[QUOTE="SeanBond"][QUOTE="Firelore29"][QUOTE="pundog"]
That and its a financial analyst talking about something he knows nothing about. The article (that firelore29 posted BTW) mentions not only MS but 2 gaming analysts calling the Forbes guy short sighted, which is completely true.Firelore29
You don't get a job at Forbes because your short sighted. That guy knows more about the stock market then everyone on this channel combined.
I think what people here are failing to realize is that Microsoft has to support the 360's they already have out to customers. When you look at that chart on the first page you will note that the revenue increased from 2002 to 2003 but the actual net profit was just as bad. Do you actually think that they didn't reduce the cost of production during that year? That is because it costs alot of money to support and maintenance systems. Virtually the same thing will happen with the 360.
Except that the 360 is gaining momentum, and is on top of the charts this gen, something the original Xbox never was. And analysts are like weathermen; they make vague predictions which half the time aren't even close, and yet people still believe them as if they were God. I'm no analyst, but I'm not taking one random guy's opinion as fact, either.
Only because it had a year head start. I'm not asking you to accept my opionon. I'm simply pointing out the numbers. If you choose to ignore them then that's your puragitive.
No, you're spinning the numbers. I have no problem with your opinion, or with you stating it, but in the end, it, like that of the analyst, is just an opinion.
Log in to comment