I would like to say that while I do agree with alot of the people in terms of Zelda games not being rehashed I also don't really believe Call of Duty games are either. Like Zelda each campaign is a new and different story, often times they includes some new weapons and minor new mechanics or gameplay elements. The multiplayer is altered is some way such as how Black Ops reworked the unlock system and and tossed out death sreaks, ect.
While the changes from one Call of Duty to the next isn't quite as significant as Zelda I still wouldn't say they're just sitting on their butts, copying and pasting the last game onto new discs like some people seem to be suggesting.
Sure, some fans maybe disapointed at a lack of major change in the last few years but plenty more appear to be satisfied. Like with Zelda many people believe Call of Duty has got just about everything right and it shouldn't recieve any drastic changes.
Me personally? I've lost quite a bit of interest in both game series and I wont be purchasing either series next entry. Just because I'm not as interested or satisfied with either series does that mean they're bad or are in need of change? No. I'm not self centered enough to believe that. You people need to realise not every game needs to be catered to you. You've got your games you like, go with those. Let everyone else enjoy their Zelda and Call of Duties as they wish and you shouldn't think anything less of them for it. This is merely a hobby to most people, after all.
Log in to comment