How is MW1 better than MW2? NO WAY

  • 124 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for KamikazeDonut
KamikazeDonut

3016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 145

User Lists: 1

#51 KamikazeDonut
Member since 2008 • 3016 Posts

MW2 had the potential to be better then CoD4 multiplayer, but fell flat on it' s face by going overboard.

- Dual shotguns and smg' s was just a stupid idea.

- The ridiculous killstreaks, such as the nuke,promote camping.

- Being able to have a shotgun as a secondary weapon promotes camping.

- The noob tubes and claymores get ridiculous combined with scavenger because they pretty much have infinite grenades and claymores.

- They still kept stopping power but took out juggernaut so there' s no counter to stopping power.

- SMG' s are useless which alienates SMG players such as myself from the game.

- The pentration system is reduced to garbage even with FMJ.

- Matchmaking always sepearates a party.

and last but not least

- No Xbox Live Party Chat which is really annoying and was a dumb move.

I think I' ll just wait for BFBC2.

Avatar image for Enraged_Bannana
Enraged_Bannana

671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Enraged_Bannana
Member since 2008 • 671 Posts

i have played through the campaign in both, got 1000/1000 in mw1. played mw1 mp for about 7 1/2 days, mw2 for about 3 1/2 days. i think i can make the judgement that mw1 is much better.

why? mw2 was overdone, unncessary amount of kill streaks and features, which ruined the balancing of it. people who defend mw2 probably act like the people fans of mw1 hate. mw2 is geared towards the more casual player, it rewards you for doing bad for god's sake.

this video sums up all the problems of mw2 well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoyyFC96r0U

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

I swear they have nerfed pistols, the usp used to be like a 2HK, but it seems to be taking 5+ hit markers to kill, does anyone agree?

Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

i have played through the campaign in both, got 1000/1000 in mw1. played mw1 mp for about 7 1/2 days, mw2 for about 3 1/2 days. i think i can make the judgement that mw1 is much better.

why? mw2 was overdone, unncessary amount of kill streaks and features, which ruined the balancing of it. people who defend mw2 probably act like the people fans of mw1 hate. mw2 is geared towards the more casual player, it rewards you for doing bad for god's sake.

this video sums up all the problems of mw2 well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoyyFC96r0U

Enraged_Bannana

This is what IW wanted all along, they wanted casuals to play their game and not rage quit becaused they sucked...bad move by IW catering to noobs.

Avatar image for ChampionoChumps
ChampionoChumps

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 ChampionoChumps
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

MW2 is more noob friendly, this is because IW wants to make as much money as possible so they had to make it easier for the noobs.

Here are some points:

  • Bullets kill faster in MW2
  • If you die 3x in a row then you are invincible for 10 seconds if you have pain killer enabled
  • If you manage to get a four kill streak you have the opportunity to get a chopper gunner which in return can get you about 15 kills
  • All of the killstreaks are overpowered
  • They balance the teams by k/d ratio which really sucks for people like me who have really high k/d's because I have to deal with the kids who go 2-31
  • Maps have more depth than in the last game which makes it way easier to camp
  • Kill streaks go after people with higher k/d's so that keeps them pre-occupied and lets the less skilled people rack up kills on the noobier people
  • Things like heartbeat sensors make it much easier to camp
  • Scavenger gives you basically infinite explosives

And, things that are broken in the game

  • Akimbo weapons (in general not just the shotguns)
  • All of the mods and other exploits in the game
  • SPAWNS
  • How they attempt to balance everything out, such as danger close and whatever the name of the anti explosive perk is
  • Nuke boosters
  • Commando, the knifing distance was already pushing it in cod4 and now it is beyond ridiculous, especially the people with the "knifing classes."

Thats all I can think of off the top of my head but I'm sure there are plenty more things that are broken in MW2. I stopped playing months ago, except sometimes I'll play a private match with my friends if none of them want to play cod4. Oh and I find myself dying more by k/s than actual players (And I know I can shoot them down/ use cold-blooded but I don't think I should have to considering that in cod4 I didn't have to worry about a pave low shooting me through walls.

Avatar image for Hickamie14
Hickamie14

1652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#56 Hickamie14
Member since 2007 • 1652 Posts

I think it's just a matter of opinion.

Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts
The map design is worse in MW2, it's easier to traverse for the average player, but it doesn't cater itself to those with skill as well; since memorization, and knowledge of the maps isn't as useful. That's not enough to stop me from enjoying all the other benefits of MW2, but it's hard to argue if either is better than the other. One is just newer.
Avatar image for Slinky_Turtle
Slinky_Turtle

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Slinky_Turtle
Member since 2008 • 113 Posts
[QUOTE="Infinite_Access"]

To me MW2 seems like a game based off of random chance. Your running around then. BAM. "Oh great, i got shot by that guy that was 3 floors up and behind me."

Meanwhile, you see a guy running (enter random direction). You see him first. Shoot him, yay! you got a kill. The only skill that comes into play is when two guys see each other and take cover and have a shoot off.

By the way, one person latency being worse than someone else's /=/ equal reaction time :roll:

Is everyone forgetting that MW1 was the exact same way??? =/
Avatar image for clinton47
clinton47

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 clinton47
Member since 2008 • 120 Posts
Totally agree, IW jsut really blew all these ideas out of there without even beta testing thinking that everyon will like all these really broken mechanics to making you seem your a better player. I personally beleive that if they beta tested fixed bad network problems, got rid of the whole Akimbo thing, and went back to the original 3 killstreaks, UAV, missles, Chopper i can garuntee that MW2 would just be better as a whole. It dosnt mean it makes it a great competitive game its still as casual arcade shotter as you can get, but those changes would make it mroe playable. Oh and yes an actual matchmaking system so level 10's aren't gettin mixed with level 55's and getting pooped on due to lack of broken perks.tehHaste
err, i see what your trying to say, but iw put in everything the community asked for, they wanted more kill streaks, bigger maps, more weapon attachments, i also recall people complaining like 12year old girls about people being in party chat, so they removed party chat from mw2, so they did everything that the community asked for, and instead of being greatfull they complain about hwo they ruined it, so basicly the community has no idea what they want and no matter what happens, they will always... ALWAYS complain about how the game they play for 6-8 hours a day is pathetic.
Avatar image for chaoz-king
chaoz-king

5956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 chaoz-king
Member since 2005 • 5956 Posts
MW1 was pushing the game line with the lack of skill it required to be good. MW2 jumps miles pass this line. So unbalanced it's not even funny.
Avatar image for 2pac_makaveli
2pac_makaveli

1681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 2pac_makaveli
Member since 2008 • 1681 Posts
why does it personally offend you so much OP!?!? cod4 is way better the mw2 any fan of shooters knows this. I agree with this : They went overboard with MW2. They brought in too many things that made the game not even feel like call of duty anymore. and they didn't beta test them, which resulted in a broken multiplayer that nobody could enjoy. Also dual shotguns? I hope they fired the guy that came up with that idea.
Avatar image for albatrossdrums
albatrossdrums

1178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 albatrossdrums
Member since 2008 • 1178 Posts

OP - why ask qustions you have no interest in hearing the answer to? Great, you love the game, and by now you know a whole lot of people do not. If you are merely interested in stating your opinion and disagreeing with everyone who tries to answer your question with their own opinion, then you should consider writing a blog next time instead of a thread. There's really nothing to discuss if you are merely interested in saying "no way."

Avatar image for sk8erwarlock
sk8erwarlock

533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#63 sk8erwarlock
Member since 2007 • 533 Posts

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Too noob friendly. Just feel that MW1 required more skill.DavidToolMusic

I smell 4 year old sour grapes. You probably remember getting an easy ride in modern warfare one and that is why you feel the need to hate on the new game. Its not a Noob Friendly game, you just don't have the skills to match those who have managed to get a grip of the gameplay and use the new guns proper. Come on people? Is there any real problems really....just because you are bad at the game don't make the game bad.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its true, akimbo shotguns, shotgunas as secondary's, scavenger allows to too have unlimited ammo, one man army same thing, no juggernaut to balance stopping power, kill streaks are unfair and unbalanced, hardy any bolt sniper rifles, bling, its just all makes a game unbalanced an unfair ehile cod4 takes much more gunskill, less camping for killstreaks, no ones boosting all day with riot shield or for their nuke, noobtube takes first perk, you cant constantly replenish claymore, c4's, and rpgs
Avatar image for AlexTheGreat995
AlexTheGreat995

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 AlexTheGreat995
Member since 2008 • 34 Posts
[QUOTE="DavidToolMusic"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Too noob friendly. Just feel that MW1 required more skill.sk8erwarlock

I smell 4 year old sour grapes. You probably remember getting an easy ride in modern warfare one and that is why you feel the need to hate on the new game. Its not a Noob Friendly game, you just don't have the skills to match those who have managed to get a grip of the gameplay and use the new guns proper. Come on people? Is there any real problems really....just because you are bad at the game don't make the game bad.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its true, akimbo shotguns, shotgunas as secondary's, scavenger allows to too have unlimited ammo, one man army same thing, no juggernaut to balance stopping power, kill streaks are unfair and unbalanced, hardy any bolt sniper rifles, bling, its just all makes a game unbalanced an unfair ehile cod4 takes much more gunskill, less camping for killstreaks, no ones boosting all day with riot shield or for their nuke, noobtube takes first perk, you cant constantly replenish claymore, c4's, and rpgs

This is so true. you explained it all. you have completely answered the whole question. Kudos :)
Avatar image for DJ082863
DJ082863

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 DJ082863
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
I think Mw2 is better than mw1 because of the things u get to do. Mw1 also of course had somewhat poor grafics. I like MW2 because of the new material as well like at the end or the museum level.
Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

I think Mw2 is better than mw1 because of the things u get to do. Mw1 also of course had somewhat poor grafics. I like MW2 because of the new material as well like at the end or the museum level.DJ082863
LMAO at all of this...

Avatar image for Ugalde-
Ugalde-

3732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Ugalde-
Member since 2009 • 3732 Posts
I stopped playing it after the first week because I didn't like it as much of the first one. There were a number of things I didn't like about it but I cant really remember all of them. I know one thing was the guns were stupid and forgettable. I mean the AK was a level 70 gun.
Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
Legolas_Katarn

15556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

#68 Legolas_Katarn
Member since 2003 • 15556 Posts

[QUOTE="DJ082863"]I think Mw2 is better than mw1 because of the things u get to do. Mw1 also of course had somewhat poor grafics. I like MW2 because of the new material as well like at the end or the museum level.DranzarTypeF

LMAO at all of this...

Yes, that was funny. It's like saying you liked one movie/game better than another because you liked the look of the text in the subtitles more.

Avatar image for RamboJLC
RamboJLC

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 RamboJLC
Member since 2010 • 63 Posts

I just jumped on cod4 after 2 months of mw2 and I must say it takes more skill and is fun

Avatar image for Brawl55
Brawl55

1223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#70 Brawl55
Member since 2007 • 1223 Posts
I stopped playing it after the first week because I didn't like it as much of the first one. There were a number of things I didn't like about it but I cant really remember all of them. I know one thing was the guns were stupid and forgettable. I mean the AK was a level 70 gun.Ugalde-
New Carbon to wreck at opener :D. OT: Obviously MW2 has better graphics the game came out two years after CoD4. Besides graphics what "new" material did MW2 have that made the game better?
Avatar image for RockysCatnipCo
RockysCatnipCo

3165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 RockysCatnipCo
Member since 2005 • 3165 Posts
[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Too noob friendly. Just feel that MW1 required more skill.

The people that say this are usually the ones that aren't getting a lot of kills. Why would you complain if you're doing good because of it being "noob friendly?"
Avatar image for RockysCatnipCo
RockysCatnipCo

3165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 RockysCatnipCo
Member since 2005 • 3165 Posts
[QUOTE="DavidToolMusic"]

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Too noob friendly. Just feel that MW1 required more skill.sk8erwarlock

I smell 4 year old sour grapes. You probably remember getting an easy ride in modern warfare one and that is why you feel the need to hate on the new game. Its not a Noob Friendly game, you just don't have the skills to match those who have managed to get a grip of the gameplay and use the new guns proper. Come on people? Is there any real problems really....just because you are bad at the game don't make the game bad.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its true, akimbo shotguns, shotgunas as secondary's, scavenger allows to too have unlimited ammo, one man army same thing, no juggernaut to balance stopping power, kill streaks are unfair and unbalanced, hardy any bolt sniper rifles, bling, its just all makes a game unbalanced an unfair ehile cod4 takes much more gunskill, less camping for killstreaks, no ones boosting all day with riot shield or for their nuke, noobtube takes first perk, you cant constantly replenish claymore, c4's, and rpgs

Pretty much everything everone complained about in COD4.
Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Too noob friendly. Just feel that MW1 required more skill.RockysCatnipCo
The people that say this are usually the ones that aren't getting a lot of kills. Why would you complain if you're doing good because of it being "noob friendly?"

I'm pretty sure by "noob friendly" he means dual shot guns, heart beat sensors etc. plus the death streak rewards for playing bad, the "noobs" or casuals are catching breaks which is why people complain...duh ?

Avatar image for RockysCatnipCo
RockysCatnipCo

3165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 RockysCatnipCo
Member since 2005 • 3165 Posts
[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"][QUOTE="RockysCatnipCo"][QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]Too noob friendly. Just feel that MW1 required more skill.

The people that say this are usually the ones that aren't getting a lot of kills. Why would you complain if you're doing good because of it being "noob friendly?"

I'm pretty sure by "noob friendly" he means dual shot guns and kill streak rewards for playing bad, the "noobs" or casuals are catching breaks which is why people complain...duh ?

All of which you can use yourself, and he probably just doesn't utilize them effectively. Death streaks are pretty useless so i don't see why you're complaining about those. Also, calling dual shotguns noob weapons is pretty dumb considering you have to level up quite a bit to get them.
Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts
[QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"][QUOTE="RockysCatnipCo"]The people that say this are usually the ones that aren't getting a lot of kills. Why would you complain if you're doing good because of it being "noob friendly?"RockysCatnipCo
I'm pretty sure by "noob friendly" he means dual shot guns and kill streak rewards for playing bad, the "noobs" or casuals are catching breaks which is why people complain...duh ?

All of which you can use yourself, and he probably just doesn't utilize them effectively. Death streaks are pretty useless so i don't see why you're complaining about those. Also, calling dual shotguns noob weapons is pretty dumb considering you have to level up quite a bit to get them.

Death streaks aren't useless to casuals because they die a lot therefore the complaints on "catering to noobs", and you're saying that its hard to level up in this game ? just because you boosted long enough to unlock the dual shotguns doesn't take away from the fact that they are stupid and help ruin the game.
Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts

Death streaks are pretty useless so i don't see why you're complaining about those. Also, calling dual shotguns noob weapons is pretty dumb considering you have to level up quite a bit to get them.RockysCatnipCo
Deathstreaks aren't useles on small maps. I can't tell you how many times I got killed BY someone with painkiller because I had to reload. The only thing I don't understand is why anyone would complain about duel-shotguns as they are useless compared to the AA12.

Avatar image for Blu_Falcon37
Blu_Falcon37

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 Blu_Falcon37
Member since 2006 • 4041 Posts

Maybe because it is? No deathstreaks, simple killstreaks, less glitches, better maps, better guns.... The list goes on and on.

Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="RockysCatnipCo"] Death streaks are pretty useless so i don't see why you're complaining about those. Also, calling dual shotguns noob weapons is pretty dumb considering you have to level up quite a bit to get them.craigalan23

Deathstreaks aren't useles on small maps. I can't tell you how many times I got killed BY someone with painkiller because I had to reload. The only thing I don't understand is why anyone would complain about duel-shotguns as they are useless compared to the AA12.

Well you can't do anything about AA12, yes its an overpowered auto-shot gun but it is a useful military weapon so I can't fault IW for putting it in, but the dual shot gun idea was stupid and should have been scratched.
Avatar image for scouttrooperbob
scouttrooperbob

2439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#79 scouttrooperbob
Member since 2008 • 2439 Posts

I think Mw2 is better than mw1 because of the things u get to do. Mw1 also of course had somewhat poor grafics. I like MW2 because of the new material as well like at the end or the museum level.DJ082863

I can agree with this even though I like mw1 more. I just think the story was random and didnt peice together to well

Avatar image for XxFireHawkXx
XxFireHawkXx

512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 XxFireHawkXx
Member since 2009 • 512 Posts

I play MW 1 on occasion, and I also play the second and friend's houses, IMO, MW2 wasn't even very fun, even if you are winning or not. I'm not a fanboy of Halo or any other, I just didnt like the terribly short campaign, and the same multiplayer as COD4 with some add ons.

Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

I play MW 1 on occasion, and I also play the second and friend's houses, IMO, MW2 wasn't even very fun, even if you are winning or not. I'm not a fanboy of Halo or any other, I just didnt like the terribly short campaign, and the same multiplayer as COD4 with some add ons.XxFireHawkXx

You mean like Halo 3 and ODST ? c'mon...if you're gonna play that card be less biased.:P

Avatar image for RockysCatnipCo
RockysCatnipCo

3165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 RockysCatnipCo
Member since 2005 • 3165 Posts
[QUOTE="RockysCatnipCo"][QUOTE="DranzarTypeF"]I'm pretty sure by "noob friendly" he means dual shot guns and kill streak rewards for playing bad, the "noobs" or casuals are catching breaks which is why people complain...duh ?DranzarTypeF
All of which you can use yourself, and he probably just doesn't utilize them effectively. Death streaks are pretty useless so i don't see why you're complaining about those. Also, calling dual shotguns noob weapons is pretty dumb considering you have to level up quite a bit to get them.

Death streaks aren't useless to casuals because they die a lot therefore the complaints on "catering to noobs", and you're saying that its hard to level up in this game ? just because you boosted long enough to unlock the dual shotguns doesn't take away from the fact that they are stupid and help ruin the game.

So you're upset because you're getting killed by casuals who have pain killer on? Even though if you're doing good you can have a helicopter fly around the map and kill people for you? That's hardly comparable. And no I didn't boost, I'm only first prestige. I don't know why you would even accuse me of that. If you're a "casual" and you suck at the game enough to use death streaks all the time, you aren't the ones making it hard for other people to play the game.
Avatar image for DellaSav
DellaSav

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 DellaSav
Member since 2010 • 27 Posts
Totally agree, IW jsut really blew all these ideas out of there without even beta testing thinking that everyon will like all these really broken mechanics to making you seem your a better player. I personally beleive that if they beta tested fixed bad network problems, got rid of the whole Akimbo thing, and went back to the original 3 killstreaks, UAV, missles, Chopper i can garuntee that MW2 would just be better as a whole. It dosnt mean it makes it a great competitive game its still as casual arcade shotter as you can get, but those changes would make it mroe playable. Oh and yes an actual matchmaking system so level 10's aren't gettin mixed with level 55's and getting pooped on due to lack of broken perks.tehHaste
Are you kidding? The new killstreak rewards are awesome. The lame UAV, airstrike and chopper was so lame. In fact, I hated CoD4, I liked CoD5 and now I adore MW2
Avatar image for DranzarTypeF
DranzarTypeF

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 DranzarTypeF
Member since 2009 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="tehHaste"]Totally agree, IW jsut really blew all these ideas out of there without even beta testing thinking that everyon will like all these really broken mechanics to making you seem your a better player. I personally beleive that if they beta tested fixed bad network problems, got rid of the whole Akimbo thing, and went back to the original 3 killstreaks, UAV, missles, Chopper i can garuntee that MW2 would just be better as a whole. It dosnt mean it makes it a great competitive game its still as casual arcade shotter as you can get, but those changes would make it mroe playable. Oh and yes an actual matchmaking system so level 10's aren't gettin mixed with level 55's and getting pooped on due to lack of broken perks.DellaSav
Are you kidding? The new killstreak rewards are awesome. The lame UAV, airstrike and chopper was so lame. In fact, I hated CoD4, I liked CoD5 and now I adore MW2

Hmmm...I wonder why you hated COD 4 and love MW2 and its kill streaks...hmmmm

Avatar image for johnryandaplin
johnryandaplin

556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 johnryandaplin
Member since 2008 • 556 Posts

its official: MW2 SUCKS

Avatar image for bassguitar19
bassguitar19

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#86 bassguitar19
Member since 2008 • 68 Posts

All the hardcore "elite" people think it's geared a little more to casual players then to people with skill. I don't really know what they are talking about, COD4 has plenty of nooby stuff and MW2 is just more fun to play.

Avatar image for NsaneNoob
NsaneNoob

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 NsaneNoob
Member since 2005 • 68 Posts

After reading this whole thread I came to the conclusion that DavidToolMusic is a tool.

Avatar image for Megaflush24
Megaflush24

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 Megaflush24
Member since 2003 • 173 Posts

I just like playing games... keep em coming!

Avatar image for Strider_91
Strider_91

6570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 Strider_91
Member since 2007 • 6570 Posts
I think MW2 is better IMO, i like the additions and whilst i respect a large group of you saying MW1 is better, the people saying MW2 is all glitches? Did you not play MW1? Don't say they weren't any because on PS3 i would always see them. And i can't believe that that has any effect on your view. Both great games, guess comes down to the player in the end? I feel more comfortable playing MW2, and no it's not because it takes less skill? I dont see how a game with the same mechanics really can? I just enjoy it more.
Avatar image for ace070590
ace070590

439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#90 ace070590
Member since 2007 • 439 Posts

I love the fact that people have their opinions and all, but I'll share mine. Modern Warfare 2 is good, don't misunderstand me. However, has anyone ever heard of the term, "too much in a game?" I now that I have and I feel that Modern Warfare 2 is a perfect example of that. It's fun, filled with action, great graphics, good campaign, etc, but it feels to me like it has too much going on. When I play the MP, there not only seems to be more camping going on but since there are so many classes, weapons, and perks, I feel more confused than anything. Maybe it's because I'm not the best at the game, I don't know. But I remember playing the original Modern Warfare and it didn't seem so difficult and crazy. I feel that the original was better, but the new one is still great.

Avatar image for sk8erwarlock
sk8erwarlock

533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#91 sk8erwarlock
Member since 2007 • 533 Posts

[QUOTE="sk8erwarlock"][QUOTE="DavidToolMusic"] I smell 4 year old sour grapes. You probably remember getting an easy ride in modern warfare one and that is why you feel the need to hate on the new game. Its not a Noob Friendly game, you just don't have the skills to match those who have managed to get a grip of the gameplay and use the new guns proper. Come on people? Is there any real problems really....just because you are bad at the game don't make the game bad.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AlexTheGreat995

Its true, akimbo shotguns, shotgunas as secondary's, scavenger allows to too have unlimited ammo, one man army same thing, no juggernaut to balance stopping power, kill streaks are unfair and unbalanced, hardy any bolt sniper rifles, bling, its just all makes a game unbalanced an unfair ehile cod4 takes much more gunskill, less camping for killstreaks, no ones boosting all day with riot shield or for their nuke, noobtube takes first perk, you cant constantly replenish claymore, c4's, and rpgs

This is so true. you explained it all. you have completely answered the whole question. Kudos :)

I WANT COOKIE!

Avatar image for mattseanbachman
mattseanbachman

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 mattseanbachman
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I really think, to each his own, both have pros and cons. A lot of people missed juggernaut, even more were glad it was gone. Two sides of the same coin that is personal opinion.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#93 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
I think Mw2 is better than mw1 because of the things u get to do. Mw1 also of course had somewhat poor grafics. I like MW2 because of the new material as well like at the end or the museum level.DJ082863
graphics are spelled with a 'ph'
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#94 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
Its amazing how much hate there is between the two games, you think people have invested in the actual game and any negative comments will hurt the stock prices...lol the war between CoD and Halo has been postponed due to a civil war :P
Avatar image for leafs_ducks
leafs_ducks

2881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#95 leafs_ducks
Member since 2005 • 2881 Posts

lolz. noob question. but what is MW?

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#96 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

lolz. noob question. but what is MW?

leafs_ducks
your not serious are you?
Avatar image for craigalan23
craigalan23

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 craigalan23
Member since 2006 • 15879 Posts
Its amazing how much hate there is between the two games, you think people have invested in the actual game and any negative comments will hurt the stock prices...lol the war between CoD and Halo has been postponed due to a civil war :Pchaoscougar1
Oh it will end within a month or two remember the Reach beta is almost here their just planning their attacks. I'd laugh if it becomes Halo 3 vs. COD4 vs. MW2 vs. Treyarch's COD vs. Halo Reach. We are going to have so many interesting vs. threads this year. :lol:
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#98 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="chaoscougar1"]Its amazing how much hate there is between the two games, you think people have invested in the actual game and any negative comments will hurt the stock prices...lol the war between CoD and Halo has been postponed due to a civil war :Pcraigalan23
Oh it will end within a month or two remember the Reach beta is almost here their just planning their attacks. I'd laugh if it becomes Halo 3 vs. COD4 vs. MW2 vs. Treyarch's COD vs. Halo Reach. We are going to have so many interesting vs. threads this year. :lol:

they should be fun threads; full of ignorance, arrogance and just plain old rage

PS i think Battlefield will probably join the war as well

Avatar image for AlecMc112
AlecMc112

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 AlecMc112
Member since 2007 • 90 Posts

MW1 multiplayer is more challenging well for me anyway but MW2 is alot better in my opinion lots more to do with the special ops etc and on the multiplayer it's easier to tell who's who with earning titles etc makes people stand out more if you get what i'm saying ...plus with all the extra stuff equipment emergency drops etc alot more fun online

Avatar image for andalore
andalore

2644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 andalore
Member since 2007 • 2644 Posts

1 Word, Nukes.