This topic is locked from further discussion.
one last thing when cliffy b was interviewed he was asked if he thought that gears was the best that the 360 could do he replied "i think that we could go a lot furthur with the platform" and in my personal opinion i think halo 3 looks better than gearsthomass60r
same here, if you look at gears and you look at real life, nothing looks like that! everything is realy shiny and plasticky and has 3 foot wide cracks and grooves in it, but halo 3 is very un shiny witch is a good thing consideing things like dirt and skin don't reflect light, while things like metal have a mild specular highlight to them; much more realistic if you ask me.
to at least make it believable its obvious you own one i mean you said that ut3 will beat halo 3 for GOTY and you know what platform is getting it first so your clearly a sony fanboyceltman2007Well UT (as Ive said before) is the king of FPS, and one of the highest rated franchises ever... and it looks like they fixed those few issues from UT2k4 (hover boards yeah). Becuase its out this year on most platforms, itll be up for GOTY probably only this year. Either way, when Epic releases their flagship product, they tend to get pretty good ratings.
[QUOTE="thomass60r"]a BETA so its not even close to being complete and if you look up screens and vids on halo 3 you will see its a stunning gameteebeenzbeta is complete, just has bugs. Alpha is the one where gfx and such are not final. Im not saying its a bad game, MS put alot of money into making it good, just saying it doesnt look Famitsu ratings good.
you obviously havn't even followed the most minor bit of news in regards to Halo3, have you? Halo3 beta was still using place holder textures because it was an older build meant SOLELY FOR TESTING THE ONLINE MP. The beta had nothing to do with the final build in terms of graphics. Please learn more about what your trying to bash before you post again.
Halo3 beta was still using place holder textures because it was an older build meant SOLELY FOR TESTING THE ONLINE MP. The beta had nothing to do with the final build in terms of graphics. Please learn more about what your trying to bash before you post again.NedemisNice try, not gunna work tho.
[QUOTE="Nedemis"] Halo3 beta was still using place holder textures because it was an older build meant SOLELY FOR TESTING THE ONLINE MP. The beta had nothing to do with the final build in terms of graphics. Please learn more about what your trying to bash before you post again.teebeenzNice try, not gunna work tho.
you are just to ignorant to even face the truth, huh?
[QUOTE="Nedemis"] Halo3 beta was still using place holder textures because it was an older build meant SOLELY FOR TESTING THE ONLINE MP. The beta had nothing to do with the final build in terms of graphics. Please learn more about what your trying to bash before you post again.teebeenzNice try, not gunna work tho.
ignorant much? yeah these graphics are really bad, halo3 is teh flop :roll:
3 years and 2 systems later millions of people still play halo2, i dont think they do it to look at pretty pixels, leave this board and go play lair, then maybe youll realize what happens when you take graphics over gameplay.
(
[QUOTE="Nedemis"]you are just to ignorant to even face the truth, huh?teebeenzSorry dude, it just doesnt look that great. Its a Step behind graphicly. Deal.
really? this horrible quality video just proves that MP has seen a jump in graphics compared to the place holder Halo3 beta build.
Sorry dude, it just doesnt look that great. Its a Step behind graphicly. Deal.[QUOTE="teebeenz"][QUOTE="Nedemis"]you are just to ignorant to even face the truth, huh?Nedemis
really? this horrible quality video just proves that MP has seen a jump in graphics compared to the place holder Halo3 beta build.
god, narrows looks awesome. but those guys playing it were so bad
[QUOTE="Nedemis"]Sorry dude, it just doesnt look that great. Its a Step behind graphicly. Deal.[QUOTE="teebeenz"][QUOTE="Nedemis"]you are just to ignorant to even face the truth, huh?axes03
really? this horrible quality video just proves that MP has seen a jump in graphics compared to the place holder Halo3 beta build.
god, narrows looks awesome. but those guys playing it were so bad
yes they were
[QUOTE="Nedemis"]you are just to ignorant to even face the truth, huh?teebeenzSorry dude, it just doesnt look that great. Its a Step behind graphicly. Deal.
Teebeenz? Sounds like ya need a teabag! The graphics are impressive for the single player campaign. And yes the multiplayer was an EARLY BUILD! i've read the same article, if I find it I will send it over with the teabag. Why dont you fanboy idiots go sleep with your PS3 and stay the hell outta our forums! Next thing Halo 3 getting a good score from Japan doesn't do alot for me. In fact i'll buy it if Gamespot gives ita freakin 2.
The graphics are impressive for the single player campaign. And yes the multiplayer was an EARLY BUILD! i've read the same article, if I find it I will send it over with the teabag. skelly7483Congratulations, most out of context post of the thread. Till this one.
Famitsu is famous for over rating games. I mean come on, Halo 3's gfx a 9? haha dont think so.teebeenzI just have one thing to say. Learn how to spell before you bash something.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment