Theeman200:
"so thats how jesus won so many followers. HE WAS RADIOACTIVE!"
Foolz3h
I'm not saying now nor ever that all religions are equal because I am Christian and I believe through and through that is the best religion out there. I am not a religious relativist, but I am one to speak for religious tolerance. You wouldn't take a shot at muhammad, you wouldn't take a shot at budda ... so why take a shot at Jesus? He as God is as important to my faith as those who created the other religions in the world.
[QUOTE="Foolz3h"]Theeman200:
"so thats how jesus won so many followers. HE WAS RADIOACTIVE!"
Temptation53
I'm not saying now nor ever that all religions are equal because I am Christian and I believe through and through that is the best religion out there. I am not a religious relativist, but I am one to speak for religious tolerance. You wouldn't take a shot at muhammad, you wouldn't take a shot at budda ... so why take a shot at Jesus? He as God is as important to my faith as those who created the other religions in the world.
You are IMHO completely overeacting.
I honestly do not see how it is a shot at your faith. Nor do I see how is intollerant.
"You wouldn't take a shot at muhammad, you wouldn't take a shot at budda ... so why take a shot at Jesus?"
That's rather hypothetical but he hasn't taken a shot at Jesus as far as I can see.
I'm a Christian too and honestly, I wasn't offended that he was insulting Jesus, becuz he really isn't. But I was offended that such a lousy caption won.
All things aside, the painting itself was rather strange (he really IS glowing...) and the fact that he's making fun of how the artist portrayed Jesus doesn't mean he's making fun of Jesus necessarily. Outside of the context, the remark could be highly offensive, but in this context he was just trying to be clever with the portrayal in the painting. Or at least, that's how I saw it.
yes, irmeleeman5995 is right. I apologize if I offended anyone with my caption. I was just trying to interpret the painting in the most humorous way possible, and that was what first came to mind. I'll delete it now.
I'm a Christian too and honestly, I wasn't offended that he was insulting Jesus, becuz he really isn't. But I was offended that such a lousy caption won.
All things aside, the painting itself was rather strange (he really IS glowing...) and the fact that he's making fun of how the artist portrayed Jesus doesn't mean he's making fun of Jesus necessarily. Outside of the context, the remark could be highly offensive, but in this context he was just trying to be clever with the portrayal in the painting. Or at least, that's how I saw it.
irmeleeman5995
Damn, that's what I meant to say.
And there was only one other caption and his was funnier imo. :P
"Attack of the blurry spectators."
I admit that was very bad. :P But this way, the competition doesn't default to the only entrant winning. 8) That and I'll hopefully be able to come up with something for the next one.
"Can you put my career on hold? I think my pregnant wife's calling from the hospital."
"As long as I get to remain second-best."
I tried :P
"Can you put my career on hold? I think my pregnant wife's calling from the hospital."
"As long as I get to remain second-best."
I tried :P
iloveflash
Yeah this picture didn't lend itself to a whole lot...:roll:
[QUOTE="iloveflash"]"Can you put my career on hold? I think my pregnant wife's calling from the hospital."
"As long as I get to remain second-best."
I tried :P
irmeleeman5995
Yeah this picture didn't lend itself to a whole lot...:roll:
If you looked it up you would find it would dammit! :P
Though, not sure how you'd be able to work out what to look up from it but whatever.
This union needs more Aussies! :P
LOL WTF. OMG SO MANY POSSIBILITIES...
Ok heres mine:
"I just hypnotized him with my finger. Now watch what happens when I put it in his mouth..."
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment