Xbox 360 Has The Best Graphics.

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] No they don't and the only comparision that has been done afaik is LoT which gave a clear victory to kz3. And yes the lightning looks better than the ps3 exclusives but that's pretty much it, character models are pretty descent too. But anyway people get crazy about the lightning and then thinks it's the best looking when it really isn't.

charlesdarwin55

"both Crysis 2 and Killzone 3 have a slew of next generation rendering techniques that only high end PC'swith decked outSLI graphics cards are able to achieve."

That's from lens of truth's comparison. You sure you want to hang your hat on a site that said something so unbelievably stupid?

Did LoT really write that? Surely they know that's incredibly incorrect.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] Yes there is a massive difference. Just look at crysis 2. Looks pretty good on Utube looks pretty crap when playing. And show me one of them direct feed then?charlesdarwin55

Doesn't look much different either.

Look, aliasing everywhere. And this is a pic, when it gets in motion it looks even worse.

charlesdarwin55

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

[QUOTE="soulitane"] IGN called it the best looking game on consoles. Lens of truth said it looked FANTASTIC They never said that KZ3 was in a league of it's own or anything on them lines, all they said is that it looked better, something that I haven't denied. The only person I see saying that they're in a league of their own is you.soulitane

They did say the victory to KZ3 was pretty clear. Still LoT trying to give facts and not their opinion, at least they're trying so they aren't gonna say oh wow this was mesmerizing!! they say better textures etc. Still they didn't cover it all.

Well regardless, in motion the game looks even worse cause then you get slow fps(worse on xbox), screen tearing(xbox), the jaggies really becomes noticable, ghosting and bad motion blur and of course the worse animations. Also if you play KZ3 & C2 close to another you'll see this.

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

Look, aliasing everywhere. And this is a pic, when it gets in motion it looks even worse.

soulitane

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="mitu123"] Direct feed isn't there yet for the final game, as the game still isn't done, or it'll be released shortly, those kinds of vids are normally near release. Youtube compresses vids depending on what you use to capture it so that's the reason, and Crysis 2 isn't all terrible, it looks just what it looks like in graphics just captured differently, I mean, look at this direct feed.

Doesn't look much different either.

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

Look, aliasing everywhere. And this is a pic, when it gets in motion it looks even worse.

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

Look, aliasing everywhere. And this is a pic, when it gets in motion it looks even worse.

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] IGN lol. First of all that's just praise and that's one guy being impressed by some lightning effects. Did he back up his statement somehow??

They did say the victory to KZ3 was pretty clear. Still LoT trying to give facts and not their opinion, at least they're trying so they aren't gonna say oh wow this was mesmerizing!! they say better textures etc. Still they didn't cover it all.

charlesdarwin55

Well regardless, in motion the game looks even worse cause then you get slow fps(worse on xbox), screen tearing(xbox), the jaggies really becomes noticable, ghosting and bad motion blur and of course the worse animations. Also if you play KZ3 & C2 close to another you'll see this.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] Looks alot different. Looks worse like blockier somehow and darker and blurrier yet you can't see all the jaggies and low res texture. you gotta play the game for yourself.charlesdarwin55

Anyway I answer you people tomorrow. Goodnight

[QUOTE="soulitane"]

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

Look, aliasing everywhere. And this is a pic, when it gets in motion it looks even worse.

JIGGADOG420

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]

"both Crysis 2 and Killzone 3 have a slew of next generation rendering techniques that only high end PC'swith decked outSLI graphics cards are able to achieve."

That's from lens of truth's comparison. You sure you want to hang your hat on a site that said something so unbelievably stupid?

Filthybastrd

Did LoT really write that? Surely they know that's incredibly incorrect.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

2nd paragraph under the "graphics" heading near the top.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

Look, aliasing everywhere. And this is a pic, when it gets in motion it looks even worse.

charlesdarwin55

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

[QUOTE="soulitane"] You haven't substantiated your argument either, you've just said things look better and that makes it look vastly better. I'll put this simply for you, gears 2 does everything better than gears 1 but that doesn't make it look vastly better. It just means it looks better. Then you post a pic that was from months before release and say the game looks like that which leads me to believe you haven't played the game because it looks much better than that.soulitane

Well regardless, in motion the game looks even worse cause then you get slow fps(worse on xbox), screen tearing(xbox), the jaggies really becomes noticable, ghosting and bad motion blur and of course the worse animations. Also if you play KZ3 & C2 close to another you'll see this.

screen tearing was minor but it was there in the xbox version, jaggies where in both but maybe they treated them differently in ps3 aa was terrible but I'm pretty sure that one is exactly the same in 360, blur was huge problem for me after playing KZ3 and other vastly superior ps3 exclusives. Since IGN said it was THE best looking console game they lost all credibilty, anyway saying it's one of the best looking is just praise u say that to alot of games.

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"][QUOTE="mitu123"] Why on earth would you use that? Did you even play Crysis 2? That's from the GDC demo. Where's the HUD for that matter? Why is the suit and gun model different from the final game? In fact, the suit looked better than that.:?

Anyway goodnight!

[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] Sure you're right but at least they are more trustworthy than IGNorant.topgunmv

Did LoT really write that? Surely they know that's incredibly incorrect.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

2nd paragraph under the "graphics" heading near the top.

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] I haven't played gears 1 or 2 so can't comment on that.

Well regardless, in motion the game looks even worse cause then you get slow fps(worse on xbox), screen tearing(xbox), the jaggies really becomes noticable, ghosting and bad motion blur and of course the worse animations. Also if you play KZ3 & C2 close to another you'll see this.

charlesdarwin55

screen tearing was minor but it was there in the xbox version, jaggies where in both but maybe they treated them differently in ps3 aa was terrible but I'm pretty sure that one is exactly the same in 360, blur was huge problem for me after playing KZ3 and other vastly superior ps3 exclusives. Since IGN said it was THE best looking console game they lost all credibilty, anyway saying it's one of the best looking is just praise u say that to alot of games.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]And when we talk about exclusives...usule

[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"] Sure you're right but at least they are more trustworthy than IGNorant.topgunmv

Did LoT really write that? Surely they know that's incredibly incorrect.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

2nd paragraph under the "graphics" heading near the top.

lensoftruth's

"Furthermore, both Crysis 2 and Killzone 3 have a slew of next generation rendering techniques that only high end PC's with decked out SLI graphics cards are able to achieve"

is BS. Any PC GpGPU that beats Xbox 360's GPU can run Crysis 2 just fine e.g. AMD Radeon HD 3850 or NVIDIA Geforce 8800 GT.

Crysis 2 PC runs fine on a single AMD Radeon HD 5730M(aka Radeon HD 5570 Desktop, aka Radeon HD 6570M).

LOT is a joke, SLI, really now?:|

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]

Did LoT really write that? Surely they know that's incredibly incorrect.

ronvalencia

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

2nd paragraph under the "graphics" heading near the top.

lensoftruth's

"Furthermore, both Crysis 2 and Killzone 3 have a slew of next generation rendering techniques that only high end PC's with decked out SLI graphics cards are able to achieve"

is BS. Any PC GpGPU that beats Xbox 360's GPU can run Crysis 2 just fine e.g. AMD Radeon HD 3850 or NVIDIA Geforce 8800 GT.

Crysis 2 PC runs fine on a single AMD Radeon HD 5730M(aka Radeon HD 5570 Desktop, aka Radeon HD 6570M).

That's the problem with Lens of Truth: they're amateurs. They are all over the place and say some of the most ridiculous things sometimes. They also give wins or losses based on silly reasons. At least Richard Leadbetter at Digital Foundry has some clue what he is talking about.

Anyway, if you play games on the PC it is hard to see the differences between the 360 and PS3 as anything but extremely marginal. The best games on each platform look extremely close in general.

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

2nd paragraph under the "graphics" heading near the top.

kalipekona

lensoftruth's

"Furthermore, both Crysis 2 and Killzone 3 have a slew of next generation rendering techniques that only high end PC's with decked out SLI graphics cards are able to achieve"

is BS. Any PC GpGPU that beats Xbox 360's GPU can run Crysis 2 just fine e.g. AMD Radeon HD 3850 or NVIDIA Geforce 8800 GT.

Crysis 2 PC runs fine on a single AMD Radeon HD 5730M(aka Radeon HD 5570 Desktop, aka Radeon HD 6570M).

That's the problem with Lens of Truth: they're amateurs. They are all over the place and say some of the most ridiculous things sometimes. They also give wins or losses based on silly reasons. At least Richard Leadbetter at Digital Foundry has some clue what he is talking about.

Anyway, if you play games on the PC it is hard to see the differences between the 360 and PS3 as anything but extremely marginal. The best games on each platform look extremely close in general.

Killzone 3, uncharted 2 and God of war 3 still look better than everything 360 has to offer and that including crysis 2, Uncharted 3 and God of war 4 would only make the gap bigger.gpuking

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Killzone 3, uncharted 2 and God of war 3 still look better than everything 360 has to offer and that including crysis 2, Uncharted 3 and God of war 4 would only make the gap bigger.AnxietyAttack

And when we talk about exclusives...DroidPhysX

well I guess gears can be considered an exclusive.

Gears 3 is nowhere near Uncharted 2. Personally I don't even think it is the best looking 360 title. One look at some of the in-game cutscenes and I think to myself, "people find this impressive?" Some of the textures are nice for a console, but man everything is sooooooooooo stiff.

Killzone 3, uncharted 2 and God of war 3 still look better than everything 360 has to offer and that including crysis 2, Uncharted 3 and God of war 4 would only make the gap bigger.gpuking

It's almost June guys. No need for april fools threads.

nah. ps3 exclusives are smooth as silk. sometimes on multiplats there may be a tad, but exclusives are smoother then anything on 360.

TheMoreYouOwn

Do you even own a 360 back that statement with some credibility?

[QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]nah. ps3 exclusives are smooth as silk. sometimes on multiplats there may be a tad, but exclusives are smoother then anything on 360.

clone01

Do you even own a 360 back that statement with some credibility?

There should be a system Wars sticky thread: Multi Console Owner Proof Thread.:shock:

There should be a system Wars sticky thread: Multi Console Owner Proof Thread.:shock:

Heirren

I agree. It gets tiresome on these boards when people bash things they have no experience with.

IMO, U2 is the best looking console game to date. Both consoles produce similar looking games, but lets be honest, at least the PS3 has games.Heil68

[QUOTE="Heirren"]There should be a system Wars sticky thread: Multi Console Owner Proof Thread.:shock:

clone01

I agree. It gets tiresome on these boards when people bash things they have no experience with.

[QUOTE="Heirren"]There should be a system Wars sticky thread: Multi Console Owner Proof Thread.:shock:

clone01

I agree. It gets tiresome on these boards when people bash things they have no experience with.

It's 2011, 360 came out in 2005; it's not outside the realm of possibility that many of the gamers on this forum have had at least some experance with the Xbox 360. Even the ones with different opinions then you.

Killzone 3, uncharted 2 and God of war 3 still look better than everything 360 has to offer and that including crysis 2, Uncharted 3 and God of war 4 would only make the gap bigger.gpuking

Gears 3 looks better than anything I have seen on consoles this gen...UC3 will probably take it though,but i haven't seen anything to go wow about in it as of yet.

It's 2011, 360 came out in 2005; it's not outside the realm of possibility that many of the gamers on this forum have had at least some experance with the Xbox 360. Even the ones with different opinions then you.

Pray_to_me

Certainly. But the users posting history suggests that the statements are made with little to no objectivity. And my opinions have very little to do with it. In fact, I don't recall defending or bashing either system. I merely suggested that the poster speak from a realm of experience.

Gears 3 looks better than anything I have seen on consoles this gen...UC3 will probably take it though,but i haven't seen anything to go wow about in it as of yet.

Bus-A-Bus

These aren't direct-feed, but they do show some level of what the 360 is capable of...

I really think that Gears 3 and Forza 4 can show some level of decent graphics, comparable to uncharted, or killzone.