[QUOTE="Microsoft1234"][QUOTE="Jagged3dge"]+1, halo wise, reach or odst are the worse. Also their last 2 games. I like ODST! Not worth the full $60 by far, I'm glad I waited, but the atmosphere is great and unlike anything in any other Halo. The music was also some of the best. The gameplay was average, but only as far as Halo is concerned. It was still good, solid fun.Its a shame tha they're going out with their worst game yet...Halo Reach.
realguitarhero5
Your right, I think that the co-op was the best yet in ODST.
I couldn't wait for Bungie to implement the firefight system in Reach but for some reason it came out as something that was simply put into the game and it wasn't really enjoyable.
I love Halo games and I think that Halo 2 & 3 are some of the best games I ever played, so believe me I tried to like Reach. The loadouts weren't terrible but I would say that they definitely damaged the Halo gameplay a little bit. Not to mention that the maps in Reach are a joke. They made Forgeworld and seriously abused it, I mean half the maps are on that mediocre map.
Which leads me to my last point. They improved the map editor but didn't provide great maps to construct games on. Forgeworld is beautiful, but we need more. And thats what seperates Reach from Halo 3. I can't invite my friends to play infection, fat-kid, cops and robbers or anything in Reach. I just view Halo 3 as a game that was justmuch more appealing.
Nothing against Bungie though, they just did what every developer tries to do nowadays; copy CoDs success.
Log in to comment