Xbox Head Phil Spencer Says Most People Don’t Care About 60FPS

  • 127 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for trumptowerlr
TrumpTowerLR

114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#101 TrumpTowerLR
Member since 2017 • 114 Posts

30 fps is fine.......10 years ago.

Avatar image for l34052
l34052

3906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 l34052
Member since 2005 • 3906 Posts

I much rather have 60fps than 4k resolution everytime.

Phil Spencer is full of shit.

Avatar image for EnergyAbsorber
EnergyAbsorber

5116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 EnergyAbsorber
Member since 2005 • 5116 Posts

Microsofts goal was to run games at 4K much more consistently than the PS4 Pro could.

Basically resolution was the first thing on their minds while developing the XoneX, because of all the media backlash of PS4 having higher resolutions in multiplats than Xbox one since the very beginning when both consoles launched.

If Microsoft was to include a Beast CPU to make sure that all games run at 60FPS and 4K, the console would cost ATLEAST another $100. Unless they'd be willing to take a MASSIVE loss financially to get more consoles to consumers. But that would just piss off Microsoft investors yet again.

Avatar image for whalefish82
whalefish82

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 whalefish82
Member since 2013 • 511 Posts

He's probably right, most people don't care but they would if they had the opportunity to experience it more. You can almost guarantee that if titles such as Uncharted or Horizon targeted 60FPS, console gamers would be sold instantly on the improvements it brings, demanding it across the board.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45561 Posts

@EnergyAbsorber said:

Microsofts goal was to run games at 4K much more consistently than the PS4 Pro could.

Basically resolution was the first thing on their minds while developing the XoneX, because of all the media backlash of PS4 having higher resolutions in multiplats than Xbox one since the very beginning when both consoles launched.

If Microsoft was to include a Beast CPU to make sure that all games run at 60FPS and 4K, the console would cost ATLEAST another $100. Unless they'd be willing to take a MASSIVE loss financially to get more consoles to consumers. But that would just piss off Microsoft investors yet again.

I believe when it makes sense MS 1st party will target 4K 60fps like FM7 but some genres really only need a rock solid 30 fps so no need to target 60 fps.

That said, on your other point of pricing, X1X at $499.99 is selling it at about cost so yeah, $599.99 - $699.99 would really be a bit more than most are willing to spend so I think they are delivering precisely the right bang for the buck right now...

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/e3-2017-microsoft-isnt-making-money-on-the-500-xbo/1100-6450952/

Avatar image for ten_pints
Ten_Pints

4072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#106  Edited By Ten_Pints
Member since 2014 • 4072 Posts

I care, I'll take 60FPS above resolution (within reason) any day.

But I can understand why they don't, you can't show off frame rate in a screenshot.

Avatar image for GameboyTroy
GameboyTroy

9855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#107  Edited By GameboyTroy
Member since 2011 • 9855 Posts

There is no defending this. What Phil said was funny.

Loading Video...
Loading Video...

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#108 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73872 Posts

I see all of this nonsense about FPS and resolution etc stemming from toxic PC gamers and they are ever so present in this thread perpetuating the nonsense that keeps this moving target going.

Avatar image for svaubel
svaubel

4571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 133

User Lists: 0

#109  Edited By svaubel
Member since 2005 • 4571 Posts

Show us where people don't care about fps?

After having a good decent gaming PC for once, below 30fps drives me nuts. Both Xbone and PS4 have some embarrassingly low fps games. I wonder how people can deal with the stutter sometimes.

FPS > resolution any day. But thanks to marketing, people only care about the resolution, regardless of how garbage the FPS is.

Avatar image for wiiboxstation
Wiiboxstation

1753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#110 Wiiboxstation
Member since 2014 • 1753 Posts

Phil is right. People don't care about 60fps. It's just the Internet minority on here that are obsessed with frame rate and graphics.

Avatar image for lhughey
lhughey

4886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111  Edited By lhughey
Member since 2006 • 4886 Posts

He's correct, especially after all of the 1080p vs 900p talk here.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts

@Pedro said:

I see all of this nonsense about FPS and resolution etc stemming from toxic PC gamers and they are ever so present in this thread perpetuating the nonsense that keeps this moving target going.

It's objectively not nonsense. The human eye easily notices 30 to 60 fps. It is extremely noticable in MP games. Going from 60 fps for years back to 30 fps is literally jarring.

Stating facts is not toxic.

You're only saying otherwise because the system you are a fan of is not delivering in this facet. AKA it's a pile of shit, so you're deflecting.

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15062 Posts
@Pedro said:

I see all of this nonsense about FPS and resolution etc stemming from toxic PC gamers and they are ever so present in this thread perpetuating the nonsense that keeps this moving target going.

What an ignorant thing to say.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@EnergyAbsorber said:

Microsofts goal was to run games at 4K much more consistently than the PS4 Pro could.

Basically resolution was the first thing on their minds while developing the XoneX, because of all the media backlash of PS4 having higher resolutions in multiplats than Xbox one since the very beginning when both consoles launched.

If Microsoft was to include a Beast CPU to make sure that all games run at 60FPS and 4K, the console would cost ATLEAST another $100. Unless they'd be willing to take a MASSIVE loss financially to get more consoles to consumers. But that would just piss off Microsoft investors yet again.

Phil Spencer has to be careful to not piss off investors that can influence the shut down the Xbox division.

@zaryia said:
@Pedro said:

I see all of this nonsense about FPS and resolution etc stemming from toxic PC gamers and they are ever so present in this thread perpetuating the nonsense that keeps this moving target going.

It's objectively not nonsense. The human eye easily notices 30 to 60 fps. It is extremely noticable in MP games. Going from 60 fps for years back to 30 fps is literally jarring.

Stating facts is not toxic.

You're only saying otherwise because the system you are a fan of is not delivering in this facet. AKA it's a pile of shit, so you're deflecting.

Why not you spec a better box for $499 which includes assembly labor cost?

Avatar image for Syferonik
Syferonik

3060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Syferonik
Member since 2006 • 3060 Posts

You only don't care about something this important when you know for a fact you ain't getting it.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@Syferonik said:

You only don't care about something this important when you know for a fact you ain't getting it.

The only fool who doesn't get is you. Thanks for converting this topic into a personalty war. I'll take you on.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

In many games, a steady 30 fps is okay. But, +60 fps is even better. Once I play games which have many high speed sequences like driving in GTA V or flying a jet fighter at tree top heights, high framerates (+60 fps) become mandatory.

Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts

I think framerate has always been up to the developers when it comes to consoles...they know how limited these boxes are..

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#119  Edited By deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

I think 60fps is not obligatory in some genres. Cinematic games like Life is Strange or walking sims like SOMA/RE7/Outlast and the like dont really need 60fps because their pacing is slow for the most part. Now when it comes to FPS, fighters or Hack'n'Slash, thats were I find it to be obligatory

Avatar image for nepu7supastar7
nepu7supastar7

6773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#120 nepu7supastar7
Member since 2007 • 6773 Posts

@Zero_epyon:

60 fps is awesome but not make or break deal to me.

Avatar image for Ant_17
Ant_17

13634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#121  Edited By Ant_17
Member since 2005 • 13634 Posts

You heard it folks. The man selling the ultimate gaming console says you don't care for 60fps.

Avatar image for mane_basic
mane_basic

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 mane_basic
Member since 2002 • 539 Posts

i'm an xbox fan and I have to call bs to phil there is a reason Halo made the jump from 30 to 60fps he knows this means a lot the gameplay in this last halo was amazing and he knows fps was a big deal every interview 343 had they said how they went with the scaling res. to make sure the game was locked at 60fps come on they overhaul the rendering just to get the engine up to 60fps cause 343 felt it was that important he was better off saying devs can do whatever they like with the power of the system

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts

@ronvalencia said:

Why not you spec a better box for $499 which includes assembly labor cost?

Upgrading your PC is cheaper than the total cost of buying a completely new XB model every 3 years, 3 years of XBL, and more expensive games.

But yes, Xbox 1x is cheaper than building a brand new pc from scratch initially for someone who has never PC gamed before. Over time, however, PC ends up cheaper due to the above reasons. But If you are already a core PC gamer, it is also not much more expensive (if not cheaper depending on how many games you buy) to stick with PC than go the XB route. And you get the benefit of 60 fps and a far superior library.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@zaryia said:
@ronvalencia said:

Why not you spec a better box for $499 which includes assembly labor cost?

Upgrading your PC is cheaper than the total cost of buying a completely new XB model every 3 years, 3 years of XBL, and more expensive games.

But yes, Xbox 1x is cheaper than building a brand new pc from scratch initially for someone who has never PC gamed before. Over time, however, PC ends up cheaper due to the above reasons. But If you are already a core PC gamer, it is also not much more expensive (if not cheaper depending on how many games you buy) to stick with PC than go the XB route. And you get the benefit of 60 fps and a far superior library.

https://pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=391&sort=price

GTX 1070's price has climbed past $400 USD.

The gap between XBO and X1X is 4 years.

Avatar image for Addict187
Addict187

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Addict187
Member since 2008 • 1128 Posts

Playing forza horizon 3 on pc and the 4k 60fps is pretty sweet.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@zaryia said:
@ronvalencia said:

Why not you spec a better box for $499 which includes assembly labor cost?

Upgrading your PC is cheaper than the total cost of buying a completely new XB model every 3 years, 3 years of XBL, and more expensive games.

But yes, Xbox 1x is cheaper than building a brand new pc from scratch initially for someone who has never PC gamed before. Over time, however, PC ends up cheaper due to the above reasons. But If you are already a core PC gamer, it is also not much more expensive (if not cheaper depending on how many games you buy) to stick with PC than go the XB route. And you get the benefit of 60 fps and a far superior library.

https://pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=391&sort=price

GTX 1070's price has climbed past $400 USD.

The gap between XBO and X1X is 4 years.

Exactly. Upgrading is still cheaper or close to a 4 year XB cycle.

New XB unit + 4 years of XBL = $700. That's already about equal to PC upgrade cycles of a rig that runs games better. Then additional costs depend on how many games you buy compared to how much cheaper they are on PC on average. Unless you buy very very few games, the price ends up roughly similiar. If you buy a lot of games, PC ends up cheaper.

Only PC is still running games better and double the aaa/aa library. Nice.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#127  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@zaryia said:
@ronvalencia said:
@zaryia said:
@ronvalencia said:

Why not you spec a better box for $499 which includes assembly labor cost?

Upgrading your PC is cheaper than the total cost of buying a completely new XB model every 3 years, 3 years of XBL, and more expensive games.

But yes, Xbox 1x is cheaper than building a brand new pc from scratch initially for someone who has never PC gamed before. Over time, however, PC ends up cheaper due to the above reasons. But If you are already a core PC gamer, it is also not much more expensive (if not cheaper depending on how many games you buy) to stick with PC than go the XB route. And you get the benefit of 60 fps and a far superior library.

https://pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=391&sort=price

GTX 1070's price has climbed past $400 USD.

The gap between XBO and X1X is 4 years.

Exactly. Upgrading is still cheaper or close to a 4 year XB cycle.

New XB unit + 4 years of XBL = $700. That's already about equal to PC upgrade cycles of a rig that runs games better. Then additional costs depend on how many games you buy compared to how much cheaper they are on PC on average. Unless you buy very very few games, the price ends up roughly similiar.

Only PC is still running games better and double the aaa/aa library. Nice.

There's about ~36 million XBO owners from ~84 million Xbox 360 owners.

Both XBO S and X1X doubles as a 4K blu-ray player. To play 4K Netflix and 4K blu-ray video content, Intel Kabylake is required while X1X can play both 4K Netflix and 4K blu-ray videos.

https://www.gamesdeal.com/xbox-360-live-gold-membership-12-month-card.html

$45.83 x 4 years = $183.32 for 4 years.

X1X: $499 including XBO controller and 4K blu-ray player.

Total: $682.32

----------

PCPartPicker part list: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/JCzcLD

Price breakdown by merchant: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/JCzcLD/by_merchant/

CPU: Intel - Pentium G4560 3.5GHz Dual-Core Processor ($68.99 @ SuperBiiz) <------- 4 threads/dual cores Intel Kabylake variant.

Motherboard: MSI - B250M PRO-VDH Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($72.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Memory: Crucial - 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4-2133 Memory ($59.99 @ Newegg)

Storage: Seagate - BarraCuda 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive ($42.49 @ Newegg)

Video Card: EVGA - GeForce GTX 1070 8GB SC Gaming ACX 3.0 Video Card ($409.99 @ Newegg)

Case: BitFenix - Comrade ATX Mid Tower Case ($29.99 @ NCIX US)

Power Supply: Thermaltake - SMART 550W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply ($34.99 @ Newegg)

Optical Drive: LG - UH12NS40 Blu-Ray Reader, DVD/CD Writer ($42.88 @ OutletPC)

Operating System: Microsoft - Windows 10 Home OEM 64-bit ($89.89 @ OutletPC)

Total: $852.20

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Avatar image for Rovelius
Rovelius

3252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#128 Rovelius
Member since 2006 • 3252 Posts

Anyone that swears by frame rate should just leave the console market and get a gaming PC.

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10943 Posts

@oflow:

You do know that KZ:SF, TLoU, UC4, and SF5 ran at 60 frames in MP don't you?