The ever pondering thought

Avatar image for DVV512eak
DVV512eak

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DVV512eak
Member since 2005 • 357 Posts
Lu_Bu01 is down. Who's next?
 
Avatar image for C-GHOST
C-GHOST

9789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 C-GHOST
Member since 2004 • 9789 Posts

Who the hell voted for me?

lol

I'm not getting banned again, lol, I'm lucky they gave me a second chance.

Avatar image for Jack-Sparrow
Jack-Sparrow

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Jack-Sparrow
Member since 2006 • 802 Posts
Whoever the hell voted for JeffSteel needs to reconsider their powers of observation.
Avatar image for JeffSteel
JeffSteel

2989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 JeffSteel
Member since 2004 • 2989 Posts

Whoever the hell voted for JeffSteel needs to reconsider their powers of observation.Jack-Sparrow

It seems that we have a traitor in our midst........ :twisted:  time for some random terror!!

Avatar image for Mr_Buttman
Mr_Buttman

5528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Mr_Buttman
Member since 2005 • 5528 Posts
I don't know about the rest of you, but in my country we got freedom of speech. IMAO banning people is uncontitutional. AND IF YOUR NOT DOWN WITH THAT, I GOT TWO WORDS FOR YA...
Avatar image for Mr_Buttman
Mr_Buttman

5528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Mr_Buttman
Member since 2005 • 5528 Posts
**** IT!!!!!!!!!!
Avatar image for Mr_Buttman
Mr_Buttman

5528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Mr_Buttman
Member since 2005 • 5528 Posts
Sorry for the double post.
Avatar image for JeffSteel
JeffSteel

2989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 JeffSteel
Member since 2004 • 2989 Posts

Sorry for the double post.Mr_Buttman

Well, technically it is a triple post, with three posts covering an idea that should only take one post, but who cares.

Avatar image for C-GHOST
C-GHOST

9789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 C-GHOST
Member since 2004 • 9789 Posts

I don't know about the rest of you, but in my country we got freedom of speech. IMAO banning people is uncontitutional. AND IF YOUR NOT DOWN WITH THAT, I GOT TWO WORDS FOR YA...Mr_Buttman

It is constitutional, Gamespot has the right to run their own organization however they want, assuming they don't break any legal contracts (and they don't, especially considering most members don't pay them anything anyway).

Once you click "I agree" to the ToS, you waive your freedom of speech and are then subject to Gamespot's regulations.  All GS can do is ban you or punish you in their own realm though, they have no further jurisdiction obviously.

Avatar image for taisho_rolyat
taisho_rolyat

3105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 taisho_rolyat
Member since 2004 • 3105 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Buttman"]I don't know about the rest of you, but in my country we got freedom of speech. IMAO banning people is uncontitutional. AND IF YOUR NOT DOWN WITH THAT, I GOT TWO WORDS FOR YA...C-GHOST

It is constitutional, Gamespot has the right to run their own organization however they want, assuming they don't break any legal contracts (and they don't, especially considering most members don't pay them anything anyway).

Once you click "I agree" to the ToS, you waive your freedom of speech and are then subject to Gamespot's regulations.  All GS can do is ban you or punish you in their own realm though, they have no further jurisdiction obviously.

Quoted for truth.

This is gamespot's site, and if they don't like us, then they have the constitutional right to kick us out.

Avatar image for ranger_waha
ranger_waha

3187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#11 ranger_waha
Member since 2005 • 3187 Posts
[QUOTE="C-GHOST"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Buttman"]I don't know about the rest of you, but in my country we got freedom of speech. IMAO banning people is uncontitutional. AND IF YOUR NOT DOWN WITH THAT, I GOT TWO WORDS FOR YA...taisho_rolyat

It is constitutional, Gamespot has the right to run their own organization however they want, assuming they don't break any legal contracts (and they don't, especially considering most members don't pay them anything anyway).

Once you click "I agree" to the ToS, you waive your freedom of speech and are then subject to Gamespot's regulations.  All GS can do is ban you or punish you in their own realm though, they have no further jurisdiction obviously.

Quoted for truth.

This is gamespot's site, and if they don't like us, then they have the constitutional right to kick us out.

Somebody needs to edit the ToS, so that if we don't like all the glitches and hang-ups of gamespot, that we can ban them, or something alike to that.
Avatar image for C-GHOST
C-GHOST

9789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 C-GHOST
Member since 2004 • 9789 Posts
[QUOTE="taisho_rolyat"][QUOTE="C-GHOST"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Buttman"]I don't know about the rest of you, but in my country we got freedom of speech. IMAO banning people is uncontitutional. AND IF YOUR NOT DOWN WITH THAT, I GOT TWO WORDS FOR YA...ranger_waha

It is constitutional, Gamespot has the right to run their own organization however they want, assuming they don't break any legal contracts (and they don't, especially considering most members don't pay them anything anyway).

Once you click "I agree" to the ToS, you waive your freedom of speech and are then subject to Gamespot's regulations.  All GS can do is ban you or punish you in their own realm though, they have no further jurisdiction obviously.

Quoted for truth.

This is gamespot's site, and if they don't like us, then they have the constitutional right to kick us out.

Somebody needs to edit the ToS, so that if we don't like all the glitches and hang-ups of gamespot, that we can ban them, or something alike to that.

...

It doesn't work that way.....

and they would never sign it.

They suck and they know it, lol.

Avatar image for ranger_waha
ranger_waha

3187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#13 ranger_waha
Member since 2005 • 3187 Posts
[QUOTE="ranger_waha"][QUOTE="taisho_rolyat"][QUOTE="C-GHOST"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Buttman"]I don't know about the rest of you, but in my country we got freedom of speech. IMAO banning people is uncontitutional. AND IF YOUR NOT DOWN WITH THAT, I GOT TWO WORDS FOR YA...C-GHOST

It is constitutional, Gamespot has the right to run their own organization however they want, assuming they don't break any legal contracts (and they don't, especially considering most members don't pay them anything anyway).

Once you click "I agree" to the ToS, you waive your freedom of speech and are then subject to Gamespot's regulations.  All GS can do is ban you or punish you in their own realm though, they have no further jurisdiction obviously.

Quoted for truth.

This is gamespot's site, and if they don't like us, then they have the constitutional right to kick us out.

Somebody needs to edit the ToS, so that if we don't like all the glitches and hang-ups of gamespot, that we can ban them, or something alike to that.

...

It doesn't work that way.....

and they would never sign it.

They suck and they know it, lol.

Yeah, but it's worth a try, right?