[QUOTE="PoppaGamer"][QUOTE="blue900"] Another poster made a good point about xbox just giving the essentials. Yes that is true but too many proceed to say xbox is better graphics, better this, better that regarding technology AND continue to say it is cheaper. How can a core or component connect pro system have better pixel by pixel comparison to a hi def ps3. I like both systems, and MS is smart but they can't say it compares to ps3 and it is cheaper. It only compares when you get the bells and whistles.
JimJackJose
Very well said.No, It's not well said. Infact is straight mis information.
HDMI and component cables both just carry a signal. The quality of the output depends entirely on the equipment at the end of each side of the cable. Saying PS3 has a better "pixel by pixel comparison" due to it's HDMI cable is a clear indication that the poster knows very little of the technology. Some people initially tried saying HDMI is able to carry a better signal due to it being digital, and not requiring conversion from the source. However, that is also not true. Both HDMI and component cables require data conversion before they can transfer the signal.
Because the HDMI spec was changing so frequently at the time these consoles were being released you will find alot of variance between the quality different TV's will display via HDMI. The same can also be said for components due to variances in regards to internal tv components, however, there is a much smaller difference in component quality across multiple brands of tv's.
At the end of the day in regards to video gaming specifically you can't just say HDMI is by default better, simply because it isn't. There are too many variables within the equation. Some TV's display HDMI better then Component, others are vice versa. The reality is Sony has told you it's better in order to further their DRM agenda, but that's a entirely different story.
The only argument that can really be made for HDMI offering better quality by default is because the signal being transferred through the cable is digital there is no such thing as a "bad signal" or "low signal" or "signal loss / degredation". With HDMI if there is signal interferance the output just does not show up. With Component the signal interference typically transfers into the picture. Still, in ideal testing situations this does not transfer into HDMI always being better. The only thing you can really say is by default HDMI is better then a broken component cable, and vice versa. However, as I've said, the reality is at 1080p and lower the cables are both more then capable of transferring the data and any quality difference is due to the TV it's hooked to.
obviously I either mistated or you paraphrased and did selective reading. HDMI is 1's and 0s. I am not a believer of buying an expensive $50$-$70 hdmi cable. Some $9 ones are just fine why? Like most people who use the "building or ladder" analogy to hdmi, you can't tell the difference. Meaning if a person is on the 4th floor you can probably tell he is on the fourth floor. If he is on the 30th floor...from where you are he is farther away and you may make a mistake in what floor he is in. Hence, you no longer know the difference between the 40th floor or the 41st or 39th etc. As he get's higher you will have an even harder time knowing. Just a tiny analogy...not purely accurate. HDMI is the same, your eyes can't tell much of the difference.
The point you missed was that if any console (exclude the ps3 and xbox 360 since I'm not a fanboy, I just like ALL), are to be compared, the best way to make a conclusion is to make sure are variables are the same. This way non believers know it is tested properly. Everyone knows this when comparing anything and conducting any sort of experiment. FOR ME, to make sure my hardware was fine, I used the same HDMI port, same cable exact cable, same TV first. Sure component (analog) is fine but I guarantee you: IF I posted a thread saying "I connected my console 1 to hdmi and the other to component and both support same 1080p, but console 2 is inferior." TONS will say that is not a fair comparison. You didn't use the same thing and now you are just trolling. THAT IS SOMETHING I AVOIDED by using THE SAME variables.
it is a direct variable math formula. y=kxz (joint variation) meaning:
quality of picture= the CONSTANT (cable&port) times the (system) times the (TV). You can change the order if you want but in this situation the constant is the cable due to multiple tvs.
so I DO understand tech and part of tech is about math, especially when you are going on digital vice analog. My admitted failure was remembering that component (depending on the tv) is 1080p. Mine happens to not do this and due to more inputs, risks a higher chance of oxidation on one of the component ports, which in turn degrades what you perceive as picture quality and color. SO to limit this you have a constant....the hdmi cable. :)
Log in to comment