Just Got Medal Of Honor!!!!

The only problem is I had to give my girlfriend the money to buy it and I won't see her for 2 days! :cry:

Please with out spoiling anything, tell me how the game is :). I have 56k internet so videos are kind of out of the question :(

Scored a 7.5 here at Gamespot.DJ_Magneto

[QUOTE="DJ_Magneto"]Scored a 7.5 here at Gamespot.JuggaloRandall

i picked it up yesterday hoping it would give me the fast paced gameplay of modern warfare 2 but without all of the cheap tactics and perks people use. honestly, im pretty disappointed. there really arent that many maps or gametypes, and leveling up is too easy. im talking about the multiplayer. ive only played a little of the single player. it didnt seem bad, but it wasnt anything great either. one thing about the single player i can say is i love the feel of shooting the guns. it feels better than alot of the other shooters ive played.

Limited maps and game types seems to be the norm these days just so they ad them later as DLC. what can anyone say that sets this game apart from other shooters besides the location?

Limited maps and game types seems to be the norm these days just so they ad them later as DLC. what can anyone say that sets this game apart from other shooters besides the location?

BLAS1AN

It's not bad. I played about an hour to an hour and a half of it last night. It's solid, but it's nothing to write home about-- if you're looking for something revolutionary, you won't find it in MoH. The only major complaint I have about it is that the graphics are a little bland and some of the animations could use work. Otherwise, it's a good, standard FPS.

Scored a 7.5 here at Gamespot.DJ_Magneto

The review was silly his main complaints

invisible walls around the single player maps that stop you from exploring, which are in nearly every game ever made...

Enemy AI was to easy, yet he played the game normal so that can be fixed by turning up the difficulty.

Single player doesn't prepare you for multiplayer, I dont remember a single game where i said man im glad i played single player first it prepared me for multiplayer.

I picked up my copy yesterday and it is still in the shrink wrap I will most likely dive in tonight after i beat spiderman shattered dimensions.

I think it got a lower score because it doesn't have Call of Duty in the title to be honest. ALthough 7.5 isn't really that bad it really stops people from buying it because it didn't get the 8.

[QUOTE="DJ_Magneto"]Scored a 7.5 here at Gamespot.ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

The review was silly his main complaints

invisible walls around the single player maps that stop you from exploring, which are in nearly every game ever made...

Enemy AI was to easy, yet he played the game normal so that can be fixed by turning up the difficulty.

Single player doesn't prepare you for multiplayer, I dont remember a single game where i said man im glad i played single player first it prepared me for multiplayer.

I picked up my copy yesterday and it is still in the shrink wrap I will most likely dive in tonight after i beat spiderman shattered dimensions.

I think it got a lower score because it doesn't have Call of Duty in the title to be honest. ALthough 7.5 isn't really that bad it really stops people from buying it because it didn't get the 8.

I didn't play it yet but many youtube videos show it's a nice game though most people who played it felt kind of disapointing ... if you don't have bfbc2 just get it instead of moh .. basiclly the same but way better :P .

Oh and the main dissapointment was on the campaign and since you said you won't play on the multi alot than it's REALLY not worth buying unless they fix all their bugs and raise the AI difficulity up .

i have been thinking about the controversy over referring to the taleban as "opposing force" in the multiplayer of medal of honor. that shouldn't be unusual to those who don't know because "opposing force" or "opfor" is what is known as the arab players in those games. just thought i would clear that up.

Sucker... haha

realguitarhero5

[QUOTE="realguitarhero5"]

Sucker... haha

JuggaloRandall

I bought it, already beat the single player. The single player, out of 10.... a 4 1/2 IMO. Very bad level design, horrible story telling and the sound and visual glitched constantly.

Multiplayer..... 7 out of 10....not as good as Battlefield 2, but ok.

All in all I wish I waited for reviews, not worth purchasing for 60 bucks, In My Opinion

[QUOTE="JuggaloRandall"][QUOTE="realguitarhero5"]

Sucker... haha

realguitarhero5

Meh, I'm enjoying the hell out of it personally. I really don't understand the hate for it, nor what people were expecting. Its not trying to revolutionize the genre, its just out to provide a good time and show exactly what would happen if the Battlefield: Bad Company and Call of Duty series had a child. In my opinion, this baby lived up to the hype.

Meh, I'm enjoying the hell out of it personally. I really don't understand the hate for it, nor what people were expecting. Its not trying to revolutionize the genre, its just out to provide a good time and show exactly what would happen if the Battlefield: Bad Company and Call of Duty series had a child. In my opinion, this baby lived up to the hype.

jamejame

People can't play a game nowadays without comparing it to another it is really lame if you ask me. People can't seem to buy a game without reviewers telling them it is ok to buy it either...

[QUOTE="DJ_Magneto"]Scored a 7.5 here at Gamespot.ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

The review was silly his main complaints

invisible walls around the single player maps that stop you from exploring, which are in nearly every game ever made...

Enemy AI was to easy, yet he played the game normal so that can be fixed by turning up the difficulty.

Single player doesn't prepare you for multiplayer, I dont remember a single game where i said man im glad i played single player first it prepared me for multiplayer.

I picked up my copy yesterday and it is still in the shrink wrap I will most likely dive in tonight after i beat spiderman shattered dimensions.

I think it got a lower score because it doesn't have Call of Duty in the title to be honest. ALthough 7.5 isn't really that bad it really stops people from buying it because it didn't get the 8.

[QUOTE="DJ_Magneto"]Scored a 7.5 here at Gamespot.JuggaloRandall

Me and a few buddies ran through the campaign earlier today. Took few hours. The campaign was pretty good. We all liked it. some little hiccups but nothing like some reviews have said. Some of the visuals are stunning. Was good times. The online though... seems like copy of BFBC2. Nice but same old thing. Good game overall. I think should have scored an 8

oh and one more thing... 56k. really? I didnt even think people could get that internet still. Time for an upgrade my friend.

ive been playing the single player for like 2 or 3 hours and it seems really boring to me,hopefully its going to get better.

[QUOTE="jamejame"]

Meh, I'm enjoying the hell out of it personally. I really don't understand the hate for it, nor what people were expecting. Its not trying to revolutionize the genre, its just out to provide a good time and show exactly what would happen if the Battlefield: Bad Company and Call of Duty series had a child. In my opinion, this baby lived up to the hype.

ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

People can't play a game nowadays without comparing it to another it is really lame if you ask me. People can't seem to buy a game without reviewers telling them it is ok to buy it either...

That's kinda bad for the developers .. if they want to make a successful fps game they want it to be better than all the ones out right now .. but if it has a bit of lower graphics 'THE GAME SUCKS' .. obviously each company wanna have the best games released .. But i can't find anything better than halo reach, black ops[even though it didn't came out no doubt it's gonna be awesome], bfbc2 and gears 2 out right now so it's really hard to make better games :[ . can't wait for gears 3 xD .

[QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

[QUOTE="DJ_Magneto"]Scored a 7.5 here at Gamespot._SOULtoSQUEEZE_

The review was silly his main complaints

invisible walls around the single player maps that stop you from exploring, which are in nearly every game ever made...

Enemy AI was to easy, yet he played the game normal so that can be fixed by turning up the difficulty.

Single player doesn't prepare you for multiplayer, I dont remember a single game where i said man im glad i played single player first it prepared me for multiplayer.

I picked up my copy yesterday and it is still in the shrink wrap I will most likely dive in tonight after i beat spiderman shattered dimensions.

I think it got a lower score because it doesn't have Call of Duty in the title to be honest. ALthough 7.5 isn't really that bad it really stops people from buying it because it didn't get the 8.

So stop comparing the two games and just play the game and accept it for what it is. Sure there may be a "better" game out there but if you start comparing that is where your bias goes out the window.

moh is garbage:!:

[QUOTE="_SOULtoSQUEEZE_"][QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

The review was silly his main complaints

invisible walls around the single player maps that stop you from exploring, which are in nearly every game ever made...

Enemy AI was to easy, yet he played the game normal so that can be fixed by turning up the difficulty.

Single player doesn't prepare you for multiplayer, I dont remember a single game where i said man im glad i played single player first it prepared me for multiplayer.

I picked up my copy yesterday and it is still in the shrink wrap I will most likely dive in tonight after i beat spiderman shattered dimensions.

I think it got a lower score because it doesn't have Call of Duty in the title to be honest. ALthough 7.5 isn't really that bad it really stops people from buying it because it didn't get the 8.

ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

So stop comparing the two games and just play the game and accept it for what it is. Sure there may be a "better" game out there but if you start comparing that is where your bias goes out the window.

you do realize the game is only seriously like 4-5 hours long.....

[QUOTE="jamejame"]

Meh, I'm enjoying the hell out of it personally. I really don't understand the hate for it, nor what people were expecting. Its not trying to revolutionize the genre, its just out to provide a good time and show exactly what would happen if the Battlefield: Bad Company and Call of Duty series had a child. In my opinion, this baby lived up to the hype.

ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

People can't play a game nowadays without comparing it to another it is really lame if you ask me. People can't seem to buy a game without reviewers telling them it is ok to buy it either...

While that's true, there's no doubting that this game borrowed HEAVILY from the recent Call of Duty games. And I don't know about you, but I have been burned too many times when blindly purchasing games without reading reviews. Potentially throwing away $60+ is not something I take too lightly.

[QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

[QUOTE="_SOULtoSQUEEZE_"] The game isn't as polished as call of duty and really doesn't offer near the amount of content. realguitarhero5

So stop comparing the two games and just play the game and accept it for what it is. Sure there may be a "better" game out there but if you start comparing that is where your bias goes out the window.

I suppose but you do have your own opinion right? You dont just see a video for a game saying it sucks and immediately say "bargain bin!" at least give games a try you know.

[QUOTE="realguitarhero5"][QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

So stop comparing the two games and just play the game and accept it for what it is. Sure there may be a "better" game out there but if you start comparing that is where your bias goes out the window.

ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

I suppose but you do have your own opinion right? You dont just see a video for a game saying it sucks and immediately say "bargain bin!" at least give games a try you know.

I havnt played the New Medal of Honor game yet but I liked the older Medal of Honor games that were more linier like medal of honor games on pS1 and Frontlines on PS2. These games were more linier and the challange of the game was to successfully learn the level structure and where the natzis would be loctated at. Also the older games had health pickups insted a recharging health meter meaning you needed to perfect the level through trial and error but when you nailed the level it was so satisfying. Especially because there wasnt mid level save pionts you just needed to perfect the level from begining to end.Medel of Honor Airborn was mediocre for me beacuse it was much more open and random with less action set pieces. I geuss I like the old school approach to this series.

[QUOTE="_SOULtoSQUEEZE_"][QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

The review was silly his main complaints

invisible walls around the single player maps that stop you from exploring, which are in nearly every game ever made...

Enemy AI was to easy, yet he played the game normal so that can be fixed by turning up the difficulty.

Single player doesn't prepare you for multiplayer, I dont remember a single game where i said man im glad i played single player first it prepared me for multiplayer.

I picked up my copy yesterday and it is still in the shrink wrap I will most likely dive in tonight after i beat spiderman shattered dimensions.

I think it got a lower score because it doesn't have Call of Duty in the title to be honest. ALthough 7.5 isn't really that bad it really stops people from buying it because it didn't get the 8.

ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

So stop comparing the two games and just play the game and accept it for what it is. Sure there may be a "better" game out there but if you start comparing that is where your bias goes out the window.

The only problem is I had to give my girlfriend the money to buy it and I won't see her for 2 days! :cry:

Please with out spoiling anything, tell me how the game is :). I have 56k internet so videos are kind of out of the question :(

JuggaloRandall

I was int eh beta the multiplayer was bad dude.

I am loving this game. Single player is pretty good, Not as good as Bad Company 2 but the Mulitplayer is pretty awesome. They really improved on the visuals from the Beta.

[QUOTE="DJ_Magneto"]Scored a 7.5 here at Gamespot.ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ

The review was silly his main complaints

invisible walls around the single player maps that stop you from exploring, which are in nearly every game ever made...

Enemy AI was to easy, yet he played the game normal so that can be fixed by turning up the difficulty.

Single player doesn't prepare you for multiplayer, I dont remember a single game where i said man im glad i played single player first it prepared me for multiplayer.

I picked up my copy yesterday and it is still in the shrink wrap I will most likely dive in tonight after i beat spiderman shattered dimensions.

I think it got a lower score because it doesn't have Call of Duty in the title to be honest. ALthough 7.5 isn't really that bad it really stops people from buying it because it didn't get the 8.

[QUOTE="ZzZEVOLUTIONZzZ"]

[QUOTE="DJ_Magneto"]Scored a 7.5 here at Gamespot.MystikRex

The review was silly his main complaints

invisible walls around the single player maps that stop you from exploring, which are in nearly every game ever made...

Enemy AI was to easy, yet he played the game normal so that can be fixed by turning up the difficulty.

Single player doesn't prepare you for multiplayer, I dont remember a single game where i said man im glad i played single player first it prepared me for multiplayer.

I picked up my copy yesterday and it is still in the shrink wrap I will most likely dive in tonight after i beat spiderman shattered dimensions.

I think it got a lower score because it doesn't have Call of Duty in the title to be honest. ALthough 7.5 isn't really that bad it really stops people from buying it because it didn't get the 8.

I hate CoD and the game still blows, unless its a huge change from the beta.

And that game is a CoD ripe, it should attract Call of Duty players.

don't come here.