why would there be a price cut? the thing is already inexpensive.
A pro with 2 games is 350.
tommcruise
Several reasons that I can think of.
1) The 360 is NOT inexpensive. Sure, compared to a PS3 it is, but so is a Lexus compared to an Audi. MS has consistently talked about the importance of getting to a mass market price ($199 is what they stated) to really get sales going this gen. As much as they have talked about it, I would suspect a plan has been put into place to get them there by a certain timeframe.
2) The 360 was released in 11/05. It is now 1/08. Manufacturing cost have unquestionably come down significantly since then (I've read that the PS3 is around half of the rumored original cost to manufacturer now). That being the case, it would only make sense that MS has been positioning themselves for a price cut by reducing manufacturing costs.
3) The first price cut (which, for the record, came later in its respective lifespan than any other console before it) was a small price cut, timed for the release of Madden '08 in particular. With expected high console sales during the release of Madden and Halo 3, MS didn't HAVE to do a price cut. Packing the two games in the box, IIRC, was part of a holiday bundle. I don't know if it is something that will continue indefinitely. With the first price cut being so small, it would only make sense that a LARGER price cut was being planned. Another $20-50 price cut would just not move them close enough to that mass market price.
4) It is imperative that, during this year where the PS3 will receive some high profile titles, that MS distance itself price-wise from the PS3 and move much, MUCH closer to the Wii.
Well, those are my reasons (at least all I can think of right now). So that's where my $199 Arcade, $249 Pro and $349 Elite predictions came from. And the timing comes from GTA IV's expected release timeframe.
Log in to comment