This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="worknow222"] Yep definetly overhyped Yet reach has better looking aspects than uncharted 2 and killzone 2monkeysmokeBesides character models and skyboxes what does Reach do better than those two games? #1. Higher dinamic lighting (go play fire fight) :P #2. More than 20 times bigger enviromental scale than uncharted 2 & killzone 2 :P #3. More than 40 active onscreen AI :P .
#4 Higher detailed textures. If you zoom in on an elite you can seen the massive amount of detail for e.g.
#5 Around a 200x higher draw distance lol.
#6 Massive epic battles going on above you (more AI).
#7 More polygons per a scene then uncharted 2 and killzone 2 combined.
#8 Better character models, but uncharted 2 does have better faces.
#9 Better vegetation.
#10 Bigger and better explosions. Best explosions ever on the 360, ps3 and mabey even pc.
Terrible jaggies and terrible pop in. The game is nice a colorful though and the open areas add alot to the game. The models in the game are very nicely detailed and animation is top notch as always, but those jaggies....
rzepak
What jaggies? What pop in? I have it playing on my pc monitor which I sit very close to, and didn't notice any of them things. You are either a cow, or have never played the game. Halo 3 had no pop in, and bungie said reach has about a 4x higher draw distance then halo 3.
[QUOTE="rzepak"]
Terrible jaggies and terrible pop in. The game is nice a colorful though and the open areas add alot to the game. The models in the game are very nicely detailed and animation is top notch as always, but those jaggies....
roflcopter317
What jaggies? What pop in? I have it playing on my pc monitor which I sit very close to, and didn't notice any of them things. You are either a cow, or have never played the game. Halo 3 had no pop in, and bungie said reach has about a 4x higher draw distance then halo 3.
Pop in is really noticeable with split screen and I don't know how you can't see the jaggies.[QUOTE="roflcopter317"][QUOTE="rzepak"]
Terrible jaggies and terrible pop in. The game is nice a colorful though and the open areas add alot to the game. The models in the game are very nicely detailed and animation is top notch as always, but those jaggies....
soulitane
What jaggies? What pop in? I have it playing on my pc monitor which I sit very close to, and didn't notice any of them things. You are either a cow, or have never played the game. Halo 3 had no pop in, and bungie said reach has about a 4x higher draw distance then halo 3.
Pop in is really noticeable with split screen and I don't know how you can't see the jaggies. You cant compare split screen and regular single player. Of course split screen is going to have some visual problems it is rendering the game for 2 different people.[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]
[QUOTE="Dark_man123"]
what if i am?
roflcopter317
Then your eyeballs are defective.
For a 2007 game it is pretty outstanding. The colours and everything looked great.
Halo 3 looked pretty good at times. The forest level at the beginning had beautiful lighting, and the floods ... cavern place? had some nice textures and lighting. Still very meh by todays standards though.
[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]
[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]
Then your eyeballs are defective.
WhenCicadasCry
For a 2007 game it is pretty outstanding. The colours and everything looked great.
Halo 3 looked pretty good at times. The forest level at the beginning had beautiful lighting, and the floods ... cavern place? had some nice textures and lighting. Still very meh by todays standards though.
Good ol halo 3 but this is reach :PGraphics are pretty bland, which is the norm for the Halo series. The gameplay is amazing, though. Way better than Halo 3.Dr_Corndogalthough i understand that this is your opinion, i must say that the graphics are in no way "bland" as you say...by ANY means. its probably one of the more colorful fps's between the two consoles. i wonder though if you think Reach is bland, what do you think of KZ2...
you my good sir have in fact never played reach and have ABSOLUTELY no idea what youre talking about.Terrible jaggies and terrible pop in. The game is nice a colorful though and the open areas add alot to the game. The models in the game are very nicely detailed and animation is top notch as always, but those jaggies....
rzepak
Looks solid, but the frame rate is unstable.Einhanderkillermany people say this but i havent had an issue with the framerate at all. nothing noticable at least. and im on the 5 or 6th level...
[QUOTE="Einhanderkiller"]Looks solid, but the frame rate is unstable.slvrraven9many people say this but i havent had an issue with the framerate at all. nothing noticable at least. and im on the 5 or 6th level... according to analyses ive seen the framerate drops the most in cutscenes.
I thought it looked meh. I like Gears 2 better than this. Few pretty moments in there though and I like the Marine sniper model (Can't remember faction name. I fail at remembering.)
Defintely the best on consoles right now. Incredible character/weapons models, unique art style and beautiful lighting.
ugly art-direction and outdated graphics.
Orchid87
Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks Halo has bad art.
[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="roflcopter317"]Pop in is really noticeable with split screen and I don't know how you can't see the jaggies. You cant compare split screen and regular single player. Of course split screen is going to have some visual problems it is rendering the game for 2 different people.I was just saying the only time I noticed pop in, in the game.What jaggies? What pop in? I have it playing on my pc monitor which I sit very close to, and didn't notice any of them things. You are either a cow, or have never played the game. Halo 3 had no pop in, and bungie said reach has about a 4x higher draw distance then halo 3.
Person0
Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks Halo has bad art.
ChubbyGuy40
I really don't understand how the characters and weapons designs straight from the Power Ranger shows and battlefields that consist of plain valleys and low-poly paper boxes that represent cities and military bases can be considered good art.
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks Halo has bad art.
Orchid87
I really don't understand how the characters and weapons designs straight from the Power Ranger shows and battlefields that consist of plain valleys and low-poly paper boxes that represent cities and military bases can be considered good art.
I found it to strongly represent the generic space soldier idea honestly. the thing that is regarded as good about halo is the gameplay, which I don't find that great personally. But everyones opinion is different. I do really agree with what you said though.
I found it to strongly represent the generic space soldier idea honestly. the thing that is regarded as good about halo is the gameplay, which I don't find that great personally. But everyones opinion is different. I do really agree with what you said though.
ChubbyGuy40
Gameplay is fun enough. But it doesn't help when everything else is cringeworthy. I usually like space soldiers settings and I love sci-fi when it doesn't look like something from 80's cartoon.
WOW! I just have to say I'm very pleasantly surprised by the comments about Halo Reach's graphics. I expected it to be mostly "Halo's graphics suck!" kind of comments. I personally think the game looks great (most of the time), but I also thought Halo 3 looked great, which many didn't agree with me. I love Halo's art style.
I think there were a few levels in multiplayer or campaign where I could see someone saying that they can't see a difference between Reach and Halo 3. It also has a few framerate drops. However, the game is absolutely stunning at times. The animations are terrific, the gun models are outstanding, and the explosions are great. The attention to detail is very strong in this game.
I thought this too 0.o thank god i was WrongWOW! I just have to say I'm very pleasantly surprised by the comments about Halo Reach's graphics. I expected it to be mostly "Halo's graphics suck!" kind of comments. I personally think the game looks great (most of the time), but I also thought Halo 3 looked great, which many didn't agree with me. I love Halo's art style.
I think there were a few levels in multiplayer or campaign where I could see someone saying that they can't see a difference between Reach and Halo 3. It also has a few framerate drops. However, the game is absolutely stunning at times. The animations are terrific, the gun models are outstanding, and the explosions are great. The attention to detail is very strong in this game.
RobbRipken
Graphics look beautiful to me. the colours are vibrant and the backdrops are incredible as mentioned. as for the game, i have to say i am very impressed. the fact that bungie released odst last year put me off. i was coming into this game with low expectations (more of the same). there are many subtle changes andadditions that keep the formula fresh. this game is so feature-rich that i dontknow where to begin.bungie, i salute you. some damn fine work with this one.
[QUOTE="bigboss5ak"]After crysis reach is the second best graphical fps this genDragonfireXZ95Umm, not it's not. with the scale Probably is welll untill rage and crysis 2 :P
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="bigboss5ak"]After crysis reach is the second best graphical fps this genworknow222Umm, not it's not. with the scale Probably is welll untill rage and crysis 2 :P
Just Cause 2, ArmA 2, Bad Company 2, Gothic 4, Singularity...theres plenty of games that look better than Reach. Not all have as big of maps as Reach though. But I didn't find the maps to be that big except for a few.
Agreed and to show the b eauty of reach in 1080P ( yeah yeah the low HD stuff but this looks quite better from 720p or something) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9EjYOiv0Uk just go to the HD 1080p and pick it :Dan outstanding game. better than killzone 2 and heck better than half-life
gamedude234
[QUOTE="gamedude234"]Agreed and to show the b eauty of reach in 1080P ( yeah yeah the low HD stuff but this looks quite better from 720p or something) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9EjYOiv0Uk just go to the HD 1080p and pick it :D Watch it in 1080p when the game is rendered in 1152x720? Whats the point in that? Watching it in 720p would be fine and save you bandwidth.an outstanding game. better than killzone 2 and heck better than half-life
worknow222
[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="gamedude234"]Agreed and to show the b eauty of reach in 1080P ( yeah yeah the low HD stuff but this looks quite better from 720p or something) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9EjYOiv0Uk just go to the HD 1080p and pick it :D Watch it in 1080p when the game is rendered in 1152x720? Whats the point in that? Watching it in 720p would be fine and save you bandwidth. Probably but its very clear and to me clearer than the 720P but ey watch it in 720p if you wantan outstanding game. better than killzone 2 and heck better than half-life
ferret-gamer
Watch it in 1080p when the game is rendered in 1152x720? Whats the point in that? Watching it in 720p would be fine and save you bandwidth. Probably but its very clear and to me clearer than the 720P but ey watch it in 720p if you want looks exactly the same to me.[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="worknow222"] Agreed and to show the b eauty of reach in 1080P ( yeah yeah the low HD stuff but this looks quite better from 720p or something) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9EjYOiv0Uk just go to the HD 1080p and pick it :D worknow222
[QUOTE="worknow222"]Probably but its very clear and to me clearer than the 720P but ey watch it in 720p if you want looks exactly the same to me. MIght be my monitor then Lol[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] Watch it in 1080p when the game is rendered in 1152x720? Whats the point in that? Watching it in 720p would be fine and save you bandwidth.ferret-gamer
:lol: ! After Killzone 2, Crysis, Arma 2, Far Cry 2, MW2, BF:BC2 and 35 other FPS games maybe.[QUOTE="hd5870corei7"][QUOTE="bigboss5ak"]After crysis reach is the second best graphical fps this genWhenCicadasCry
Nah. Looks better then BC2, MW2 and Killzone 2 imo.
Not the PC versions of BC2 and MW2.
[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]
[QUOTE="hd5870corei7"] :lol: ! After Killzone 2, Crysis, Arma 2, Far Cry 2, MW2, BF:BC2 and 35 other FPS games maybe.Hakkai007
Nah. Looks better then BC2, MW2 and Killzone 2 imo.
Not the PC versions of BC2 and MW2.
Opinions are opinions[QUOTE="worknow222"]Opinions are opinions Hakkai007
Not when you compare how much tech it is pushing.
so it's an opinion if i say hitler was a Smart man thats my opinion you may hate it to hell but deal with it[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="BigBoss154"]Yep definetly overhyped Yet reach has better looking aspects than uncharted 2 and killzone 2 Besides character models and skyboxes what does Reach do better than those two games? Bigger levels,more use of particle effects,no corridor shooter,more enemies on screen and having amazing graphics.. and the list goes on.Above average at best for a console game. It's not even the best looking game on the 360. Overhyped by lemmings.
FIipMode
[QUOTE="Hakkai007"][QUOTE="worknow222"]Opinions are opinions worknow222
Not when you compare how much tech it is pushing.
so it's an opinion if i say hitler was a Smart man thats my opinion you may hate it to hell but deal with it Thats not really an opinion though, experts place hitler's IQ to be around the 140 mark, easily qualifying him to be in the "smart" category.[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="Hakkai007"]so it's an opinion if i say hitler was a Smart man thats my opinion you may hate it to hell but deal with it Thats not really an opinion though, experts place hitler's IQ to be around the 140 mark, easily qualifying him to be in the "smart" category. ALOT of people still dont believe it hating on an opinion so i say if one man/girl like believes something let em who are we to say there Dumb for it?Not when you compare how much tech it is pushing.
ferret-gamer
[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="worknow222"] Yep definetly overhyped Yet reach has better looking aspects than uncharted 2 and killzone 2TessellationBesides character models and skyboxes what does Reach do better than those two games? Bigger levels,more use of particle effects,no corridor shooter,more enemies on screen and having amazing graphics.. and the list goes on. Graphics are not that amazing for a 2010 game, more like 2007-2008 one. And bigger levels are made at the cost of details - most of the maps are bland and repetitive.
Bigger levels,more use of particle effects,no corridor shooter,more enemies on screen and having amazing graphics.. and the list goes on. Graphics are not that amazing for a 2010 game, more like 2007-2008 one. And bigger levels are made at the cost of details - most of the maps are bland and repetitive.Clearly has not played Reach[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="FIipMode"] Besides character models and skyboxes what does Reach do better than those two games?Orchid87
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment