@charizard1605: A forum dominated by blind Sony fanboys. Times are changing. Forum fights are a young man's game.
lol are u fucking kidding me look at your own avatar picture little boy lol
@charizard1605: A forum dominated by blind Sony fanboys. Times are changing. Forum fights are a young man's game.
lol are u fucking kidding me look at your own avatar picture little boy lol
Hey, rules are rules
Hahaha only blind fanboys will ignore a complete fu**ing genre in order to move their agenda even more when PC is freaking plague by strategy games and PC is where they were born some still are very popular.
A game is a game even freaking Candy Crush i one..lol
Wait...you thought I was serious?
@charizard1605: A forum dominated by blind Sony fanboys. Times are changing. Forum fights are a young man's game.
lol are u fucking kidding me look at your own avatar picture little boy lol
It's a gaming forum. What else would be my avatar?
And look at my sign up date, 2003. Been here for a long time.
Thank you a 9.
Tell that to the lemmings who bring Beyond two souls IGN 6 to counter gamespot 9 like i already told you,you don't see them because your agenda is against cows.
If anyone brings up IGN scores in a hype thread then they are wrong. Have I seen people do it before? Yes I have. Have I seen anyone do it more than you? No I have not. And I have made it clear that I don't have an agenda against Cows, I just have a problem with 99% of the things you say. This thread was pretty much made for you. And anyone with a reading comprehension level higher than yours, (about a 2nd grade level apparently) can look at the last couple of pages and see that you are a HUGE hypocrite.
I the last couple of pages you,
- Understand the rules of the hype game just fine
- Fight mods about the hype game when a Sony exclusive flops
- Bring up outside scores when an Xbox game doesn't flop here
- Call out Lems for doing the same thing
I know you are a grown man in your 40's, but I would swear I was talking to a child. The "I only do it because they are doing it too" is childish. Be better than them and System Wars will be a better place.
@tormentos: You didn't quote rules of anything.
You want to talk about meta scores, go on their forum. GS scores are all that matter here.
Always struck me as a cop out reason for SW. Not sure why only GS scores should count. They tend to be the most off.
@tormentos: You didn't quote rules of anything.
You want to talk about meta scores, go on their forum. GS scores are all that matter here.
Always struck me as a cop out reason for SW. Not sure why only GS scores should count. They tend to be the most off.
As I told Tormentos - There's a remedy: leave SW and go on MetaCritic's forums. No one is saying your can't discuss scored from other sites, but saying "MetaCritic/IGN/Wathatever is more important" is inane.
@tormentos: You didn't quote rules of anything.
You want to talk about meta scores, go on their forum. GS scores are all that matter here.
Always struck me as a cop out reason for SW. Not sure why only GS scores should count. They tend to be the most off.
Eh, I would said Polygon seems to be the most off.
People seem to be confused about what System Wars is. This isn't really a place for level headed video game discussion. This is a place where Video Game Nerds fight over whose box is the best. And for a forum as silly as System Wars, it needs to be cut and dry when it comes to review scores and "flopping." Using Gamespots score makes things more simple flop wise and creates more "butthurt" at the same time.
@tormentos: You didn't quote rules of anything.
You want to talk about meta scores, go on their forum. GS scores are all that matter here.
Always struck me as a cop out reason for SW. Not sure why only GS scores should count. They tend to be the most off.
As I told Tormentos - There's a remedy: leave SW and go on MetaCritic's forums. No one is saying your can't discuss scored from other sites, but saying "MetaCritic/IGN/Wathatever is more important" is inane.
I think it's a more than a little inane to only use one score. Whether you like it or not.
@tormentos: You didn't quote rules of anything.
You want to talk about meta scores, go on their forum. GS scores are all that matter here.
Always struck me as a cop out reason for SW. Not sure why only GS scores should count. They tend to be the most off.
As I told Tormentos - There's a remedy: leave SW and go on MetaCritic's forums. No one is saying your can't discuss scored from other sites, but saying "MetaCritic/IGN/Wathatever is more important" is inane.
I think it's a more than a little inane to only use one score. Whether you like it or not.
If you were on Richard Roeper's website, should anyone place the opinions of Gene Shalit over Roeper?
@tormentos: You didn't quote rules of anything.
You want to talk about meta scores, go on their forum. GS scores are all that matter here.
Always struck me as a cop out reason for SW. Not sure why only GS scores should count. They tend to be the most off.
As I told Tormentos - There's a remedy: leave SW and go on MetaCritic's forums. No one is saying your can't discuss scored from other sites, but saying "MetaCritic/IGN/Wathatever is more important" is inane.
No you idiot i quoted the rules you either accept it or live on denial gamespot score only count when it comes to the Meta flop game other than that you can discuss any score and even this own site promotes meta idiot and are part of meta to.
But but but Meta is not valid,but but but gamespot promotes it ..hahahahahaa.
You like going only by gamespot because it tend to over score xbox crap,like they did here ^^ and like they did even Halo ODST which they also rate 9..lol
Face it this site endorse meta is part of it,now cry more lemming..lol
If anyone brings up IGN scores in a hype thread then they are wrong. Have I seen people do it before? Yes I have. Have I seen anyone do it more than you? No I have not. And I have made it clear that I don't have an agenda against Cows, I just have a problem with 99% of the things you say. This thread was pretty much made for you. And anyone with a reading comprehension level higher than yours, (about a 2nd grade level apparently) can look at the last couple of pages and see that you are a HUGE hypocrite.
I the last couple of pages you,
- Understand the rules of the hype game just fine
- Fight mods about the hype game when a Sony exclusive flops
- Bring up outside scores when an Xbox game doesn't flop here
- Call out Lems for doing the same thing
I know you are a grown man in your 40's, but I would swear I was talking to a child. The "I only do it because they are doing it too" is childish. Be better than them and System Wars will be a better place.
The only problem you have is that you side with lemmings and attack cow much instead of seeing that every one does the same.
I already prove that to you.
No you don't and mostly when you attack a faction is cows which you admit to hate more.. :)
If you were on Richard Roeper's website, should anyone place the opinions of Gene Shalit over Roeper?
Yes they should if Richard Roaper's have a part where it say Gene Shalit opinion is allowed and actually show Gene Shalit opinion right beside it ass like gamespot does with Metacritics.
@tormentos: You didn't quote rules of anything.
You want to talk about meta scores, go on their forum. GS scores are all that matter here.
Always struck me as a cop out reason for SW. Not sure why only GS scores should count. They tend to be the most off.
As I told Tormentos - There's a remedy: leave SW and go on MetaCritic's forums. No one is saying your can't discuss scored from other sites, but saying "MetaCritic/IGN/Wathatever is more important" is inane.
No you idiot i quoted the rules you either accept it or live on denial gamespot score only count when it comes to the Meta flop game other than that you can discuss any score and even this own site promotes meta idiot and are part of meta to.
But but but Meta is not valid,but but but gamespot promotes it ..hahahahahaa.
You like going only by gamespot because it tend to over score xbox crap,like they did here ^^ and like they did even Halo ODST which they also rate 9..lol
Face it this site endorse meta is part of it,now cry more lemming..lol
If anyone brings up IGN scores in a hype thread then they are wrong. Have I seen people do it before? Yes I have. Have I seen anyone do it more than you? No I have not. And I have made it clear that I don't have an agenda against Cows, I just have a problem with 99% of the things you say. This thread was pretty much made for you. And anyone with a reading comprehension level higher than yours, (about a 2nd grade level apparently) can look at the last couple of pages and see that you are a HUGE hypocrite.
I the last couple of pages you,
- Understand the rules of the hype game just fine
- Fight mods about the hype game when a Sony exclusive flops
- Bring up outside scores when an Xbox game doesn't flop here
- Call out Lems for doing the same thing
I know you are a grown man in your 40's, but I would swear I was talking to a child. The "I only do it because they are doing it too" is childish. Be better than them and System Wars will be a better place.
The only problem you have is that you side with lemmings and attack cow much instead of seeing that every one does the same.
I already prove that to you.
No you don't and mostly when you attack a faction is cows which you admit to hate more.. :)
I don't give a crap what is on metacritic, nor will I ever call a game a flop or not based on Metacritic.
This "metacritic" thing is a recent phenomenon, cultivated by cows after several PS3 games flopped in a row. "Bu... bu... bu... the scores were better on Metacritic!!!"
I think it's a more than a little inane to only use one score. Whether you like it or not.
If you were on Richard Roeper's website, should anyone place the opinions of Gene Shalit over Roeper?
Why not if they find they agree more with him? Really taking anyone's opinion as gospel is ridiculous. Only thing reviews are good for is finding out technical limitations. Nothing more. Arguing over scores is stupid. But if you are willing to do that.....more than one source SHOULD be consulted. Otherwise you're arguing over one individuals opinion. Like I said....stupid.
I've always called bullshit on these types of deals that lock players out. And I always get annoyed with it.
So, please.
I think timed exclusivity is a great idea on Square Enix's part. It means console manufacturer's have to front up with the marketing costs. Quite smart to be honest.
I don't get what the problem is for Tomb Raider or FF7
Look guys, this isn't meant for you. If you are consistent in your like or dislike of this kind of a thing, great! Seriously, it' not directed at you. It's directed at those who have selective interpretation of this kind of a thing. They know who they are, and there are loads of them on here, and on NeoGAF, and on Reddit, and so on. It's meant for them, and on a larger level, it's meant to draw attention to this problem.
So, then, are you specifically targeting cows who wanted to play Tomb Raider?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment