This topic is locked from further discussion.
Really? I heard lair takes up 95% of the ps3 and Mass Effect only takes 0.53% of one core on the 360? My friend told me who's dad works for nintendo said so, so it must be true!
Hey loook I have logic just like yours!
[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"]Is it bannable to say /thread now?
CaseyWegner
bans are permanent so...no.
Can I be suspended? Doesn't really matter, deep down we'll all know that there is no more reason to post in this thread, the numbers are made up.
Yeah just wait a little longer...:roll:.
The question is When?,WHEN?!!.No really When?,When are the devs going to do something that uses all the Ps3 powar?.
It seems all these days is multi-platform,port or TBA.
Another sad thing is that Devs rather develop for the Wii,Is cheaper and you see the money faster without putting a lot of effort on it.
The Ps3 has the capacity for a true Game masterpiece but Devs rather develop multi-platform crap,ports,rehashes or half baked games.
[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"]Is it bannable to say /thread now?
Vyse_The_Daring
bans are permanent so...no.
Can I be suspended? Doesn't really matter, deep down we'll all know that there is no more reason to post in this thread, the numbers are made up.
Yep..It wouldn't surprise me if the last generation consoles didn't get maxed out either
with Mass Effect dont come here saying that mass effect is only using 50% of xbox360's power!it looks good but Lair for the ps3 looks almost as good and their only using 20% of ps3's power imagine when ps3 unleashe all of its power!61913
Power. I can't believe people still try to challenge the 360's power. What are you thinking?:| The 360 is the clear leader as far as technology goes. It has the better GPU and more memory. Memory being the most important part! Prepare yourself when Unreal Tournement 3, GTA4, Call of Duty 4, Assassin's Creed, and other high profile mutiplats look and run better on 360.
I can't wait to see what you have to say when Halo 3 ends up looking and playing better than Killzone, if they even have the balls to show it this E3.
I don't even care about graphics, and if I did, I would get the 360! Any idiot with a pair of working eyes can see that. The only thing you can maybe brag about is the Cell's computational power, which is still only in theory. We have yet to see a single PS3 game step up to the plate, so why not just drop it.
You can come back when, and if any PS3 game truly surpasses the 360. Good luck by the way.:)
If you wanted to experience the best games on the planet, then you should have bought the 360 for cheaper. You would be playing the best of the best right now! Any one who was smart, I.E. me, would have waited to get the PS3 when actual games showed up.
Stuff like MGS4, GT5, GoW3, and whatever sweet game Team ICO comes up with.
This also goes withoutmentioning the fact that the system won't be the clear ripoff that it currently is. I'd say the PS3 is worth 300, same as the 360. I could care less that Sony tried to make me buy an overpricedBlue-ray player.
When I do finally pick up my PS3, you can be sure it was for the exclusive games that it features. Not Blue-ray, notthe gimmicky Cell, and not some gimmicky 6-axis BS either. It will be for a system thatshould have retailed for $300-400, just like the 360.
I will always be fact that Sony didn't focus on a games machine, while Microsoft did! Take apart the 360, and all you'll find is a pure games machine. Take apart the PS3, and all you'll find is unproven technology.
I'm not trying to bash the PS3, because I'll eventually get one. I think the exclusive games will be great. Uncharted, Lair, MGS4, GT5, Heavenly Sword, Killzone 2, and Little Big Planet among others. But in no way shape or form is the PS3 the most powerfull.
I would suggest you just enjoy what you have, and stop the comparisons. I love FPS's like Halo 3, Haze, Unreal 3, and Killzone2, but everybody knows Halo 3will bethe King! If you even have to question that, then it's too late for you.:(
These upcoming gamesare going to use a lot of each systems power. When a PS3 developer says that they'reonly usinga certain percentage of power, thenyou can bet they mean the Cell. The PS3's GPU will never win. The PS3 will never win memory either, so you better pray the Cell produces graphics.:D
It's too bad you even care. It's sad.:(
These are interesting stats about these games and the percentage of power that each one uses for their respective systems. I wasn't aware that Lair used 20% of the PS3 power. I thought it was just baby vomit splattered on a VHS copy of Dragon Heart written on Blu-ray.
Isn't Oblivion better on the PS3?osirisomeomi
You cannot get shivering isles with the ps3. Bethesda also said they will release a download that gives you the same exact graphics.
so to answer your question, no.
[QUOTE="61913"]with Mass Effect dont come here saying that mass effect is only using 50% of xbox360's power!it looks good but Lair for the ps3 looks almost as good and their only using 20% of ps3's power imagine when ps3 unleashe all of its power!Spartanx23
Power. I can't believe people still try to challenge the 360's power. What are you thinking?:| The 360 is the clear leader as far as technology goes. It has the better GPU and more memory. Memory being the most important part! Prepare yourself when Unreal Tournement 3, GTA4, Call of Duty 4, Assassin's Creed, and other high profile mutiplats look and run better on 360.
I can't wait to see what you have to say when Halo 3 ends up looking and playing better than Killzone, if they even have the balls to show it this E3.
I don't even care about graphics, and if I did, I would get the 360! Any idiot with a pair of working eyes can see that. The only thing you can maybe brag about is the Cell's computational power, which is still only in theory. We have yet to see a single PS3 game step up to the plate, so why not just drop it.
You can come back when, and if any PS3 game truly surpasses the 360. Good luck by the way.:)
If you wanted to experience the best games on the planet, then you should have bought the 360 for cheaper. You would be playing the best of the best right now! Any one who was smart, I.E. me, would have waited to get the PS3 when actual games showed up.
Stuff like MGS4, GT5, GoW3, and whatever sweet game Team ICO comes up with.
This also goes withoutmentioning the fact that the system won't be the clear ripoff that it currently is. I'd say the PS3 is worth 300, same as the 360. I could care less that Sony tried to make me buy an overpricedBlue-ray player.
When I do finally pick up my PS3, you can be sure it was for the exclusive games that it features. Not Blue-ray, notthe gimmicky Cell, and not some gimmicky 6-axis BS either. It will be for a system thatshould have retailed for $300-400, just like the 360.
I will always be fact that Sony didn't focus on a games machine, while Microsoft did! Take apart the 360, and all you'll find is a pure games machine. Take apart the PS3, and all you'll find is unproven technology.
I'm not trying to bash the PS3, because I'll eventually get one. I think the exclusive games will be great. Uncharted, Lair, MGS4, GT5, Heavenly Sword, Killzone 2, and Little Big Planet among others. But in no way shape or form is the PS3 the most powerfull.
I would suggest you just enjoy what you have, and stop the comparisons. I love FPS's like Halo 3, Haze, Unreal 3, and Killzone2, but everybody knows Halo 3will bethe King! If you even have to question that, then it's too late for you.:(
These upcoming gamesare going to use a lot of each systems power. When a PS3 developer says that they'reonly usinga certain percentage of power, thenyou can bet they mean the Cell. The PS3's GPU will never win. The PS3 will never win memory either, so you better pray the Cell produces graphics.:D
It's too bad you even care. It's sad.:(
I feel the same way as you bro.
Yeah just wait a little longer...:roll:.
The question is When?,WHEN?!!.No really When?,When are the devs going to do something that uses all the Ps3 powar?.
It seems all these days is multi-platform,port or TBA.
Another sad thing is that Devs rather develop for the Wii,Is cheaper and you see the money faster without putting a lot of effort on it.
The Ps3 has the capacity for a true Game masterpiece but Devs rather develop multi-platform crap,ports,rehashes or half baked games.
Hater3000
lol your joking me right? We have those games comming, they are in development and we've seen proof they exist. You speak as if we've never seen proof of a great looking game running on the ps3/ made for the ps3. Gears didnt get a game that stunned people/ took advantage of the 360's power untill almost a year later, that game was gears. The ps3 will get one sooner, hell it will get 2 sooner. Lair and warhawk.
Please just don't hit the submit button until you reread your statement, because its just as redundant as this thread.
[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"]Is it bannable to say /thread now?
Heil68
bans are permanent so...no.
Can I be suspended? Doesn't really matter, deep down we'll all know that there is no more reason to post in this thread, the numbers are made up.
Yep..It wouldn't surprise me if the last generation consoles didn't get maxed out either
Diddn't God of war 2 already proved that?
[QUOTE="Hater3000"]Yeah just wait a little longer...:roll:.
The question is When?,WHEN?!!.No really When?,When are the devs going to do something that uses all the Ps3 powar?.
It seems all these days is multi-platform,port or TBA.
Another sad thing is that Devs rather develop for the Wii,Is cheaper and you see the money faster without putting a lot of effort on it.
The Ps3 has the capacity for a true Game masterpiece but Devs rather develop multi-platform crap,ports,rehashes or half baked games.
Sully28
lol your joking me right? We have those games comming, they are in development and we've seen proof they exist. You speak as if we've never seen proof of a great looking game running on the ps3/ made for the ps3. Gears didnt get a game that stunned people/ took advantage of the 360's power untill almost a year later, that game was gears. The ps3 will get one sooner, hell it will get 2 sooner. Lair and warhawk.
Please just don't hit the submit button until you reread your statement, because its just as redundant as this thread.
And yet, you're so confident that Lair and Warhawk will be amazing graphically...you sound just as redundant...
[QUOTE="Sully28"][QUOTE="Hater3000"]Yeah just wait a little longer...:roll:.
The question is When?,WHEN?!!.No really When?,When are the devs going to do something that uses all the Ps3 powar?.
It seems all these days is multi-platform,port or TBA.
Another sad thing is that Devs rather develop for the Wii,Is cheaper and you see the money faster without putting a lot of effort on it.
The Ps3 has the capacity for a true Game masterpiece but Devs rather develop multi-platform crap,ports,rehashes or half baked games.
Kizzle28
lol your joking me right? We have those games comming, they are in development and we've seen proof they exist. You speak as if we've never seen proof of a great looking game running on the ps3/ made for the ps3. Gears didnt get a game that stunned people/ took advantage of the 360's power untill almost a year later, that game was gears. The ps3 will get one sooner, hell it will get 2 sooner. Lair and warhawk.
Please just don't hit the submit button until you reread your statement, because its just as redundant as this thread.
And yet, you're so confident that Lair and Warhawk will be amazing graphically...you sound just as redundant...
No i dont sound as redundant. He is speaking as if we havent seen one game that looks amazing on the ps3 when we have. I am saying the ps3 will get games as soon if not sooner than the 360 did in its life span. I never said lair and warhawk will look amazingly graphicly, i said they will take advantage of the system. Should i explain?
Lair looks amazing from the vids shown. It has levels that HUGE, and look great. There are hundreds of enemys on screen that do their own thing(i can rhyme), you fly a dragon with the 6 axis, and it is said to be very fluid and well done, and its made my a dev team that has been known to make excelent games, excelent air combat games, which lair is. Now those are all reasons on how it can/will take advatage of the ps3.
Warhawk isnta game looking to set a new bar in teh graphic department. That doesnt mean it looks bad though. From the vids we've seen, and the comments beta testers make, it looks great, and will please many. It features all online and so far goes up to 32(rumor is that number will be pushed up, but its ONLY a rumor). Its gameplay is said to be AMAZING, and some people even dared to say that it was better than halo, some websites and betatesters even said warhawks beta was better than halo 3's. Also this game features six axis control and is to be hard at first, but once you get the hang of it, its amazing. These are also reasons why it can/will take advantage of the ps3.
i dont care what anyone says but Geow pretty much burned up most of the systemspower.GermanShepard06I wouldnt say it burned most of it off, but it did burn alot. Im excited to see some better looking games come out on 360, i play my friends 360's all the time. Its just i dont think it will get that much farther than gears.
i dont care what anyone says but Geow pretty much burned up most of the systemspower.GermanShepard06
hmm.............go with germanshepard or go with a developer from epic.. really tough choice.:roll:
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]i dont care what anyone says but Geow pretty much burned up most of the systemspower.istreakforfood
hmm.............go with germanshepard or go with a developer from epic.. really tough choice.:roll:
Geow2 will prove me right.
[QUOTE="istreakforfood"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]i dont care what anyone says but Geow pretty much burned up most of the systemspower.GermanShepard06
hmm.............go with germanshepard or go with a developer from epic.. really tough choice.:roll:
Geow2 will prove me right.
But until Geow2 "proves you right," how about some actual concrete details to back your original statement up? >_>[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="istreakforfood"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]i dont care what anyone says but Geow pretty much burned up most of the systemspower.PannicAtack
hmm.............go with germanshepard or go with a developer from epic.. really tough choice.:roll:
Geow2 will prove me right.
But until Geow2 "proves you right," how about some actual concrete details to back your original statement up? >_>i have been fallowing console gaming since sega's master system, the first nintendo and so on, i have read over gazzilion(sarcasm)magazines and i know these things. Im not saying it will look the same but only little things will improve, its still going to be an 8 player online game.
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="istreakforfood"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]i dont care what anyone says but Geow pretty much burned up most of the systemspower.GermanShepard06
hmm.............go with germanshepard or go with a developer from epic.. really tough choice.:roll:
Geow2 will prove me right.
But until Geow2 "proves you right," how about some actual concrete details to back your original statement up? >_>i have been fallowing console gaming since sega's master system, the first nintendo and so on, i have read overgazzilion(sarcasm)magazines and i know these things. Im not saying it will look the same but only little things will improve, its still going to be an 8 player online game.
I asked for concrete details, not an overblown attempt at an appeal to ethos. >_>[QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="istreakforfood"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]i dont care what anyone says but Geow pretty much burned up most of the systemspower.GermanShepard06
hmm.............go with germanshepard or go with a developer from epic.. really tough choice.:roll:
Geow2 will prove me right.
But until Geow2 "proves you right," how about some actual concrete details to back your original statement up? >_>i have been fallowing console gaming since sega's master system, the first nintendo and so on, i have read over gazzilion(sarcasm)magazines and i know these things. Im not saying it will look the same but only little things will improve, its still going to be an 8 player online game.
Yeah right. Look at GOW2 on the PS2 game devs learn a lot over the years about the consolepower and same thing is going to happen on the 360.
[QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]I read somewhere that Lair uses 80% of the PS3 power.
Sully28
and untill your provide and like, your statement is as good as me saying "the 360 and ps3 use 100% of their power to play oblivion".
Tell that to the TC saying Lair is only using 20% Power of the PS3. :|
first, they aimed at 60fps and 4xxAA and that didnt work, second the game was running at 15fps even when theydowngraded the game, i read the story, at first Epic believed x360's spec sheets were impressive but later on they did find out that MS's numbers on x360 hardwarewere FALSE..
dont pretend that you never heard MS saying that Forza2 is going to look amazing and have 4xaa and crazy special effects, look how that turned out.
GermanShepard06
well, in the case of GeoW2... it's kinda obvious it's gonna look like GeoW1.. it's a sequal. i have no doubt that all the improvements in textures, lighting, etc... will look like minor changes to you.. just like the changes in Halo3.
The 360 will have a lot more improvement in graphics, don't worry.
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="istreakforfood"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]i dont care what anyone says but Geow pretty much burned up most of the systemspower.PS3_3DO
hmm.............go with germanshepard or go with a developer from epic.. really tough choice.:roll:
Geow2 will prove me right.
But until Geow2 "proves you right," how about some actual concrete details to back your original statement up? >_>i have been fallowing console gaming since sega's master system, the first nintendo and so on, i have read over gazzilion(sarcasm)magazines and i know these things. Im not saying it will look the same but only little things will improve, its still going to be an 8 player online game.
Yeah right. Look at GOW2 on the PS2 game devs learn a lot over the years about the consolepower and same thing is going to happen on the 360.
wrong, not all consoles r like that, this is why ps1 and ps2 were soo good, cuz they had future proof hardware. Xbox360 is not one of those systems, sorry to tell you that.
wrong, not all consoles r like that, this is why ps1 and ps2 were soo good, cuz they had future proof hardware. Xbox360 is not one of those systems, sorry to tell you that.
GermanShepard06
sorry to tell you, but you sound like an irrational kid. try to be a reasonable person here. You just say things without knowing what you are talking about. for your own sake, don't do that..... try to keep it real.
[QUOTE="61913"]with Mass Effect dont come here saying that mass effect is only using 50% of xbox360's power!it looks good but Lair for the ps3 looks almost as good and their only using 20% of ps3's power imagine when ps3 unleashe all of its power!Spartanx23
Power. I can't believe people still try to challenge the 360's power. What are you thinking?:| The 360 is the clear leader as far as technology goes. It has the better GPU and more memory. Memory being the most important part! Prepare yourself when Unreal Tournement 3, GTA4, Call of Duty 4, Assassin's Creed, and other high profile mutiplats look and run better on 360.
I can't wait to see what you have to say when Halo 3 ends up looking and playing better than Killzone, if they even have the balls to show it this E3.
I don't even care about graphics, and if I did, I would get the 360! Any idiot with a pair of working eyes can see that. The only thing you can maybe brag about is the Cell's computational power, which is still only in theory. We have yet to see a single PS3 game step up to the plate, so why not just drop it.
You can come back when, and if any PS3 game truly surpasses the 360. Good luck by the way.:)
If you wanted to experience the best games on the planet, then you should have bought the 360 for cheaper. You would be playing the best of the best right now! Any one who was smart, I.E. me, would have waited to get the PS3 when actual games showed up.
Stuff like MGS4, GT5, GoW3, and whatever sweet game Team ICO comes up with.
This also goes withoutmentioning the fact that the system won't be the clear ripoff that it currently is. I'd say the PS3 is worth 300, same as the 360. I could care less that Sony tried to make me buy an overpricedBlue-ray player.
When I do finally pick up my PS3, you can be sure it was for the exclusive games that it features. Not Blue-ray, notthe gimmicky Cell, and not some gimmicky 6-axis BS either. It will be for a system thatshould have retailed for $300-400, just like the 360.
I will always be fact that Sony didn't focus on a games machine, while Microsoft did! Take apart the 360, and all you'll find is a pure games machine. Take apart the PS3, and all you'll find is unproven technology.
I'm not trying to bash the PS3, because I'll eventually get one. I think the exclusive games will be great. Uncharted, Lair, MGS4, GT5, Heavenly Sword, Killzone 2, and Little Big Planet among others. But in no way shape or form is the PS3 the most powerfull.
I would suggest you just enjoy what you have, and stop the comparisons. I love FPS's like Halo 3, Haze, Unreal 3, and Killzone2, but everybody knows Halo 3will bethe King! If you even have to question that, then it's too late for you.:(
These upcoming gamesare going to use a lot of each systems power. When a PS3 developer says that they'reonly usinga certain percentage of power, thenyou can bet they mean the Cell. The PS3's GPU will never win. The PS3 will never win memory either, so you better pray the Cell produces graphics.:D
It's too bad you even care. It's sad.:(
overpriced blue ray player WTF MAN the ps3 alone is cheaper than most blu ray players out their i dont know what the hell you are talking about calling it an overpriced blu ray player :S HA[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wrong, not all consoles r like that, this is why ps1 and ps2 were soo good, cuz they had future proof hardware. Xbox360 is not one of those systems, sorry to tell you that.
danneswegman
sorry to tell you, but you sound like an irrational kid. try to be a reasonable person here. You just say things without knowing what you are talking about. for your own sake, don't do that..... try to keep it real.
what is x360 going to do when ps3 games in 1-2 years from now are going to be taking up 10-15gigs just for physics and animation?
Look at Uncharted, the game is aiming to be 30gigs long.
[QUOTE="danneswegman"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wrong, not all consoles r like that, this is why ps1 and ps2 were soo good, cuz they had future proof hardware. Xbox360 is not one of those systems, sorry to tell you that.
GermanShepard06
sorry to tell you, but you sound like an irrational kid. try to be a reasonable person here. You just say things without knowing what you are talking about. for your own sake, don't do that..... try to keep it real.
what is x360 going to do when ps3 games in 1-2 years from now are going to be taking up 10-15gigs just for physics and animation?
Look at Uncharted, the game is aiming to be 30gigs long.
The 360 does have the best GPU so it's future proof. :roll:
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="danneswegman"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wrong, not all consoles r like that, this is why ps1 and ps2 were soo good, cuz they had future proof hardware. Xbox360 is not one of those systems, sorry to tell you that.
PS3_3DO
sorry to tell you, but you sound like an irrational kid. try to be a reasonable person here. You just say things without knowing what you are talking about. for your own sake, don't do that..... try to keep it real.
what is x360 going to do when ps3 games in 1-2 years from now are going to be taking up 10-15gigs just for physics and animation?
Look at Uncharted, the game is aiming to be 30gigs long.
The 360 does have the best GPU so it's future proof. :roll:
there is not one source that benchmarked both gpu's so ur claim is false. And plzz its all about total system performance and ps3 has twice or more the performance over x360
[QUOTE="osirisomeomi"]Isn't Oblivion better on the PS3?DoctorBunny
You cannot get shivering isles with the ps3. Bethesda also said they will release a download that gives you the same exact graphics.
so to answer your question, no.
Oblivion on the 360 already received that download through XBL and, the PS3 version is still superior, nice try fanboy!
[QUOTE="PS3_3DO"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="danneswegman"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wrong, not all consoles r like that, this is why ps1 and ps2 were soo good, cuz they had future proof hardware. Xbox360 is not one of those systems, sorry to tell you that.
GermanShepard06
sorry to tell you, but you sound like an irrational kid. try to be a reasonable person here. You just say things without knowing what you are talking about. for your own sake, don't do that..... try to keep it real.
what is x360 going to do when ps3 games in 1-2 years from now are going to be taking up 10-15gigs just for physics and animation?
Look at Uncharted, the game is aiming to be 30gigs long.
The 360 does have the best GPU so it's future proof. :roll:
there is not one source that benchmarked both gpu's so ur claim is false. And plzz its all about total system performance and ps3 has twice or more the performance over x360
LMAO :lol: Every game dev has said the 360 has the better GPU.
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="osirisomeomi"]Isn't Oblivion better on the PS3?WalterPaladines
You cannot get shivering isles with the ps3. Bethesda also said they will release a download that gives you the same exact graphics.
so to answer your question, no.
Oblivion on the 360 already received that download through XBL and, the PS3 version is still superior, nice try fanboy!
How so? Sales don't show that...
Yeah just wait a little longer...:roll:.
The question is When?,WHEN?!!.No really When?,When are the devs going to do something that uses all the Ps3 powar?.
It seems all these days is multi-platform,port or TBA.
Another sad thing is that Devs rather develop for the Wii,Is cheaper and you see the money faster without putting a lot of effort on it.
The Ps3 has the capacity for a true Game masterpiece but Devs rather develop multi-platform crap,ports,rehashes or half baked games.
Hater3000
it will be during november since most of the really good games are comeing out late
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="PS3_3DO"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="danneswegman"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wrong, not all consoles r like that, this is why ps1 and ps2 were soo good, cuz they had future proof hardware. Xbox360 is not one of those systems, sorry to tell you that.
Heil68
sorry to tell you, but you sound like an irrational kid. try to be a reasonable person here. You just say things without knowing what you are talking about. for your own sake, don't do that..... try to keep it real.
what is x360 going to do when ps3 games in 1-2 years from now are going to be taking up 10-15gigs just for physics and animation?
Look at Uncharted, the game is aiming to be 30gigs long.
The 360 does have the best GPU so it's future proof. :roll:
there is not one source that benchmarked both gpu's so ur claim is false. And plzz its all about total system performance and ps3 has twice or more the performance over x360
Link to back that up?
PS3:
The floating point performance of the whole system (CPU + GPU) is reported to be 2 TFLOPS.[100] PlayStation 3's Cell CPU achieves 204 GFLOPS single precision float and 15 GFLOPS double precision. The PS3 has 256MB of RambusXDR DRAM, clocked at CPU die speed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ps3
Xbox360:
It has a theoretical peak performance of 115.2 GFLOPS and 1 TFLOPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox360
sorry pal, but the ps3 isthe superior console.
[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="PS3_3DO"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="danneswegman"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wrong, not all consoles r like that, this is why ps1 and ps2 were soo good, cuz they had future proof hardware. Xbox360 is not one of those systems, sorry to tell you that.
GermanShepard06
sorry to tell you, but you sound like an irrational kid. try to be a reasonable person here. You just say things without knowing what you are talking about. for your own sake, don't do that..... try to keep it real.
what is x360 going to do when ps3 games in 1-2 years from now are going to be taking up 10-15gigs just for physics and animation?
Look at Uncharted, the game is aiming to be 30gigs long.
The 360 does have the best GPU so it's future proof. :roll:
there is not one source that benchmarked both gpu's so ur claim is false. And plzz its all about total system performance and ps3 has twice or more the performance over x360
Link to back that up?
PS3:
The floating point performance of the whole system (CPU + GPU) is reported to be 2 TFLOPS.[100] PlayStation 3's Cell CPU achieves 204 GFLOPS single precision float and 15 GFLOPS double precision. The PS3 has 256MB of RambusXDR DRAM, clocked at CPU die speed.
Xbox360:
It has a theoretical peak performance of 115.2 GFLOPS and 1 TFLOPS.
sorry pal, but the ps3 isthe superior console.
Quite true. The PS3 does have more flops :P
If GeoW is the best the 360 can do, then I will be a happy gamer. There were enough special effects going on on screen to wow me, so any game that taps the same powerbut relies on its own **** is going to make me happy.
However, I don't believe all three cores on the 360 have been used to capacity, probably no where near. Also I don't think the eRAM or daughter die has been totally abused either. I don't think there is a lot more "untapped power" in the 360, but I think there is enough to wow us for a couple of years.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment