Enemy Territory: quake wars... is it worth buying

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for partydude123
partydude123

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 partydude123
Member since 2008 • 49 Posts
is it worth buying and do many people play this online???
Avatar image for adders99
adders99

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 adders99
Member since 2005 • 2623 Posts
short answer no with a but, long answer... just no.
Avatar image for vanek26
vanek26

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 vanek26
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
Omg not even a little bit, I HATED this game it was awful
Avatar image for ASK_Story
ASK_Story

11455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ASK_Story
Member since 2006 • 11455 Posts
I asked the same question not to long ago. And guess what the answer was? It was "NO." The reason? Nobody is playing it anymore and there was a lot of lag.
Avatar image for Avenger1324
Avenger1324

16344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Avenger1324
Member since 2007 • 16344 Posts
I played the demo and enjoyed it, but with all the competition from Gears 2, COD, Halo, BFBC, FarCry 2 etc. I guess the community would be quite small.
Avatar image for makchady
makchady

1303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#6 makchady
Member since 2007 • 1303 Posts
if the game hadnt have been as ridiculously laggy as it was the online community would still be strong enough to support enough games, however the lag was so bad that i, along with virtually everyone else, stopped playing because even after a month and a half of being out the game still had no patch. i updated once i think and it solved nothing for any of us. the game by itself though was sheer fun. if you had a group of friends together who know how to coordinate and work together as a team there truly isnt another gaming experience like this. since the games lagged so much we ended up just playing against the hardest difficulty of bots and seeing how quickly we could beat them which was fun but not enough longevity to keep us all playing. plus i wont lie, we didnt have competition online either, we simply dominated. teams werent organized and would set round times to the max, 30 minutes. we would beat them in under the minimum time, 10 mins, normally beating them in about 7 on offense and then would turn around and hold them for 30 minutes on defense, it was sad really.
Avatar image for EnderSR388
EnderSR388

6552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 EnderSR388
Member since 2004 • 6552 Posts
In a word, no. I bought it on release day and it was horrible. Better on the PC IMO. I held on to if for a few months thinking it would get patched, but the lag never got better and the players were quickly leaving. I don't know if it's in good shape now or not, but I'd venture to guess not. If you want a cheap MP game similar to ET:QW or CoD:WaW, try Frontlines: Fuel of War. The dedicated servers have almost no lag and support up to 50 players! Yes, there are 50 player matches still going on and most of the time they are full. There's also plenty of people still playing, myself included. Definitely worth $20 and especially worth more the ET:QW.