Xbox 360 is MORE expensive then PS3

  • 69 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Bleach_is_basic
Bleach_is_basic

3020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Bleach_is_basic
Member since 2002 • 3020 Posts
The 360 is not just MORE expensive but it is WAY MORE expensive. Sure Xbox Live is $50 a year but that's just a drop in the bucket when you consider all the great games you have to buy. You'll probably be spending like $500 a year just to buy the games! With the PS3 you don't have any of those costs associated with owning the machine.
Avatar image for Laserwolf65
Laserwolf65

6701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 Laserwolf65
Member since 2003 • 6701 Posts
and to the people who don't bother to use Xbox live?
Avatar image for -Sora
-Sora

15152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 -Sora
Member since 2004 • 15152 Posts
not this again
Avatar image for user_nat
user_nat

3130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 user_nat
Member since 2006 • 3130 Posts
It also costs more money in the long run because there is more games worth buying.
Avatar image for KodiakGTS
KodiakGTS

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 KodiakGTS
Member since 2003 • 1262 Posts
[QUOTE="Zero5000X"][QUOTE="BumFluff122"]Do you think it would be more damage on your finances to pay 600 dollars in one lump sum or 400 in one lump sum and 50 dollars per year from then on out?BumFluff122
i would rather pay the $600. think about it. if u had the money would u rather pay ur house off as soon as u get it or have a mortgage u pay interest on? the first way has u paying more at one time, but in the long run u pay less.

Interest? Since when do you pay interest on XBL accounts? Interest has nothing to do with this argument.

Actually, based upon interest your arguement is completely flawed and backwards. If you actually consider prevailing interest/inflation rates to compute the present value of the money you will pay for each of the next 5 years, it ends up costing $608.15 for Xbox360 and 5 years of XBL in terms of 2007 US dollars. Considering the advantages Xbox Live still holds over PSN, and the higher quality of content and online titles for X360, I think the an extra $8.15 is more than justified over a five year period. As a member of XBL essentially since its inception, I can honestly say that I believe the price is more than justified for the service provided. Until PSN improves to the level of XBL I believe the price is more than reasonable.
Avatar image for BloodTorment1
BloodTorment1

2580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 BloodTorment1
Member since 2005 • 2580 Posts
These topics are like broken records -_-"
Avatar image for Bgrngod
Bgrngod

5766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#57 Bgrngod
Member since 2002 • 5766 Posts
when you think about it the Xbox 360 is more expensive then the PS3 in the long run. Sure the 360 is $400 and the PS3 is $600, but you have to pay for Xbox Live which builds up over time. After a while you are paying more to have the 360 since PS's online is free. Most people just think of the right now costs. not trying to bash the 360 just pointing something out people might not consider.Zero5000X
Everyone and their mother has considered this in SW..... According to your logic it would take 4 years for the 360 to become more expensive then the PS3. Less then $5 a month is nothing for what you get with XBL. Excluding games I have spent $760 on my PS3 and $700 on my 360 which includes 2 payments toward XBL that I would have paid to continue playing my original Xbox anyways.
Avatar image for Ironhorse001
Ironhorse001

648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Ironhorse001
Member since 2002 • 648 Posts

The 360 is not just MORE expensive but it is WAY MORE expensive. Sure Xbox Live is $50 a year but that's just a drop in the bucket when you consider all the great games you have to buy. You'll probably be spending like $500 a year just to buy the games! With the PS3 you don't have any of those costs associated with owning the machine.Bleach_is_basic

So your still going to be spending like $500 a year just to buy PS3 games too, so what's your point.  Also $50 a year is cheap for what you get. You get exactly what you pay for.

Avatar image for DrinkDuff
DrinkDuff

6762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 DrinkDuff
Member since 2004 • 6762 Posts
Wow. I haven't heard of this stale arguement for about 4 months, now why did you have to go and do a think like revive it?
Avatar image for deactivated-57a12126af02c
deactivated-57a12126af02c

3290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 deactivated-57a12126af02c
Member since 2007 • 3290 Posts
The thing that sucks about XBL is when your saving up you really have to save 520 if you want online.
Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

How many of these threads do we need to see? rexoverbey

I know it's sad...

Someone do a motorstorm review score / no AAA's / DMC4 to 360 / people worldwide mock Sony and they're price thread since we are doing repeats on SW lol 

Avatar image for jsstlh
jsstlh

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 jsstlh
Member since 2005 • 1078 Posts
oh my god..another brilliant 360 costs more than PS3 thread AAAAHHH!!! /wrist
Avatar image for KingOfJersey
KingOfJersey

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 KingOfJersey
Member since 2007 • 285 Posts

when you think about it the Xbox 360 is more expensive then the PS3 in the long run. Sure the 360 is $400 and the PS3 is $600, but you have to pay for Xbox Live which builds up over time. After a while you are paying more to have the 360 since PS's online is free. Most people just think of the right now costs. not trying to bash the 360 just pointing something out people might not consider.Zero5000X

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Are you sure about that? I don't have Xbox live and at this point I don't need it I'm kind of a solitary player I like playing alone so that I can focus better , I paid $400 for my 360 and thats all I paid for besides games, Xbox live is optional by the way it aint like they pulled a Sony and threw a blu-ray in the system, if someone feels like they want to shell out an extra $50 then so be it but people need to stop trying to defend the PS3's price thats pretty much what this topic comes down to, the PS3 is expensive either way you slice the cake, $600 in 1 shot is alot of money for most people, at least with the Xbox if you play live for 4 years then it will be like $600 total , so this topic is pointless bottom line IS PS3 IS EXPENSIVE FOR A "GAMING" MACHINE!!!!!!!

Avatar image for 2largeadults
2largeadults

1608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 2largeadults
Member since 2007 • 1608 Posts
PS3 IS EXPENSIVE FOR A "GAMING" MACHINE!KingOfJersey
It's more than a gaming machine. It's why I can live with the price I paid.
Avatar image for mmogoon
mmogoon

7311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#65 mmogoon
Member since 2006 • 7311 Posts
You know what..it's absolutely true. But i guess the idea is than XBL is a superior service to PSN
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
[QUOTE="Zero5000X"]when you think about it the Xbox 360 is more expensive then the PS3 in the long run. Sure the 360 is $400 and the PS3 is $600, but you have to pay for Xbox Live which builds up over time. After a while you are paying more to have the 360 since PS's online is free. Most people just think of the right now costs. not trying to bash the 360 just pointing something out people might not consider.Danm_999
From the perspective of an online user, yes. But most console owners don't use online, so while the argument may be applicable to us, it isn't to most others.

Interesting, I've never considered that before. With more and more RPGs coming to the 360, perhaps more 360 users won't feel the need to go with XBL.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
when you think about it the Xbox 360 is more expensive then the PS3 in the long run. Sure the 360 is $400 and the PS3 is $600, but you have to pay for Xbox Live which builds up over time. After a while you are paying more to have the 360 since PS's online is free. Most people just think of the right now costs. not trying to bash the 360 just pointing something out people might not consider.Zero5000X
I don't pay for Live. So tell me again, how is $600 cheaper than $400?
Avatar image for creekfan_basic
creekfan_basic

2539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 creekfan_basic
Member since 2002 • 2539 Posts
Stop, stop, stop, please STOP...these posts are so pointless, its very cut and dry, the PS3 costs $499 and $599 and the 360 costs $299 and $399...WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND!!!!
Avatar image for Gimp_Shard
Gimp_Shard

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Gimp_Shard
Member since 2006 • 104 Posts
PSN will never be as good as XBL because PSN relies on the game Developers to host their own servers for games they release and some will not be willing to do that... the new tennis game anyone?  X360=online, PS3=offline.Â