I have a good idea, hope your listening Microsoft

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jayd02
jayd02

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 jayd02
Member since 2007 • 802 Posts

By now everybody knows about the XBL price raise. I am personally against it not because it is too but because it is a rip off. So I think I have a solution that could possibly fix this.

For the people who bought their Xbox to play video games and just want to play multiplayer for their games, all they need is silver which is free.

Now for the people who use Facebook, Twitter, Netflix, Last.fm, and Hulu, and all of the extra crap that microsoft makes us pay for that most of us don't use.

Now half of the stuff that you are paying for you get for free on the internet that your already paying to use. Your already paying Netflix, so why pay again to use it? I just want to play the multi for my games because that is what my gaming console is for. When I want to socialize I have my handy dandy laptop computer. So place your vote and lets see what people say and want.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#3 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts
lets hope not.... personaly i like the idea paying for online why? because people can't create 1 million names and take every gamer then go in MP and cheat
Avatar image for gta4_2112
gta4_2112

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 gta4_2112
Member since 2007 • 3270 Posts

Nah I don't really like that. I think I watch Netflix just as much as I play multiplayer.

Avatar image for Flamecommando
Flamecommando

11634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 Flamecommando
Member since 2003 • 11634 Posts

Ehh. I think they should keep ESPN. Probably not going to even use it.

It sucks. "No price increase for ESPN." Lies. Don't think they'll change their minds. Probably not listening either.

Avatar image for jayd02
jayd02

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 jayd02
Member since 2007 • 802 Posts

lets hope not.... personaly i like the idea paying for online why? because people can't create 1 million names and take every gamer then go in MP and cheat k2theswiss

don't you have to pay to change your gamertag?

Avatar image for chaosflare44
chaosflare44

601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 chaosflare44
Member since 2009 • 601 Posts

I think it should be pay as you use it. If you play online, pay for that, if you use the other features, then you pay for them separately. I for one couldn't be any less interested in using that ESPN thing and whatever else they have. All I care about are the games, its stupid for me to have to pay for everything else too.

Avatar image for Flamecommando
Flamecommando

11634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Flamecommando
Member since 2003 • 11634 Posts

[QUOTE="k2theswiss"]lets hope not.... personaly i like the idea paying for online why? because people can't create 1 million names and take every gamer then go in MP and cheat jayd02

don't you have to pay to change your gamertag?

Yes you do. Some people change it anyway or make a new account to take advantage of the free month.

Avatar image for link716
link716

652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#9 link716
Member since 2009 • 652 Posts

That's exactly how MS sells Gold membership. They probably know that barely anybody would pay for Gold if all they were getting out of it was just all this extra crap we can do on a PC. If we could all play online without paying for Gold, MS would lose almost all of their profits off of it. And I really think that any time somebody has an idea for MS, they just plug their ears and start saying "lalalalala"

Avatar image for decepticondevil
decepticondevil

3607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 decepticondevil
Member since 2003 • 3607 Posts

That's exactly how MS sells Gold membership. They probably know that barely anybody would pay for Gold if all they were getting out of it was just all this extra crap we can do on a PC. If we could all play online without paying for Gold, MS would lose almost all of their profits off of it. And I really think that any time somebody has an idea for MS, they just plug their ears and start saying "lalalalala"

link716

I think it should be tiered then. Like, I dunno... $40 a year just to play online, $60 for all the extra crap. Still... all that facebook crap and everything? the PS3 has a full broswer where you could do all that stuff if you really wanted to, and not pay anything extra. Hell, even Wii has Netflix with no additional charge (other than for Netflix itself)

Avatar image for commander-cool
commander-cool

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 commander-cool
Member since 2007 • 359 Posts

lets hope not.... personaly i like the idea paying for online why? because people can't create 1 million names and take every gamer then go in MP and cheat k2theswiss

Great point, I hate new accounts, it ruins ranking systems, especially in Halo

Avatar image for jayd02
jayd02

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#12 jayd02
Member since 2007 • 802 Posts

That's exactly how MS sells Gold membership. They probably know that barely anybody would pay for Gold if all they were getting out of it was just all this extra crap we can do on a PC. If we could all play online without paying for Gold, MS would lose almost all of their profits off of it. And I really think that any time somebody has an idea for MS, they just plug their ears and start saying "lalalalala"

link716

they do that unless you say "I have found a new way to make you a bunch of money off of something that people already pay for."

Avatar image for jayd02
jayd02

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 jayd02
Member since 2007 • 802 Posts

looks like silver won, had a feeling that would happen.

Avatar image for GhostHardwar3
GhostHardwar3

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 GhostHardwar3
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
having silver give the option to play multiplayer would be a great idea, although, as has been said before, it would destroy the ranking systems in games such as halo 3. on the other hand, if someone were to regularly use all of the new features that are being implemented, they would class it as value for money. it's just the ones who don't use it that see it as a waste, which is fair enough. i don't see what else microsoft could do given the circumstances, without completely changing the structure of xbox live. being honest, i think they've done pretty well to introduce all the new features for the small, small price raise. it's just a matter of whether you use them or not.
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#15 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

[QUOTE="k2theswiss"]lets hope not.... personaly i like the idea paying for online why? because people can't create 1 million names and take every gamer then go in MP and cheat jayd02

don't you have to pay to change your gamertag?

change it yes, but hes talking about creating a new gamertag
Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

silver having free online would destroy everything, no-one would pay for gold, and thus, MS would either have to increase the price, or decrease the quality of service. I like it the way it is. Bar the price rise :evil:

Avatar image for killev
killev

657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#17 killev
Member since 2010 • 657 Posts

well if they microsoft allowed silver users to play multiplayer then i dont think anyone would buy the god live card which will be a huge loss for microsoft.

Avatar image for Zophar87
Zophar87

4344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Zophar87
Member since 2008 • 4344 Posts

Honestly... The price raise doesn't bother me in the slightest.

Avatar image for orb_03_2006
orb_03_2006

8494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 75

User Lists: 0

#19 orb_03_2006
Member since 2006 • 8494 Posts

Nah I don't really like that. I think I watch Netflix just as much as I play multiplayer.

gta4_2112
Same here.
Avatar image for Ghost_702
Ghost_702

7405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#20 Ghost_702
Member since 2006 • 7405 Posts
I think that you should still need gold in order to play multi games. However, I think you should only need silver for Netflix, since you have to pay a seperate subscription fee to use it.
Avatar image for NoDzombie
NoDzombie

1483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 NoDzombie
Member since 2009 • 1483 Posts

i think they should just introduce a third level of subscription they should have:

  • silver - just the same as it is right now
  • gold - slightly cheaper than it is now, but access only to online multiplayer and the marketplace and stuff (no twitter, facebook etc)
  • platinum (maybe) - slightly more than current gold, but includes access to everything, the twitter, facebook, last.fm etc etc

this would mean that instead of increasing the cost for everyone, only the people that actually use these features would have to pay for them, i personally almost never use these features and it annoys me that we are all now going to have to pay more just because they are there, there should be an extra level of subscription so that people who want these things can have them, and people that use the console only for gaming should be able to do that without having to pay more for stuff they never use

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts

i think they should just introduce a third level of subscription they should have:

  • silver - just the same as it is right now
  • gold - slightly cheaper than it is now, but access only to online multiplayer and the marketplace and stuff (no twitter, facebook etc)
  • platinum (maybe) - slightly more than current gold, but includes access to everything, the twitter, facebook, last.fm etc etc

this would mean that instead of increasing the cost for everyone, only the people that actually use these features would have to pay for them, i personally almost never use these features and it annoys me that we are all now going to have to pay more just because they are there, there should be an extra level of subscription so that people who want these things can have them, and people that use the console only for gaming should be able to do that without having to pay more for stuff they never use

NoDzombie

or even with platinum you could give users discounts or special offers that only apply to them. ie every third marketplace purchase a certain percentage off (up to a limit), early access to demos and betas, occasional free avatar gear or themes (that is obviously otherwise not free :P). An incentive to get a user to upgrade

Avatar image for jayd02
jayd02

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 jayd02
Member since 2007 • 802 Posts

[QUOTE="NoDzombie"]

i think they should just introduce a third level of subscription they should have:

  • silver - just the same as it is right now
  • gold - slightly cheaper than it is now, but access only to online multiplayer and the marketplace and stuff (no twitter, facebook etc)
  • platinum (maybe) - slightly more than current gold, but includes access to everything, the twitter, facebook, last.fm etc etc

this would mean that instead of increasing the cost for everyone, only the people that actually use these features would have to pay for them, i personally almost never use these features and it annoys me that we are all now going to have to pay more just because they are there, there should be an extra level of subscription so that people who want these things can have them, and people that use the console only for gaming should be able to do that without having to pay more for stuff they never use

chaoscougar1

or even with platinum you could give users discounts or special offers that only apply to them. ie every third marketplace purchase a certain percentage off (up to a limit), early access to demos and betas, occasjional free avatar gear or themes (that is obviously otherwise not free :P). An incentive to get a user to upgrade

they have had three levels once with bronze silver and gold but i dont know wut bronze was for or what even happened to bronze