Ive been thinking it will be on 2 discs since it was first shown to us. I got the feeling from the first trailer that this game is going to be big and just immerse you in.
I think I brought this up a while ago and someone said that it would be hard to have it on two disks since Zelda is quite open ended. For a linear game such as the RE games, you can afford to have parts on different discs. I think they could do 2 discs and have a lot of overlapping content. That way, some elements would overlap on both discs while, some story elements will be able to be spread over multitple discs.
That's true. It would be a pain if you had to load the other disc in order to explore an earlier dungeon with your new items. But, then again, there is no spoon.
i hope its long enough for 2 discs but i hope they make it so when you go to different places you dont have to keep going from 1 to 2. but you probly wont have to
That would certainly be a very good sign of a long adventure, which is exactly what I am looking forward too *as long as a triforce piece hunt is not included ;)*
That would certainly be a very good sign of a long adventure, which is exactly what I am looking forward too *as long as a triforce piece hunt is not included ;)* Mr_Bob471
That took awhile but it wasn't that bad...infact I kinda liked that in WW.
[QUOTE="Mr_Bob471"]That would certainly be a very good sign of a long adventure, which is exactly what I am looking forward too *as long as a triforce piece hunt is not included ;)* RErikku12
That took awhile but it wasn't that bad...infact I kinda liked that in WW.
woah thats odd i hated that hunt damn tingle charging 300 to decipher a map anyways RE4 had 2 discs and it wasnt aven that long maybe just the cinamatec and voice acting thoughÂ
woah thats odd i hated that hunt damn tingle charging 300 to decipher a map anyways RE4 had 2 discs and it wasnt aven that long maybe just the cinamatec and voice acting though LOZlink
RE4 had a huge attention to detail. It probably has the best graphics on the Game Cube.
I hope they do :) This will be one of the few games that I actually unlock and search everything. It's something about the Zelda series that has held my attention all the way throughÂ
[QUOTE="Mr_Bob471"]That would certainly be a very good sign of a long adventure, which is exactly what I am looking forward too *as long as a triforce piece hunt is not included ;)* Gary_Jinfield
That took awhile but it wasn't that bad...infact I kinda liked that in WW.
:shock:
You, you, liked the Triforce Hunt?:shock:
Yea...it gave me alot of time to explore islands while I was looking for them.
[QUOTE="Mr_Bob471"]That would certainly be a very good sign of a long adventure, which is exactly what I am looking forward too *as long as a triforce piece hunt is not included ;)* RErikku12
That took awhile but it wasn't that bad...infact I kinda liked that in WW.
:shock:
You, you, liked the Triforce Hunt?:shock:
Yea...it gave me alot of time to explore islands while I was looking for them.
But the sailing, was so boring. And the islands were so small.
Sailing wasn't boring. It may have been pointless, but not mind-numbingly boring. I will say that the cyclone teleporting song really helped the game!
Sailing wasn't boring. It may have been pointless, but not mind-numbingly boring. I will say that the cyclone teleporting song really helped the game!UNOwen802
Even so, warping across a huge world would be impossible to play if the world was spread out over two discs.UNOwen802
Unless the game uses some sort of technology that overlaps the information found on both disks so, after the first loading of the game, you never have to switch the disk again!
Space age! The map would have to be loaded on both discs, realistically. The side quests would have to be overlapping. The characters would have to be overlapping, except for those only in cutscenes. Too much would have to overlap.
Space age! The map would have to be loaded on both discs, realistically. The side quests would have to be overlapping. The characters would have to be overlapping, except for those only in cutscenes. Too much would have to overlap.UNOwen802
If anyone can do it, its Nintendo. (discounting Chuck Norris of course)
i want there to be 3 discs 1. TP 2. MM 3. All the original nes and supernes
darthisaki
That would be overkill. Like, using a light arrow to kill a keese. Sure, you get 50 rupees, but the energy required just doesn't make it worth it. A regular ol' arrow should be the most you need.
i want there to be 3 discs 1. TP 2. MM 3. All the original nes and supernes
UNOwen802
That would be overkill. Like, using a light arrow to kill a keese. Sure, you get 50 rupees, but the energy required just doesn't make it worth it. A regular ol' arrow should be the most you need.
No, ice arrows are cooler than light arrows. I don't know what you were attepting to say with that last statement, but, if you use light/ice/fire arrows to kill keese, you won't have enough magic to take on the REAL enemies.
No, ice arrows are cooler than light arrows. I don't know what you were attepting to say with that last statement, but, if you use light/ice/fire arrows to kill keese, you won't have enough magic to take on the REAL enemies.UNOwen802
You could always drink some Chateau Romani. Then you wouldn't have to worry about magic.
Look, that's not the point. The point is I hate saurkraut! That's all I'm really trying to say.
Actually, I'm sure you already get my point, being that my point has already been made:Â Using the 2nd disc to TP as a LOZ collectors edition is a bit of overkill.
unless they put bonus content on the second disc, (like retro zelda games, or stuff like that)Â i don't even think they'd need it, because the only GCN games i've ever played with 2 discs is Medal of Honor rising sun, and LOTR the third age. TP doesnt have voice overs (that we know of) or 20 minute long MGS or FF cutscenes, so it will prolly only be 1 disc. I could be wrong though.
Log in to comment