@pdogg93 said:
@thatdbfan: “ You were acting like every Xbox had hardware problems, and that Playstation didn't. Then you kept dodging the facts I presented you, and trying to damage control by saying the 360 had a higher one.“
You’ve presented exactly ZERO facts. Only butthurt xboner responses because you have no idea what you’re taking about. You can’t be reasoned with or talked to because you don’t comprehend the basics of what you’re even trying to say.
The facts are ms spent over $1 billion on the 360 fixes. Show me FACTUAL INFORMATION that state Sony came anywhere near the magnitude of ms dealt with a similar hardware problem.
Again I don’t expect any responses from you with actual substance. You have proven yourself to be a butthurt lemming with nothing but tears.
DUDE! I told you multiple times, I am aware of the how big the 360's hardware failure rate was, I am NOT here to argue it wasn't the biggest hardware failure rate of any console. I'm just trying to point out the flaws in your blatant fanboyism. "Show me FACTUAL INFORMATION that state Sony came anywhere near the magnitude of ms dealt with a similar hardware problem." Dude, where the hell did I say Sony came close to the Xbox 360's failure rate? In fact, I said the near opposite- "to be fair, the PS3's wasn't as big as the 360, but it was still a noticeable failure rate".
I was never trying to say that Sony's hardware failure rate was as high as the 360's. You're argument is incredibly flawed. I'm just saying that Sony's consoles have a history of high hardware failure rates. Why. Can't. You. Comprehend that? With the PS2 being the previous owner of the "console with highest failure rate" title.
"Again I don’t expect any responses from you with actual substance" I have given you nothing but facts dude xD.
If I were you, I'd take the L and leave. You really are making yourself look like an idiot, and best not to continue to make yourself look like one.
Log in to comment