Your thoughts on Halo Reach's Graphics? Overall as a game?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts
Like it...
Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="worknow222"] Yep definetly overhyped Yet reach has better looking aspects than uncharted 2 and killzone 2monkeysmoke
Besides character models and skyboxes what does Reach do better than those two games?

#1. Higher dinamic lighting (go play fire fight) :P #2. More than 20 times bigger enviromental scale than uncharted 2 & killzone 2 :P #3. More than 40 active onscreen AI :P .

#4 Higher detailed textures. If you zoom in on an elite you can seen the massive amount of detail for e.g.

#5 Around a 200x higher draw distance lol.

#6 Massive epic battles going on above you (more AI).

#7 More polygons per a scene then uncharted 2 and killzone 2 combined.

#8 Better character models, but uncharted 2 does have better faces.

#9 Better vegetation.

#10 Bigger and better explosions. Best explosions ever on the 360, ps3 and mabey even pc.

Avatar image for roflcopter317
roflcopter317

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 roflcopter317
Member since 2010 • 709 Posts

Terrible jaggies and terrible pop in. The game is nice a colorful though and the open areas add alot to the game. The models in the game are very nicely detailed and animation is top notch as always, but those jaggies....

rzepak

What jaggies? What pop in? I have it playing on my pc monitor which I sit very close to, and didn't notice any of them things. You are either a cow, or have never played the game. Halo 3 had no pop in, and bungie said reach has about a 4x higher draw distance then halo 3.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

Terrible jaggies and terrible pop in. The game is nice a colorful though and the open areas add alot to the game. The models in the game are very nicely detailed and animation is top notch as always, but those jaggies....

roflcopter317

What jaggies? What pop in? I have it playing on my pc monitor which I sit very close to, and didn't notice any of them things. You are either a cow, or have never played the game. Halo 3 had no pop in, and bungie said reach has about a 4x higher draw distance then halo 3.

Pop in is really noticeable with split screen and I don't know how you can't see the jaggies.
Avatar image for deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
deactivated-59f03d6ce656b

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
Member since 2009 • 2944 Posts
[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

Terrible jaggies and terrible pop in. The game is nice a colorful though and the open areas add alot to the game. The models in the game are very nicely detailed and animation is top notch as always, but those jaggies....

soulitane

What jaggies? What pop in? I have it playing on my pc monitor which I sit very close to, and didn't notice any of them things. You are either a cow, or have never played the game. Halo 3 had no pop in, and bungie said reach has about a 4x higher draw distance then halo 3.

Pop in is really noticeable with split screen and I don't know how you can't see the jaggies.

You cant compare split screen and regular single player. Of course split screen is going to have some visual problems it is rendering the game for 2 different people.
Avatar image for WhenCicadasCry
WhenCicadasCry

2727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 WhenCicadasCry
Member since 2010 • 2727 Posts

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="Dark_man123"]

what if i am?

roflcopter317

Then your eyeballs are defective.

For a 2007 game it is pretty outstanding. The colours and everything looked great.

Halo 3 looked pretty good at times. The forest level at the beginning had beautiful lighting, and the floods ... cavern place? had some nice textures and lighting. Still very meh by todays standards though.

Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts
Looks solid, but the frame rate is unstable.
Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

[QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

Then your eyeballs are defective.

WhenCicadasCry

For a 2007 game it is pretty outstanding. The colours and everything looked great.

Halo 3 looked pretty good at times. The forest level at the beginning had beautiful lighting, and the floods ... cavern place? had some nice textures and lighting. Still very meh by todays standards though.

Good ol halo 3 but this is reach :P
Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#59 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts
Graphics are pretty bland, which is the norm for the Halo series. The gameplay is amazing, though. Way better than Halo 3.Dr_Corndog
although i understand that this is your opinion, i must say that the graphics are in no way "bland" as you say...by ANY means. its probably one of the more colorful fps's between the two consoles. i wonder though if you think Reach is bland, what do you think of KZ2...
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Possible best 360 graphics shown yet (well AW is also a contender), but still less than Kz2 or U2.

Though the graphics fall well short of the hype before release.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
Its alright, i recognize some of the technical feats in the game, but i still think it looks ugly subjectively.
Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#62 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts

Terrible jaggies and terrible pop in. The game is nice a colorful though and the open areas add alot to the game. The models in the game are very nicely detailed and animation is top notch as always, but those jaggies....

rzepak
you my good sir have in fact never played reach and have ABSOLUTELY no idea what youre talking about.
Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#63 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts
Looks solid, but the frame rate is unstable.Einhanderkiller
many people say this but i havent had an issue with the framerate at all. nothing noticable at least. and im on the 5 or 6th level...
Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
[QUOTE="Einhanderkiller"]Looks solid, but the frame rate is unstable.slvrraven9
many people say this but i havent had an issue with the framerate at all. nothing noticable at least. and im on the 5 or 6th level...

according to analyses ive seen the framerate drops the most in cutscenes.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I thought it looked meh. I like Gears 2 better than this. Few pretty moments in there though and I like the Marine sniper model (Can't remember faction name. I fail at remembering.)

Avatar image for butteman12
butteman12

2726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#66 butteman12
Member since 2005 • 2726 Posts

Defintely the best on consoles right now. Incredible character/weapons models, unique art style and beautiful lighting.

Avatar image for deactivated-6079d224de716
deactivated-6079d224de716

2567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 deactivated-6079d224de716
Member since 2009 • 2567 Posts

Fun gameplay but ugly art-direction and outdated graphics.

Avatar image for xgeua
xgeua

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 xgeua
Member since 2010 • 98 Posts

Awsome skyboxes

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

ugly art-direction and outdated graphics.

Orchid87

Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks Halo has bad art.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="roflcopter317"]

What jaggies? What pop in? I have it playing on my pc monitor which I sit very close to, and didn't notice any of them things. You are either a cow, or have never played the game. Halo 3 had no pop in, and bungie said reach has about a 4x higher draw distance then halo 3.

Person0

Pop in is really noticeable with split screen and I don't know how you can't see the jaggies.

You cant compare split screen and regular single player. Of course split screen is going to have some visual problems it is rendering the game for 2 different people.

I was just saying the only time I noticed pop in, in the game.

Avatar image for deactivated-6079d224de716
deactivated-6079d224de716

2567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 deactivated-6079d224de716
Member since 2009 • 2567 Posts

Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks Halo has bad art.

ChubbyGuy40

I really don't understand how the characters and weapons designs straight from the Power Ranger shows and battlefields that consist of plain valleys and low-poly paper boxes that represent cities and military bases can be considered good art.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks Halo has bad art.

Orchid87

I really don't understand how the characters and weapons designs straight from the Power Ranger shows and battlefields that consist of plain valleys and low-poly paper boxes that represent cities and military bases can be considered good art.

I found it to strongly represent the generic space soldier idea honestly. the thing that is regarded as good about halo is the gameplay, which I don't find that great personally. But everyones opinion is different. I do really agree with what you said though.

Avatar image for deactivated-6079d224de716
deactivated-6079d224de716

2567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 deactivated-6079d224de716
Member since 2009 • 2567 Posts

I found it to strongly represent the generic space soldier idea honestly. the thing that is regarded as good about halo is the gameplay, which I don't find that great personally. But everyones opinion is different. I do really agree with what you said though.

ChubbyGuy40

Gameplay is fun enough. But it doesn't help when everything else is cringeworthy. I usually like space soldiers settings and I love sci-fi when it doesn't look like something from 80's cartoon.

Avatar image for RobbRipken
RobbRipken

263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#74 RobbRipken
Member since 2003 • 263 Posts

WOW! I just have to say I'm very pleasantly surprised by the comments about Halo Reach's graphics. I expected it to be mostly "Halo's graphics suck!" kind of comments. I personally think the game looks great (most of the time), but I also thought Halo 3 looked great, which many didn't agree with me. I love Halo's art style.

I think there were a few levels in multiplayer or campaign where I could see someone saying that they can't see a difference between Reach and Halo 3. It also has a few framerate drops. However, the game is absolutely stunning at times. The animations are terrific, the gun models are outstanding, and the explosions are great. The attention to detail is very strong in this game.

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

WOW! I just have to say I'm very pleasantly surprised by the comments about Halo Reach's graphics. I expected it to be mostly "Halo's graphics suck!" kind of comments. I personally think the game looks great (most of the time), but I also thought Halo 3 looked great, which many didn't agree with me. I love Halo's art style.

I think there were a few levels in multiplayer or campaign where I could see someone saying that they can't see a difference between Reach and Halo 3. It also has a few framerate drops. However, the game is absolutely stunning at times. The animations are terrific, the gun models are outstanding, and the explosions are great. The attention to detail is very strong in this game.

RobbRipken
I thought this too 0.o thank god i was Wrong
Avatar image for alextherussian
alextherussian

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 alextherussian
Member since 2009 • 2642 Posts
Im not impressed by the graphics. I have yet to finish the campaign though but it just does not stack up graphically to me. It does not help that half my multiplayer time is spent on forge maps that often look horrible, of all maps could they not have at least made blood glutch ground up?
Avatar image for mgs_freak91
mgs_freak91

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 mgs_freak91
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts
It's graphics are alright, I wouldn't ever consider it as a Graphics King though. Crysis, Metro 2033 and a whole lot of other games are much better looking when it comes to technical graphics. But this isn't really news, it's a fact that Halo isn't meant to be a powerhouse when it comes to killer graphics. It's a great looking game that can contend in a Graphics King vote, but won't win unless a whole bunch of fanboys come along and bump it up :S It's art style is amazing though, and it does have some great touches that boost the overall quality of the game (graphically). As some have mentioned already.
Avatar image for pepsikola001
pepsikola001

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 pepsikola001
Member since 2010 • 67 Posts

Graphics look beautiful to me. the colours are vibrant and the backdrops are incredible as mentioned. as for the game, i have to say i am very impressed. the fact that bungie released odst last year put me off. i was coming into this game with low expectations (more of the same). there are many subtle changes andadditions that keep the formula fresh. this game is so feature-rich that i dontknow where to begin.bungie, i salute you. some damn fine work with this one.

Avatar image for Merex760
Merex760

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 Merex760
Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts
It's alright. I'd give the graphics an 8/10. One of the better looking games on console.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts

After crysis reach is the second best graphical fps this genbigboss5ak
Umm, no it's not.

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts
[QUOTE="bigboss5ak"]After crysis reach is the second best graphical fps this genDragonfireXZ95
Umm, not it's not.

with the scale Probably is welll untill rage and crysis 2 :P
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="bigboss5ak"]After crysis reach is the second best graphical fps this genworknow222
Umm, not it's not.

with the scale Probably is welll untill rage and crysis 2 :P

Just Cause 2, ArmA 2, Bad Company 2, Gothic 4, Singularity...theres plenty of games that look better than Reach. Not all have as big of maps as Reach though. But I didn't find the maps to be that big except for a few.

Avatar image for gamedude234
gamedude234

2558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#83 gamedude234
Member since 2009 • 2558 Posts

an outstanding game. better than killzone 2 and heck better than half-life

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

an outstanding game. better than killzone 2 and heck better than half-life

gamedude234

Agreed and to show the b eauty of reach in 1080P ( yeah yeah the low HD stuff but this looks quite better from 720p or something) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9EjYOiv0Uk just go to the HD 1080p and pick it :D

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
[QUOTE="gamedude234"]

an outstanding game. better than killzone 2 and heck better than half-life

worknow222
Agreed and to show the b eauty of reach in 1080P ( yeah yeah the low HD stuff but this looks quite better from 720p or something) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9EjYOiv0Uk just go to the HD 1080p and pick it :D

Watch it in 1080p when the game is rendered in 1152x720? Whats the point in that? Watching it in 720p would be fine and save you bandwidth.
Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="gamedude234"]

an outstanding game. better than killzone 2 and heck better than half-life

ferret-gamer

Agreed and to show the b eauty of reach in 1080P ( yeah yeah the low HD stuff but this looks quite better from 720p or something) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9EjYOiv0Uk just go to the HD 1080p and pick it :D

Watch it in 1080p when the game is rendered in 1152x720? Whats the point in that? Watching it in 720p would be fine and save you bandwidth.

Probably but its very clear and to me clearer than the 720P but ey watch it in 720p if you want

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="worknow222"] Agreed and to show the b eauty of reach in 1080P ( yeah yeah the low HD stuff but this looks quite better from 720p or something) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9EjYOiv0Uk just go to the HD 1080p and pick it :D worknow222

Watch it in 1080p when the game is rendered in 1152x720? Whats the point in that? Watching it in 720p would be fine and save you bandwidth.

Probably but its very clear and to me clearer than the 720P but ey watch it in 720p if you want

looks exactly the same to me.
Avatar image for NotTarts
NotTarts

342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 NotTarts
Member since 2010 • 342 Posts

Although Reach doesn't look amazing as a whole, some of the detail in it is just mindblowing, particularlythe Covenant vehicles (zooming in with a sniper scope on a Wraith and still seeing scratches = epic). Let's also not forget the explosions:

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts
[QUOTE="worknow222"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] Watch it in 1080p when the game is rendered in 1152x720? Whats the point in that? Watching it in 720p would be fine and save you bandwidth.ferret-gamer

Probably but its very clear and to me clearer than the 720P but ey watch it in 720p if you want

looks exactly the same to me.

MIght be my monitor then Lol
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="hd5870corei7"][QUOTE="bigboss5ak"]After crysis reach is the second best graphical fps this genWhenCicadasCry

:lol: ! After Killzone 2, Crysis, Arma 2, Far Cry 2, MW2, BF:BC2 and 35 other FPS games maybe.

Nah. Looks better then BC2, MW2 and Killzone 2 imo.

Not the PC versions of BC2 and MW2.

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]

[QUOTE="hd5870corei7"] :lol: ! After Killzone 2, Crysis, Arma 2, Far Cry 2, MW2, BF:BC2 and 35 other FPS games maybe.Hakkai007

Nah. Looks better then BC2, MW2 and Killzone 2 imo.

Not the PC versions of BC2 and MW2.

Opinions are opinions
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

Opinions are opinions worknow222

Not when you compare how much tech it is pushing.

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

[QUOTE="worknow222"]Opinions are opinions Hakkai007

Not when you compare how much tech it is pushing.

so it's an opinion if i say hitler was a Smart man thats my opinion you may hate it to hell but deal with it
Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts
[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

Above average at best for a console game. It's not even the best looking game on the 360. Overhyped by lemmings.

FIipMode
Yep definetly overhyped Yet reach has better looking aspects than uncharted 2 and killzone 2

Besides character models and skyboxes what does Reach do better than those two games?

Bigger levels,more use of particle effects,no corridor shooter,more enemies on screen and having amazing graphics.. and the list goes on.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="worknow222"]Opinions are opinions worknow222

Not when you compare how much tech it is pushing.

so it's an opinion if i say hitler was a Smart man thats my opinion you may hate it to hell but deal with it

Thats not really an opinion though, experts place hitler's IQ to be around the 140 mark, easily qualifying him to be in the "smart" category.
Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

Not when you compare how much tech it is pushing.

ferret-gamer

so it's an opinion if i say hitler was a Smart man thats my opinion you may hate it to hell but deal with it

Thats not really an opinion though, experts place hitler's IQ to be around the 140 mark, easily qualifying him to be in the "smart" category.

ALOT of people still dont believe it hating on an opinion so i say if one man/girl like believes something let em who are we to say there Dumb for it?

Avatar image for deactivated-6079d224de716
deactivated-6079d224de716

2567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 deactivated-6079d224de716
Member since 2009 • 2567 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="worknow222"] Yep definetly overhyped Yet reach has better looking aspects than uncharted 2 and killzone 2Tessellation
Besides character models and skyboxes what does Reach do better than those two games?

Bigger levels,more use of particle effects,no corridor shooter,more enemies on screen and having amazing graphics.. and the list goes on.

Graphics are not that amazing for a 2010 game, more like 2007-2008 one. And bigger levels are made at the cost of details - most of the maps are bland and repetitive.

Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts
New Alexandria and Winter Contingency levels look stunning IMO probably some of the best on consoles. However overall it's probably only in the top 5 best looking console games.
Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="FIipMode"] Besides character models and skyboxes what does Reach do better than those two games?Orchid87

Bigger levels,more use of particle effects,no corridor shooter,more enemies on screen and having amazing graphics.. and the list goes on.

Graphics are not that amazing for a 2010 game, more like 2007-2008 one. And bigger levels are made at the cost of details - most of the maps are bland and repetitive.

Clearly has not played Reach

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#100 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

It looks ok. it seems a bit more darker/grittier then the other halo games as well.