasein808
Dasein808

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#131  Edited By Dasein808
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts
@timster20 said:

Something irrelevant because he couldn't prove that consoles being available in China for the past 14 years would yield greater revenue than that produced by PC gaming.

Avatar image for timster20
timster20

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#132  Edited By timster20
Member since 2014 • 399 Posts

@Dasein808 said:
@timster20 said:

Dasein weaseling out of a debate he can't win.