For me id have to say Gears of War. I mean it was cool for about a few weeks and then, for me anyways, got old. The single player wasnt bad, but the multiplayer was horrible after awhile. Everyone would just glitch and it made it no fun at all. Also i kind of wish they had more than like 6 or 7 weapons. I mean the game is set kind of in the future. they could have some better weapons than everyones favorite, the shotgun. Anyway i just thought this game isnt as great as everyone makes it out to be.
[QUOTE="pinionxl"]Rainbow Six Vegas. I do not understand why that series is popular at all. Bad graphics, bad gameplay, poor story... yet everyone loves it.tylerdurden2621
You are joking right...?
No. That's what this thread is about... having an opinion opposite than the norm...?
A noob question, I don't care. But it seemed relevant towards this topic and I've heard the term quite a lot on these, but what exactly constitutes a AAA game, pardon if it's a stupid question, but I'd like to know..
GoW - gonane get flamed for this but you asked for opinion............although graphics were stunning, i found the story bland, the gameplay slow and repetitive, online was a bit primative, and press A for everything was just plain lazy by the programmers! The one AAA game on 360 that makes me cringe at the thought of a sequel........
R6 Vegas... I'm not a big fan of so called "realistic" shooters, but I like GRAW1&2. Anyway, hated R6's campaignbecause of the nonsensical plot, repetitive gameplay, moronic AI... And then with the multiplayer: half-baked coop modes, lots of glitches with the cover-system, boring sniper battles (I prefer close quarter combat, like in GOW and hopefully the Club), ugly graphics, unbalanced gameplay (customization = better equipment = if you don't play A LOT, you don't stand a chance), plus I hate all that crappy SWAT fetichism... It just makes me sick.
I like the game, but its just so mediocre and horrible compared to the first one. Plus it doesnt help that you have all these morons on the forums who think Halois the second coming of Christ.
pezboy7
Agreed.
Halo 3 was great at first and I loved the storyline a TON and the multiplayer was good too but it was short-lived I think mainly because of COD 4... also Assassins Creed was great too but like Halo 3 it was short-llived aswell, ofcourse no multiplayer didn't help but we didn't expect that anyways, good just very short...
[QUOTE="pinionxl"]Rainbow Six Vegas. I do not understand why that series is popular at all. Bad graphics, bad gameplay, poor story... yet everyone loves it.tylerdurden2621
You are joking right...?
He must be!!! Blasphemy!!! :lol: just kidding, I do love it though... but to each his own...
Bioshock. Nothing about that game kept me interested enough to play for more than an hour, let alone finish the game. I think at this point Bioshock is more overrated than Halo.Spindoc_SEI
Call of Duty 4...and 3 and 2, I just can't bring myself to liike the series...I honestly couldn't tell you what I dislike but there's nothing all that outstanding (although the dog attacks in CoD4 are pretty cool)
A noob question, I don't care. But it seemed relevant towards this topic and I've heard the term quite a lot on these, but what exactly constitutes a AAA game, pardon if it's a stupid question, but I'd like to know..thekidmrj
I still don't know exactly myself never heard people use the term till a few months ago. To me AAA seems to mean just a big budget game.
Halo 3. The whole cortana thing was retarded, and the multiplayer has ranks (Not like the matchmaking ranks, but lieutenant and stuff) but they dont do anything. There were barely any maps, and the only ones that were really any good were the ones from halo 2 and High ground.
I would have to say Gears. The single player campaign was great, but I didn't seem to have fun with the multiplayer mainly because of the bullet lag and host advantage.
Log in to comment