!!!!!!!!!!!! XBOX LIVE FRee !!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 61 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for rakee999
rakee999

368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 rakee999
Member since 2006 • 368 Posts
This is a topic for cows, they know if XBL goes free then it well drop in quality and then PSN well have a slim chance to catch up to XBL's level of quality.Citizen_Zero
WOW! PSN sounds like HIGH TECH!
Avatar image for Citizen_Zero
Citizen_Zero

1786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Citizen_Zero
Member since 2006 • 1786 Posts
[QUOTE="Citizen_Zero"]This is a topic for cows, they know if XBL goes free then it well drop in quality and then PSN well have a slim chance to catch up to XBL's level of quality.rakee999
WOW! PSN sounds like HIGH TECH!

 

I don't get what your trying say, could you speak in a clear and understandable sentience?
Avatar image for Fusible
Fusible

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#53 Fusible
Member since 2005 • 2828 Posts
XBL for free will finally be able to compete with PSN.mskrft007
PSN is nothing compared to LIVE. As a matter of fact, it would slaughter PSN if it did that.
Avatar image for chazz07
chazz07

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 chazz07
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
XBL for free will be a great marketing decision for microsoft, because evryone know xbox live rulez!!!! and this can increase sales...... please dont be a rumour!!!!
Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#55 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

This is what competition is all about. Sony pressures Microsoft into making online play free of charge.KeyWii

yeah,sony should worry about how to make the playstation network as good as live is,not the other way around.

Avatar image for rakee999
rakee999

368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 rakee999
Member since 2006 • 368 Posts
[QUOTE="rakee999"][QUOTE="Citizen_Zero"]This is a topic for cows, they know if XBL goes free then it well drop in quality and then PSN well have a slim chance to catch up to XBL's level of quality.Citizen_Zero
WOW! PSN sounds like HIGH TECH!

 

I don't get what your trying say, could you speak in a clear and understandable sentience?

First tell me what is sentience?
Avatar image for Citizen_Zero
Citizen_Zero

1786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Citizen_Zero
Member since 2006 • 1786 Posts
[QUOTE="Citizen_Zero"][QUOTE="rakee999"][QUOTE="Citizen_Zero"]This is a topic for cows, they know if XBL goes free then it well drop in quality and then PSN well have a slim chance to catch up to XBL's level of quality.rakee999
WOW! PSN sounds like HIGH TECH!

 

I don't get what your trying say, could you speak in a clear and understandable sentience?

First tell me what is sentience?



Nice way to avoid my Question, and yes it was a typo it should spell  "Sentence" I feel sorry for you if a typo I makes it where you can't read it.
Avatar image for sidler88
sidler88

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 sidler88
Member since 2006 • 724 Posts

its talking about Windows Live being free.. which would be total BS if we had to pay to play freaking computer games online

but if xbox live was free that would make my decision between that or the PS3,, i have to decide cuz im goin to college next year.

Avatar image for Heith
Heith

1231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Heith
Member since 2003 • 1231 Posts
If Live goes free, cows will just claim "PSN is even MORE free.." Fanboy Logic..
Avatar image for klabut
klabut

3264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 klabut
Member since 2006 • 3264 Posts
It better be. Paying to play online is the worst offense the Xbox 360 currently offers.KeyWii
If you thinkk $4.16 a month is expensive then how do you expect to pay $600 for a single machine?
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
Here's the tradeoff. Sure, Live users pay for online play, but most of that goes towards maintenance. PC online play appears to be free, but remember this. Someone's paying for the servers and the bandwidth associated with them. If you're hosting, you're paying not just your online play but everyone else who plays on your server. What happens if the host no longer feels so generous or begins to become strapped for cash due to increased traffic or fees?

And forget adversiting. In these days of popup blockers and commercial skippers, do you think gamers want to endure more advertising? Considering the number of subscribers, I think most would rather pay the small premium and spare the indignity.

As for Sony's approach to the problem, consider this. First, only Sony games have their own servers. Second, those servers and the bandwidth they use up cost money--and the PS3 is still a money-loser. You have to wonder: How long can they keep this up?