This topic is locked from further discussion.
i dont understand how you say it is a weaker version of cod4 when it uses the same engine and also campaign is longer. has more perks. yes the crappy ww2 guns arent as great as the new ones on cod4 but overall i think the game is just as good. i would give waw the advantage on the campaign but cod4 would win the multiplayer.getrdun118
More perks yes but just like the game before it, most will use the same configureration of perks and the more perks are down to tank perks. I hate the tanks anyway, so many rounds (RPG) to kill them. Yes it uses the same engine but what has it brought new to the table? Tanks & a flamethrower and as I have pointed out I don't like them.
As for the single/co-op it may be longer but IMO it's not better. Crawing through a burning bulding with nazis shooting at you. Or hiding in grass as a patrol passes over you and crawing under tanks, trying not to be spoted wins hands down. Also having japs run at you ready to be mowed down is hardly fantastic.
As for MP you said it cod4 wins, WAW maps are not as good IMO and bolt action rifes are useless unless scoped FUNNY that!
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment