Your opinion on Super Mario Galaxy 2

  • 137 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Captainqwark10
Captainqwark10

1170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Captainqwark10
Member since 2011 • 1170 Posts
Now, I want serious answers here. Do YOU think, and I mean REALLY think, while looking at other games on the syste, heck not just on that system, do you REALLY THINK SMG2 deserves all of the critical praise it got> Think about this now. Because when I saw the game get high scores of 10/10 and all this praise about being one of the best ever made I seriously had my Wii out the window about to throw it as I thought the world had freaking gone crazy. I personally do not believe how this game got this much praise when it came out. Eventually becoming more popular and getting these hard to believe reviews. To me, the game was a step back and I cannot find one reason, not even an explanation from somebody that likes the game, that is enough of a reason to prove to me why this game got all it's godly reputation from. I think it has to do with the fact that most Wii games are indeed lacking. They are poor, and every game no matter who releases it, that is better than the large pile of lacking games, will instantly be overrated. I am even talking about the first SMG, which I still think is better than the 2 even though I also think that was overrated. But that's just an opinion. What's yours?
Avatar image for super600
super600

33158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33158 Posts

Now, I want serious answers here. Do YOU think, and I mean REALLY think, while looking at other games on the syste, heck not just on that system, do you REALLY THINK SMG2 deserves all of the critical praise it got> Think about this now. Because when I saw the game get high scores of 10/10 and all this praise about being one of the best ever made I seriously had my Wii out the window about to throw it as I thought the world had freaking gone crazy. I personally do not believe how this game got this much praise when it came out. Eventually becoming more popular and getting these hard to believe reviews. To me, the game was a step back and I cannot find one reason, not even an explanation from somebody that likes the game, that is enough of a reason to prove to me why this game got all it's godly reputation from. I think it has to do with the fact that most Wii games are indeed lacking. They are poor, and every game no matter who releases it, that is better than the large pile of lacking games, will instantly be overrated. I am even talking about the first SMG, which I still think is better than the 2 even though I also think that was overrated. But that's just an opinion. What's yours?Captainqwark10

Literally everything about the game was amazing.The graphics and art style were incredible, the gameplay was creative and fun in literally all the main 122 starmissions(even though the green stars were the weakest part of the game),the final mission was a brutal test in SMG2 gameplay,thesoundtrackis incredible and can't be matchedby any Wii game

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Awesome game, and undeniably a 9.0 or higher, but giving it a 10 is quite a stretch (I try and reserve 10 for special occasions). I go back and forth between 9 and 9.5 for the game. My issues are the lack of a good hub world, lack of difficulty in most areas (some are brutal), and a couple other things. SM64 is still my favorite by far.

Avatar image for GojiMaster
GojiMaster

451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 GojiMaster
Member since 2009 • 451 Posts

SMG2 was one of those most brilliant platformers I've ever played. The level design, sound, and attention to detail was incredible. This game was the real deal. A 10? I don't know, but I would say it is worth at least a 9.5

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#5 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

I actually bought the game really cheap a couple of months but barely played it,it looks ok (great if you´re into platformers) but not really my thing.

Avatar image for martinX3X
martinX3X

4488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 martinX3X
Member since 2009 • 4488 Posts

Yes I think it deserved the praise. The whole game was designed very well and is a blast to play. It's even a lot of fun to play after you beat the game. The graphics are great and look better technically and artistically than alot of ps3 games. The platforming is well designed and is never repetitive. The orchestra music sounds great and matches the game well.

The game is just pure fun.

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#7 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

I thought the level of creativity and variety was astounding. It was really really really fun all throughout. Unlike most games, I cannot think of one part that annoyed me, or seemed imperfect in any way. It wasn't that innovative, but the sheer lack of platformers, or just any games as polished or imaginative as SMG2, makes that no big deal in the slightest.

Avatar image for JMR09
JMR09

504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 JMR09
Member since 2007 • 504 Posts
SMG 2 is awesome. More of the same, but the amount of refinement and variety present in the game is insane.
Avatar image for felipebo
felipebo

4170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 felipebo
Member since 2009 • 4170 Posts

It is the best game on the Wii. Period.

Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#10 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

Wasn't perfect, but pretty damn close to it.

Terrific game.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

Wasn't perfect, but pretty damn close to it.

Terrific game.

DJ-Lafleur
this, one of the best games this gen period.
Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21753 Posts

Best game this gen, and the best 3D platformer ever made.

Avatar image for forgot_it
forgot_it

6756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 forgot_it
Member since 2004 • 6756 Posts

Probably one of the best games I've played in a long time...though I would agree that a 10 would be somewhat of a stretch. My biggest issue was that even though it had more power ups, more stars...just more of everything except for the surprisingly touching story...the thing that annoyed me was that even though it is clearly a better game, the first Mario Galaxy already took my breath away so Galaxy 2 didn't give me as big a punch as it should have.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

I love the game, but does noone else find that it is way too easy in parts, especially the cloud suit? I think the cloud suit was an awesome idea, but it was never used to its potential and instead made things very easy. I also just dont like the Galaxy theme as much as 64's theme.

Avatar image for Solid_Link22
Solid_Link22

5698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Solid_Link22
Member since 2006 • 5698 Posts

Amazing game :D

Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

Best Nintendo game I've played this gen. It was god damn superb. Worth owning a Wii for.

Avatar image for sandbox3d
sandbox3d

5166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 sandbox3d
Member since 2010 • 5166 Posts

With every previous generation I have never been able to decide what my favorite game of the gen was. I could usually narrow it down to about 5 games at best.

This gen SMG2 is far and away the best game I have played. I don't even have to think twice, the game has no peers. If I worked as a gameplay, or level designer I would have probably quit my job and pursued a new career due to feeling insufficient after playing SMG2. Its that damn untouchable. And this is coming from a guy that never really liked 3d platformers to begin with.

Best game of the gen and easily one of the best games I've ever played. If any game has ever been deserving of a 10, this is the one.

Avatar image for Captainqwark10
Captainqwark10

1170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Captainqwark10
Member since 2011 • 1170 Posts

[QUOTE="Captainqwark10"]Now, I want serious answers here. Do YOU think, and I mean REALLY think, while looking at other games on the syste, heck not just on that system, do you REALLY THINK SMG2 deserves all of the critical praise it got> Think about this now. Because when I saw the game get high scores of 10/10 and all this praise about being one of the best ever made I seriously had my Wii out the window about to throw it as I thought the world had freaking gone crazy. I personally do not believe how this game got this much praise when it came out. Eventually becoming more popular and getting these hard to believe reviews. To me, the game was a step back and I cannot find one reason, not even an explanation from somebody that likes the game, that is enough of a reason to prove to me why this game got all it's godly reputation from. I think it has to do with the fact that most Wii games are indeed lacking. They are poor, and every game no matter who releases it, that is better than the large pile of lacking games, will instantly be overrated. I am even talking about the first SMG, which I still think is better than the 2 even though I also think that was overrated. But that's just an opinion. What's yours?super600

Literally everything about the game was amazing.The graphics and art style were incredible, the gameplay was creative and fun in literally all the main 122 starmissions(even though the green stars were the weakest part of the game),the final mission was a brutal test in SMG2 gameplay,thesoundtrackis incredible and can't be matchedby any Wii game

Ok, While we are shouting opinions i will attack them anyway just so I am clearer. The Graphics were not amazing. It looked good but not to the point were I would even give them an 8. The game looks honestly like something that can be done/or close to being done by the GC. Also, a bit blocky at times. Art Style? Art Styles doesn't make the game, espeically when it looks simillar to other games in the SAME series. The gameplay was creative? Other than adding a Yoshi it is the same game I have played since SM64 with minimal upgrades. Fun is an opinion, but I think that's what's blocking people from seeing the flaw of the game that I will not be listing as it is long. The soundtrack? God I hope that's not why you buy games.

Awesome game, and undeniably a 9.0 or higher, but giving it a 10 is quite a stretch (I try and reserve 10 for special occasions). I go back and forth between 9 and 9.5 for the game. My issues are the lack of a good hub world, lack of difficulty in most areas (some are brutal), and a couple other things. SM64 is still my favorite by far.

Adding: Very Linear, Some objects look like they were ripped from earlier games. Fuzzy, We have been collecting stars for how long now? Actually, what has this game done to improve the first game in ANYWAY is really my question.
Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Good game but is a platformer, stopped caring about platformers when i was 14 during N64 era.
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Good game but is a platformer, stopped caring about platformers when i was 14 during N64 era.silversix_

this...breaks my heart :cry:

Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#21 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="Captainqwark10"]Now, I want serious answers here. Do YOU think, and I mean REALLY think, while looking at other games on the syste, heck not just on that system, do you REALLY THINK SMG2 deserves all of the critical praise it got> Think about this now. Because when I saw the game get high scores of 10/10 and all this praise about being one of the best ever made I seriously had my Wii out the window about to throw it as I thought the world had freaking gone crazy. I personally do not believe how this game got this much praise when it came out. Eventually becoming more popular and getting these hard to believe reviews. To me, the game was a step back and I cannot find one reason, not even an explanation from somebody that likes the game, that is enough of a reason to prove to me why this game got all it's godly reputation from. I think it has to do with the fact that most Wii games are indeed lacking. They are poor, and every game no matter who releases it, that is better than the large pile of lacking games, will instantly be overrated. I am even talking about the first SMG, which I still think is better than the 2 even though I also think that was overrated. But that's just an opinion. What's yours?Captainqwark10

Literally everything about the game was amazing.The graphics and art style were incredible, the gameplay was creative and fun in literally all the main 122 starmissions(even though the green stars were the weakest part of the game),the final mission was a brutal test in SMG2 gameplay,thesoundtrackis incredible and can't be matchedby any Wii game

Ok, While we are shouting opinions i will attack them anyway just so I am clearer. The Graphics were not amazing. It looked good but not to the point were I would even give them an 8. The game looks honestly like something that can be done/or close to being done by the GC. Also, a bit blocky at times. Art Style? Art Styles doesn't make the game, espeically when it looks simillar to other games in the SAME series. The gameplay was creative? Other than adding a Yoshi it is the same game I have played since SM64 with minimal upgrades. Fun is an opinion, but I think that's what's blocking people from seeing the flaw of the game that I will not be listing as it is long. The soundtrack? God I hope that's not why you buy games.

Awesome game, and undeniably a 9.0 or higher, but giving it a 10 is quite a stretch (I try and reserve 10 for special occasions). I go back and forth between 9 and 9.5 for the game. My issues are the lack of a good hub world, lack of difficulty in most areas (some are brutal), and a couple other things. SM64 is still my favorite by far.

Adding: Very Linear, Some objects look like they were ripped from earlier games. Fuzzy, We have been collecting stars for how long now? Actually, what has this game done to improve the first game in ANYWAY is really my question.

-getting rid of the worthless HUB world (or shrinking it down anyway), to save time getting from level to level

-more difficult.

These two come to mind.

Avatar image for sandbox3d
sandbox3d

5166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 sandbox3d
Member since 2010 • 5166 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="Captainqwark10"]Now, I want serious answers here. Do YOU think, and I mean REALLY think, while looking at other games on the syste, heck not just on that system, do you REALLY THINK SMG2 deserves all of the critical praise it got> Think about this now. Because when I saw the game get high scores of 10/10 and all this praise about being one of the best ever made I seriously had my Wii out the window about to throw it as I thought the world had freaking gone crazy. I personally do not believe how this game got this much praise when it came out. Eventually becoming more popular and getting these hard to believe reviews. To me, the game was a step back and I cannot find one reason, not even an explanation from somebody that likes the game, that is enough of a reason to prove to me why this game got all it's godly reputation from. I think it has to do with the fact that most Wii games are indeed lacking. They are poor, and every game no matter who releases it, that is better than the large pile of lacking games, will instantly be overrated. I am even talking about the first SMG, which I still think is better than the 2 even though I also think that was overrated. But that's just an opinion. What's yours?Captainqwark10

Literally everything about the game was amazing.The graphics and art style were incredible, the gameplay was creative and fun in literally all the main 122 starmissions(even though the green stars were the weakest part of the game),the final mission was a brutal test in SMG2 gameplay,thesoundtrackis incredible and can't be matchedby any Wii game

Ok, While we are shouting opinions i will attack them anyway just so I am clearer. The Graphics were not amazing. It looked good but not to the point were I would even give them an 8. The game looks honestly like something that can be done/or close to being done by the GC. Also, a bit blocky at times. Art Style? Art Styles doesn't make the game, espeically when it looks simillar to other games in the SAME series. The gameplay was creative? Other than adding a Yoshi it is the same game I have played since SM64 with minimal upgrades. Fun is an opinion, but I think that's what's blocking people from seeing the flaw of the game that I will not be listing as it is long. The soundtrack? God I hope that's not why you buy games.

Awesome game, and undeniably a 9.0 or higher, but giving it a 10 is quite a stretch (I try and reserve 10 for special occasions). I go back and forth between 9 and 9.5 for the game. My issues are the lack of a good hub world, lack of difficulty in most areas (some are brutal), and a couple other things. SM64 is still my favorite by far.

Adding: Very Linear, Some objects look like they were ripped from earlier games. Fuzzy, We have been collecting stars for how long now? Actually, what has this game done to improve the first game in ANYWAY is really my question.

It seems you are trying very hard to not like the game. If Yoshi is the only thing that comes to mind when you think about how this game is creative then I dont know what to tell you. I want to say it sounds as if you havent played the game, but I'd hate to be one of those guys.

Maybe the game just wasnt for you.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#23 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="silversix_"]Good game but is a platformer, stopped caring about platformers when i was 14 during N64 era.NaveedLife

this...breaks my heart :cry:

I´m kind of on the same boat as he is,only I stopped caring about them after the 16 bit gen. The only platformers that get me mildly excited are the sonic ones,and even then...most of the recent stuff has been rubbish,so...

Platforming is kind of a dead genre for me these days to be honest.

Avatar image for super600
super600

33158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33158 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="Captainqwark10"]Now, I want serious answers here. Do YOU think, and I mean REALLY think, while looking at other games on the syste, heck not just on that system, do you REALLY THINK SMG2 deserves all of the critical praise it got> Think about this now. Because when I saw the game get high scores of 10/10 and all this praise about being one of the best ever made I seriously had my Wii out the window about to throw it as I thought the world had freaking gone crazy. I personally do not believe how this game got this much praise when it came out. Eventually becoming more popular and getting these hard to believe reviews. To me, the game was a step back and I cannot find one reason, not even an explanation from somebody that likes the game, that is enough of a reason to prove to me why this game got all it's godly reputation from. I think it has to do with the fact that most Wii games are indeed lacking. They are poor, and every game no matter who releases it, that is better than the large pile of lacking games, will instantly be overrated. I am even talking about the first SMG, which I still think is better than the 2 even though I also think that was overrated. But that's just an opinion. What's yours?Captainqwark10

Literally everything about the game was amazing.The graphics and art style were incredible, the gameplay was creative and fun in literally all the main 122 starmissions(even though the green stars were the weakest part of the game),the final mission was a brutal test in SMG2 gameplay,thesoundtrackis incredible and can't be matchedby any Wii game

Ok, While we are shouting opinions i will attack them anyway just so I am clearer. The Graphics were not amazing. It looked good but not to the point were I would even give them an 8. The game looks honestly like something that can be done/or close to being done by the GC. Also, a bit blocky at times. Art Style? Art Styles doesn't make the game, espeically when it looks simillar to other games in the SAME series. The gameplay was creative? Other than adding a Yoshi it is the same game I have played since SM64 with minimal upgrades. Fun is an opinion, but I think that's what's blocking people from seeing the flaw of the game that I will not be listing as it is long. The soundtrack? God I hope that's not why you buy games.

Awesome game, and undeniably a 9.0 or higher, but giving it a 10 is quite a stretch (I try and reserve 10 for special occasions). I go back and forth between 9 and 9.5 for the game. My issues are the lack of a good hub world, lack of difficulty in most areas (some are brutal), and a couple other things. SM64 is still my favorite by far.

Adding: Very Linear, Some objects look like they were ripped from earlier games. Fuzzy, We have been collecting stars for how long now? Actually, what has this game done to improve the first game in ANYWAY is really my question.

It's impossible to create something as good lookingas SMG2 on the GC.Anyway I meant it looked good for a Wii game. Literally no third partyWii game comes close to it in graphics or artstyle. The only one I think that comes close is Sonic Colours. The gamedidn't look fuzzy for me at all and soundtracks can help to make a game feel more fun or have a better atmosphere.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

-getting rid of the worthless HUB world (or shrinking it down anyway), to save time getting from level to level

-more difficult.

These two come to mind.

DJ-Lafleur

I am not sure what you are responding to, but the HUB worlds were awesome in 64 and Sunshine. If they are going to cut it out, they should have done so COMPLETELY, as there was NO point in the one in Galaxy. It was not fun to wander around, there was nothing to collect, and really nothing to do. It was just the annoying purple fat star that said the same crap over and over again. I hate that guy lol. This was a complaint for me, but other than that the game just needed a bit more difficulty in areas then it would have been a 10 to me.

Avatar image for Captainqwark10
Captainqwark10

1170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Captainqwark10
Member since 2011 • 1170 Posts
The problem is that when a game that looks and plays and adds more than but still pretty much does the same thing it gets bashed, but when Mario does it everyone is freaking blind (Or follows professional "reviews" like GS) and it is suddenly this great piece of work even though it is the exact same with little improvements. How can it possibly gain all this raise for stuff it really does not do that much better than other games even on its own SYSTEM? My only conclusions point to fanboys, following fools like GS reviewers, the Wii library is THAT bad, or the fact that 2 3D Mario (MARIO) Platforming games appeared on one system at the same time, or Nintendo is paying for this crude, or the fans don't want Mario to die and end up like Sonic or whatever mascot so badly that they will do all in their power to prevent the game from failing and will blindly play the game even though they know the game is not really that good, or the world is insane.
Avatar image for Jolt_counter119
Jolt_counter119

4226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Jolt_counter119
Member since 2010 • 4226 Posts

My opinion is that I didnt enjoy it as much as I would have if I played it when I was younger. Im used to open world gameplay like 64, Sunshine, Kazooie, and Tooie and the Zelda games, Metroid.

Ive gotten accustomed to exploration and playing around in game worlds. Galaxy 2 gives too many rules, it forces you to play the way it wants you too. That makes the game better paced and gives more platforming, but I didnt care for any of the worlds. When I finished a galaxy I never wanted to go back because once you finish the levels theres literally nothing else to do there and each galaxy had few stars so you dont even get used to the world before you're off to another one. I'd rather play with big open play grounds that let you fully flesh out and discover rather than plow through and be done with.

Avatar image for forgot_it
forgot_it

6756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 forgot_it
Member since 2004 • 6756 Posts
[QUOTE="Captainqwark10"]The problem is that when a game that looks and plays and adds more than but still pretty much does the same thing it gets bashed, but when Mario does it everyone is freaking blind (Or follows professional "reviews" like GS) and it is suddenly this great piece of work even though it is the exact same with little improvements. How can it possibly gain all this raise for stuff it really does not do that much better than other games even on its own SYSTEM? My only conclusions point to fanboys, following fools like GS reviewers, the Wii library is THAT bad, or the fact that 2 3D Mario (MARIO) Platforming games appeared on one system at the same time, or Nintendo is paying for this crude, or the fans don't want Mario to die and end up like Sonic or whatever mascot so badly that they will do all in their power to prevent the game from failing and will blindly play the game even though they know the game is not really that good, or the world is insane.

 .
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

My opinion is that I didnt enjoy it as much as I would have if I played it when I was younger. Im used to open world gameplay like 64, Sunshine, Kazooie, and Tooie and the Zelda games, Metroid.

Ive gotten accustomed to exploration and playing around in game worlds. Galaxy 2 gives too many rules, it forces you to play the way it wants you too. That makes the game better paced and gives more platforming, but I didnt care for any of the worlds. When I finished a galaxy I never wanted to go back because once you finish the levels theres literally nothing else to do there and each galaxy had few stars so you dont even get used to the world before you're off to another one. I'd rather play with big open play grounds that let you fully flesh out and discover rather than plow through and be done with.

Jolt_counter119

Sort of how I feel...nicely put. Amazing game, but that is something that bothered me no doubt.

Avatar image for sandbox3d
sandbox3d

5166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 sandbox3d
Member since 2010 • 5166 Posts

The problem is that when a game that looks and plays and adds more than but still pretty much does the same thing it gets bashed, but when Mario does it everyone is freaking blind (Or follows professional "reviews" like GS) and it is suddenly this great piece of work even though it is the exact same with little improvements. How can it possibly gain all this raise for stuff it really does not do that much better than other games even on its own SYSTEM? My only conclusions point to fanboys, following fools like GS reviewers, the Wii library is THAT bad, or the fact that 2 3D Mario (MARIO) Platforming games appeared on one system at the same time, or Nintendo is paying for this crude, or the fans don't want Mario to die and end up like Sonic or whatever mascot so badly that they will do all in their power to prevent the game from failing and will blindly play the game even though they know the game is not really that good, or the world is insane.Captainqwark10

And you are closed minded for thinking it all boils down to fanboys, suckers for reviews, or Wii only owners. One look at my sig could tell you I fall into neither of those categories.

The game simply outdoes its predecessor in every conceivable way. Sorry that not every little difference can be put into a list for you. It simply took an amazing formula (SMG) and evolved it into something much better (SMG2). The level design was much more risky for lack of a better word. They took the mechanics and used them in extremely creative ways. The game was packed with tons of original content, and I hardly ever felt like I was doing the same thing twice. The way they handled green star missions in this game was much better and in a lot of instances pushed the mechanics in ways that I couldn't imagine.

To put it simply it was just extremely well designed. Sorry if you can not see that, but you are in the minority here. It was the most fun gaming experience I've had this gen and apparently many others felt the same way. Honestly, I havent had a game entertain me so much since I was a kid.

Avatar image for Kaze_no_Mirai
Kaze_no_Mirai

11763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Kaze_no_Mirai
Member since 2004 • 11763 Posts
Its one of my favorite games this gen. :D
Avatar image for tubbyc
tubbyc

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 tubbyc
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts

It was flawless but didn't have the same, fresh impact of the original for me. I think the first was worth a 10.0 and the 2nd 9.5

Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts
One of the best Wii games so far, which ain't sayin' much for me! But It's a great game compared to every other game this generation, which is excellent :). Still like SM64 more :P. Beats Mario Sunshine by 10 miles at least.
Avatar image for Pikminmaniac
Pikminmaniac

11514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#34 Pikminmaniac
Member since 2006 • 11514 Posts

I felt the same way as you did with the first Super Mario Galaxy. The second Super Mario Galaxy, however, hit the biggest home run any platformer ever could deem possible.

I cannot emphasise just how much better Super Mario Galaxy 2 is than the first Mario galaxy!

-It has unmatched variety (every single level was completely different than the last. You never expected anything that was coming next)

-The level of creativity is completely untouched (I have NEVER seen a game have this many brilliant ideas crammed into one package. This game is a testement to the capabilities of the human imagination)

-One of the most visually appealing games this gen

-Much better difficulty than the last game

-twice as many stars as any 3D Mario game

-Far better reward for getting all the stars

-The level designers completely outdid themselves this time!

-As always, the controls in thisMario game are piych perfect!

Mario Galaxy 1 had no impact on me. It was just another Mario game

Mario Galaxy 2 blew me awayon 49 seperate occations

Avatar image for deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8

22399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
Member since 2007 • 22399 Posts
The whole package was tied together in such an amazing way that it was like a sweet symphony of awsome. kept my attention from begining to end, and kept me tied to the TV for hours on end the way so few games can these days. Yes, this is coming from a manticore. I own and play every platform. the only other titles in recent memory to grip me like that game were Assassin's Creed 2, Portal 2 and The World Ends With You
Avatar image for oldkingallant
oldkingallant

4958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 oldkingallant
Member since 2010 • 4958 Posts

I actually bought the game really cheap a couple of months but barely played it,it looks ok (great if you´re into platformers) but not really my thing.

Arach666
Yay, someone outside of the Sheep persuasion who's able to admit that it's great but not their thing. You sir are something of a saint. I personally believe it deserves every last bit of praise it's received since I love platformers and it's pretty much the best I've ever played. The "lower standards" argument that seems to come up again here ticks me off, SMG1 won GOTY in 2007 over insanely rough competition, best of the gen. They didn't judge each nominee by the standards of its platform, they compared them all and it was in their opinion the best.
Avatar image for Jelley0
Jelley0

1867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Jelley0
Member since 2009 • 1867 Posts

I don't get what is good about it. Not bad, but doesn't stick out. It's too linear and easy for it be fun, and I don't know why the level design wowed people, it was pretty basic to be honest; not in a bad way but at the same time it isn't something worth bragging about.

Avatar image for Scythes777
Scythes777

2796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Scythes777
Member since 2006 • 2796 Posts
[QUOTE="darkspineslayer"]The whole package was tied together in such an amazing way that it was like a sweet symphony of awsome. kept my attention from begining to end, and kept me tied to the TV for hours on end the way so few games can these days. Yes, this is coming from a manticore. I own and play every platform. the only other titles in recent memory to grip me like that game were Assassin's Creed 2, Portal 2 and The World Ends With You

YAY someone else who likes TWEWY! Seriously, that is one of my other top games this generation. I honestly could not find anything wrong with that game and I'm surprised it didnt perfect scores.
Avatar image for svetzenlether
svetzenlether

3082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 svetzenlether
Member since 2003 • 3082 Posts

The problem is that when a game that looks and plays and adds more than but still pretty much does the same thing it gets bashed, but when Mario does it everyone is freaking blind (Or follows professional "reviews" like GS) and it is suddenly this great piece of work even though it is the exact same with little improvements. How can it possibly gain all this raise for stuff it really does not do that much better than other games even on its own SYSTEM? My only conclusions point to fanboys, following fools like GS reviewers, the Wii library is THAT bad, or the fact that 2 3D Mario (MARIO) Platforming games appeared on one system at the same time, or Nintendo is paying for this crude, or the fans don't want Mario to die and end up like Sonic or whatever mascot so badly that they will do all in their power to prevent the game from failing and will blindly play the game even though they know the game is not really that good, or the world is insane.Captainqwark10

I'm not sure what to comment on with this post. Either:

a) Level 2 with 35 posts

b) most likely has never played either SMG 1 or 2 to correctly form an opinion of such

c) his PSN account is down and can't get into his hacked Black Ops game, thus feeling extremely bitter about games and/or life in general

d) all of the above

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
My only complaint is that the levels seemed to end abruptly. But everything else was pretty awesome. Great level variety, great gameplay, and great music (I'm a sucker for great music).
Avatar image for WAJ
WAJ

771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 WAJ
Member since 2003 • 771 Posts

I don't get what is good about it. Not bad, but doesn't stick out. It's too linear and easy for it be fun, and I don't know why the level design wowed people, it was pretty basic to be honest; not in a bad way but at the same time it isn't something worth bragging about.

Jelley0
Difficulty and linearity = fun for you?! If that's the way it works, i guess Portal 2 was absolute trash, as that was easy as hell, even though I had a blast playing it.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#42 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

I felt the same way as you did with the first Super Mario Galaxy. The second Super Mario Galaxy, however, hit the biggest home run any platformer ever could deem possible.

I cannot emphasise just how much better Super Mario Galaxy 2 is than the first Mario galaxy!

-It has unmatched variety (every single level was completely different than the last. You never expected anything that was coming next)

-The level of creativity is completely untouched (I have NEVER seen a game have this many brilliant ideas crammed into one package. This game is a testement to the capabilities of the human imagination)

-One of the most visually appealing games this gen

-Much better difficulty than the last game

-twice as many stars as any 3D Mario game

-Far better reward for getting all the stars

-The level designers completely outdid themselves this time!

-As always, the controls in thisMario game are piych perfect!

Mario Galaxy 1 had no impact on me. It was just another Mario game

Mario Galaxy 2 blew me awayon 49 seperate occations

Pikminmaniac

I agree I loved it also I loved that they went back to a Map system from the 2D Mario platformers I love that I wasn't a big fan of the HUB world in most of the 3D Mario Platformers.

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#43 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
Great timing, I've started to play SMG2 again (after forgetting about the game with a tonne of good games being released last year) and I love it. It doesn't have the same wow-factor that SMG does but the galaxies are original and they all have something great in them, a moment that'll make you smile or think "wow that's clever". The controls and platforming is near-perfect and is easily the best looking game on the Wii, since it improves on SMG in many ways I think it deserves its 10/10 score.
Avatar image for Ironbash
Ironbash

1132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Ironbash
Member since 2011 • 1132 Posts

Finished it back when I owned a Wii, damn that game was one of a kind, I can hands down say its IS the best platformer this gen

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

I haven't played it, but I have played super mario galaxy and got all 121 stars, and that game was absolutely incredible. so, I have to assume it's the same for the sequal.

Avatar image for LaytonsCat
LaytonsCat

3652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#46 LaytonsCat
Member since 2010 • 3652 Posts

Well it was way better than SMG which got 9.5ish scores from most places. So a ten is very deserving. Ot was my favorite game last year and my third favorite of the gen

Avatar image for nintendo-4life
nintendo-4life

18281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 nintendo-4life
Member since 2004 • 18281 Posts
It deserves a 10 here ONLY because of the other games that received the same score. So far, I don't think any game this generation deserves such a high score.
Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts

I was skeptical when I saw SMG2...A second Galaxy game :?

I was blown away.It felt as fresh as the first one.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
Too linear.
Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#50 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

It's ana amazing game, one of the best this gen. Not a 10/ 10, but pretty durn close.