Battlefield 3 or Call of Duty 3?

Just borrowed cod 2 and Downloaded the Battlefield 3 beta
COD 2 is amazing and the battlefield beta if impressive I don't know
if I should buy Battlefield or wait for COD 3 I am leaning towards waiting
I might be a fan boy I don't know but what do you guys think Cod 3 or battlefield 3?

I think you mean Modern Warfare 3, COD3 was a huge pile of crap from Treyarch.

I'm in the same position, but since BF3 is so sick, I'm just gonna buy it.

You mean Modern warfare 3 because Cod3 already came out and its getting old and suckish.

Definitely Battlefield 3. The gameplay is more authentic than CoD, and it isn't a rehash :P

Definitely Battlefield 3. The gameplay is more authentic than CoD, and it isn't a rehash :P

AvatarMan96

how is it not? it looks/plays/feels JUST like Bad Company 2 on consoles.

Not sure where you guys get your information, but MW3 is a completely diffrent game than any other CoD ever released.

I think you mean Modern Warfare 3, COD3 was a huge pile of crap from Treyarch.

JayQproductions

Not sure where you guys get your information, but MW3 is a completely diffrent game than any other CoD ever released.

driftingsilvia

[QUOTE="driftingsilvia"]

Not sure where you guys get your information, but MW3 is a completely diffrent game than any other CoD ever released.

k2theswiss

[QUOTE="JayQproductions"]

I think you mean Modern Warfare 3, COD3 was a huge pile of crap from Treyarch.

Stevo7991

ya I ment MW3

Niether. COD is a virus. And BF3 is just mediocre.

Arkham CIty thats were its at.

Arkham CIty for GOTY!

mw3 is just a crappy rehash with not graphic updates honestly. and bf seesm to try to hard idk i dont much care for either of them

When you say Call of Duty 3, I'm assuming you mean "Modern Warfare 3."

I think they'll both be equal in terms of quality. It's hard to revolutionize FPSs right now. I'm looking forward to the story of both of them and their campaigns. As for multiplayer, I'll probably go for BF3.

Niether. COD is a virus. And BF3 is just mediocre.

Arkham CIty thats were its at.

Arkham CIty for GOTY!

Master_Of_Fools

Battlefield 3 without question.

MW3 doesn't look like it's made much progression, if any, since MW2. Where as BF3 has clearly made leaps in technical progression. Also the current beta of BF3 is an early build model (several months old) and the final release version will be far more polished than the beta.

Not sure where you guys get your information, but MW3 is a completely diffrent game than any other CoD ever released.

driftingsilvia

I really hope this is sarcasm/trolling. This game will be MW2 with a new killstreak system, gun unlocks (proficiencies), and new maps (lol). That's not highly different from MW2, or Black Ops for that matter. All the perks are generally the same, with new names, the guns are more or less the same, and the killstreaks are comprised of old ones mixed in with several new ones which no one will use (Valkyrie-esque ones). Just because they renamed Killstreaks as Strike Packages and brought in the point system doesn't make the gameplay wildly different. Besides kills, you only get points for bomb plants and flag captures (lol) or kill assists if you have Hardline pro. That's supposed to make people want to play the objective? Why would I rush to capture the B flag for 1 point, when I could camp it out and kill 3 people for 3 points. Strike Packages and the point system won't change anyone's mentality. This is MW2.5.

Oh and I'm getting both, but if I had to choose one, BF3 for sure.

[QUOTE="driftingsilvia"]

Not sure where you guys get your information, but MW3 is a completely diffrent game than any other CoD ever released.

elpooz

I really hope this is sarcasm/trolling. This game will be MW2 with a new killstreak system, gun unlocks (proficiencies), and new maps (lol). That's not highly different from MW2, or Black Ops for that matter. All the perks are generally the same, with new names, the guns are more or less the same, and the killstreaks are comprised of old ones mixed in with several new ones which no one will use (Valkyrie-esque ones). Just because they renamed Killstreaks as Strike Packages and brought in the point system doesn't make the gameplay wildly different. Besides kills, you only get points for bomb plants and flag captures (lol) or kill assists if you have Hardline pro. That's supposed to make people want to play the objective? Why would I rush to capture the B flag for 1 point, when I could camp it out and kill 3 people for 3 points. Strike Packages and the point system won't change anyone's mentality. This is MW2.5.

Oh and I'm getting both, but if I had to choose one, BF3 for sure.

I prefer the CoD series, I didn't like the BF3 beta all that much. But both are irrelevant cause I'll be playing Skyrim.=D lol but I'll still pick up MW3 for those days when you want to wreck people.

I prefer the CoD series, I didn't like the BF3 beta all that much. But both are irrelevant cause I'll be playing Skyrim.=D lol but I'll still pick up MW3 for those days when you want to wreck people.

Nick-42

MW3. Only one worth my money.

I'm still playing MW2 on a daily basis, totally worth it :)

MW3. Only one worth my money.

I'm still playing MW2 on a daily basis, totally worth it :)

_TheJoker_

I prefer Battlefield, I always have. I'm just way more into the strategic way of Battlefield more then the run and gun of CoD. Even though it's going to be really short I wouldn't mind playing the campaign for MW3, but as for the multiplayer I just wouldn't be into it. So it wouldn't be worth the purchase for me.

[QUOTE="_TheJoker_"]

MW3. Only one worth my money.

I'm still playing MW2 on a daily basis, totally worth it :)

DylanTheVillyn

Why can't you just get both? I know I have both Battlefield: Bad Co. 2 and Black Ops and I play them both. I tend to get tired of Black Ops after a few matches (kinda repetitive), but can play BFBC2 for hours.

Also, I know this has been beaten to death, but MW3 is really the game that broke the camels back for me. I'm completely surprised that they have the balls to release a game that is EXACTLY like MW2. I'll probably end up buying it because I want to have the competition, but I'm definitely not pre-ordering it. I have a feeling that Black Ops will have full servers even after MW3 comes out. Just pop in MW2 and you'll see what I mean.

cod 3 has been out for a long time

I'm still on the fence with with this one but may be leading towards BF3 only because I'm looking for a change and want something different than COD's shooter version of Madden NFL.

MW3 for me. I dont understand the argument with the whole MW3 is really MW2 2.0 or whatever. Like the Battlefields arent? The only thing that changed with Bad Co 1 and 2 was that you could add sights to the guns and a little bit more destructibility. The BF3 gameplay is the same jus a few new features to the setup. Now before you BF3 fanboys get all upset because I dont like it, remember this is my opinion and what I think are facts. If you disagree with me and like BF3 then good for u.

MW3 for me. I dont understand the argument with the whole MW3 is really MW2 2.0 or whatever. Like the Battlefields arent? The only thing that changed with Bad Co 1 and 2 was that you could add sights to the guns and a little bit more destructibility. The BF3 gameplay is the same jus a few new features to the setup. Now before you BF3 fanboys get all upset because I dont like it, remember this is my opinion and what I think are facts. If you disagree with me and like BF3 then good for u.

EPIC FAIL

ixSasquatchxx

[QUOTE="ixSasquatchxx"]

MW3 for me. I dont understand the argument with the whole MW3 is really MW2 2.0 or whatever. Like the Battlefields arent? The only thing that changed with Bad Co 1 and 2 was that you could add sights to the guns and a little bit more destructibility. The BF3 gameplay is the same jus a few new features to the setup. Now before you BF3 fanboys get all upset because I dont like it, remember this is my opinion and what I think are facts. If you disagree with me and like BF3 then good for u.

HilbillyRokstar

[QUOTE="ixSasquatchxx"]

MW3 for me. I dont understand the argument with the whole MW3 is really MW2 2.0 or whatever. Like the Battlefields arent? The only thing that changed with Bad Co 1 and 2 was that you could add sights to the guns and a little bit more destructibility. The BF3 gameplay is the same jus a few new features to the setup. Now before you BF3 fanboys get all upset because I dont like it, remember this is my opinion and what I think are facts. If you disagree with me and like BF3 then good for u.

EPIC FAIL

HilbillyRokstar

[QUOTE="HilbillyRokstar"]

[QUOTE="ixSasquatchxx"]

MW3 for me. I dont understand the argument with the whole MW3 is really MW2 2.0 or whatever. Like the Battlefields arent? The only thing that changed with Bad Co 1 and 2 was that you could add sights to the guns and a little bit more destructibility. The BF3 gameplay is the same jus a few new features to the setup. Now before you BF3 fanboys get all upset because I dont like it, remember this is my opinion and what I think are facts. If you disagree with me and like BF3 then good for u.

EPIC FAIL

ixSasquatchxx

i know this has been said, but why not both? Both of them are going to be good...hopefully...*knock on wood*...:P

Neither, I'm tired of COD, and the Beta for BF3 made me decide to wait til a price drop, if then.

Neither, I'm tired of COD, and the Beta for BF3 made me decide to wait til a price drop, if then.

Xeogua

[QUOTE="AvatarMan96"]

Definitely Battlefield 3. The gameplay is more authentic than CoD, and it isn't a rehash :P

JayQproductions

how is it not? it looks/plays/feels JUST like Bad Company 2 on consoles.

I'm sorry you are completely wrong in that statement. It doesn't look exactly like BC2 for starters; play and feel are different too. The guns feel so powerful and realistic, in BC2 is was upgraded MW shooting. Running non-stop over cover and diving/sliding into a wall for cover is much different feel than any other Battlefield game I have played since 1942. This trolling is getting out of hand. Might as well say this game is racist and you dont like it for that reason because you're calling out things in the game that shouldnt even be mentioned at this point.

[QUOTE="Xeogua"]

Neither, I'm tired of COD, and the Beta for BF3 made me decide to wait til a price drop, if then.

HilbillyRokstar

I know, it wasn't really the problems with the beta, I just couldn't get into it, mainly because I'm just tired of FPS games.

[QUOTE="HilbillyRokstar"][QUOTE="Xeogua"]

Neither, I'm tired of COD, and the Beta for BF3 made me decide to wait til a price drop, if then.

Xeogua

I know, it wasn't really the problems with the beta, I just couldn't get into it, mainly because I'm just tired of FPS games.

You can enjoy both games, but that doesn't mean you can't critisize the developers. MW3 is going to be fun, but you can't deny that this is a complete profit generator. Sequels are supposed to be similar (if the original was good), and I think alot of gaming companies are learning from the Halo3 -> Reach transition. However it's completely clear that MW3 doesn't qualify as a sequel. It's insulting how little is changing with this game and selling for the price of a sequel (heard rumors it might even be $70).

The fact is, Tryarch and Infinity Ward are using the "Madden tactic". NFL Madden games have a new iteration every year, with basically the exact same game. However, they can do this because THE GOD DAMN LEAGUE CHANGES! There is no significant factor that requires MW3 to be released other than overstaffing of the developer companies.

Neither, I'm tired of COD, and the Beta for BF3 made me decide to wait til a price drop, if then.

Xeogua

There will be no price drop. Look at Black Ops... one year later and it's only dropped $10

http://www.amazon.com/Call-Duty-Black-Ops-Xbox-360/dp/B003JVKHEQ