Xbox 360 vs PS3, graphic comparisons are not needed anymore.

I'm not intending to start a flame war here but how can there still be a discussion, about which console that can deliver the best graphics? We're not going to compare flagships like Killzone 2 and Uncharted vs Halo and... ahh... uhm... Halo. Instead, let's compare two third party AAA games. FFXIII(Square Enix, 2010) and Operation Flashpoint 2(Codemasters, 2009). In the video review gamespot stated that the PS3 version of FF looked much better than the 360 version. Now search Youtube for a OF2:DR graphics comparison. You'll see that X360 barely handles OP.

There are som developers that have failed with the PS3 version or sometimes they make bad porting and then the X360 version looks better. But when it comes to which can deliver the best graphics there should be no discussion.

PS3 has the better hardware in every perspective. Blueray, bigger HD, cheaper controllers, better microphone support, smother OS, more advanced CPU and so on.

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

Yea it has more advanced cpu,but less advanced gpu and its memory management is bit more pain in the ass.

Anyway i thought this thread will be about how tons of great looking games for both system are coming and that best looking game will be Crysis 2 so no need for comparison but i was wrong:|

Wrong.KittenWishes

But really, TC. What makes you think that, if the majority of multiplat games look better because they were designed for Xbox and ported to PS3, that the games that look better on PS3 aren't designed for PS3 and ported to Xbox?

The hipocrisy here is epic. So....dozens of multiplats looking better on 360 dont prove nothing but on the other hand, those 2 that look better on PS3 are the proof it is superior? :shock:

Some of the latest multiplats like MW2, Bioshock2, Assassins Creed 2 and Bayonetta look better than the multiplats you posted and 360 has the advantage. Again....you are free to believe in what you want but in fact (apart bluray) PS3 and 360 are no diferent

Inb4 hermits saying that it's not needed because of Crysis. There is no less a need for graphics comparisons than before. It gives fanboys something to squabble over, and everyone else gets eye candy. As to your statement that the PS3 more powerful, as of right now that can be assumed correct. Since UC2 is the best looking game on consoles, it is only on PS3, any other assumption that a future 360 game will look better is just that, an assumption.

Inb4 hermits saying that it's not needed because of Crysis. There is no less a need for graphics comparisons than before. It gives fanboys something to squabble over, and everyone else gets eye candy. As to your statement that the PS3 more powerful, as of right now that can be assumed correct. Since UC2 is the best looking game on consoles, it is only on PS3, any other assumption that a future 360 game will look better is just that, an assumption.

sam_nintendo

[QUOTE="sam_nintendo"]

Inb4 hermits saying that it's not needed because of Crysis. There is no less a need for graphics comparisons than before. It gives fanboys something to squabble over, and everyone else gets eye candy. As to your statement that the PS3 more powerful, as of right now that can be assumed correct. Since UC2 is the best looking game on consoles, it is only on PS3, any other assumption that a future 360 game will look better is just that, an assumption.

KittenWishes

I saw newest footage of Alan Wake in daytime(well glimps of it :)) and i have to say that i think technically they are about to release something equally impressive as UC2.Here is the link...

http://www.xboxdynasty.de/movie/xbox_360_alan_wake_albtraum_in_helsinki___38mb_movie_3366.html

*Animations are more polished,and vegetation looks amazing,everything is jaggie free*

*Pay attention when they change the time of day and how the lightning changes and colors.

[QUOTE="sam_nintendo"]

Inb4 hermits saying that it's not needed because of Crysis. There is no less a need for graphics comparisons than before. It gives fanboys something to squabble over, and everyone else gets eye candy. As to your statement that the PS3 more powerful, as of right now that can be assumed correct. Since UC2 is the best looking game on consoles, it is only on PS3, any other assumption that a future 360 game will look better is just that, an assumption.

KittenWishes

Yep. Gamersyde said that but i havent seen that IGN´s preview. Do you have a link?

[QUOTE="sam_nintendo"]

Inb4 hermits saying that it's not needed because of Crysis. There is no less a need for graphics comparisons than before. It gives fanboys something to squabble over, and everyone else gets eye candy. As to your statement that the PS3 more powerful, as of right now that can be assumed correct. Since UC2 is the best looking game on consoles, it is only on PS3, any other assumption that a future 360 game will look better is just that, an assumption.

KittenWishes

[QUOTE="sam_nintendo"]

Inb4 hermits saying that it's not needed because of Crysis. There is no less a need for graphics comparisons than before. It gives fanboys something to squabble over, and everyone else gets eye candy. As to your statement that the PS3 more powerful, as of right now that can be assumed correct. Since UC2 is the best looking game on consoles, it is only on PS3, any other assumption that a future 360 game will look better is just that, an assumption.

KittenWishes

The hipocrisy here is epic. So....dozens of multiplats looking better on 360 dont prove nothing but on the other hand, those 2 that look better on PS3 are the proof it is superior? :shock:

Some of the latest multiplats like MW2, Bioshock2, Assassins Creed 2 and Bayonetta look better than the multiplats you posted and 360 has the advantage. Again....you are free to believe in what you want but in fact (apart bluray) PS3 and 360 are no diferent

PAL360

[QUOTE="KittenWishes"][QUOTE="sam_nintendo"] IGN and Gamersyde have said that Alan Wake is on par with Uncharted 2, so now U2 is just "one of"...Ensamheten

The hipocrisy here is epic. So....dozens of multiplats looking better on 360 dont prove nothing but on the other hand, those 2 that look better on PS3 are the proof it is superior? :shock:

Some of the latest multiplats like MW2, Bioshock2, Assassins Creed 2 and Bayonetta look better than the multiplats you posted and 360 has the advantage. Again....you are free to believe in what you want but in fact (apart bluray) PS3 and 360 are no diferent

PAL360

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

EndorphinMaster

dammit, endorphin. you've been here long enough to know that you don't bring truth system wars. only conjecture and flawed "logic".

-1 for you. :evil:

hey TC:

Orange Box, F.E.A.R and Bayonetta.

/Thread

[QUOTE="KittenWishes"][QUOTE="sam_nintendo"] IGN and Gamersyde have said that Alan Wake is on par with Uncharted 2, so now U2 is just "one of"...Ensamheten

The hipocrisy here is epic. So....dozens of multiplats looking better on 360 dont prove nothing but on the other hand, those 2 that look better on PS3 are the proof it is superior? :shock:

Some of the latest multiplats like MW2, Bioshock2, Assassins Creed 2 and Bayonetta look better than the multiplats you posted and 360 has the advantage. Again....you are free to believe in what you want but in fact (apart bluray) PS3 and 360 are no diferent

PAL360

You are contradicting yourself here since FF13, the game you are saying that pushes PS3 to its limits, dont even look close to 360 games like Gears2, AC2, ME2, etc

hey TC:

Orange Box, F.E.A.R and Bayonetta.

/Thread

cowgriller

those games have nothing to do with what system can produce better graphics. that has to do with lazy developers not knowing how to properly port games. we see what happends when a ps3 game is ported to 360 (ff13)

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

hey TC:

Orange Box, F.E.A.R and Bayonetta.

/Thread

bokiloki

those games have nothing to do with what system can produce better graphics. that has to do with lazy developers not knowing how to properly port games. we see what happends when a ps3 game is ported to 360 (ff13)

[QUOTE="bokiloki"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

hey TC:

Orange Box, F.E.A.R and Bayonetta.

/Thread

Jamani

those games have nothing to do with what system can produce better graphics. that has to do with lazy developers not knowing how to properly port games. we see what happends when a ps3 game is ported to 360 (ff13)

yes 8.5 is terrible score for a game(same as mass effect 1) go enjoy perfect dark zero since you only play "AAA" games. lol

[QUOTE="Jamani"][QUOTE="bokiloki"]

those games have nothing to do with what system can produce better graphics. that has to do with lazy developers not knowing how to properly port games. we see what happends when a ps3 game is ported to 360 (ff13)

bokiloki

yes 8.5 is terrible score for a game(same as mass effect 1) go enjoy perfect dark zero since you only play "AAA" games. lol

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

hey TC:

Orange Box, F.E.A.R and Bayonetta.

/Thread

bokiloki

those games have nothing to do with what system can produce better graphics. that has to do with lazy developers not knowing how to properly port games. we see what happends when a ps3 game is ported to 360 (ff13)

I have seen what happens when a PS3 game is ported to 360 with Ghostbusters, Assassins Creed and Dead Space. It ends up looking equal on both if not better on 360. FF13 is just one of the very few examples of the oposite but you cant use it as a proof since many 360´s games look better than it.

[QUOTE="bokiloki"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

hey TC:

Orange Box, F.E.A.R and Bayonetta.

/Thread

those games have nothing to do with what system can produce better graphics. that has to do with lazy developers not knowing how to properly port games. we see what happends when a ps3 game is ported to 360 (ff13)

I have seen what happens when a PS3 game is ported to 360 with Ghostbusters, Assassins Creed and Dead Space. It ends up looking equal on both if not better on 360. FF13 is just one of the very few examples of the oposite but you cant use it as a proof since many 360´s games look better than it.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="bokiloki"]

those games have nothing to do with what system can produce better graphics. that has to do with lazy developers not knowing how to properly port games. we see what happends when a ps3 game is ported to 360 (ff13)

windsquid9000

I have seen what happens when a PS3 game is ported to 360 with Ghostbusters, Assassins Creed and Dead Space. It ends up looking equal on both if not better on 360. FF13 is just one of the very few examples of the oposite but you cant use it as a proof since many 360´s games look better than it.

I really hope so

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

EndorphinMaster

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

hey TC:

Orange Box, F.E.A.R and Bayonetta.

/Thread

bokiloki

those games have nothing to do with what system can produce better graphics. that has to do with lazy developers not knowing how to properly port games. we see what happends when a ps3 game is ported to 360 (ff13)

so you're calling EA Games, Monolith/Warner Games and Platinum Games/SEGA lazy? :lol: they've done more with the ps3 than you've ever had.

as for FF13...so. mirrors edge was made with the ps3 as the lead platform then ported to the 360. link

hell, almost all of EA's games are made for the ps3 then ported to the 360 and the 360 still gets the better version if not equal. like the upcoming medal of honor. link

btw, your example fails because FF13 was in development since 2004 and then ported to the xbox 360 in the last few months of 2009.

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

roddollente

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

you got a link for that?

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

roddollente

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="bokiloki"]

those games have nothing to do with what system can produce better graphics. that has to do with lazy developers not knowing how to properly port games. we see what happends when a ps3 game is ported to 360 (ff13)

windsquid9000

I have seen what happens when a PS3 game is ported to 360 with Ghostbusters, Assassins Creed and Dead Space. It ends up looking equal on both if not better on 360. FF13 is just one of the very few examples of the oposite but you cant use it as a proof since many 360´s games look better than it.

it already has and it's not even out yet. the pc, hands down. hell, the original crysis should've ended this argument three years ago, but then again, you know fanboys...even if crysis 2 were shown to look and perform better on one of the consoles, the faboys of the other will deny it and say an upcoming exclusive looks better than crysis 2. we've been down this same broken road several times this gen.

[QUOTE="roddollente"]

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

cowgriller

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

you got a link for that?

I think he's just making stuff up again.

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

roddollente

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

Ahahahahahahahahaha. Seriously, I'm not very technically minded - but no, just no.

[QUOTE="roddollente"]

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

EndorphinMaster

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

Funny thing is, the 360's technology is one full year behind PS3's. Yet the vast majority of multiplats still look noticeably better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

roddollente

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

[QUOTE="roddollente"]

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

EndorphinMaster

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

Funny thing is, the 360's technology is one full year behind PS3's. Yet the vast majority of multiplats still look noticeably better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

Unable to play and enjoy God of War 3 or Uncharted 2, hurts doesn't it?

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

[QUOTE="roddollente"]

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

Adamantium4k2

Funny thing is, the 360's technology is one full year behind PS3's. Yet the vast majority of multiplats still look noticeably better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

Unable to play and enjoy God of War 3 or Uncharted 2, hurts doesn't it?

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

[QUOTE="roddollente"]

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

Adamantium4k2

Funny thing is, the 360's technology is one full year behind PS3's. Yet the vast majority of multiplats still look noticeably better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

Unable to play and enjoy God of War 3 or Uncharted 2, hurts doesn't it?

red herring much?

[QUOTE="EndorphinMaster"]

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

roddollente

funny thing is, multiplats only use 1 SPU from the Cell out of the 6 available. and yet the ps3 version is almost as identical as the 360 one.

Yea it has more advanced cpu,but less advanced gpu and its memory management is bit more pain in the ass.

Anyway i thought this thread will be about how tons of great looking games for both system are coming and that best looking game will be Crysis 2 so no need for comparison but i was wrong:|

I hope Crysis 2 delivers and is equal on both consoles. This forum would see an immediate improvement.

I'm not intending to start a flame war here but how can there still be a discussion, about which console that can deliver the best graphics? We're not going to compare flagships like Killzone 2 and Uncharted vs Halo and... ahh... uhm... Halo. Instead, let's compare two third party AAA games. FFXIII(Square Enix, 2010) and Operation Flashpoint 2(Codemasters, 2009). In the video review gamespot stated that the PS3 version of FF looked much better than the 360 version. Now search Youtube for a OF2:DR graphics comparison. You'll see that X360 barely handles OP.

There are som developers that have failed with the PS3 version or sometimes they make bad porting and then the X360 version looks better. But when it comes to which can deliver the best graphics there should be no discussion.

PS3 has the better hardware in every perspective. Blueray, bigger HD, cheaper controllers, better microphone support, smother OS, more advanced CPU and so on.

Ensamheten

How is 60 euro for a DS3 cheaper then 40 euro for a 360 controller? too bad you didn't post that earlier, would've saved me reading the rest.

/thread

Bayonetta :|

Bayonetta :|

RawDeal_basic

Shhh! Cows have almost convinced themselves that Bayonetta doesn't count. It's teh lazy devs!!

Most multiplats look better on the 360. Hurts doesn't it?

EndorphinMaster

I'm not intending to start a flame war here but how can there still be a discussion, about which console that can deliver the best graphics? We're not going to compare flagships like Killzone 2 and Uncharted vs Halo and... ahh... uhm... Halo. Instead, let's compare two third party AAA games. FFXIII(Square Enix, 2010) and Operation Flashpoint 2(Codemasters, 2009). In the video review gamespot stated that the PS3 version of FF looked much better than the 360 version. Now search Youtube for a OF2:DR graphics comparison. You'll see that X360 barely handles OP.

There are som developers that have failed with the PS3 version or sometimes they make bad porting and then the X360 version looks better. But when it comes to which can deliver the best graphics there should be no discussion.

PS3 has the better hardware in every perspective. Blueray, bigger HD, cheaper controllers, better microphone support, smother OS, more advanced CPU and so on.

I'm not intending to start a flame war here but how can there still be a discussion, about which console that can deliver the best graphics? We're not going to compare flagships like Killzone 2 and Uncharted vs Halo and... ahh... uhm... Halo. Instead, let's compare two third party AAA games. FFXIII(Square Enix, 2010) and Operation Flashpoint 2(Codemasters, 2009). In the video review gamespot stated that the PS3 version of FF looked much better than the 360 version. Now search Youtube for a OF2:DR graphics comparison. You'll see that X360 barely handles OP.

There are som developers that have failed with the PS3 version or sometimes they make bad porting and then the X360 version looks better. But when it comes to which can deliver the best graphics there should be no discussion.

PS3 has the better hardware in every perspective. Blueray, bigger HD, cheaper controllers, better microphone support, smother OS, more advanced CPU and so on.

[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="Ensamheten"]

I'm not intending to start a flame war here but how can there still be a discussion, about which console that can deliver the best graphics? We're not going to compare flagships like Killzone 2 and Uncharted vs Halo and... ahh... uhm... Halo. Instead, let's compare two third party AAA games. FFXIII(Square Enix, 2010) and Operation Flashpoint 2(Codemasters, 2009). In the video review gamespot stated that the PS3 version of FF looked much better than the 360 version. Now search Youtube for a OF2:DR graphics comparison. You'll see that X360 barely handles OP.

There are som developers that have failed with the PS3 version or sometimes they make bad porting and then the X360 version looks better. But when it comes to which can deliver the best graphics there should be no discussion.

PS3 has the better hardware in every perspective. Blueray, bigger HD, cheaper controllers, better microphone support, smother OS, more advanced CPU and so on.

planbfreak4eva

Neither of those two should point out which platform is stronger one.For example,cows are saying that ps3 is harder to develop for and that it usually gets the ports as far as multiplats go.But the thing is when developers make game on ps3(Gostbusters,Assasins Creed,Dead Space...) they tend to look the same or better on 360.But that really is not the way to judge,but neither is exclusives.Alot of things must be counted in exclusives:developer talent,dev cycle,engines(all ps3 exclusives have ground up engines,while 360 has only AW and Banjo),budget,type of game(linear like KZ2 or something like Reach),dev tools(EDGE)...and so on.But of course you guys are blind to this FACTS.

One question,what happens if Crysis 2 looks or runs a bit better on 360?Seeing what they do on consoles it is without a question the most impressive game to be mad for BOTH consoles.I know,if it looks just a bit better on 360 you guys will say Crytek is not talented or didnt want to use spus,but fact is that in latest kotaku interview engine director from Crytek said that they use spus for things Sony didnt even know can be used,so that argument will fall...