Activision making a Modern Warfare 2, not under the COD name?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for snipeshot11
snipeshot11

1006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 snipeshot11
Member since 2007 • 1006 Posts
I'm sure everyone knows about cod5 being confirmed and being in WWII, I think it would be a good idea for Activision to make a Modern Warefare, but not under the COD name..what do you guys think?
Avatar image for Altair1337
Altair1337

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 Altair1337
Member since 2007 • 387 Posts
that would make sense for them. milk CoD like they milk guitar Hero...
Avatar image for ardie4352
ardie4352

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#3 ardie4352
Member since 2005 • 195 Posts
Not sure that would be a good idea, but if its made by Infinity Ward, I'd pay attention to it.
Avatar image for xxxMoreBeerxxx
xxxMoreBeerxxx

993

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 xxxMoreBeerxxx
Member since 2006 • 993 Posts

I'm sure everyone knows about cod5 being confirmed and being in WWII, I think it would be a good idea for Activision to make a Modern Warefare, but not under the COD name..what do you guys think?snipeshot11

I don't think that it is confirmed for being in WWII. I believe what Activision has said is that the game will be set in a different theater. Maybe instead of the setting from COD4 it might be set in a future war torn theater such as North Korea or something of the like.

Avatar image for luigismansion101
luigismansion101

733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#5 luigismansion101
Member since 2003 • 733 Posts

i think they should stop ww2 games period and only make more recent wars (Vietnam and after) or fictional wars. i never wanna play another ww2 game lol, i've only had and beaten about 20 lol. it's time to move on to some other war or make up your own lol.

as for your idea, it sounds good. the only problem is without the call of duty name it might not sell as good because it is all about the name in a lot of games. people see that 4 and think it must be an awesome game to have that many games in the series, but look at dynasty warriors and we know that would be bad logic lol. but infinity ward should stop developing call of duty games and just make fictional modern wars instead.

Avatar image for mmackura
mmackura

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 mmackura
Member since 2007 • 237 Posts
except for the fact that infinity ward created the COD series... no they won't abandon their claim to fame, but i would like it if they went back to the modern era once again in the future...
Avatar image for mistahripstah
mistahripstah

116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 mistahripstah
Member since 2008 • 116 Posts
except for the fact that infinity ward created the COD series... no they won't abandon their claim to fame, but i would like it if they went back to the modern era once again in the future...mmackura


They didnt make COD3, thats why it sucked so bad.

so watch out, but good luck to that
Avatar image for Hatefish2
Hatefish2

1783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 Hatefish2
Member since 2006 • 1783 Posts

[QUOTE="snipeshot11"]I'm sure everyone knows about cod5 being confirmed and being in WWII, I think it would be a good idea for Activision to make a Modern Warefare, but not under the COD name..what do you guys think?xxxMoreBeerxxx

I don't think that it is confirmed for being in WWII. I believe what Activision has said is that the game will be set in a different theater. Maybe instead of the setting from COD4 it might be set in a future war torn theater such as North Korea or something of the like.

It's 100% confirmed, what are you talking about?

Avatar image for brood_aliance
brood_aliance

1005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#9 brood_aliance
Member since 2004 • 1005 Posts
As long as Treyarch pays good attention to the details that made CoD4, CoD2, and the original CoD great, I'm in.
Avatar image for xxxMoreBeerxxx
xxxMoreBeerxxx

993

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 xxxMoreBeerxxx
Member since 2006 • 993 Posts
[QUOTE="xxxMoreBeerxxx"]

[QUOTE="snipeshot11"]I'm sure everyone knows about cod5 being confirmed and being in WWII, I think it would be a good idea for Activision to make a Modern Warefare, but not under the COD name..what do you guys think?Hatefish2

I don't think that it is confirmed for being in WWII. I believe what Activision has said is that the game will be set in a different theater. Maybe instead of the setting from COD4 it might be set in a future war torn theater such as North Korea or something of the like.

It's 100% confirmed, what are you talking about?

Read what I wrote. It's definetely being made but they haven't said its a WWII game. It is simply in another THEATER.

Avatar image for nebagaman4life
nebagaman4life

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 nebagaman4life
Member since 2006 • 65 Posts
sorry, wrong, check gamespot front page
Avatar image for tommat119944
tommat119944

970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 tommat119944
Member since 2008 • 970 Posts
[QUOTE="Hatefish2"][QUOTE="xxxMoreBeerxxx"]

[QUOTE="snipeshot11"]I'm sure everyone knows about cod5 being confirmed and being in WWII, I think it would be a good idea for Activision to make a Modern Warefare, but not under the COD name..what do you guys think?xxxMoreBeerxxx

I don't think that it is confirmed for being in WWII. I believe what Activision has said is that the game will be set in a different theater. Maybe instead of the setting from COD4 it might be set in a future war torn theater such as North Korea or something of the like.

It's 100% confirmed, what are you talking about?

Read what I wrote. It's definetely being made but they haven't said its a WWII game. It is simply in another THEATER.

I think he meant it was 100% confirmed in the WWII setting. I think it would be pointless and, on their part, extremely stupid to take out the Call of Duty name. Sals and the like.

Avatar image for nebagaman4life
nebagaman4life

65

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 nebagaman4life
Member since 2006 • 65 Posts
It's on the front page of gamespot! Call of Duty: World at War or something, plus theres a feature in some mag about it I would call it 100& confirmed. Its the pacific theatre.
Avatar image for nahmean187
nahmean187

640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#14 nahmean187
Member since 2008 • 640 Posts
we have games like bioshock, mass effect that make up their own settings and stories. y doesnt cod do that!? itd be sweet playing a interesting story, in an interesting place. not the same ww2 stuff we've seen a million times.
Avatar image for Hatefish2
Hatefish2

1783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Hatefish2
Member since 2006 • 1783 Posts
[QUOTE="Hatefish2"][QUOTE="xxxMoreBeerxxx"]

[QUOTE="snipeshot11"]I'm sure everyone knows about cod5 being confirmed and being in WWII, I think it would be a good idea for Activision to make a Modern Warefare, but not under the COD name..what do you guys think?xxxMoreBeerxxx

I don't think that it is confirmed for being in WWII. I believe what Activision has said is that the game will be set in a different theater. Maybe instead of the setting from COD4 it might be set in a future war torn theater such as North Korea or something of the like.

It's 100% confirmed, what are you talking about?

Read what I wrote. It's definetely being made but they haven't said its a WWII game. It is simply in another THEATER.

As I said before.. in perfect relation to your post. It's 100% confirmed.. it was on the front page of gamespot for example.. which confirms that it's WW2..

Avatar image for ReturnOfShinobi
ReturnOfShinobi

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 ReturnOfShinobi
Member since 2008 • 880 Posts
Yes that wouldnt be a bad idea, please Activision, stop diluting quality franchises
Avatar image for ChampionoChumps
ChampionoChumps

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 ChampionoChumps
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

we have games like bioshock, mass effect that make up their own settings and stories. y doesnt cod do that!? itd be sweet playing a interesting story, in an interesting place. not the same ww2 stuff we've seen a million times.nahmean187

If Bioware made cod then it probably would be more interesting

Avatar image for xxxMoreBeerxxx
xxxMoreBeerxxx

993

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 xxxMoreBeerxxx
Member since 2006 • 993 Posts
[QUOTE="xxxMoreBeerxxx"][QUOTE="Hatefish2"][QUOTE="xxxMoreBeerxxx"]

[QUOTE="snipeshot11"]I'm sure everyone knows about cod5 being confirmed and being in WWII, I think it would be a good idea for Activision to make a Modern Warefare, but not under the COD name..what do you guys think?Hatefish2

I don't think that it is confirmed for being in WWII. I believe what Activision has said is that the game will be set in a different theater. Maybe instead of the setting from COD4 it might be set in a future war torn theater such as North Korea or something of the like.

It's 100% confirmed, what are you talking about?

Read what I wrote. It's definetely being made but they haven't said its a WWII game. It is simply in another THEATER.

As I said before.. in perfect relation to your post. It's 100% confirmed.. it was on the front page of gamespot for example.. which confirms that it's WW2..

My bad. I see that. WTF! WWII has been done to death and then someone pi$$ed on its grave. Another downside to this is that Treyarch is developing it. This is a COD that I will not be buying.

Avatar image for qwertyoip
qwertyoip

1681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 qwertyoip
Member since 2007 • 1681 Posts
[QUOTE="Hatefish2"][QUOTE="xxxMoreBeerxxx"][QUOTE="Hatefish2"][QUOTE="xxxMoreBeerxxx"]

[QUOTE="snipeshot11"]I'm sure everyone knows about cod5 being confirmed and being in WWII, I think it would be a good idea for Activision to make a Modern Warefare, but not under the COD name..what do you guys think?xxxMoreBeerxxx

I don't think that it is confirmed for being in WWII. I believe what Activision has said is that the game will be set in a different theater. Maybe instead of the setting from COD4 it might be set in a future war torn theater such as North Korea or something of the like.

It's 100% confirmed, what are you talking about?

Read what I wrote. It's definetely being made but they haven't said its a WWII game. It is simply in another THEATER.

As I said before.. in perfect relation to your post. It's 100% confirmed.. it was on the front page of gamespot for example.. which confirms that it's WW2..

My bad. I see that. WTF! WWII has been done to death and then someone pi$$ed on its grave. Another downside to this is that Treyarch is developing it. This is a COD that I will not be buying.

If you can Kamikaze, I will buy.
Avatar image for Mario2007
Mario2007

2520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 Mario2007
Member since 2005 • 2520 Posts
Treyarch did make CoD: United Offensive..... which was very very good.
Avatar image for Mario2007
Mario2007

2520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#21 Mario2007
Member since 2005 • 2520 Posts
But Big Red One and CoD3 sucked.
Avatar image for DuxRow
DuxRow

136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 DuxRow
Member since 2005 • 136 Posts

It's going to be in WWII and it going to be when United States fought the Japenese. Which is a different theater from European battles. You will be encountering guerilla warfare, snipers hiding in trees, jungle warfare. All pretty exciting new fields.

Modern Warfare is fun, but to be honest I would hate for it to get any farther then that. Otherwise they will include those technologies similar to those they had in GRAW and I absolutly hate GRAW.

Screw that fancy tech. I want dirty, loud, scary sounding guns. I want to have to really on my eyes not cameras or drones or little red outlines telling me where my enemy is. It looks pretty awesome. There are pictures in some forum for CoD 5

Avatar image for chansaet
chansaet

6282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 chansaet
Member since 2003 • 6282 Posts

It's going to be in WWII and it going to be when United States fought the Japenese. Which is a different theater from European battles. You will be encountering guerilla warfare, snipers hiding in trees, jungle warfare. All pretty exciting new fields.

Modern Warfare is fun, but to be honest I would hate for it to get any farther then that. Otherwise they will include those technologies similar to those they had in GRAW and I absolutly hate GRAW.

Screw that fancy tech. I want dirty, loud, scary sounding guns. I want to have to really on my eyes not cameras or drones or little red outlines telling me where my enemy is. It looks pretty awesome. There are pictures in some forum for CoD 5

DuxRow

sounds like you want vietnam. Jungle fighting of WWII combined with modern weapons with scary sounding guns and no drones or fancy tech