Xbox 360 not designed for MMO

  • 104 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] uncharted 2 cinematic gameplay is nothing special.....mags scale is nothing special....killzone 2 graphics were nothing special......next gen mmorpgs on ps3 are nothing special.......mgs4 flawless framerate was nothing special.........but you know what.....they all have one thing in common......they were all done on the PS3.........this is just the beginning.....soon everyone will see the kind of games the ps3 will produce.....and 360 will be left in the dust.....devs are just realizing this......that is why rockstar is making the ultimate game......that is why crytek is showing off they are touching the edges of ps3s power.....that is why EA has just realized the ps3's potential is not even half touched......sony knew this all along.....1st party devs learned 1st and showed it off a little.....now other devs are seeing seeing this and taking it as example....Supa__Mario

Aren't we getting just a little bit carried away? Nothing has come out of the PS3 as of right now that the 360 couldn't do comparably. There is no point in pulling quotes from publishers or devs either since they will be bias for the system they are deving for (obviously). I think you are giving the console just a little too much credit.

this is just the beginning.......

3 years in, isn't this more of the middle?

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Supa__Mario"]people need to understand....2 years ago....360 and ps3 games were similar.....back then ppl used to say ps3 has barely scratched the surface........but this isnt 2 years ago......now we are seeing what ppl were talking about back then.....now we see games like mag.......and 360 owners just Expect anything they see on the ps3 to be possible on the 360......Supa__Mario
MAG is nothing special, it isn't doing anything different or better than all other games, can't see why people claim this as prove of some ps3 superiority. People may expect same things because as multiplatform have shown the games do look similar if not better on 360 most of the time. Haven't seen anything on the ps3 that could prove it's somehow noticeably better hardware wise.

uncharted 2 cinematic gameplay is nothing special.....mags scale is nothing special....killzone 2 graphics were nothing special......next gen mmorpgs on ps3 are nothing special.......mgs4 flawless framerate was nothing special.........but you know what.....they all have one thing in common......they were all done on the PS3.........this is just the beginning.....soon everyone will see the kind of games the ps3 will produce.....and 360 will be left in the dust.....devs are just realizing this......that is why rockstar is making the ultimate game......that is why crytek is showing off they are touching the edges of ps3s power.....that is why EA has just realized the ps3's potential is not even half touched......sony knew this all along.....1st party devs learned 1st and showed it off a little.....now other devs are seeing seeing this and taking it as example....

Scale? take a look at WoW, pretty big game that runs under my 3200+ Athlon processor. MGS4, yes the 360 has games like Assasin's Creed for example that have twice as many polys per character, I wouldn't doubt MGS:R looking better than MGS4, so what would that mean. What exactly is your argument? Games like FFXIII, Gears of War, RE5 are being done on the 360 as well and they look phenomenal, nothing to envy the best of ps3 exclusives, so what your point. Sony knew how to hype the ps3 and confuse people like you, I'll give them that, but that's the only thing they knew with the ps3 otherwise it wouldn't have been such a disaster for them. The ps3 has its limitations very close to the 360, if you check the hardware specs it should be pretty clear why those games thought to be only doable on ps3 are also being done on the 360.
Avatar image for carter15kd5
carter15kd5

605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 carter15kd5
Member since 2006 • 605 Posts

lol at sony fanboys thinking the ps3 magically got so far advanced then the 360 heck why not say ps3 can produce graphics the pc cant even do

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
it's amazing how quick people assume there must be something wrong with the 360 hardware because they didn't announce(or reannounce) a 360 verson :roll: and yes..FF11 is an MMO and it does count :|
Avatar image for Supa__Mario
Supa__Mario

680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Supa__Mario
Member since 2009 • 680 Posts
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Aren't we getting just a little bit carried away? Nothing has come out of the PS3 as of right now that the 360 couldn't do comparably. There is no point in pulling quotes from publishers or devs either since they will be bias for the system they are deving for (obviously). I think you are giving the console just a little too much credit.

this is just the beginning.......

3 years in, isn't this more of the middle?

for this brand new technology? no it takes time.....
Avatar image for Khanbhai0
Khanbhai0

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Khanbhai0
Member since 2007 • 121 Posts

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"]people need to understand....2 years ago....360 and ps3 games were similar.....back then ppl used to say ps3 has barely scratched the surface........but this isnt 2 years ago......now we are seeing what ppl were talking about back then.....now we see games like mag.......and 360 owners just Expect anything they see on the ps3 to be possible on the 360......themyth01
MAG is nothing special, it isn't doing anything different or better than all other games, can't see why people claim this as prove of some ps3 superiority. People may expect same things because as multiplatform have shown the games do look similar if not better on 360 most of the time. Haven't seen anything on the ps3 that could prove it's somehow noticeably better hardware wise.

WTF

are you saying the scale of MAG is not special, agree the graphics are not high tech as Halo or Killzone

your the most arrogant fanboy I have ever met

I appreciate games coming out from any console

Halo 3 is one the best game out there and so is left for dead and Gears of War

these guy work their ass off on games like these, MAG is a revolutionary game with its scale, it has definitely set the bar high and no one should deny that

Avatar image for tonyleo01
tonyleo01

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 tonyleo01
Member since 2004 • 2257 Posts
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] uncharted 2 cinematic gameplay is nothing special.....mags scale is nothing special....killzone 2 graphics were nothing special......next gen mmorpgs on ps3 are nothing special.......mgs4 flawless framerate was nothing special.........but you know what.....they all have one thing in common......they were all done on the PS3.........this is just the beginning.....soon everyone will see the kind of games the ps3 will produce.....and 360 will be left in the dust.....devs are just realizing this......that is why rockstar is making the ultimate game......that is why crytek is showing off they are touching the edges of ps3s power.....that is why EA has just realized the ps3's potential is not even half touched......sony knew this all along.....1st party devs learned 1st and showed it off a little.....now other devs are seeing seeing this and taking it as example....Supa__Mario

Aren't we getting just a little bit carried away? Nothing has come out of the PS3 as of right now that the 360 couldn't do comparably. There is no point in pulling quotes from publishers or devs either since they will be bias for the system they are deving for (obviously). I think you are giving the console just a little too much credit.

this is just the beginning.......

lol, i seriously think you need to see someone about this, man. scaring me... look, ps3 is not a bad consoles like it appeared to be (hey, i even have one). Im just saying that giving opportunity, the 360 can do just as good if not better.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] this is just the beginning.......Supa__Mario

3 years in, isn't this more of the middle?

for this brand new technology? no it takes time.....

The tech is from like, 2005, I don't really think its all that new honestly.

Avatar image for Khanbhai0
Khanbhai0

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Khanbhai0
Member since 2007 • 121 Posts

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

[QUOTE="tonyleo01"] my common sense tells me that you're wrong...mitu123

then think a little bit harder

Halo 3

maxium players 16

Gears of War

maxium players 10

compare to PS3 exclusives

Resistance 2

maxium players 60

Killzone 2

maxium players 32

MAG

maxium players 256

so yes only possible on PS3

Perfect Dark Zero on 360 has 32 players, just to let you know.

and Resistance has 60 players and not to mention MAG

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#60 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Supa__Mario"]people need to understand....2 years ago....360 and ps3 games were similar.....back then ppl used to say ps3 has barely scratched the surface........but this isnt 2 years ago......now we are seeing what ppl were talking about back then.....now we see games like mag.......and 360 owners just Expect anything they see on the ps3 to be possible on the 360......Khanbhai0

MAG is nothing special, it isn't doing anything different or better than all other games, can't see why people claim this as prove of some ps3 superiority. People may expect same things because as multiplatform have shown the games do look similar if not better on 360 most of the time. Haven't seen anything on the ps3 that could prove it's somehow noticeably better hardware wise.

WTF

are you saying the scale of MAG is not special, agree the graphics are not high tech as Halo or Killzone

your the most arrogant fanboy I have ever met

I appreciate games coming out from any console

Halo 3 is one the best game out there and so is left for dead and Gears of War

these guy work their ass off on games like these, MAG is arevolutionary game with its scale, it hasdefinitelyset the bar high and no one should deny that

Exactly. For an mmo it's nothing special, look at WoW, or the other dozens of MMOs out there, they have huge worlds and a lot of people on at once, heck you can even get some for free now.

Thanks?

Well that makes two of us.

-

Revolutionary? hardly, almost no game nowadays is revolutionary. I know they work hard, not bashing on the game, simply saying how the technology running it is really no different from many other great games out there and definitely not proof that MMOs could only be done on the ps3.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#61 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

then think a little bit harder

Halo 3

maxium players 16

Gears of War

maxium players 10

compare to PS3 exclusives

Resistance 2

maxium players 60

Killzone 2

maxium players 32

MAG

maxium players 256

so yes only possible on PS3

Khanbhai0

Perfect Dark Zero on 360 has 32 players, just to let you know.

and Resistance has 60 players and not to mention MAG

Yeah, you win.
Avatar image for furomaster_99
furomaster_99

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 furomaster_99
Member since 2009 • 737 Posts

people need to understand....2 years ago....360 and ps3 games were similar.....back then ppl used to say ps3 has barely scratched the surface........but this isnt 2 years ago......now we are seeing what ppl were talking about back then.....now we see games like mag.......and 360 owners just Expect anything they see on the ps3 to be possible on the 360......Supa__Mario
Very true. I don't blame the lems...It just shows how bad MS brainwashed them into thinking the 360 was the same as the PS3. All of these excuses are spilling out now because they are rightfully confused.

Avatar image for Supa__Mario
Supa__Mario

680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Supa__Mario
Member since 2009 • 680 Posts
[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

MAG is nothing special, it isn't doing anything different or better than all other games, can't see why people claim this as prove of some ps3 superiority. People may expect same things because as multiplatform have shown the games do look similar if not better on 360 most of the time. Haven't seen anything on the ps3 that could prove it's somehow noticeably better hardware wise. themyth01

WTF

are you saying the scale of MAG is not special, agree the graphics are not high tech as Halo or Killzone

your the most arrogant fanboy I have ever met

I appreciate games coming out from any console

Halo 3 is one the best game out there and so is left for dead and Gears of War

these guy work their ass off on games like these, MAG is arevolutionary game with its scale, it hasdefinitelyset the bar high and no one should deny that

Exactly. For an mmo it's nothing special, look at WoW, or the other dozens of MMOs out there, they have huge worlds and a lot of people on at once, heck you can even get some for free now. Thanks? Well that makes two of us. - Revolutionary? hardly, almost no game nowadays is revolutionary. I know they work hard, not bashing on the game, simply saying how the technology running it is really no different from many other great games out there and definitely not proof that MMOs could only be done on the ps3.

you using wow as an example?.......why not use ff11.....like before.....dont use pc strengths for 360....
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

im not believing square enix one bit about this "considering 360 version" story

http://square-enix-news.newslib.com/story/5218-3209935/

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/08/square-enix-confirms-new-mmo-for-xbox-360-and-vista-maybe-ps3/

this demo of the game's engine was shown at microsoft's E3 2005 conference

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgtZvn5c4e4

so yeah....give them afew months to announce it again for the 360.

Avatar image for lhughey
lhughey

4886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 lhughey
Member since 2006 • 4886 Posts

APB

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/e3-report-apb-still-heading-to-360

/thread

SUD123456
It looks like several of you glanced over this post. Its important that you don't.
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#66 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

WTF

are you saying the scale of MAG is not special, agree the graphics are not high tech as Halo or Killzone

your the most arrogant fanboy I have ever met

I appreciate games coming out from any console

Halo 3 is one the best game out there and so is left for dead and Gears of War

these guy work their ass off on games like these, MAG is arevolutionary game with its scale, it hasdefinitelyset the bar high and no one should deny that

Supa__Mario

Exactly. For an mmo it's nothing special, look at WoW, or the other dozens of MMOs out there, they have huge worlds and a lot of people on at once, heck you can even get some for free now. Thanks? Well that makes two of us. - Revolutionary? hardly, almost no game nowadays is revolutionary. I know they work hard, not bashing on the game, simply saying how the technology running it is really no different from many other great games out there and definitely not proof that MMOs could only be done on the ps3.

you using wow as an example?.......why not use ff11.....like before.....dont use pc strengths for 360....

You obviously missed the point. I'll make it simpler for you, WoW requires less hardware to run than what the original xbox can do. So how exactly is it that MMOs cannot be done on the 360?

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="SUD123456"]

APB

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/e3-report-apb-still-heading-to-360

/thread

lhughey
It looks like several of you glanced over this post. Its important that you don't.

and you can't forget champions online for the 360/PC
Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

@ Supa__Mario

yeah totally agree with you

[QUOTE="fixer293"]Champions online The secret world FF 11 Say this thread is fail.Khanbhai0

and the funny thing is these fanboys are not going through our replies

even though I have addressed their argument onFF 11 in my very first post

fixer293 is like the sixth person to repeat that same Sh@# again and again

And yet you never responded to my post on APB.

And you just ignored the other two games in the above quote: Champions Online and The Secret World.

The hypocrisy is strong in this thread.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"]people need to understand....2 years ago....360 and ps3 games were similar.....back then ppl used to say ps3 has barely scratched the surface........but this isnt 2 years ago......now we are seeing what ppl were talking about back then.....now we see games like mag.......and 360 owners just Expect anything they see on the ps3 to be possible on the 360......furomaster_99

Very true. I don't blame the lems...It just shows how bad MS brainwashed them into thinking the 360 was the same as the PS3. All of these excuses are spilling out now because they are rightfully confused.

I am confuzzled. People are trying to tell me the 360 can't handle MMORPGs that were able to run on the PS2 and Gamecube :| I really am in awe as to hpw the PS3 is susposedly so far ahead of the 360 and yet there has been few games to even showa fraction of what people are saying in terms of power difference. Do you people really think the 360 couldn't handle MAG or FFXIV?

Avatar image for Khanbhai0
Khanbhai0

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Khanbhai0
Member since 2007 • 121 Posts

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

[QUOTE="themyth01"] MAG is nothing special, it isn't doing anything different or better than all other games, can't see why people claim this as prove of some ps3 superiority. People may expect same things because as multiplatform have shown the games do look similar if not better on 360 most of the time. Haven't seen anything on the ps3 that could prove it's somehow noticeably better hardware wise. themyth01

WTF

are you saying the scale of MAG is not special, agree the graphics are not high tech as Halo or Killzone

your the most arrogant fanboy I have ever met

I appreciate games coming out from any console

Halo 3 is one the best game out there and so is left for dead and Gears of War

these guy work their ass off on games like these, MAG is arevolutionary game with its scale, it hasdefinitelyset the bar high and no one should deny that

Exactly. For an mmo it's nothing special, look at WoW, or the other dozens of MMOs out there, they have huge worlds and a lot of people on at once, heck you can even get some for free now.

Thanks?

Well that makes two of us.

-

Revolutionary? hardly, almost no game nowadays is revolutionary. I know they work hard, not bashing on the game, simply saying how the technology running it is really no different from many other great games out there and definitely not proof that MMOs could only be done on the ps3.

seriously are you going to compare WoW with MAG

WoW is a role playing game and MAG is a first person shooter

these are two differentgenres, its like comparing apples and oranges

Avatar image for carter15kd5
carter15kd5

605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 carter15kd5
Member since 2006 • 605 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

then think a little bit harder

Halo 3

maxium players 16

Gears of War

maxium players 10

compare to PS3 exclusives

Resistance 2

maxium players 60

Killzone 2

maxium players 32

MAG

maxium players 256

so yes only possible on PS3

Khanbhai0

Perfect Dark Zero on 360 has 32 players, just to let you know.

and Resistance has 60 players and not to mention MAG

the ps3 games r just done on servers that whole more people this means nothing because if you do some reasearh it cost more money to have more players playing on a server for example a tf2 server cost 12$ a month for ten slots and a about 1$ more for each slot you add

Avatar image for Supa__Mario
Supa__Mario

680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Supa__Mario
Member since 2009 • 680 Posts
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

3 years in, isn't this more of the middle?

for this brand new technology? no it takes time.....

The tech is from like, 2005, I don't really think its all that new honestly.

the ps3's lifetime has almost been as new as this tech....what did u expect....devs should have this technology mastered already in a few years?.......doesnt work like that........ on a sidenote......cant wait till GT5 comes out this year.........it will show the power of the cell like no other game before it..........count on it..........
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#73 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="themyth01"]

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

WTF

are you saying the scale of MAG is not special, agree the graphics are not high tech as Halo or Killzone

your the most arrogant fanboy I have ever met

I appreciate games coming out from any console

Halo 3 is one the best game out there and so is left for dead and Gears of War

these guy work their ass off on games like these, MAG is arevolutionary game with its scale, it hasdefinitelyset the bar high and no one should deny that

Khanbhai0

Exactly. For an mmo it's nothing special, look at WoW, or the other dozens of MMOs out there, they have huge worlds and a lot of people on at once, heck you can even get some for free now.

Thanks?

Well that makes two of us.

-

Revolutionary? hardly, almost no game nowadays is revolutionary. I know they work hard, not bashing on the game, simply saying how the technology running it is really no different from many other great games out there and definitely not proof that MMOs could only be done on the ps3.

seriously are you going to compare WoW with MAG

WoW is a role playing game and MAG is a first person shooter

these are two differentgenres, its like comparing apples and oranges

Both are MMOs, perhaps we should compare Huxley to MAG then. Regardless, their network infrastructure is independent of the hardware limitations of either console and thus makes MAG a very bad choice to use as something that the XBOX360 could not do and PS3 could.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] for this brand new technology? no it takes time.....Supa__Mario

The tech is from like, 2005, I don't really think its all that new honestly.

the ps3's lifetime has almost been as new as this tech....what did u expect....devs should have this technology mastered already in a few years?.......doesnt work like that........ on a sidenote......cant wait till GT5 comes out this year.........it will show the power of the cell like no other game before it..........count on it..........

So the argument has changed from new tech to what should I expect? Its not new tech period, its 4 years old bro, I never said it has to be mastered but it certainly isn't new.

Anyway, I suspose this power of the cell non sense is never going to end so meh, I'm done for today.

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

[QUOTE="themyth01"]

Exactly. For an mmo it's nothing special, look at WoW, or the other dozens of MMOs out there, they have huge worlds and a lot of people on at once, heck you can even get some for free now.

Thanks?

Well that makes two of us.

-

Revolutionary? hardly, almost no game nowadays is revolutionary. I know they work hard, not bashing on the game, simply saying how the technology running it is really no different from many other great games out there and definitely not proof that MMOs could only be done on the ps3.

themyth01

seriously are you going to compare WoW with MAG

WoW is a role playing game and MAG is a first person shooter

these are two differentgenres, its like comparing apples and oranges

Both are MMOs, perhaps we should compare Huxley to MAG then. Regardless, their network infrastructure is independent of the hardware limitations of either console and thus makes MAG a very bad choice to use as something that the XBOX360 could not do and PS3 could.

Don't bother you are wasting your time. You could name a shooter MMO and he would just respond with: yah, but does it start with M? LMAO.

Which is why he won't address APB, Champions Online, The Secret World (action adventure BTW) :)

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"][QUOTE="themyth01"] MAG is nothing special, it isn't doing anything different or better than all other games, can't see why people claim this as prove of some ps3 superiority. People may expect same things because as multiplatform have shown the games do look similar if not better on 360 most of the time. Haven't seen anything on the ps3 that could prove it's somehow noticeably better hardware wise. ActicEdge

uncharted 2 cinematic gameplay is nothing special.....mags scale is nothing special....killzone 2 graphics were nothing special......next gen mmorpgs on ps3 are nothing special.......mgs4 flawless framerate was nothing special.........but you know what.....they all have one thing in common......they were all done on the PS3.........this is just the beginning.....soon everyone will see the kind of games the ps3 will produce.....and 360 will be left in the dust.....devs are just realizing this......that is why rockstar is making the ultimate game......that is why crytek is showing off they are touching the edges of ps3s power.....that is why EA has just realized the ps3's potential is not even half touched......sony knew this all along.....1st party devs learned 1st and showed it off a little.....now other devs are seeing seeing this and taking it as example....

Aren't we getting just a little bit carried away? Nothing has come out of the PS3 as of right now that the 360 couldn't do comparably. There is no point in pulling quotes from publishers or devs either since they will be bias for the system they are deving for (obviously). I think you are giving the console just a little too much credit.

i disagree, i dont think Uncharted 2 or KZ2 would look near as good on the 360 based on the performance of my 360 Vs my PS3. Its already been determined in my mind the 360 is incapable of scale like the PS3.
Avatar image for deuteris
deuteris

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 deuteris
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts

@ Supa__Mario

yeah totally agree with you

[QUOTE="fixer293"]Champions online The secret world FF 11 Say this thread is fail.Khanbhai0

and the funny thing is these fanboys are not going through our replies

even though I have addressed their argument onFF 11 in my very first post

fixer293 is like the sixth person to repeat that same Sh@# again and again

The same way you're choosing to ignore the 360's MMOs, people are choosing to ignore your reasons for ignoring them! Fitting.

At least the 360 has some that you can play, "dated" or not. Does the PS3 have any?

Avatar image for Khanbhai0
Khanbhai0

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Khanbhai0
Member since 2007 • 121 Posts

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

@ Supa__Mario

yeah totally agree with you

[QUOTE="fixer293"]Champions online The secret world FF 11 Say this thread is fail.SUD123456

and the funny thing is these fanboys are not going through our replies

even though I have addressed their argument onFF 11 in my very first post

fixer293 is like the sixth person to repeat that same Sh@# again and again

And yet you never responded to my post on APB.

And you just ignored the other two games in the above quote: Champions Online and The Secret World.

The hypocrisy is strong in this thread.

Champions Online and The Secret World both games are not even out yet, I haven't even seen the game play of these games

Marvel Online was alsoannounced on PC, but guess what the game got cancelled

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] uncharted 2 cinematic gameplay is nothing special.....mags scale is nothing special....killzone 2 graphics were nothing special......next gen mmorpgs on ps3 are nothing special.......mgs4 flawless framerate was nothing special.........but you know what.....they all have one thing in common......they were all done on the PS3.........this is just the beginning.....soon everyone will see the kind of games the ps3 will produce.....and 360 will be left in the dust.....devs are just realizing this......that is why rockstar is making the ultimate game......that is why crytek is showing off they are touching the edges of ps3s power.....that is why EA has just realized the ps3's potential is not even half touched......sony knew this all along.....1st party devs learned 1st and showed it off a little.....now other devs are seeing seeing this and taking it as example....djsifer01

Aren't we getting just a little bit carried away? Nothing has come out of the PS3 as of right now that the 360 couldn't do comparably. There is no point in pulling quotes from publishers or devs either since they will be bias for the system they are deving for (obviously). I think you are giving the console just a little too much credit.

i disagree, i dont think Uncharted 2 or KZ2 would look near as good on the 360 based on the performance of my 360 Vs my PS3. Its already been determined in my mind the 360 is incapable of scale like the PS3.

To be perfectly honest, what you have determined in your mind isn't really important. Constantly devs have said the PS3 and 360 are equal, no game on either console have ever embarassed the other and your personal comparisons are skewed byseveral different factor one being you haven't even played Uncharted 2 and you are not a dev. So yeah, your personal opinion, is rather irrelevant for this type of comparison even if you are enttitled to it.

Avatar image for bdum_pshhh
bdum_pshhh

1456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 bdum_pshhh
Member since 2009 • 1456 Posts
The fact is here that PS3 and 360 are pretty much equal in terms of power with a few difference, maybe some more textures on the 360 vs. more physics effect on the PS3. Only reason you're hearing about a lot (?) of MMO's on the PS3 is because sony seem to be pushing for them on the PS3.
Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#82 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts
I can't really see a console MMO being any good. The control pad just doesn't have enough buttons for it.
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="majadamus"][QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

I thought it was foolishness on part of Square Enix by makingFinal Fantasy XIV Online a PS3 exclusive, since they are third party, plus they have worked with Microsoft, not to mention their fanbase goes well beyond Ps3.

a MMORPG for 360 was under development calledMarvel Universe Online, but that game was canceled forundisclosed reason. On the other DC Universe Online MMORPG for PS3 is on Alpha stage right now.

Final Fantasy XI MMORPG which came out on Xbox 360 is a dated game released on PC way back in 2002, so its clearly not the next generation MMORPG game, so I wont count this one.

so isXbox 360 not designed for MMO

With the additional online fees along with X Box Live's, I think not.

you don't have to pay for live if you play ff xi
Avatar image for Supa__Mario
Supa__Mario

680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Supa__Mario
Member since 2009 • 680 Posts
which dev is more credible....the one that says ps3 and 360 are equal back when ps3 technology was only 1-2 years old......or the one that has realized the true power now after seeing examples and the technology has had 4-5 years in working hands..........
Avatar image for Khanbhai0
Khanbhai0

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Khanbhai0
Member since 2007 • 121 Posts

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

[QUOTE="themyth01"]

Exactly. For an mmo it's nothing special, look at WoW, or the other dozens of MMOs out there, they have huge worlds and a lot of people on at once, heck you can even get some for free now.

Thanks?

Well that makes two of us.

-

Revolutionary? hardly, almost no game nowadays is revolutionary. I know they work hard, not bashing on the game, simply saying how the technology running it is really no different from many other great games out there and definitely not proof that MMOs could only be done on the ps3.

themyth01

seriously are you going to compare WoW with MAG

WoW is a role playing game and MAG is a first person shooter

these are two differentgenres, its like comparing apples and oranges

Both are MMOs, perhaps we should compare Huxley to MAG then. Regardless, their network infrastructure is independent of the hardware limitations of either console and thus makes MAG a very bad choice to use as something that the XBOX360 could not do and PS3 could.

http://e3.gamespot.com/story/6211009/huxley-hands-on-enforcer-deathmatch

read the last paragraph

It should be noted that Ijji.com is bringing over only the PC version of Huxley; the Xbox 360 version's development is being handled by the game's original developer, Webzen, whose plans for the Xbox 360 version are unclear at this point.

and this is a downloadable game:?

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
I can't really see a console MMO being any good. The control pad just doesn't have enough buttons for it.Lethalhazard
M$ probably figures every one will spend most of the time on the mmo so not a very good idea, decrease in software sales.
Avatar image for twztid13
twztid13

2014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 twztid13
Member since 2009 • 2014 Posts
which dev is more credible....the one that says ps3 and 360 are equal back when ps3 technology was only 1-2 years old......or the one that has realized the true power now after seeing examples and the technology has had 4-5 years in working hands..........Supa__Mario
the first one.
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"]which dev is more credible....the one that says ps3 and 360 are equal back when ps3 technology was only 1-2 years old......or the one that has realized the true power now after seeing examples and the technology has had 4-5 years in working hands..........twztid13
the first one.

i'd go with that crysis dev's says, shaders will run a little better on 360, physics will run a little better on ps3.
Avatar image for All_that_is_Man
All_that_is_Man

2044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 All_that_is_Man
Member since 2008 • 2044 Posts

I read somewhere that they added cell processors in some ibm servers to allow them to Host MMORPGs, so maybe it would make sense, but Im not sure, it might just be a pain in the ass to make it around the XBL structure they might have to go through a hassle they don't want to.

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

[QUOTE="SUD123456"]

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

and the funny thing is these fanboys are not going through our replies

even though I have addressed their argument onFF 11 in my very first post

fixer293 is like the sixth person to repeat that same Sh@# again and again

Khanbhai0

And yet you never responded to my post on APB.

And you just ignored the other two games in the above quote: Champions Online and The Secret World.

The hypocrisy is strong in this thread.

Champions Online and The Secret World both games are not even out yet, I haven't even seen the game play of these games

Marvel Online was alsoannounced on PC, but guess what the game got cancelled

Unlike MAG and FFX XIV and all those other PS3 MMO which are already out, right?;)

As I said, the hypocrisy is strong in this thread...and it is getting stronger.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#91 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

If the 360 isn't designed for MMO's, then ps3 isn't either. There's really not a significant enough difference between the two where 360 can't play MMO's but ps3 can. Which reminds me, how many MMO's does the ps3 have so far. Oh yea, none.

Avatar image for All_that_is_Man
All_that_is_Man

2044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 All_that_is_Man
Member since 2008 • 2044 Posts

I can't really see a console MMO being any good. The control pad just doesn't have enough buttons for it.Lethalhazard

it does for FFXI, and I assume 14 will have the same attack system, its not your conventional mmo, its a way harder than any other mmo

Avatar image for racastro65
racastro65

1081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 racastro65
Member since 2006 • 1081 Posts

that makes no sense at all..of course it can

Avatar image for MegajerkNYC
MegajerkNYC

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 MegajerkNYC
Member since 2009 • 505 Posts
360 is good for small scale games. Nobody wants to play an MMO where you switch disks between battles. Really this game is only possible with the power of bluray and teh cell.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#95 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
The 360 has both Phantasy Star Online and Final Fantasy XI on the system... so the "not made for an MMO" bit doesn't hold up. It doesn't help that Square-Enix already stated they are actively considering putting FF XIV on the 360.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#96 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

you think there's some built in limitation that won't let it play them?

CaseyWegner
The Xbox 360 is chemically similar to water, while MMOs are chemically similar to oil. As you know, water and oil don't mix - so clearly we cannot put an MMO on the 360 - it just won't work. - The PS3 on the other hand, is chemically similar to a sandwich. That's in fact why it looks like a George Foreman grill - to remind of its sandwich nature. Oil is delicious on a sandwich, the bread soaks up the oil, therefore we can easily apply the oily MMO to the PS3. - It's just basic chemistry. - - And to be clear, if anyone here believes any of that, I'll be happy to sell you some land on the moon for only $500 an acre. There's no reason the 360 won't have FF XIV short of a genuine lack of interest from 360 owners (possible) or a massive under the table payoff from Sony.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

did you even go over my previous posts

FF11, Phantasy Star Online also come out on PS2

again

FF11, Phantasy Star Online is a dated game

Khanbhai0

selective exclusion?

why should I include dated games that originally came out PC/PS2 back in 2001 and 2002 years before the launch of Xbox 360 itself

because they are mmos that are on the 360. :|

Avatar image for twztid13
twztid13

2014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 twztid13
Member since 2009 • 2014 Posts
that is so GREAT - HA!
Avatar image for Leostatic
Leostatic

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Leostatic
Member since 2008 • 217 Posts

Just a comment for all the ignorant discourse and those who propogate MS propoganda: Major universities are using ps3's as a supercomputer...are they doing that with the Xbox? No obviously...they don't have the cell. Say what you want, or what your pride, ego and ignorance demand as subterfuge, but the cell truly is a remarkable piece of technology.

What I find entertaining and a little sad is that 360/ps3 owners are so blind that a discussion on the merits of gpu vs cpu etc, etc is lost. It really is ok to admit the ps3 is capable of things the 360 is not. Has that translated to better games across the board? That's open to debate, the rest of this nonsense is not.

Avatar image for Hihatrider87
Hihatrider87

1042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#100 Hihatrider87
Member since 2007 • 1042 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] uncharted 2 cinematic gameplay is nothing special.....mags scale is nothing special....killzone 2 graphics were nothing special......next gen mmorpgs on ps3 are nothing special.......mgs4 flawless framerate was nothing special.........but you know what.....they all have one thing in common......they were all done on the PS3.........this is just the beginning.....soon everyone will see the kind of games the ps3 will produce.....and 360 will be left in the dust.....devs are just realizing this......that is why rockstar is making the ultimate game......that is why crytek is showing off they are touching the edges of ps3s power.....that is why EA has just realized the ps3's potential is not even half touched......sony knew this all along.....1st party devs learned 1st and showed it off a little.....now other devs are seeing seeing this and taking it as example....djsifer01

Aren't we getting just a little bit carried away? Nothing has come out of the PS3 as of right now that the 360 couldn't do comparably. There is no point in pulling quotes from publishers or devs either since they will be bias for the system they are deving for (obviously). I think you are giving the console just a little too much credit.

i disagree, i dont think Uncharted 2 or KZ2 would look near as good on the 360 based on the performance of my 360 Vs my PS3. Its already been determined in my mind the 360 is incapable of scale like the PS3.

close-minded much? gears 2 looks as good as u2. i cant speak for killzone cause i haven't seen it played.