WWEv Weekly - RAW, ECW, iMPACT!, SmackDown: WEEK 35

  • 65 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for Link256
Link256

29195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Link256
Member since 2005 • 29195 Posts

^Again, its not about what Cena is saying --- its how he is saying it.

Avatar image for wwe4ever_in05
wwe4ever_in05

5173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#52 wwe4ever_in05
Member since 2005 • 5173 Posts

- WWE RAW did a 3.2 rating on Monday, down from a 3.7 last week. The drop is largely due to the show airing on Sci-Fi. The show did hours of 3.0 and 3.3. The RAW replay that aired on USA Network at 11PM ET did a 1.0 rating off hours of 1.1 and 0.9.

- The US Open, airing in RAW's Monday night timeslot, did a 1.0 rating.

- ECW On Sci-Fi did a 1.3 rating on Tuesday night, down from a 1.7 the previous week.

Credit: PWInsider.com

Link256

I don't understand why USA has to have RAW move over just so they can show Tennis that has worst ratings than ECW.

Avatar image for The_Dude14
The_Dude14

17165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#53 The_Dude14
Member since 2004 • 17165 Posts
[QUOTE="Link256"] - WWE RAW did a 3.2 rating on Monday, down from a 3.7 last week. The drop is largely due to the show airing on Sci-Fi. The show did hours of 3.0 and 3.3. The RAW replay that aired on USA Network at 11PM ET did a 1.0 rating off hours of 1.1 and 0.9.

- The US Open, airing in RAW's Monday night timeslot, did a 1.0 rating.

- ECW On Sci-Fi did a 1.3 rating on Tuesday night, down from a 1.7 the previous week.

Credit: PWInsider.com wwe4ever_in05

I don't understand why USA has to have RAW move over just so they can show Tennis that has worst ratings than ECW.

Even though its a smaller audience, advertisers percieve that audience to be a higher class audience than folks who like wrasslin'. You won't see many BMW commercials around Raw. BMW ain't gonna pay the big bucks to advertise to what it believes is the trailer park crowd. Its a smaller audience that advertisers are willing to pay more to reach. Same thing with the Dog Show.

Avatar image for trick_man01
trick_man01

11441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#54 trick_man01
Member since 2003 • 11441 Posts
[QUOTE="wwe4ever_in05"][QUOTE="Link256"] - WWE RAW did a 3.2 rating on Monday, down from a 3.7 last week. The drop is largely due to the show airing on Sci-Fi. The show did hours of 3.0 and 3.3. The RAW replay that aired on USA Network at 11PM ET did a 1.0 rating off hours of 1.1 and 0.9.

- The US Open, airing in RAW's Monday night timeslot, did a 1.0 rating.

- ECW On Sci-Fi did a 1.3 rating on Tuesday night, down from a 1.7 the previous week.

Credit: PWInsider.com The_Dude14

I don't understand why USA has to have RAW move over just so they can show Tennis that has worst ratings than ECW.

Even though its a smaller audience, advertisers percieve that audience to be a higher class audience than folks who like wrasslin'. You won't see many BMW commercials around Raw. BMW ain't gonna pay the big bucks to advertise to what it believes is the trailer park crowd. Its a smaller audience that advertisers are willing to pay more to reach. Same thing with the Dog Show.

The real reason, is that the US Open (and the dog show) has a very long contract with USA that was active long before WWE came back to the network. Not because of perceived higher and lower classes.
Avatar image for The_Dude14
The_Dude14

17165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#55 The_Dude14
Member since 2004 • 17165 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Dude14"][QUOTE="wwe4ever_in05"][QUOTE="Link256"] - WWE RAW did a 3.2 rating on Monday, down from a 3.7 last week. The drop is largely due to the show airing on Sci-Fi. The show did hours of 3.0 and 3.3. The RAW replay that aired on USA Network at 11PM ET did a 1.0 rating off hours of 1.1 and 0.9.

- The US Open, airing in RAW's Monday night timeslot, did a 1.0 rating.

- ECW On Sci-Fi did a 1.3 rating on Tuesday night, down from a 1.7 the previous week.

Credit: PWInsider.com trick_man01

I don't understand why USA has to have RAW move over just so they can show Tennis that has worst ratings than ECW.

Even though its a smaller audience, advertisers percieve that audience to be a higher class audience than folks who like wrasslin'. You won't see many BMW commercials around Raw. BMW ain't gonna pay the big bucks to advertise to what it believes is the trailer park crowd. Its a smaller audience that advertisers are willing to pay more to reach. Same thing with the Dog Show.

The real reason, is that the US Open (and the dog show) has a very long contract with USA that was active long before WWE came back to the network. Not because of perceived higher and lower classes.

And this was happening on WWE's previous run on USA as well. Why does USA keep these programs and is more than happy to bump Raw to keep them, even though they draw fractions of the Raw ratings when they've had the opportunities? Advertising. Advertising is what runs the TV world. There's a reason you'll see BMW and diamond commercials during tennis and the Dog show, while Raw will get Stacker and Ax Body spray.

Advertising is the reason that WCW is owned by WWE. Eric Bischoff had a company ready to buy WCW when TNT decided to drop WCW as part of a format change and they decided that WCW did not fit that format, even though it'd draw higher ratings of most of the stuff replacing it. Why would TNT change its format? To draw a more valuable demographic to get better paying advertising. Without a TV deal, Bischoff's deal fell through and Vince bought WCW for a bargain.

Avatar image for Stargazmo69
Stargazmo69

1063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Stargazmo69
Member since 2005 • 1063 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Dude14"][QUOTE="wwe4ever_in05"][QUOTE="Link256"] - WWE RAW did a 3.2 rating on Monday, down from a 3.7 last week. The drop is largely due to the show airing on Sci-Fi. The show did hours of 3.0 and 3.3. The RAW replay that aired on USA Network at 11PM ET did a 1.0 rating off hours of 1.1 and 0.9.

- The US Open, airing in RAW's Monday night timeslot, did a 1.0 rating.

- ECW On Sci-Fi did a 1.3 rating on Tuesday night, down from a 1.7 the previous week.

Credit: PWInsider.com trick_man01

I don't understand why USA has to have RAW move over just so they can show Tennis that has worst ratings than ECW.

Even though its a smaller audience, advertisers percieve that audience to be a higher class audience than folks who like wrasslin'. You won't see many BMW commercials around Raw. BMW ain't gonna pay the big bucks to advertise to what it believes is the trailer park crowd. Its a smaller audience that advertisers are willing to pay more to reach. Same thing with the Dog Show.

The real reason, is that the US Open (and the dog show) has a very long contract with USA that was active long before WWE came back to the network. Not because of perceived higher and lower classes.

I like the_dude's answer better :P

Avatar image for wwe4ever_in05
wwe4ever_in05

5173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#57 wwe4ever_in05
Member since 2005 • 5173 Posts
[QUOTE="trick_man01"][QUOTE="The_Dude14"][QUOTE="wwe4ever_in05"][QUOTE="Link256"] - WWE RAW did a 3.2 rating on Monday, down from a 3.7 last week. The drop is largely due to the show airing on Sci-Fi. The show did hours of 3.0 and 3.3. The RAW replay that aired on USA Network at 11PM ET did a 1.0 rating off hours of 1.1 and 0.9.

- The US Open, airing in RAW's Monday night timeslot, did a 1.0 rating.

- ECW On Sci-Fi did a 1.3 rating on Tuesday night, down from a 1.7 the previous week.

Credit: PWInsider.com The_Dude14

I don't understand why USA has to have RAW move over just so they can show Tennis that has worst ratings than ECW.

Even though its a smaller audience, advertisers percieve that audience to be a higher class audience than folks who like wrasslin'. You won't see many BMW commercials around Raw. BMW ain't gonna pay the big bucks to advertise to what it believes is the trailer park crowd. Its a smaller audience that advertisers are willing to pay more to reach. Same thing with the Dog Show.

The real reason, is that the US Open (and the dog show) has a very long contract with USA that was active long before WWE came back to the network. Not because of perceived higher and lower classes.

And this was happening on WWE's previous run on USA as well. Why does USA keep these programs and is more than happy to bump Raw to keep them, even though they draw fractions of the Raw ratings when they've had the opportunities? Advertising. Advertising is what runs the TV world. There's a reason you'll see BMW and diamond commercials during tennis and the Dog show, while Raw will get Stacker and Ax Body spray.

Advertising is the reason that WCW is owned by WWE. Eric Bischoff had a company ready to buy WCW when TNT decided to drop WCW as part of a format change and they decided that WCW did not fit that format, even though it'd draw higher ratings of most of the stuff replacing it. Why would TNT change its format? To draw a more valuable demographic to get better paying advertising. Without a TV deal, Bischoff's deal fell through and Vince bought WCW for a bargain.

You know this may sound funny weird, but I was thinking about how Vince got to buy WCW today.

Avatar image for FlamesFan2
FlamesFan2

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 FlamesFan2
Member since 2006 • 5118 Posts
Wow. Impact didn't look completely horrible this week. Maybe I'll check out the replay on Saturday.
Avatar image for Stargazmo69
Stargazmo69

1063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Stargazmo69
Member since 2005 • 1063 Posts

Wow. Impact didn't look completely horrible this week. Maybe I'll check out the replay on Saturday.FlamesFan2

It was a surprisingly good show. The main event was really entertaining IMO and took up half the show. Unfortunately Pacman Jones made an appearance in the end to 'give someone an autograph' but we only had to hear him speak once or twice.

Avatar image for iloverikku11
iloverikku11

11039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 iloverikku11
Member since 2005 • 11039 Posts
are SD or ECW worth watching tonight?
Avatar image for Stargazmo69
Stargazmo69

1063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Stargazmo69
Member since 2005 • 1063 Posts
Wtf, they're not showing SD, instead they're showing lame baseball (the worst sport ever).
Avatar image for tman93
tman93

7769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#62 tman93
Member since 2006 • 7769 Posts
are SD or ECW worth watching tonight?iloverikku11
Oh yes, best ECW and Smackdown in alongggggg time IMO. Expically Smackdown.
Avatar image for wwe4ever_in05
wwe4ever_in05

5173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#63 wwe4ever_in05
Member since 2005 • 5173 Posts

Smackdown so far has been good, MVP and Matt hardy are tag Champs. Ballin!!!!!!!!!

Kane Vs. Finlay 2 sucked kanelost the match that he should of won. :(

Avatar image for mrgab
mrgab

23329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 1

#64 mrgab
Member since 2005 • 23329 Posts

are SD or ECW worth watching tonight?iloverikku11

SD is ok, especially the tag team title match. ECW nope.

Avatar image for wwervin
wwervin

10274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#65 wwervin
Member since 2003 • 10274 Posts
Don't see this week's RAW thread so I'll post this here. A Cena heel turn? Hmm... Who else is watching tonight?