halo 3... graphics?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BPfail
BPfail

284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 BPfail
Member since 2005 • 284 Posts

I was abit disappointed with the graphics... i thought they would of addded abit more motion blur, and more details to the marines... if the graphics were in 480p they would have been very similiar to halo 2 (my opinion)...

im not saying they r bad, but they arent the best for the 360's hardware... probably because of amount of action goign on? i dont know, you tell me...

i probably had high very high expectations for the game...

Avatar image for eatspie
eatspie

1716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 eatspie
Member since 2006 • 1716 Posts

I was abit disappointed with the graphics... i thought they would of addded abit more motion blur, and more details to the marines... if the graphics were in 480p they would have been very similiar to halo 2 (my opinion)...

im not saying they r bad, but they arent the best for the 360's hardware... probably because of amount of action goign on? i dont know, you tell me...

i probably had high very high expectations for the game...

BPfail

Your supposed to post halo comments in the sticky thread

Avatar image for mother_farter
mother_farter

16676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 mother_farter
Member since 2003 • 16676 Posts
i think that the graphics are great
Avatar image for rgsniper1
rgsniper1

9398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 rgsniper1
Member since 2003 • 9398 Posts

I think eatspie has a good point.

Awards eatspie with +1 intelligence

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
parts are great, but too much jaggies.
Avatar image for Idontremember
Idontremember

965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Idontremember
Member since 2003 • 965 Posts

parts are great, but too much jaggies.Always-Honest

Here is why.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=25949250&sid=6180100&action=convert&om_clk=latestnews&tag=latestnews;title;4

Avatar image for xshinobi
Xshinobi

3011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 Xshinobi
Member since 2003 • 3011 Posts
They aren't the best around but they get the job done very well. And for a MP heavy game that is all you really need.
Avatar image for sadikovic
sadikovic

3868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 sadikovic
Member since 2004 • 3868 Posts

Im not a graphics whore at all so to me its not important but IMO it looks great.

Plus Im a CSS addict so playing halo is a breath of fresh air to me.

Avatar image for FunkyHeadHunter
FunkyHeadHunter

1758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 FunkyHeadHunter
Member since 2007 • 1758 Posts

i think that the graphics are greatmother_farter

And anyone who thinks different is a tard. So here is my assesment....From the begining of "this gen" people have been unhappy. I know the console has its issues and I know some of the game are a little rushed. But for GODS SAKE!!!!....its not that bad.

Im still happy with Xbox, PS2 , and GameCube graphics. They still look great and to me, developers should spend more time packing discs with great levels and options and more options in games rather than worrying about better graphics.

This whole "complaining" thing is getting old people........

Avatar image for pete_merlin
pete_merlin

6098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#10 pete_merlin
Member since 2007 • 6098 Posts
yeah i think the graphics are okay. sometimes they look good but other times they really dont. like your squadmates faces. they look out of date.
Avatar image for -MlKE-
-MlKE-

1796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 -MlKE-
Member since 2007 • 1796 Posts
I was impressed with the graphics. They were better than they were from the screens of the beta.
Avatar image for Soul_to_Squeeze
Soul_to_Squeeze

560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Soul_to_Squeeze
Member since 2007 • 560 Posts
ill agree that the peoples faces arent the greatest, but the environments look really great. especially the trees and bushes. and the physics system is also really really good. another thing i noticed about how it looked was how good the lighting was. so other than the people, i think halo 3 looks great.
Avatar image for capthavic
capthavic

6478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#13 capthavic
Member since 2003 • 6478 Posts
I think a lot of people had way too high expectations, both graphically and gameplay wise. Thats why I always keep mine grounded and don't judge a game till it's out.
Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]parts are great, but too much jaggies.Idontremember

Here is why.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=25949250&sid=6180100&action=convert&om_clk=latestnews&tag=latestnews;title;4

i'm guessing it's a link about the resolution... that's not the reason though.

Avatar image for outbreak201
outbreak201

8372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#15 outbreak201
Member since 2005 • 8372 Posts
im disappointed in halo 3's graphics as well.....well at least the series is finally over..but it sucks for people that are fans of the series...Gears is still the graphics king