I have been excited about Fable II since its announcement in '06. I played Fable casually for a while years ago but found myself displeased (of course) with the lack of the promised ambitious inclusions by Peter Molyneux. Overall I found the game to be enjoyable, don't get me wrong, but nothing close to addictive and orignal as I had hoped it would be. In fact, I found myself more drawn to the unique ambition demonstrated by Molyneux than the execution of what he desired Fable to be. "Plant an acorn, grow a tree" became a phrase that made me undeniably excited about the soon-to-be Fable series and future Molyneux IPs in general.
After reading the Variety article that presents Molyneux's note attached to the review build of Fable II, I find myself severely challenged in anticipating my previously intended purchase. Here is the article: http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2008/10/peter-moores-re.html
To sum it up, Molyneux has asked reviewers, "...please, please, please, please, pleae find somebody who doesn't play games, watch them play it and see how their world turns out, because I think it's only when you see those differences that the unique experiences come through."
While arguably Molyneux wants to generate an exhaustive and just approach to Fable II's reviews, I feel that this "favour" could mean the downfall of another ambitious project. (I initially tossed aside the fears aroused by the button-mashing occupations for players who are uninterested in playing as paupers for 10 hours.)
What do you think?
Log in to comment