bioshock 9.0 wtf

  • 96 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hogowagh
hogowagh

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#1 hogowagh
Member since 2007 • 82 Posts
I love bioshock it rocks but why did they gave it that forza got 9.2 rating so why did they give bioshock 9.0 why not 9.5. When I saw the review I was not hapy about it. Ing and diffrent sites gave it a beter score then gears of war so why this.
Avatar image for samcotts
samcotts

305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 samcotts
Member since 2007 • 305 Posts
9.0 is fair. You get much more gameplay out of forza that's why it was rated higher.
Avatar image for Joeker501
Joeker501

619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Joeker501
Member since 2004 • 619 Posts
It's funny, I remember when people were happy to see a goodgame get a 7.5, now it seems a game must suck if it got anything less than a 9, or a 9.2 in this case.
Avatar image for BounceDK
BounceDK

7388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 BounceDK
Member since 2005 • 7388 Posts
When they gave Perfect Dark Zero a 9 I simply stopped caring.
Avatar image for Soldi3r1stClass
Soldi3r1stClass

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Soldi3r1stClass
Member since 2006 • 205 Posts
yeaaah id say 9.0 is too much even. while the graphics are great and its quite a fun game its not really next gen. There's absolutely nothing new here and it didnt live up to even a quarter of what it was promising. Even while being hugely disappointing and not living up to expectation it still deserves an 8.0 or 8.5 for the story, length and fun gameplay
Avatar image for gp19
gp19

4252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 gp19
Member since 2005 • 4252 Posts

I love bioshock it rocks but why did they gave it that forza got 9.2 rating so why did they give bioshock 9.0 why not 9.5. When I saw the review I was not hapy about it. Ing and diffrent sites gave it a beter score then gears of war so why this.hogowagh

Forza is much longer and it has multiplayer. This gen, critics are suckers for multiplayer

Avatar image for gp19
gp19

4252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 gp19
Member since 2005 • 4252 Posts

I love bioshock it rocks but why did they gave it that forza got 9.2 rating so why did they give bioshock 9.0 why not 9.5. When I saw the review I was not hapy about it. Ing and diffrent sites gave it a beter score then gears of war so why this.hogowagh

Forza is much longer and it has multiplayer. This gen, critics are suckers for multiplayer

Avatar image for WillT12345
WillT12345

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 WillT12345
Member since 2004 • 3123 Posts
yeaaah id say 9.0 is too much even. while the graphics are great and its quite a fun game its not really next gen. There's absolutely nothing new here and it didnt live up to even a quarter of what it was promising. Even while being hugely disappointing and not living up to expectation it still deserves an 8.0 or 8.5 for the story, length and fun gameplaySoldi3r1stClass
What makes a game so called "next gen"? I don't know any games last gen that had this level of AI, Physics, water in the game is just crazy, and the gameplay senerios it puts you in are very well thought out. I think the 9.0 score nails it, its not perfect but it sure is excellent. Not that a point score matters, why complain about how you wanted it to get a 9.5 rather than a 9.0? Is like complaining that your team won the superbowl by 7 points rather than 21, they won what does it matter. 9.0 is a great score, what does it matter?
Avatar image for BounceDK
BounceDK

7388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 BounceDK
Member since 2005 • 7388 Posts
I'm still waiting for good AI not getting stuck in walls etc.
Avatar image for Splincir
Splincir

5791

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 Splincir
Member since 2002 • 5791 Posts

I think Bioshock is lucky to have gotten all the praise it has. So I think a 9.0 is probably more than it deserves. After everyone hyping it so much I dont think it really lives up to that, and most people just dont have the balls to admit that its really nothing more than Doom with some neat tricks here and there. I'd say 8 or 8.5 at most, both of whuch by the way are still great scores. Hype can do alot to sway the opinions of the feeble minded. I look to Halo for a hype machine, while it may not be as good as everyone says these games are still great in their own way and to people who like them.

For the most part I just dont like Bioshock. Something about it just doesnt do it for me, it just ended up being a circle strafe back peddling doom like combat festival, with like I said the neat things spread about.

I think it was those neat things that everyone bit into and used to pull the game ahead of what it really is.

Just my 2 cents.

Avatar image for Packt
Packt

3380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Packt
Member since 2004 • 3380 Posts
9.0 sounds about right to me. Why does it deserve higher? Nothing really new or inovative with the gameplay. The graphics are on-par with current games, story is great, game isn't that long (longer than most FPSs but only by 5-6 hours), not a whole lot of replay after you get the alternate endings, game is fairly linear.
Avatar image for hogowagh
hogowagh

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#12 hogowagh
Member since 2007 • 82 Posts
well I read egm they gave it a 10 3 times
Avatar image for Gregoroth
Gregoroth

2552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Gregoroth
Member since 2005 • 2552 Posts
I don't care about GS's review, Forza 2, nor what they say for the most part about anything to do with gaming but BioShock, as it is, doesn't deserve a 10 anyway,imo.

1. The game is short. The reason it may take a while if you play it how it's supposed to be played is because you have to back track constantly.
2. The boss battle felt cheap, tacked on and didn't fit with the overall tone of the game. Like a friend said, it's more like super hero rip off of an idea. I thought the ending was great but the boss ruins it for me.

A 9 score seems fair to me although I would be tempted to rate it lower.

-----------------

Another point I just remembered...what the hell is up with dead enemies' limbs moving? Some kind of physics bug that happens like 30% of the time?
Avatar image for pigonthewing
pigonthewing

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 pigonthewing
Member since 2003 • 380 Posts
i rated it 9.5. It has some flaws sure. But never before in gaming has anyone even tried to bring a story of this calibur to the table. But i have no problems with a 9 outta 10 for a score i wasnt sure what people were complaining about. Also under the old system that forza is in we dont know what it would have gotten.
Avatar image for WillT12345
WillT12345

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 WillT12345
Member since 2004 • 3123 Posts
I think some people that follow games so closely get this picture in their head on how the game is going to be, based off a combination of what the devs say and their own imagination. Its a FPS, at its heart your still going to be strafing and backpedaling and if you thought different your the only one at fault for over hyping it in your own mind. If you thought you could play the whole game and never see a strange AI behavor its only your fault for thinking this is going to be some perfect game (despite what EGM said, btw rating it a 10 is wrong, no game should get a 10). I personnally enjoy following game production but I know better than to expect this god of a game when its done. Years or Months of hearing a dev talk about how awsome their game is, is getting to you guys, they are only doing so you buy it. At least for the next few gens your always going to see a few animation glitches, strange AI behavors, and just generally unforseen things. They'are not living thinking things, there just a series of "if than sequences" and "path finding behaviors". Personnally anything between a 8 and 9 is a good score for this game.
Avatar image for arab_prince
arab_prince

4089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#16 arab_prince
Member since 2005 • 4089 Posts
Well bioshock couldve scored a 9.2 and they just rounded down. did you think of that?
Avatar image for jefe414
jefe414

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 jefe414
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts

I'd give it a 7.5 or 8. Good graphics and effects, a great story/atmosphere and.... That's it. AI is simple (I don't understand why people find it so involved). The game was basically a very watered down version of System Shock 2. Why isn't Bioshock ground breaking? Because System Shock 2 was and it came out years ago.

This is of course only my opinion and I by no means think everyone should agree with it.

Avatar image for cwagmire
cwagmire

3398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 cwagmire
Member since 2003 • 3398 Posts

9.0 is an AMAZING score.

Questions:

1.Why does .5 make it that much better?

2.How does GS's scores change the how you enjoy the game

Answers:

1. It doesn't

2. It shouldn't, but probably does sadly.

Avatar image for ghstbstr
ghstbstr

8790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#19 ghstbstr
Member since 2006 • 8790 Posts

BioShock 9.0 WTF. I agree it should have been lower, as it should have been atleast an 8.0 or lower.

Avatar image for lge777
lge777

2507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 lge777
Member since 2003 • 2507 Posts

I love bioshock it rocks but why did they gave it that forza got 9.2 rating so why did they give bioshock 9.0 why not 9.5. When I saw the review I was not hapy about it. Ing and diffrent sites gave it a beter score then gears of war so why this.hogowagh

Bioshock isvisually beautiful with a good story and generic gameplay game and little to no replay value and no multplayer i am surprised it got in the 9's i was thinking in the 8's.and Forza 2 has everything multplay, great gameplay, endless replay value.

Avatar image for zidan4000
zidan4000

3167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#21 zidan4000
Member since 2006 • 3167 Posts
the new 0.5 rating system is ****
Avatar image for Large_Soda
Large_Soda

8658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 Large_Soda
Member since 2003 • 8658 Posts
I don't get why people get so bent out of shape over a review score. Does it mean anything to you in the end if it gets a 9.0 or a 9.5? Do you get money or cred when it happens? No! So why in God's name does it matter?

There are many sites that gave it a 10 but for some people it only matter what Gamespot scores it.

But what it ultimately comes down to is that these reviews are one person's opinion and that opinion differs from their own and for some stupid reason that matters.

If you really want to make a big stink then get a job at Gamespot and review the games and then get prepared for some fool on a forum to question your sanity/intelligence because you gave a game .5 lower than they thought you should have.

Avatar image for hogowagh
hogowagh

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#23 hogowagh
Member since 2007 • 82 Posts
wow alot pepole dont like bioshock
Avatar image for Bladefighter23
Bladefighter23

1201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Bladefighter23
Member since 2005 • 1201 Posts
Does it even matter what the rating is? If you like it don't worry about what anyone else thinks.
Avatar image for blue-fish
blue-fish

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#25 blue-fish
Member since 2003 • 1389 Posts

I think Bioshock is lucky to have gotten all the praise it has. So I think a 9.0 is probably more than it deserves. After everyone hyping it so much I dont think it really lives up to that, and most people just dont have the balls to admit that its really nothing more than Doom with some neat tricks here and there. I'd say 8 or 8.5 at most, both of whuch by the way are still great scores. Hype can do alot to sway the opinions of the feeble minded. I look to Halo for a hype machine, while it may not be as good as everyone says these games are still great in their own way and to people who like them.

For the most part I just dont like Bioshock. Something about it just doesnt do it for me, it just ended up being a circle strafe back peddling doom like combat festival, with like I said the neat things spread about.

I think it was those neat things that everyone bit into and used to pull the game ahead of what it really is.

Just my 2 cents.

Splincir

I appreciate everyone has an opion but when you say it's a Doom clone and would give it an 8, I have to wonder at your tastes when you give PDZ a 9, a football game a 9.8 and Kameo a 9.1 Something tells me you should get a refund for those two cents...

Avatar image for MonacoX
MonacoX

453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 MonacoX
Member since 2007 • 453 Posts
It might have gotten just a 9.0 for being so glitchy.  Anybody else experience alot of texture pop-up?
Avatar image for Scroll-Lock
Scroll-Lock

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Scroll-Lock
Member since 2007 • 530 Posts
[QUOTE="Splincir"]

I think Bioshock is lucky to have gotten all the praise it has. So I think a 9.0 is probably more than it deserves. After everyone hyping it so much I dont think it really lives up to that, and most people just dont have the balls to admit that its really nothing more than Doom with some neat tricks here and there. I'd say 8 or 8.5 at most, both of whuch by the way are still great scores. Hype can do alot to sway the opinions of the feeble minded. I look to Halo for a hype machine, while it may not be as good as everyone says these games are still great in their own way and to people who like them.

For the most part I just dont like Bioshock. Something about it just doesnt do it for me, it just ended up being a circle strafe back peddling doom like combat festival, with like I said the neat things spread about.

I think it was those neat things that everyone bit into and used to pull the game ahead of what it really is.

Just my 2 cents.

blue-fish

I appreciate everyone has an opion but when you say it's a Doom clone and would give it an 8, I have to wonder at your tastes when you give PDZ a 9, a football game a 9.8 and Kameo a 9.1 Something tells me you should get a refund for those two cents...

Saying a game is a doom clone is a weak argument really. Maybe people are hating for the point of hating.

Avatar image for MindFreeze
MindFreeze

2814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 MindFreeze
Member since 2007 • 2814 Posts

9.0 is an AMAZING score.

Questions:

1.Why does .5 make it that much better?

2.How does GS's scores change the how you enjoy the game

Answers:

1. It doesn't

2. It shouldn't, but probably does sadly.

cwagmire

Exactly, other than that it doesn't deserve a 10 or 9.5 anyway.

Avatar image for Franchise2k6
Franchise2k6

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Franchise2k6
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts
no replay value and no online..
Avatar image for pigonthewing
pigonthewing

380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 pigonthewing
Member since 2003 • 380 Posts
They are. Its a solid game. And deserves it's 9+ that it got from all reviewers. I can understand people not liking it cause its not your style of game. But to say its not original or inventive, or has a lame story just makes you look like a fool.
Avatar image for AtomicBaconBits
AtomicBaconBits

8855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#31 AtomicBaconBits
Member since 2006 • 8855 Posts
Who ****ing cares what Gamespot gives it? Besides 9 is a damn good score;it means SUPERB.Go look the word up if you don't know what the definition is...
Avatar image for hornymushroom
hornymushroom

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 hornymushroom
Member since 2006 • 714 Posts
9.0 is very generous score to give to a game that lasted me 3 days is very good that i rented it cause i had my doubt about it. I just found it very repetitive after a while and something that can easily be rushed through and the weapons just dont seem to pack the punch that they should. It just dosnt feel like your holding a shotgun . But games like fear and gears of war really make you feel that your holding these weapons. This is just my opinion. I would give it a 7.0 because it has no online and it lasted me 3 days but the graphics are what makes it ok..
Avatar image for -MlKE-
-MlKE-

1796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#33 -MlKE-
Member since 2007 • 1796 Posts
9.0 is fair. You get much more gameplay out of forza that's why it was rated higher.samcotts
It was rated higher because of GameSpot's awful new rating system which makes it impossible to compare ratings for games on the old rating system and the new one.
Avatar image for BrianLittrell
BrianLittrell

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 BrianLittrell
Member since 2006 • 91 Posts
I hate how games suck if they dont have multiplayer. Not everyone has xbox live! Its a great game and did deserve better then forza
Avatar image for SentryGunner411
SentryGunner411

1047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 SentryGunner411
Member since 2007 • 1047 Posts

Gamespot's reviews are completely worthless.

Anyone with common sense knows Bioshock is a million times better than Rare's garabage Perfect Dark game.

Avatar image for Supabul
Supabul

4266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 Supabul
Member since 2004 • 4266 Posts
yeaaah id say 9.0 is too much even. while the graphics are great and its quite a fun game its not really next gen. There's absolutely nothing new here and it didnt live up to even a quarter of what it was promising. Even while being hugely disappointing and not living up to expectation it still deserves an 8.0 or 8.5 for the story, length and fun gameplaySoldi3r1stClass
Can you please tell me what a next-gen game is suppose to be like.
Avatar image for Agent32
Agent32

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Agent32
Member since 2003 • 79 Posts
if u really love to play video games and FPS it shouldnt matter. u'll play it non stop just cuz its fun to play... if ur playin it on easy then ur dumb anyone can beat it in 7hrs if u do that... make it a challange and play ur games on HARD if u want more out of the game.
Avatar image for SentryGunner411
SentryGunner411

1047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 SentryGunner411
Member since 2007 • 1047 Posts

There's absolutely nothing new here and it didnt live up to even a quarter of what it was promising. Even while being hugely disappointing and not living up to expectation it still deserves an 8.0 or 8.5 for the story, length and fun gameplay Soldi3r1stClass

EVERYTHING that Irrational Games promised is there.

What the **** is it missing? The game is perfect.

Avatar image for rgsniper1
rgsniper1

9398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 rgsniper1
Member since 2003 • 9398 Posts

At the end of the day does it really matter? Reviews are opinions, they gave it what they thought in there opinion.

Beyond that they were reviewed by different people.

Forza 2 was Alex N.

BioShock was Jeff G.

Who's to say that if they both reviewed by Alex or by Jeff the scoring would have been the same? Maybe if Alex had reviewed BioShock he might have gave it a 9.5 because just "got it" more than Jeff did. Oh yeah, but really does it matter?

Avatar image for devin360
devin360

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 devin360
Member since 2007 • 72 Posts
I think it's a fair score. Bioshock is a great game, but like many people have said it's one draw back is the lack of multiplayer. Forza would not have done so well if it weren't for multiplayer. I was getting pretty tired of racing the same tracks in career mode, but developed a new interest when I tried online multiplayer.
Avatar image for BigDaveyDogz
BigDaveyDogz

1815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 BigDaveyDogz
Member since 2003 • 1815 Posts
[QUOTE="blue-fish"][QUOTE="Splincir"]

I think Bioshock is lucky to have gotten all the praise it has. So I think a 9.0 is probably more than it deserves. After everyone hyping it so much I dont think it really lives up to that, and most people just dont have the balls to admit that its really nothing more than Doom with some neat tricks here and there. I'd say 8 or 8.5 at most, both of whuch by the way are still great scores. Hype can do alot to sway the opinions of the feeble minded. I look to Halo for a hype machine, while it may not be as good as everyone says these games are still great in their own way and to people who like them.

For the most part I just dont like Bioshock. Something about it just doesnt do it for me, it just ended up being a circle strafe back peddling doom like combat festival, with like I said the neat things spread about.

I think it was those neat things that everyone bit into and used to pull the game ahead of what it really is.

Just my 2 cents.

Scroll-Lock

I appreciate everyone has an opion but when you say it's a Doom clone and would give it an 8, I have to wonder at your tastes when you give PDZ a 9, a football game a 9.8 and Kameo a 9.1 Something tells me you should get a refund for those two cents...

Saying a game is a doom clone is a weak argument really. Maybe people are hating for the point of hating.

BINGO!!

Avatar image for daviwinn
daviwinn

4827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 daviwinn
Member since 2004 • 4827 Posts

Forza 2 is a game I will be playing for a long time, maybe even years. I feel it is the best console racing sim released thus far and deserved every bit of the 9.2 score it received.

BioShock is also an excellent title. 9.0 is good to me. I've had it since it was released and just finished it last night on my first play through. Granted I work full time so I may have been able to beat it sooner if I sat at home all day playing it. I plan on picking it back up in a week or two and playing again on the hardest difficulty. Then it will go on a shelf, and 3 or for months from now I may play it again on easy. I might even try things like beating the game without firing a bullet, or playing with no plasmids equipment. Plenty of replay there for my tastes. Just like a castelvania game.

Avatar image for shadystxxx
shadystxxx

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 shadystxxx
Member since 2005 • 2158 Posts

yeaaah id say 9.0 is too much even. while the graphics are great and its quite a fun game its not really next gen. There's absolutely nothing new here and it didnt live up to even a quarter of what it was promising. Even while being hugely disappointing and not living up to expectation it still deserves an 8.0 or 8.5 for the story, length and fun gameplaySoldi3r1stClass

Nothing new, bioshock brings a load of new elements to the fps genre.

Avatar image for lando423
lando423

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 lando423
Member since 2004 • 83 Posts

I think bioshock was rated apropriatlythey rated it for what it is.Its a single player experiance with a great story. Kind of like when Gamespot gave thps 3 a 10. plus bioshock has pretty good replay value im playin it through another time.

Avatar image for klusps
klusps

10386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#45 klusps
Member since 2005 • 10386 Posts
You should be proud that it even reached to a 9.0 because sense there is no multiplayer and barely any replay value, that's a sign that the single player is very good.
Avatar image for gruoch1
gruoch1

1178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 gruoch1
Member since 2003 • 1178 Posts

yeaaah id say 9.0 is too much even. while the graphics are great and its quite a fun game its not really next gen. There's absolutely nothing new here and it didnt live up to even a quarter of what it was promising. Even while being hugely disappointing and not living up to expectation it still deserves an 8.0 or 8.5 for the story, length and fun gameplaySoldi3r1stClass

If you don't think that Bioshock is "next-gen" then I think your in for a big disappointment over the next 4 years.

Avatar image for mauimonkey27
mauimonkey27

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 mauimonkey27
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

I think you have to look at this through a bigger scope. I went to reviews and went from highest review game down to 9.0's and here are some of the results (i chose games i thought everyone would know). (note only 4 perfect 10's on gamespot) (also note i guarantee if you go to other review sites like ign they reviewed it higher as they are easier graders i feel, so remember 9.0 is not the universal grade for the game...just what gamespot thought)

anyway

10.0

1. tony hawks pro skater 3

2. chrono cross

3. soul caliber

4. legend of zelda ocarina of time.

9.9's

1. perfect dark 64

9.8's

golden eye 007!!!!

9.6's
1. Oblivion

2. san andreas

3. resident evil 4

4. vagrant story

5. diablo

9.5's (what you think this game is comparable to)

1. Paper mario

2. final fantasy 7 and 8

3. command and conquer red alert

9.4's (games that, to you, are slightly WORSE than bioshock)

1. halo 2

2. ninja gaiden black

3. quake 3 arena

4. HALF-LIFE!!!!!

all of these rank from 9.1-9.3 all of which you feel are somewhat worse than bioshock:

god of war 1 and 2, vice city, ff 10, granida 1, black and white, forza1 and 2, prince of persia warrior within age of mythology/empires 2, pikmin 2, skies of arcadia, baldurs gate!, F.E.A.R. tactics ogre, ogre battle 64, starcraft.

now, to whoever posted this, think to yourself does bioshock belong with these games OR with games that were rated 9.0

rainbow 6 vegas for ps3, okami (second best game of last year) and dragon quest 8? or should it go with the elites of all time?

i know realistically i am hard pressed to say that bioshock is better than many of the games rated over 9.0 and frankly look at the company it has at 9.0, its great company. Be proud you own, played, and hopefully beat a very good game and one of the best released in the past few months, certainly not one of the bests EVER, however.

Avatar image for hogowagh
hogowagh

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#48 hogowagh
Member since 2007 • 82 Posts
I beat bioshock and it rocks but I think it sholde get a beter score
Avatar image for SentryGunner411
SentryGunner411

1047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 SentryGunner411
Member since 2007 • 1047 Posts

Halo 2's camapign was complete crap and it got a 9.4

Bioshock's campaign was gold. Perfection and it gota 9.0

I smell BIAS!!!!

Avatar image for RollingZeppelin
RollingZeppelin

579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 RollingZeppelin
Member since 2007 • 579 Posts
Ya i disagree with Jeff when he said the combat is a weak point. This game has some of the most intelligent and exciting combat in any game ive seen. It deserves a higher score, but i cant change that and its not like the score actually affects the game.