Xbox One = Better Games (So Far), PS4 = Slightly Better Hardware

inFamous: Second Son shits on every Xbone exclusive. Planetside 2 shits on Titan Fall. PS4 is much more powerful than Xbone.

NathanDrakeSwag

inFamous: Second Son shits on every Xbone exclusive. Planetside 2 shits on Titan Fall. PS4 is much more powerful than Xbone.

NathanDrakeSwag

Dude, please stop...

all exclusive games are trash, the only good games are multiplat.

all exclusive games are trash, the only good games are multiplat.

Armoured_Mage

Do you have the money to buy all those exclusives? Sony games already don't sell to we'll and now they are going to saturate the market just so they can win a pissing contest. No a good move in my book.FoxbatAlpha

Oh DAT DAMAGE.

 

 

Dude, please stop...

TheEroica

The closes thing to Infamous on xbox one is Quantum Fake.

So far Xbox One has the better lineup of games, and quality of games is what matters most. Things could change over time, but for now this is how it stands.

Who agrees?

Baurus_1

ps4 is too weak to run titanfall, confirmed the by devs themselves. :(

KarateeeChop

Yeah and those are the same devs that claim that only 5% of gamers play single player games, which everyone knows that is a complete BS. Plus they have said so many things that contradict each other that I think their credibility is completely spent. I used to feel sorry for them, but now I'm starting to wonder if Activision had good reason firing them.

if you think this is "quality" then i feel terrible for you,

xbox one has noticeably weaker hardware, the worst game launch lineup in history and is priced $100 more. 

do you notice the copy and paste soldiers? the pre baked lighting and static backgrounds? such a epic battle scene omg omg thank you Microsoft for bringing this awesome next gen experience.

just like last gen Sony Fan wont have games to play the first year their console is out but instead talk about how theoretically powaful te hawdwa is.  History repeating itself.

 

Only the games matter Sony Fan and the earlier they come the better.

kuu2

[QUOTE="pcgamingowns"][QUOTE="kuu2"]

just like last gen Sony Fan wont have games to play the first year their console is out but instead talk about how theoretically powaful te hawdwa is.  History repeating itself.

 

Only the games matter Sony Fan and the earlier they come the better.

kuu2

Sigh.......

MSoft didnt have a Halo game on 36o for a while but still buried Sony with other exclusives early.  Shooters are not the only games that people play by the way.  Again look at Sony's history of having games early in their console life cycle, it does not happen.

[QUOTE="pcgamingowns"][QUOTE="kuu2"]

just like last gen Sony Fan wont have games to play the first year their console is out but instead talk about how theoretically powaful te hawdwa is.  History repeating itself.

 

Only the games matter Sony Fan and the earlier they come the better.

kuu2

Sigh.......

MSoft didnt have a Halo game on 36o for a while but still buried Sony with other exclusives early.  Shooters are not the only games that people play by the way.  Again look at Sony's history of having games early in their console life cycle, it does not happen.

xbox360 at launch had no games pc gamers could care about except a true exclusive fps (perfect dark zero)

ps4 is launching with a true exclusive fps right out of the gate like 360 did (killzone shadow fall)

PC wins in hardware and games so either way you're getting second best.gamebreakerz__

So how come you constantly see PC gamers petition and begging for ports of console games?

How come the walking dead won so many awards when it didnt have any cutting edge graphics and was inferior to most other games at the time? I mean it couldnt have been a good game without super high end graphics right? Or the last of us is being hailed as the best game in years, but it isnt on the PC.

Respawn entertainment is releasing titanfall for the xbox one and the PC but they say the game is better on the xbox one than the PC.

How many PC exclusives each year are there that win game of the year awards and end up being some of the years biggest sellers compared to console games?

50% more powerfull is "slightly better"?

[QUOTE="silversix_"]"slightly" haha 50% is slightly now? PS4 has better games and much more powerful hardware. EG101

So according to you the 4 DME's and ES RAM that Xbox ONE has and PS4 does NOT have will have ZERO effect on game performance. That is why MS brought in Top engineers from IBM and AMD to work on their chip. You believe that these engineers are stupid and decided to waste silicon on the XboxOne motherboard for NO good reason. well I guess we'll just have to sit back and see how it shakes out. So Far every DEV that has commented on PS4 and One have said they are comparable.

Thats why games on Xbox ONE to this point not only look better than PS4 games but are currently running better even though Sony's games are further in the development cycle. Go ahead and make assumptions about technology you have zero clue about. Xbox One currently has a much better game line up than PS4.

You can go ahead and stick your head in the sand and PRETEND like PS4 has better games and hardware but so far nothing Sony has shown has proven this. It might very well end up true but until games actually start showing this its all hypothetical.

The ESram doesnt do much because the xbone gpu has less hardware, 6 less CU's, 16 less ROPS, less TMU's, less ACES, 

fewer CPU cores available for games

less ram available for games

no on board ARM SoC to deal with background stuff

DME's and Esram cant add on 700 gigaflops of graphical processing power, it cant add on 6 more CU's or 16 more ROPS, it cant free up CPU cores

The Sorcerer real tech demo running in real time on a PS4 blows every single thing out the water that Xbox One had to show graphically

Infamous graphics are better then anything shown at Xbox E3 by a long shot, Xbox One GPU has 12 CU's, 16 ROPS while the PS4 has 18 CU's and 32 ROPS along with a onboard ARM SoC, which the Xbox One doesnt have the ps4 also has more ram available for games then the Xbox One... stop being delusional, nothing showed at Xbox e3 looked graphically impressive at all, not even pre baked lighting, poor physics, static backgrounds Forza 5. lemms are butthurt they got the weakest next gen console bahahahaha

[QUOTE="silversix_"]"slightly" haha 50% is slightly now? PS4 has better games and much more powerful hardware. EG101

So according to you the 4 DME's and ES RAM that Xbox ONE has and PS4 does NOT have will have ZERO effect on game performance. That is why MS brought in Top engineers from IBM and AMD to work on their chip. You believe that these engineers are stupid and decided to waste silicon on the XboxOne motherboard for NO good reason. well I guess we'll just have to sit back and see how it shakes out. So Far every DEV that has commented on PS4 and One have said they are comparable.

Thats why games on Xbox ONE to this point not only look better than PS4 games but are currently running better even though Sony's games are further in the development cycle. Go ahead and make assumptions about technology you have zero clue about. Xbox One currently has a much better game line up than PS4.

You can go ahead and stick your head in the sand and PRETEND like PS4 has better games and hardware but so far nothing Sony has shown has proven this. It might very well end up true but until games actually start showing this its all hypothetical.

Good post.

In case you dumbasses in love with sony havent realized... the official specs arent even official yet, everybody arguing about all ddr3 vs ddr5 crap when all of that can change by launch day, if the ps4 is more powerful then why cant it run Titanfall?? its like some sports cars are rated at like 300 hp when really their running 380hp or like tuning a car. You could have a motor that can handle anything but if its not tuned right then it doesnt matter, as of right now suposedly ps4 is more powerful, but its the developers of the games that need to tune the games for the hardware.bayboydray

i wonder why all the developers showed most of their multiplat games on PS4 (like Watch Dogs and others)

PS4 obviously more powerful, Xbox One is at a severe disadvantage in graphical power, 700 gigaflops less of GPU power really does show already when you have the Xbox one struggling to run Titanfall at 60 FPS

Xbox one struggles to run Dead rising 3, it ran at 20 fps and it didnt even look good so now theyre going to have to tone down the graphics even more in DR3 just to get the frame rate stable, poor lems

Arent you all forgetting that Sony main studios havent announced their games yet?

We still have GamesCom and TGS.

Naughty Dog, Santa Monica Studios, Media Molecule (Tearaway is not being made by the main team, but by a small 15 people team) and Guerrilla (2nd team) havent announced their games. Im sure Japan Studios also has something in the works, since Japan Studio has many teams.

ManatuBeard

[QUOTE="EG101"]

[QUOTE="silversix_"]"slightly" haha 50% is slightly now? PS4 has better games and much more powerful hardware. xboxiphoneps3

So according to you the 4 DME's and ES RAM that Xbox ONE has and PS4 does NOT have will have ZERO effect on game performance. That is why MS brought in Top engineers from IBM and AMD to work on their chip. You believe that these engineers are stupid and decided to waste silicon on the XboxOne motherboard for NO good reason. well I guess we'll just have to sit back and see how it shakes out. So Far every DEV that has commented on PS4 and One have said they are comparable.

Thats why games on Xbox ONE to this point not only look better than PS4 games but are currently running better even though Sony's games are further in the development cycle. Go ahead and make assumptions about technology you have zero clue about. Xbox One currently has a much better game line up than PS4.

You can go ahead and stick your head in the sand and PRETEND like PS4 has better games and hardware but so far nothing Sony has shown has proven this. It might very well end up true but until games actually start showing this its all hypothetical.

The ESram doesnt do much because the xbone gpu has less hardware, 6 less CU's, 16 less ROPS, less TMU's, less ACES, 

fewer CPU cores available for games

less ram available for games

no on board ARM SoC to deal with background stuff

The Sorcerer real tech demo running in real time on a PS4 blows every single thing out the water that Xbox One had to show graphically

Infamous graphics are better then anything shown at Xbox E3 by a long shot, Xbox One GPU has 12 CU's, 16 ROPS while the PS4 has 18 CU's and 32 ROPS along with a onboard ARM SoC, which the Xbox One doesnt have the ps4 also has more ram available for games then the Xbox One... stop being delusional, nothing showed at Xbox e3 looked graphically impressive at all, not even pre baked lighting, poor physics, static backgrounds Forza 5. lemms are butthurt they got the weakest next gen console bahahahaha

Sorry, but your post is wrong. 4 DMEs and ES RAM, on the Xbox One, matters a lot. It can bridge the supposed gap between the Xbox One and PS4. Also, the Xbox One has much better DirectX support and that can make a big difference in games too. Most likely, graphics will be extremely similar on both consoles to the point of being indistinguishable.

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"]

[QUOTE="EG101"]

So according to you the 4 DME's and ES RAM that Xbox ONE has and PS4 does NOT have will have ZERO effect on game performance. That is why MS brought in Top engineers from IBM and AMD to work on their chip. You believe that these engineers are stupid and decided to waste silicon on the XboxOne motherboard for NO good reason. well I guess we'll just have to sit back and see how it shakes out. So Far every DEV that has commented on PS4 and One have said they are comparable.

Thats why games on Xbox ONE to this point not only look better than PS4 games but are currently running better even though Sony's games are further in the development cycle. Go ahead and make assumptions about technology you have zero clue about. Xbox One currently has a much better game line up than PS4.

You can go ahead and stick your head in the sand and PRETEND like PS4 has better games and hardware but so far nothing Sony has shown has proven this. It might very well end up true but until games actually start showing this its all hypothetical.

 

 

 

Baurus_1

The ESram doesnt do much because the xbone gpu has less hardware, 6 less CU's, 16 less ROPS, less TMU's, less ACES, 

fewer CPU cores available for games

less ram available for games

no on board ARM SoC to deal with background stuff

The Sorcerer real tech demo running in real time on a PS4 blows every single thing out the water that Xbox One had to show graphically

Infamous graphics are better then anything shown at Xbox E3 by a long shot, Xbox One GPU has 12 CU's, 16 ROPS while the PS4 has 18 CU's and 32 ROPS along with a onboard ARM SoC, which the Xbox One doesnt have the ps4 also has more ram available for games then the Xbox One... stop being delusional, nothing showed at Xbox e3 looked graphically impressive at all, not even pre baked lighting, poor physics, static backgrounds Forza 5. lemms are butthurt they got the weakest next gen console bahahahaha

Sorry, but your post is wrong. 4 DMEs and ES RAM, on the Xbox One, matters a lot. It can bridge the supposed gap between the Xbox One and PS4. Also, the Xbox One has much better DirectX support and that can make a big difference in games too. Most likely, graphics will be extremely similar on both consoles to the point of being indistinguishable.

indistinguishable? lmfao you got to be kidding me... look at the copy and pasted soldiers, pre baked lighting and static background, hell even all the soldiers are the same exact looking doing the same exact animations.... THAT CLOUD :lol::lol::lol::lol:

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"]

[QUOTE="EG101"]

So according to you the 4 DME's and ES RAM that Xbox ONE has and PS4 does NOT have will have ZERO effect on game performance. That is why MS brought in Top engineers from IBM and AMD to work on their chip. You believe that these engineers are stupid and decided to waste silicon on the XboxOne motherboard for NO good reason. well I guess we'll just have to sit back and see how it shakes out. So Far every DEV that has commented on PS4 and One have said they are comparable.

Thats why games on Xbox ONE to this point not only look better than PS4 games but are currently running better even though Sony's games are further in the development cycle. Go ahead and make assumptions about technology you have zero clue about. Xbox One currently has a much better game line up than PS4.

You can go ahead and stick your head in the sand and PRETEND like PS4 has better games and hardware but so far nothing Sony has shown has proven this. It might very well end up true but until games actually start showing this its all hypothetical.

 

 

 

Baurus_1

The ESram doesnt do much because the xbone gpu has less hardware, 6 less CU's, 16 less ROPS, less TMU's, less ACES, 

fewer CPU cores available for games

less ram available for games

no on board ARM SoC to deal with background stuff

The Sorcerer real tech demo running in real time on a PS4 blows every single thing out the water that Xbox One had to show graphically

Infamous graphics are better then anything shown at Xbox E3 by a long shot, Xbox One GPU has 12 CU's, 16 ROPS while the PS4 has 18 CU's and 32 ROPS along with a onboard ARM SoC, which the Xbox One doesnt have the ps4 also has more ram available for games then the Xbox One... stop being delusional, nothing showed at Xbox e3 looked graphically impressive at all, not even pre baked lighting, poor physics, static backgrounds Forza 5. lemms are butthurt they got the weakest next gen console bahahahaha

Sorry, but your post is wrong. 4 DMEs and ES RAM, on the Xbox One, matters a lot. It can bridge the supposed gap between the Xbox One and PS4. Also, the Xbox One has much better DirectX support and that can make a big difference in games too. Most likely, graphics will be extremely similar on both consoles to the point of being indistinguishable.

[QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] first of all data move engines do absolutely nothing for performance so stop acting like you know what your talking about.

 

The ESram doesnt do much because the xbone gpu has less hardware, 6 less CU's, 16 less ROPS, less TMU's, less ACES, 

fewer CPU cores available for games

less ram available for games

no on board ARM SoC to deal with background stuff

 

 

 

The Sorcerer real tech demo running in real time on a PS4 blows every single thing out the water that Xbox One had to show graphically

Infamous graphics are better then anything shown at Xbox E3 by a long shot, Xbox One GPU has 12 CU's, 16 ROPS while the PS4 has 18 CU's and 32 ROPS along with a onboard ARM SoC, which the Xbox One doesnt have the ps4 also has more ram available for games then the Xbox One... stop being delusional, nothing showed at Xbox e3 looked graphically impressive at all, not even pre baked lighting, poor physics, static backgrounds Forza 5. lemms are butthurt they got the weakest next gen console bahahahaha

22Toothpicks

Sorry, but your post is wrong. 4 DMEs and ES RAM, on the Xbox One, matters a lot. It can bridge the supposed gap between the Xbox One and PS4. Also, the Xbox One has much better DirectX support and that can make a big difference in games too. Most likely, graphics will be extremely similar on both consoles to the point of being indistinguishable.

[QUOTE="22Toothpicks"][QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

Sorry, but your post is wrong. 4 DMEs and ES RAM, on the Xbox One, matters a lot. It can bridge the supposed gap between the Xbox One and PS4. Also, the Xbox One has much better DirectX support and that can make a big difference in games too. Most likely, graphics will be extremely similar on both consoles to the point of being indistinguishable.

xboxiphoneps3

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"][QUOTE="22Toothpicks"] nm I'm not going to comment on the hardware side of things as it's not my forte but MS has DirectX support because it's their own graphic API Why the fvck would Sony be using it? PS4 uses OpenGL, I'm sure.BlackShirt20

not only can the PS4 provide the same feature sets of DX11, it has its own tricks up its sleeves that the One doesnt have 

[QUOTE="Shensolidus"]

*sigh* To be fair, Sony does have a far bigger line up of exclusives and games for the PS4, particularly at launch.. MS just showed you all the major titles they have for the first 18 months of their console, and its pretty bare by comparison.kuu2

Sony always talks about their games and then misses on their delivery dates.  Until Sony delivers on their empty rhetoric of games early they are just doing what thy do every gen since PS1 and that is just talk.

Showing games is way better than telling me what you are going to launch.

[QUOTE="BlackShirt20"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] PS4 can use DirectX, doesnt mean they will, anyways DirectX is not really a advantage at all, Gabe Newell has actually managed to squeeze out better performance through OpenGL then DirectXxboxiphoneps3

not only can the PS4 provide the same feature sets of DX11, it has its own tricks up its sleeves that the One doesnt have

FF (fun fact), Final Fantasy XV uses Directx 11.2 and is being developed on PC and Xbox One before its port to PS4 LOL.

Not me! :)

And anyone who thinks Sony is not going to come out guns blazing with games and keep the support up, is out of their mind.

NaveedLife

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"]

[QUOTE="BlackShirt20"]the PS4 cannot use directx. The Xbox One can use Directx 11.2 fully.

BlackShirt20

not only can the PS4 provide the same feature sets of DX11, it has its own tricks up its sleeves that the One doesnt have

FF (fun fact), Final Fantasy XV uses Directx 11.2 and is being developed on PC and Xbox One before its port to PS4 LOL.

[QUOTE="BlackShirt20"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] http://www.geek.com/games/sony-iimprove-directx-11-for-the-ps4-blu-ray-1544364/

 

not only can the PS4 provide the same feature sets of DX11, it has its own tricks up its sleeves that the One doesnt have

xboxiphoneps3

FF (fun fact), Final Fantasy XV uses Directx 11.2 and is being developed on PC and Xbox One before its port to PS4 LOL.

xbots dont have a clue about hardware, software or programming, that is very clear just by looking at the dumb things they write.

so x1=your opinion, PS4=actual fact

[QUOTE="BlackShirt20"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] http://www.geek.com/games/sony-iimprove-directx-11-for-the-ps4-blu-ray-1544364/

not only can the PS4 provide the same feature sets of DX11, it has its own tricks up its sleeves that the One doesnt have

xboxiphoneps3

FF (fun fact), Final Fantasy XV uses Directx 11.2 and is being developed on PC and Xbox One before its port to PS4 LOL.

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"][QUOTE="BlackShirt20"]Its there version of Directx 11.1 that has never been proven......mean while DirectX 11.2 is light years ahead of 11.1 lol so good luck with scraps.

FF (fun fact), Final Fantasy XV uses Directx 11.2 and is being developed on PC and Xbox One before its port to PS4 LOL.

The4thVIII

Microsoft's game did not win Best of Show. It was a cross-platform game. ;)CrownedClownAg

The jealousy is wonderful!

[QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] first of all data move engines do absolutely nothing for performance so stop acting like you know what your talking about.

 

The ESram doesnt do much because the xbone gpu has less hardware, 6 less CU's, 16 less ROPS, less TMU's, less ACES, 

fewer CPU cores available for games

less ram available for games

no on board ARM SoC to deal with background stuff

 

 

 

The Sorcerer real tech demo running in real time on a PS4 blows every single thing out the water that Xbox One had to show graphically

Infamous graphics are better then anything shown at Xbox E3 by a long shot, Xbox One GPU has 12 CU's, 16 ROPS while the PS4 has 18 CU's and 32 ROPS along with a onboard ARM SoC, which the Xbox One doesnt have the ps4 also has more ram available for games then the Xbox One... stop being delusional, nothing showed at Xbox e3 looked graphically impressive at all, not even pre baked lighting, poor physics, static backgrounds Forza 5. lemms are butthurt they got the weakest next gen console bahahahaha

22Toothpicks

Sorry, but your post is wrong. 4 DMEs and ES RAM, on the Xbox One, matters a lot. It can bridge the supposed gap between the Xbox One and PS4. Also, the Xbox One has much better DirectX support and that can make a big difference in games too. Most likely, graphics will be extremely similar on both consoles to the point of being indistinguishable.

You're sure... really... I guess you need to check out these links.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-inside-playstation-4

http://www.geek.com/games/sony-iimprove-directx-11-for-the-ps4-blu-ray-1544364/

"Developers will be able to take advantage of Microsofts latest industry standardDirectX API DirectX 11.1, but Sony has taken the time to improve upon it, pushing the feature set beyond what is available for PC games development."

[QUOTE="TheEroica"]

 

 

Dude, please stop...

tormentos

The closes thing to Infamous on xbox one is Quantum Fake.

PS... that dude looks like Butch from Fallout 3

can't wait till naughty dog premieres their ps4 title then all the slighty better hardware people will shut up

can't wait till naughty dog premieres their ps4 title then all the slighty better hardware people will shut up

Chris_Williams

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"]

[QUOTE="BlackShirt20"]the PS4 cannot use directx. The Xbox One can use Directx 11.2 fully.

BlackShirt20

not only can the PS4 provide the same feature sets of DX11, it has its own tricks up its sleeves that the One doesnt have

FF (fun fact), Final Fantasy XV uses Directx 11.2 and is being developed on PC and Xbox One before its port to PS4 LOL.

Sony might be able to compete with MS someday far in the future if they can manage to keep their online service up without crashing or getting hacked all the time.