Look....(sorry for the length)
My issue with Kinect 2 stems from something it seems many here can't distinguish. There's a huge, HUGE difference between someone passively gathering information about you, and someone aggressively attaining it. I have no cameras in my place and will never have cameras in my place. And not because I'm embarrassed or ashamed. Yes, my iPhone has a tiny one but so what? They can stare at my ugly mug staring at the screen as I surf the web for hours for all I care, and at any other time they can get a view of the inside of my pocket or it'll look like a movie Paul Greengrass is directing.
Has anyone actually paid attention to the capabilities the Kinect 2 has? It's not just a camera. It can read facial bone structure to attempt to determine age and identity, IR signatures to ascertain pulse, it tracks body motion, and it's able to count how many people are in the room. It always listens and is able to distinguish different voices from one another. Hell, forget privacy for a second and think on the potential negative ramifications to gaming and consumer rights some of those features bring to light.
Now I don't know about the rest of you, but **** all if I'm allowing something like that within 100 miles of my room. Actually, I find it outright insulting that MS believes people would be OK with this and mandate it a requirement to the system. How incredibly arrogant.
Anyway, back to the difference I mentioned between active and passive info: anything I do and put on the Internet or out in the world I am willingly allowing. Clicking the mouse, downloading and uploading, and viewing webpages, and walking outside is my unofficial consent to gather my info. But being required to have a camera that I don't want staring into my living room at all times just to have the damn system feels incredibly invasive and insidious. A sleazy Segway. I won't do it. Privacy must be sacrificed somewhat to live, especially in today's information age, but there's a line I simply won't cross. And there's quite a large difference between my name being on a list with a million others on some server somewhere as opposed to full on video footage, sound, and my fucking IR signature of me being taken from inside my home.
Are you guys insane?
Whether it's just going to be used to throw more McDonald or Dorito ads my way when my pulse quickens upon viewing an ad (I wish that were a joke) is really irrelevant to the issue, it's on principle alone that I won't allow it. But also keep in mind a camera in your home is game to the whole world, not just MS. The whole world. In the end, an article I read sums up my feelings perfectly, and to those who can't understand the paranoia and think the fuss over it is absurd, you should have no trouble with this scenario whatsoever:
"I've already heard the argument that if you have nothing to hide then you shouldn't have a problem with this feature. To the people saying this, I have one request: let me put a webcam and mic in your bed/living room that has a direct link to my computer that you cannot turn off or obscure. I promise not to watch you. Maybe."
You wouldn't care? Fine. I do, and it's not at all silly or unwarranted to feel such so don't attempt to make me out to be some Orwellian conspiracy nutcase. It's actually a bit frightening how nonchalant some people are when it comes to their privacy.
Log in to comment