Terrible consoles, relative to their predecessors, upon release.
No seriously.....
The best out of the two this generation has a GPU that is only slightly better than a $100-$120 R7-260x.
Source: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-r7-260x-vs-next-gen-console
While the most powerful console of "last gen" (the 360) had a GPU roughly on par with the best computer GPU (which cost $549 at launch) at the time.
Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenos_(graphics_chip) & https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/159/radeon-x1800-xt.html
To reiterate:
This gen = Low-end/zero future-proof GPU used upon release.
Last Gen = High-end superb GPU used upon release.
Just pointing this out so you people stop arguing about graphics. No PS fan should ever vaunt their graphics if they are not the top of the food chain. Since their graphics are shite too; relative to PC. Both of the consoles are terrible; one is just less terrible than the other, but terrible nonetheless.
Log in to comment