This topic is locked from further discussion.
Einstien was self taught. So are you saying he's an idiot just because he didn't do good in school?eztarg8Einstien was not a fighter, so that arguement is invalid in the first place. It's like saying "Ice cream is a food. It tastes good. Logically, pizza must taste good too, because it is also a food."
Well that training never really help if he can never finish off ganon i mean how many zelda's he was in already.Sora on the other hand kills his opponents you never see ansem again cause sora killed him.blademasterxRunning under theory, Gannon could be some type of immortal. YHou can get rid of him temporarily, but never permanently. Considering the horrible things he causes when he comes back, it is worth it to get rid of him, atleast for a little while, so the training is a huge help
] GOD WHY CAN'T YOU GUYS LET IT GO! And metal y do you hate kh so much? it's not a bad game.blademasterxI can't let go cause fs metal can't see the fact that link sucksI could say the exact same thing about Sora
[QUOTE="eztarg8"]Einstien was self taught. So are you saying he's an idiot just because he didn't do good in school?fs_metalEinstien was not a fighter, so that arguement is invalid in the first place. It's like saying "Ice cream is a food. It tastes good. Logically, pizza must taste good too, because it is also a food."
[QUOTE="blademasterx"]Well that training never really help if he can never finish off ganon i mean how many zelda's he was in already.Sora on the other hand kills his opponents you never see ansem again cause sora killed him.fs_metalRunning under theory, Gannon could be some type of immortal. YHou can get rid of him temporarily, but never permanently. Considering the horrible things he causes when he comes back, it is worth it to get rid of him, atleast for a little while, so the training is a huge help
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="eztarg8"]Einstien was self taught. So are you saying he's an idiot just because he didn't do good in school?liquid_sEinstien was not a fighter, so that arguement is invalid in the first place. It's like saying "Ice cream is a food. It tastes good. Logically, pizza must taste good too, because it is also a food."
If FF7 seph = KH2 seph than the battle in KH2 would have been a hell of a lot harder than KH1, then realisiticaly a 14 year old with a big key would never beat him then. Metal is right, the charecters is written as if they never existed as he said in a previous post.
BUT if It was really true FF7 seph = KH2 seph than that would just be plain old sad that a 14 year old kid again with a big key beating him, a guy who almost destroyed the world with a big metoer, and killed so many people. It would never make any sence so it again shows that metal is right from his previous post, the charecters are written as if they never existed.
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="blademasterx"]Well that training never really help if he can never finish off ganon i mean how many zelda's he was in already.Sora on the other hand kills his opponents you never see ansem again cause sora killed him.blademasterxRunning under theory, Gannon could be some type of immortal. YHou can get rid of him temporarily, but never permanently. Considering the horrible things he causes when he comes back, it is worth it to get rid of him, atleast for a little while, so the training is a huge help
[QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="eztarg8"]Einstien was self taught. So are you saying he's an idiot just because he didn't do good in school?liquid_sEinstien was not a fighter, so that arguement is invalid in the first place. It's like saying "Ice cream is a food. It tastes good. Logically, pizza must taste good too, because it is also a food."
[QUOTE="liquid_s"][QUOTE="fs_metal"][QUOTE="eztarg8"]Einstien was self taught. So are you saying he's an idiot just because he didn't do good in school?eztarg8Einstien was not a fighter, so that arguement is invalid in the first place. It's like saying "Ice cream is a food. It tastes good. Logically, pizza must taste good too, because it is also a food."
You clearly stated here:I KNOW THATS WHAT I SAID! Just bcus they are both food and one is good does NOT make the other good also. If the they are both food and one is EATABLE they both are eatable and that's a fact. And my Einstien comparison does make sence. You aren't able to do math equations with numbers past the tenth degree overnight. Also you didn't answer me how the masters could have created new martial arts iff they were all taught by teach. "chicken and the egg" They had to come up with them on there own and does that mean that there new style is instantly worse just because he wasn't taught by someone? It's results that really matter. Aikido looks like nothing is happening and rather timid, yet still lets you take down even the biggest of foes.
It would not be since they both are food they both taste good.
that both taste good.
I was pointing out that just because something is a food, it does not automatically make it taste good.
fs_metal
[QUOTE="fs_metal"]You clearly stated here:I KNOW THATS WHAT I SAID! Just bcus they are both food and one is good does NOT make the other good also. If the they are both food and one is EATABLE they both are eatable and that's a fact. And my Einstien comparison does make sence. You aren't able to do math equations with numbers past the tenth degree overnight. Also you didn't answer me how the masters could have created new martial arts iff they were all taught by teach. "chicken and the egg" They had to come up with them on there own and does that mean that there new style is instantly worse just because he wasn't taught by someone? It's results that really matter. Aikido looks like nothing is happening and rather timid, yet still lets you take down even the biggest of foes.I already explained why your Einstien comparison is a bad one. I will not explain it again
It would not be since they both are food they both taste good.
that both taste good.
I was pointing out that just because something is a food, it does not automatically make it taste good.
eztarg8
[QUOTE="fs_metal"]You clearly stated here:I KNOW THATS WHAT I SAID! Just bcus they are both food and one is good does NOT make the other good also. If the they are both food and one is EATABLE they both are eatable and that's a fact. And my Einstien comparison does make sence. You aren't able to do math equations with numbers past the tenth degree overnight. Also you didn't answer me how the masters could have created new martial arts iff they were all taught by teach. "chicken and the egg" They had to come up with them on there own and does that mean that there new style is instantly worse just because he wasn't taught by someone? It's results that really matter. Aikido looks like nothing is happening and rather timid, yet still lets you take down even the biggest of foes. And i agree masters did have to make up there own fighting styles maybe sora is just creating a new way of swordplay.Did you ever think of that fs metal?no because your zelda fanboyism always come first.
It would not be since they both are food they both taste good.
that both taste good.
I was pointing out that just because something is a food, it does not automatically make it taste good.
eztarg8
I am not even going to take into consideration any arguements from you. You cannot drop the Link thing. You cannot debate without being flamatory. All your arguements basically ammount to "I am right because I say I am, and if you disagree with me, you are wrong." You have the debating skills of a middle schooler. You are the type of person that would get kicked off of a debate team for saying "Yeah, well F*ck you!"wtf?
fs_metal
Somehow I knew you wouldn't get it.fs_metalI get what your trying to say, it is relativism though, we both agree on our own opinions, neither of them being truly right, so we are both in the right side of thinking. It is when we disagree that it comes to a clash. I think that Sora can weild his blade well because I know it is a game, which it is, and I know that it is fantasy, which it is. You think he sucks due to havin g no forms or anything, and agree Link is a better swordsman. I am not saying your wrong, just argung my opinion, in a bad way. Sorry, fs, if i seemed otherwise.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment