You Can Tell The PS3 Is the Lead Platform For DMC4..

  • 51 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts
...some of those textures are AWFUL!
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#2 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts

most ps3 versions of the same game have less texturing....

if the 360 version is the same you may be right...

Avatar image for Dahaka-UK
Dahaka-UK

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Dahaka-UK
Member since 2005 • 6915 Posts
Eh? It's coming out for the PC,& 360 to... an looks exactly the same for all versions.
Avatar image for Dahaka-UK
Dahaka-UK

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Dahaka-UK
Member since 2005 • 6915 Posts

most ps3 versions of the same game have less texturing....

if the 360 version is the same you may be right...

daveg1

Only games made by Ubisoft have the less texturing.

Avatar image for Blinblingthing
Blinblingthing

6943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Blinblingthing
Member since 2005 • 6943 Posts

Eh? It's coming out for the PC,& 360 to... an looks exactly the same for all versions.Dahaka-UK

1up says the X360 version has screen tearing

Avatar image for TMontana1004
TMontana1004

4537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#6 TMontana1004
Member since 2007 • 4537 Posts
Ugh...graphics fanboys...
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#7 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
[QUOTE="daveg1"]

most ps3 versions of the same game have less texturing....

if the 360 version is the same you may be right...

Dahaka-UK

Only games made by Ubisoft have the less texturing.

keep telling your self that...
Avatar image for Blinblingthing
Blinblingthing

6943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Blinblingthing
Member since 2005 • 6943 Posts
[QUOTE="Dahaka-UK"][QUOTE="daveg1"]

most ps3 versions of the same game have less texturing....

if the 360 version is the same you may be right...

daveg1

Only games made by Ubisoft have the less texturing.

keep telling your self that...

There EA to

Avatar image for moshakirby
moshakirby

1502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 moshakirby
Member since 2006 • 1502 Posts
I don't think EA gives us less texturing, just halves the framerate so we can handle the textures :)
Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts

Ugh...graphics fanboys...TMontana1004

yeahNO.

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ?

Avatar image for teufelherz
teufelherz

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 teufelherz
Member since 2004 • 1315 Posts

[QUOTE="TMontana1004"]Ugh...graphics fanboys...BambooBanger

yeahNO.

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ?

LOL :lol: exactly

Avatar image for _AsasN_
_AsasN_

3646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 _AsasN_
Member since 2003 • 3646 Posts

[QUOTE="TMontana1004"]Ugh...graphics fanboys...BambooBanger

yeahNO.

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ?



In multi-plat comparisons, the PS3 has equal textures to the 360. The main differences end up being a bit of AA, and lighting. If you wanna talk exclusives, I would say the PS3 is more powerful. I've yet to see anything on the 360 that looks like Uncharted, and it's been out for a year longer than PS3.

We all know that when equal attention is paid to each version of a multi-plat game, the outcome is the same. CoD 4 is one of the more impressive looking games, and runs at a steady 60FPS. If the 360 can handle better textures than the PS3, why isn't that the case here?

I always get my multi-plat games for the PS3, and it's due to the fact that it's a much more stable, and well built machine. The differences between the multi-plats have never been anywhere close to being enough for me to consider getting the 360 version over the PS3 version.

They're both powerful consoles, and there's no doubt about that, but I own both, and so far, the PS3 has the most impressive looking game. That definitely says something. I also haven't seen any upcoming 360 games that look as impressive as Killzone 2.

Oh yeah, that "waiting" comment is so old, and doesn't have any merit. Sony fans obviously aren't waiting for good games. We have lots right now, and many more to come. Looking at the lineup for both systems in 2008, I'm personally looking forward to the PS3's a lot more.
Avatar image for ProductNumber49
ProductNumber49

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 ProductNumber49
Member since 2006 • 3840 Posts

I dont think lemmings would go on riot if DMC4 would be superior on the ps3...

After all,it was a ps3 exclusive :)

I think DMC4 on 360 looks a bit better,just like IGN said

Avatar image for Cubs360
Cubs360

3771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Cubs360
Member since 2006 • 3771 Posts

Eh? It's coming out for the PC,& 360 to... an looks exactly the same for all versions.Dahaka-UK

Not according to the 1up show. They say the Ps3 version is sharper then the 360 version, which is expected because its been in dev longer for the ps3. We will see when they ship.

Avatar image for Cubs360
Cubs360

3771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Cubs360
Member since 2006 • 3771 Posts

I dont think lemmings would go on riot if DMC4 would be superior on the ps3...

After all,it was a ps3 exclusive :)

I think DMC4 on 360 looks a bit better,just like IGN said

ProductNumber49

Really, can you give me a link, I would like to read that. The 1up guys think the opposite, but I have never seen the 360 version so I cannot say who is right.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
[QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="TMontana1004"]Ugh...graphics fanboys..._AsasN_

yeahNO.

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ?



In multi-plat comparisons, the PS3 has equal textures to the 360.

not at all. you clearly don't have both systems.

Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts



In multi-plat comparisons, the PS3 has equal textures to the 360. The main differences end up being a bit of AA, and lighting. If you wanna talk exclusives, I would say the PS3 is more powerful. I've yet to see anything on the 360 that looks like Uncharted, and it's been out for a year longer than PS3.

_AsasN_

PS3 was supposed to come out in February 2006, the PS3's hardware was finalised alot earlier than it's launch.



We all know that when equal attention is paid to each version of a multi-plat game, the outcome is the same. CoD 4 is one of the more impressive looking games, and runs at a steady 60FPS. If the 360 can handle better textures than the PS3, why isn't that the case here?

_AsasN_

From the plethora of comparisons that I have seen, the PS3 versions textures are more washed out and blurry. Not that it matters right ? Well it does when you run around carrying on about SUPERCOMPUTERS and CURING CANCER :roll:




Oh yeah, that "waiting" comment is so old, and doesn't have any merit. Sony fans obviously aren't waiting for good games. We have lots right now, and many more to come. Looking at the lineup for both systems in 2008, I'm personally looking forward to the PS3's a lot more._AsasN_

The waiting only gets old for those doing the waiting. For the observers, it's rather amusing.

Avatar image for Cubs360
Cubs360

3771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Cubs360
Member since 2006 • 3771 Posts
[QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="TMontana1004"]Ugh...graphics fanboys..._AsasN_

yeahNO.

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ?



In multi-plat comparisons, the PS3 has equal textures to the 360. The main differences end up being a bit of AA, and lighting. If you wanna talk exclusives, I would say the PS3 is more powerful. I've yet to see anything on the 360 that looks like Uncharted, and it's been out for a year longer than PS3.

We all know that when equal attention is paid to each version of a multi-plat game, the outcome is the same. CoD 4 is one of the more impressive looking games, and runs at a steady 60FPS. If the 360 can handle better textures than the PS3, why isn't that the case here?

I always get my multi-plat games for the PS3, and it's due to the fact that it's a much more stable, and well built machine. The differences between the multi-plats have never been anywhere close to being enough for me to consider getting the 360 version over the PS3 version.

They're both powerful consoles, and there's no doubt about that, but I own both, and so far, the PS3 has the most impressive looking game. That definitely says something. I also haven't seen any upcoming 360 games that look as impressive as Killzone 2.

Oh yeah, that "waiting" comment is so old, and doesn't have any merit. Sony fans obviously aren't waiting for good games. We have lots right now, and many more to come. Looking at the lineup for both systems in 2008, I'm personally looking forward to the PS3's a lot more.

ps3 may have some "good" games, but it has very few "Great" games which is the difference between the two, excluding online and achievements. Plus, your basically saying a machine that costs more money is on the same level as a machine that costs less. Which is why Sony is failing in certain territories.

Avatar image for linkin_guy109
linkin_guy109

8864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 linkin_guy109
Member since 2005 • 8864 Posts
wow...such blatant fanboyism, the ps3 is equal to the 360 fanboys, get over it
Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts

achievementsCubs360

According to Cows achievements didn't matter and were a complete waste of time... until PS3 "Trophies" arrived :roll:

Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts

wow...such blatant fanboyism, the ps3 is equal to the 360 fanboys, get over itlinkin_guy109

That just doesn't cut it when it's supposedly a 'Supercomputer' and upteen times more powerful than the 360...

Avatar image for numba1234
numba1234

3561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#22 numba1234
Member since 2007 • 3561 Posts

What beloved textures are xbox 360 fanboys seeing that is better then r&c tod, and uncharted drakes fortune?

Avatar image for Krisgebis
Krisgebis

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Krisgebis
Member since 2004 • 277 Posts
[QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="TMontana1004"]Ugh...graphics fanboys..._AsasN_

yeahNO.

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ?



In multi-plat comparisons, the PS3 has equal textures to the 360. The main differences end up being a bit of AA, and lighting. If you wanna talk exclusives, I would say the PS3 is more powerful. I've yet to see anything on the 360 that looks like Uncharted, and it's been out for a year longer than PS3. GeoW, Bioshock and ME ring a bell?

We all know that when equal attention is paid to each version of a multi-plat game, the outcome is the same. CoD 4 is one of the more impressive looking games, and runs at a steady 60FPS. If the 360 can handle better textures than the PS3, why isn't that the case here? CoD4 didn't get equal amounts of attention for both platforms. They themselves stated that they put their must talented developers on the PS3 version. So more work on the PS3 gets you about equal to the xbox, congrats! Why should it also look better on CoD4? Almost every other game does, but if they really wanted to force their equal look they could do so.

I always get my multi-plat games for the PS3, and it's due to the fact that it's a much more stable, and well built machine. The differences between the multi-plats have never been anywhere close to being enough for me to consider getting the 360 version over the PS3 version. Why would reliability have anything to do with the choise of your multiplats. If they gamesystem couldn't be turned on like half the time I could understand you, but this isn't the case. If you don't prefer the best controller, best online options, achievements, better multiplats (both grahical and preformance vise) or any combination of them, you come of as a fanboy.

They're both powerful consoles, and there's no doubt about that, but I own both, and so far, the PS3 has the most impressive looking game. That definitely says something. I also haven't seen any upcoming 360 games that look as impressive as Killzone 2.

Oh yeah, that "waiting" comment is so old
, and doesn't have any merit. Sony fans obviously aren't waiting for good games. We have lots right now, and many more to come. Looking at the lineup for both systems in 2008, I'm personally looking forward :D to the PS3's a lot more.

Avatar image for Cubs360
Cubs360

3771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Cubs360
Member since 2006 • 3771 Posts

wow...such blatant fanboyism, the ps3 is equal to the 360 fanboys, get over itlinkin_guy109

It terms of Technical Prowess, Its damn close, but it costs more money.

Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts
its EA right? what do you expect
Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts

its EA right? what do you expectmistervengeance

EA probably don't want to spend 4 times longer on the PS3 version than the 360 version and recieve only 1/10 of the profits.

Avatar image for _AsasN_
_AsasN_

3646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 _AsasN_
Member since 2003 • 3646 Posts
[QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="TMontana1004"]Ugh...graphics fanboys...Always-Honest

yeahNO.

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ?



In multi-plat comparisons, the PS3 has equal textures to the 360.

not at all. you clearly don't have both systems.



Yeah, I do actually. Gears of War is still one of the most impressive 360 games (I own it). Why don't you take a closer look at it's textures.

[QUOTE="_AsasN_"]

In multi-plat comparisons, the PS3 has equal textures to the 360. The main differences end up being a bit of AA, and lighting. If you wanna talk exclusives, I would say the PS3 is more powerful. I've yet to see anything on the 360 that looks like Uncharted, and it's been out for a year longer than PS3.

BambooBanger

PS3 was supposed to come out in February 2006, the PS3's hardware was finalised alot earlier than it's launch.



We all know that when equal attention is paid to each version of a multi-plat game, the outcome is the same. CoD 4 is one of the more impressive looking games, and runs at a steady 60FPS. If the 360 can handle better textures than the PS3, why isn't that the case here?

_AsasN_

From the plethora of comparisons that I have seen, the PS3 versions textures are more washed out and blurry. Not that it matters right ? Well it does when you run around carrying on about SUPERCOMPUTERS and CURING CANCER :roll:




Oh yeah, that "waiting" comment is so old, and doesn't have any merit. Sony fans obviously aren't waiting for good games. We have lots right now, and many more to come. Looking at the lineup for both systems in 2008, I'm personally looking forward to the PS3's a lot more._AsasN_

The waiting only gets old for those doing the waiting. For the observers, it's rather amusing.



So, you just assume what I think, and that's your argument?

You're right, some PS3 games look washed out compared to the 360, but that doesn't apply to the textures only. It's the entire screen overall. The 360 versions usually look darker.
[QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="TMontana1004"]Ugh...graphics fanboys...Cubs360

yeahNO.

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ?



In multi-plat comparisons, the PS3 has equal textures to the 360. The main differences end up being a bit of AA, and lighting. If you wanna talk exclusives, I would say the PS3 is more powerful. I've yet to see anything on the 360 that looks like Uncharted, and it's been out for a year longer than PS3.

We all know that when equal attention is paid to each version of a multi-plat game, the outcome is the same. CoD 4 is one of the more impressive looking games, and runs at a steady 60FPS. If the 360 can handle better textures than the PS3, why isn't that the case here?

I always get my multi-plat games for the PS3, and it's due to the fact that it's a much more stable, and well built machine. The differences between the multi-plats have never been anywhere close to being enough for me to consider getting the 360 version over the PS3 version.

They're both powerful consoles, and there's no doubt about that, but I own both, and so far, the PS3 has the most impressive looking game. That definitely says something. I also haven't seen any upcoming 360 games that look as impressive as Killzone 2.

Oh yeah, that "waiting" comment is so old, and doesn't have any merit. Sony fans obviously aren't waiting for good games. We have lots right now, and many more to come. Looking at the lineup for both systems in 2008, I'm personally looking forward to the PS3's a lot more.

ps3 may have some "good" games, but it has very few "Great" games which is the difference between the two, excluding online and achievements. Plus, your basically saying a machine that costs more money is on the same level as a machine that costs less. Which is why Sony is failing in certain territories.



That's completely left up to opinion. You may see good games, but I personallysee a good chunk of great games. Many others do as well.

So, you think that PS3 being more expensive should automatically make it more powerful? Try thinking about what's included in the PS3 out of the box.
Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts



Yeah, I do actually. Gears of War is still one of the most impressive 360 games (I own it). Why don't you take a closer look at it's textures._AsasN_

yes, but PS3 does not have the same quality textures in multiplats. you are dead wrong about that. It's catching up but even now most 360 versions have better textures.

Avatar image for _AsasN_
_AsasN_

3646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 _AsasN_
Member since 2003 • 3646 Posts
[QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="TMontana1004"]Ugh...graphics fanboys...Krisgebis

yeahNO.

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ?



In multi-plat comparisons, the PS3 has equal textures to the 360. The main differences end up being a bit of AA, and lighting. If you wanna talk exclusives, I would say the PS3 is more powerful. I've yet to see anything on the 360 that looks like Uncharted, and it's been out for a year longer than PS3. GeoW, Bioshock and ME ring a bell?

Why would I talk about those games? They don't look as good as Uncharted.


We all know that when equal attention is paid to each version of a multi-plat game, the outcome is the same. CoD 4 is one of the more impressive looking games, and runs at a steady 60FPS. If the 360 can handle better textures than the PS3, why isn't that the case here? CoD4 didn't get equal amounts of attention for both platforms. They themselves stated that they put their must talented developers on the PS3 version. So more work on the PS3 gets you about equal to the xbox, congrats! Why should it also look better on CoD4? Almost every other game does, but if they really wanted to force their equal look they could do so.
We all know the PS3 is more difficult to develop for, and is a much different architecture than the 360, so putting a more talented team doesn't necessarily mean they're giving it special attention. They're just ensuring both versions are EQUAL.


I always get my multi-plat games for the PS3, and it's due to the fact that it's a much more stable, and well built machine. The differences between the multi-plats have never been anywhere close to being enough for me to consider getting the 360 version over the PS3 version. Why would reliability have anything to do with the choise of your multiplats. If they gamesystem couldn't be turned on like half the time I could understand you, but this isn't the case. If you don't prefer the best controller, best online options, achievements, better multiplats (both grahical and preformance vise) or any combination of them, you come of as a fanboy.
That's hillarious. You just said the 360 has the best controller, online options, and seem to think that achievements are a big deal. That makes you come off like a fanboy. You don't seem to be familiar with opinion if you really think that.


They're both powerful consoles, and there's no doubt about that, but I own both, and so far, the PS3 has the most impressive looking game. That definitely says something. I also haven't seen any upcoming 360 games that look as impressive as Killzone 2.

Oh yeah, that "waiting" comment is so old
, and doesn't have any merit. Sony fans obviously aren't waiting for good games. We have lots right now, and many more to come. Looking at the lineup for both systems in 2008, I'm personally looking forward :D to the PS3's a lot more.



Why highlight "looking forward" Did you happen to notice where I talked about the PS3 having great games right now, and also in the future?
Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
To all lemmings still claiming GEOW looks better than Uncharted: you're entitled to your own opinion and all, but nigh EVERYONE owning both games is stating Uncharted looks better. And we all know the devs said it only used around 30% of the PS3's capabilities. 1+1=2; the PS3 will surpass the 360 graphically in due time.
Avatar image for niall077
niall077

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 niall077
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts
at burnout paradice...... even EA can make ps3 game look amazing when its the lead platform
Avatar image for _AsasN_
_AsasN_

3646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 _AsasN_
Member since 2003 • 3646 Posts
[QUOTE="_AsasN_"]



Yeah, I do actually. Gears of War is still one of the most impressive 360 games (I own it). Why don't you take a closer look at it's textures.Always-Honest

yes, but PS3 does not have the same quality textures in multiplats. you are dead wrong about that. It's catching up but even now most 360 versions have better textures.



What are some examples?
Avatar image for deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
deactivated-57af49c27f4e8

14149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#33 deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
Member since 2005 • 14149 Posts
Eh? It's coming out for the PC,& 360 to... an looks exactly the same for all versions.Dahaka-UK
that's his point, they have ps3 textures because they're developing it on ps3.
Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts

To all lemmings still claiming GEOW looks better than Uncharted: you're entitled to your own opinion and all, but nigh EVERYONE owning both games is stating Uncharted looks better.NielsNL

Gears of War - Nov 2006

Uncharted - Nov 2007

And we all know the devs said it only used around 30% of the PS3's capabilities. 1+1=2; the PS3 will surpass the 360 graphically in due time. NielsNL

Another Sony PR mouthpiece in the making!

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
[QUOTE="Always-Honest"][QUOTE="_AsasN_"]



Yeah, I do actually. Gears of War is still one of the most impressive 360 games (I own it). Why don't you take a closer look at it's textures._AsasN_

yes, but PS3 does not have the same quality textures in multiplats. you are dead wrong about that. It's catching up but even now most 360 versions have better textures.



What are some examples?

haven't you checked all the comparissons??... it's no secret the PS3 has problems with textures. search yourself.

And if you truelly have both systems, compare... it's easy to see.

Avatar image for Krisgebis
Krisgebis

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Krisgebis
Member since 2004 • 277 Posts
[QUOTE="Always-Honest"][QUOTE="_AsasN_"]



Yeah, I do actually. Gears of War is still one of the most impressive 360 games (I own it). Why don't you take a closer look at it's textures._AsasN_

yes, but PS3 does not have the same quality textures in multiplats. you are dead wrong about that. It's catching up but even now most 360 versions have better textures.



What are some examples?

Assassins creed and CoD4?

Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts
[QUOTE="Always-Honest"][QUOTE="_AsasN_"]



Yeah, I do actually. Gears of War is still one of the most impressive 360 games (I own it). Why don't you take a closer look at it's textures._AsasN_

yes, but PS3 does not have the same quality textures in multiplats. you are dead wrong about that. It's catching up but even now most 360 versions have better textures.



What are some examples?

Eurogamer recently did a feature on this, complete with pictures. Look it up (I don't have the link).

Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]To all lemmings still claiming GEOW looks better than Uncharted: you're entitled to your own opinion and all, but nigh EVERYONE owning both games is stating Uncharted looks better.BambooBanger

Gears of War - Nov 2006

Uncharted - Nov 2007

And we all know the devs said it only used around 30% of the PS3's capabilities. 1+1=2; the PS3 will surpass the 360 graphically in due time. NielsNL

Another Sony PR mouthpiece in the making!

1 - So? My point is that still lemmings claim GEOW looks better, which it doesn't. When the games came out has nothing to do with my point.

2- Yeah yeah whatever. Whenever something positive is said about the PS3 it's Sony PR and when something positive is said about the 360 it's true; this is fanboy logic. You want spin? How about people accepting a 33% fail rate bacasue of 'teh 3 year warranty'. That's your spin.

Avatar image for Sir-Marwin105
Sir-Marwin105

3785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 Sir-Marwin105
Member since 2007 • 3785 Posts
at burnout paradice...... even EA can make ps3 game look amazing when its the lead platformniall077
The developer is Criterion, not EA.
Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts
[QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]To all lemmings still claiming GEOW looks better than Uncharted: you're entitled to your own opinion and all, but nigh EVERYONE owning both games is stating Uncharted looks better.NielsNL

Gears of War - Nov 2006

Uncharted - Nov 2007

And we all know the devs said it only used around 30% of the PS3's capabilities. 1+1=2; the PS3 will surpass the 360 graphically in due time. NielsNL

Another Sony PR mouthpiece in the making!

1 - So? My point is that still lemmings claim GEOW looks better, which it doesn't. When the games came out has nothing to do with my point.

2- Yeah yeah whatever. Whenever something positive is said about the PS3 it's Sony PR and when something positive is said about the 360 it's true; this is fanboy logic. You want spin? How about people accepting a 33% fail rate bacasue of 'teh 3 year warranty'. That's your spin.

1 -The fact that Uncharted is still JUST comparable to Gears of War, a year later, is testament to the PS3 underperforming and broken promises.

2 - Nothing has ever happened to my 360 "bu but teh RROD!!!! :("

Avatar image for Fumpa
Fumpa

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Fumpa
Member since 2003 • 3307 Posts



Oh yeah, that "waiting" comment is so old, and doesn't have any merit. Sony fans obviously aren't waiting for good games. We have lots right now, and many more to come. Looking at the lineup for both systems in 2008, I'm personally looking forward to the PS3's a lot more._AsasN_

The "waiting" comment may be old but it is still being used. It isn't as if people are attacking a statement that was made a year ago, they're attacking a comment that is still being used as a defense in the forums. We're all still waiting, just like you.

Avatar image for Krisgebis
Krisgebis

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Krisgebis
Member since 2004 • 277 Posts
[QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]To all lemmings still claiming GEOW looks better than Uncharted: you're entitled to your own opinion and all, but nigh EVERYONE owning both games is stating Uncharted looks better.NielsNL

Gears of War - Nov 2006

Uncharted - Nov 2007

And we all know the devs said it only used around 30% of the PS3's capabilities. 1+1=2; the PS3 will surpass the 360 graphically in due time. NielsNL

Another Sony PR mouthpiece in the making!

1 - So? My point is that still lemmings claim GEOW looks better, which it doesn't. When the games came out has nothing to do with my point.

2- Yeah yeah whatever. Whenever something positive is said about the PS3 it's Sony PR and when something positive is said about the 360 it's true; this is fanboy logic. You want spin? How about people accepting a 33% fail rate bacasue of 'teh 3 year warranty'. That's your spin. You are right, people shouldn't believe MS PR spout either. But nobody who takes themselves serious don't buy into the "this games uses x amount of the consoles total power" it's just BS. So please stop trying to claim ownage with it.

Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts

1 -The fact that Uncharted is still JUST comparable to Gears of War, a year later, is testament to the PS3 underperforming and broken promises.

2 - Nothing has ever happened to my 360 "bu but teh RROD!!!! :("

BambooBanger

It isn't just comparable, it's better. And it took the PS3shorter to get at that level of graphical detail than it did the 360, even though it's mor difficult to program for.

The fact that yours didn't break doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist now does it? It also doesn't change the fact that it's strange that people just accept an unacceptable fail rate becasue of warranty. News flash: warranty is normal! It being needed so often is what's the bad thing.

I'm glad to seemore and morepeople starting to agree and trading their 360's for PS3's (or do you really believe all of these topics are fake? Get over it!).

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10966 Posts

[QUOTE="Cubs360"] achievementsBambooBanger

According to Cows achievements didn't matter and were a complete waste of time... until PS3 "Trophies" arrived :roll:

and according to lems, more HDD space and HDMI wasn't important until the Elite was announced. Did you see what i did there?
Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
[QUOTE="NielsNL"][QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]To all lemmings still claiming GEOW looks better than Uncharted: you're entitled to your own opinion and all, but nigh EVERYONE owning both games is stating Uncharted looks better.Krisgebis

Gears of War - Nov 2006

Uncharted - Nov 2007

And we all know the devs said it only used around 30% of the PS3's capabilities. 1+1=2; the PS3 will surpass the 360 graphically in due time. NielsNL

Another Sony PR mouthpiece in the making!

1 - So? My point is that still lemmings claim GEOW looks better, which it doesn't. When the games came out has nothing to do with my point.

2- Yeah yeah whatever. Whenever something positive is said about the PS3 it's Sony PR and when something positive is said about the 360 it's true; this is fanboy logic. You want spin? How about people accepting a 33% fail rate bacasue of 'teh 3 year warranty'. That's your spin. You are right, people shouldn't believe MS PR spout either. But nobody who takes themselves serious don't buy into the "this games uses x amount of the consoles total power" it's just BS. So please stop trying to claim ownage with it.

Okay I'll give you that one. But seeing as the PS3 is very difficult to program for and all prior Sony consoles steadily grew in performance over the years,I'd say it's pretty safe to assume that when we're slightly over a year in the PS3 lifecycle there's much room for improvement left. The 360 however with it's easy to program for pc-like architecture will converge to it's performance ceiling much faster. You have to admit that sounds pretty reasonable..

Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts

Cow's always carrying on about the 'power' of the PS3. What power ? The power of blurry textures and waiting ? BambooBanger

I think you're the only one who's actually brought it up for a while.

That's hyperbole for you.

Avatar image for ffx2warrior
ffx2warrior

332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 ffx2warrior
Member since 2003 • 332 Posts

...some of those textures are AWFUL!BambooBanger

Uncharted

/thread

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

[QUOTE="BambooBanger"]...some of those textures are AWFUL!ffx2warrior

Uncharted

/thread

yep, in uncharted the textures are pretty good.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
[QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"][QUOTE="_AsasN_"]



Yeah, I do actually. Gears of War is still one of the most impressive 360 games (I own it). Why don't you take a closer look at it's textures.Krisgebis

yes, but PS3 does not have the same quality textures in multiplats. you are dead wrong about that. It's catching up but even now most 360 versions have better textures.



What are some examples?

Assassins creed and CoD4?

although those multi plats are almost exactly the same, the textures on the 360 version are slightly better/sharper, yes.

Avatar image for pilotc
pilotc

3986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 pilotc
Member since 2004 • 3986 Posts

Well I would believe the dev over you. The dev said there is no difference. The article is featured at IGN.com right now.