Microsoft reversing their restrictions!!!

  • 83 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xFL4WL3SSx
xFL4WL3SSx

1018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 xFL4WL3SSx
Member since 2009 • 1018 Posts
So people got pissed because of MS bullsh*t policies, then MS decides to please the community and listen to them and change all their restrictions and people are still not satisfied??? I just don't get this, what else do you want?? Ohhh I'm not gonna forgive MS for what they've done, lmaoo and who the F are you, I guarantee regardless of all this whinning you're still gonna stand in line day 1 and buy the X1, my god people make a big deal out of nothing, you really can never please everybody.
Avatar image for driftingsilvia
driftingsilvia

4089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#52 driftingsilvia
Member since 2005 • 4089 Posts

As happy as I am to see they listened to us. I just don't feel like I want the system still, and I won't buy it. Not because of everything that happened, but because it just doesn't look like it will entertain me. I want a gaming system, not a entertainment hub. So basically.....

Xbox One with restrictions = rape without a condom

Xbox One without restrictions = rape with a condom

Avatar image for Lulekani
Lulekani

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Lulekani
Member since 2012 • 2318 Posts
Its nice that people are so easily fooled. The truth is it was a 2 step Con.

Create a fake DRM problem/policy and then fix it like a hero in the nick of time! It gives the illusion of progress but in truth, any bullsh!t that MS managed to get away with on the 360 will carry over, unaddressed to the Xbox One.

"What if the DRM policy was Real? " well then, should you trust a company that changes policies whenever it damn well feels like it ? Theres no reason to be own an Xbox One anymore than there is to own the 360.

Avatar image for robybaggio
robybaggio

562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 robybaggio
Member since 2004 • 562 Posts

So people got pissed because of MS bullsh*t policies, then MS decides to please the community and listen to them and change all their restrictions and people are still not satisfied??? I just don't get this, what else do you want?? Ohhh I'm not gonna forgive MS for what they've done, lmaoo and who the F are you, I guarantee regardless of all this whinning you're still gonna stand in line day 1 and buy the X1, my god people make a big deal out of nothing, you really can never please everybody.xFL4WL3SSx

 

You don't understand what was happening? :roll:

Avatar image for robybaggio
robybaggio

562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 robybaggio
Member since 2004 • 562 Posts
Enjoy the new console, in it's new gimped version. The good version just died.
Avatar image for firefox59
firefox59

4530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 firefox59
Member since 2005 • 4530 Posts
Its nice that people are so easily fooled. The truth is it was a 2 step Con.

Create a fake DRM problem/policy and then fix it like a hero in the nick of time! It gives the illusion of progress but in truth, any bullsh!t that MS managed to get away with on the 360 will carry over, unaddressed to the Xbox One.

"What if the DRM policy was Real? " well then, should you trust a company that changes policies whenever it damn well feels like it ? Theres no reason to be own an Xbox One anymore than there is to own the 360.

Lulekani
You can't believe the BS that you type. It's just not possible.
Avatar image for rubber-chicken
rubber-chicken

2081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 rubber-chicken
Member since 2009 • 2081 Posts
Could you believe that they might have done this on purpose as a marketing strategy...
Avatar image for JohnFifteen12
JohnFifteen12

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 JohnFifteen12
Member since 2012 • 205 Posts

Two steps in the right direction - now sell me a version without Kinect for $400 and we've got a deal. 

Vari3ty

 

I feel the same way.

I would love to buy the Xbox One, and I am very happy to hear that Microsoft has finally come to their senses regarding the DRM policies, but the Kinect is still a deal breaker for me, so until they remove it from the console, I will not purchase one.

I worry that fewer people are as upset about the Kinect as there were about the DRM issues, so I doubt we will see a Kinect-free version of the Xbox One anytime soon. :(

I would love to be wrong about that, though.

Avatar image for Infinite_Access
Infinite_Access

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#59 Infinite_Access
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts

[QUOTE="Mickeyminime"]for me, i'm 100& solid on PS4 now, but will decide whether or not to get X1, if i do, it will prob be a while, i for one will not forgive MS for what they did and if they can just take it all off, what if they put it all back on?. Not that they would of course, but i no longer trust MS, but thats just mexhawk27

Yeah but what happens if Sony puts in DRM. Let me guess Sony are the Saints of gaming they would never do that. Please grow up. 

You literally contradicted yourself from what you said the post before this one.
Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
Legolas_Katarn

15556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

#60 Legolas_Katarn
Member since 2003 • 15556 Posts
Alright, now just lose the Kinect, lower the price from losing the Kinect, and support Indie devs who are likely to make much more interesting games than the AAA crap we've been getting.

what if they change there mind a year down the road  :cry:

djdarkforces
What if Sony does?
Avatar image for John_Read
John_Read

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 John_Read
Member since 2009 • 1214 Posts
Nice
Avatar image for JohnTheGrudge
JohnTheGrudge

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 JohnTheGrudge
Member since 2013 • 27 Posts
So now it's really just about the games. I'm still going with the PS4 because in the long run I think it'll have more interesting exclusives. All these third party exclusives on the XBox One aren't indicative of what we can expect from MS in the future. With the XBox 360, exclusives I was interested in dried up after a year or so. I'll be honest though if Remedy were doing Alan Wake 2 instead of Quantum Break I'd be going with the XBox One.
Avatar image for Vari3ty
Vari3ty

11111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Vari3ty
Member since 2009 • 11111 Posts

I am fine with Kinect actually. It is the only way to have developers getting onboard with unified control system. Add-on never works. Motion controlled TV is the future. There is no doubt about it. I actually think Kinect 3.0 needs to be part of the TV itself, otherwise other manufactures will just build-in their own version of Kinect. Hate it or not, all smart TV will have motion sensor one way or another, the only difference is, it is not a MS product and it is likely have much more security loopholes than the big M.magicalclick

Why does motion have to be the future? I still don't see what is so difficult about using a remote - just hit a button or two, the channel is switched, volume adjusted, whatever... it works just fine. 

Avatar image for BrutallyBiased
BrutallyBiased

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 BrutallyBiased
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
Microsoft really shouldn't waste all that programing and instead give the user the option to use it If I were Microsoft I would have just included an activation code with every game and have let the user make the choice. If the user activates it they gain all the cloud features but the copy of the game will be under DRM restrictions. If they do not activate the code the system will act like a 360 and require the game disk, but it will lack all of the cloud features available through locking the game to a single account I really wouldn't be surprised if people actually liked all the extra features and chose to put up with the DRM
Avatar image for Lulekani
Lulekani

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Lulekani
Member since 2012 • 2318 Posts
[QUOTE="Lulekani"]Its nice that people are so easily fooled. The truth is it was a 2 step Con.

Create a fake DRM problem/policy and then fix it like a hero in the nick of time! It gives the illusion of progress but in truth, any bullsh!t that MS managed to get away with on the 360 will carry over, unaddressed to the Xbox One.

"What if the DRM policy was Real? " well then, should you trust a company that changes policies whenever it damn well feels like it ? Theres no reason to be own an Xbox One anymore than there is to own the 360.

firefox59
You can't believe the BS that you type. It's just not possible.

Thats what I would do. Its too easy not to consider.
Avatar image for Lulekani
Lulekani

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Lulekani
Member since 2012 • 2318 Posts
[QUOTE="BrutallyBiased"]Microsoft really shouldn't waste all that programing and instead give the user the option to use it If I were Microsoft I would have just included an activation code with every game and have let the user make the choice. If the user activates it they gain all the cloud features but the copy of the game will be under DRM restrictions. If they do not activate the code the system will act like a 360 and require the game disk, but it will lack all of the cloud features available through locking the game to a single account I really wouldn't be surprised if people actually liked all the extra features and chose to put up with the DRM

Yes, offering a choice and letting people realise for themselves how much better the new policy is would've been cool. But I think the "Build it, and they will come" philosophy may have needed a higher number of preorders in order for it to be financialy viable so maybe they made the new policy mandatory because it may have been more cost effective than trying to support the old and the new Simultaneously
Avatar image for BrutallyBiased
BrutallyBiased

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 BrutallyBiased
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
Most of the negativity came from Microsoft forcing it on consumers. Honestly they should have known forcing new DRM policies would piss people off. Just look at the reaction during Sony's event Sony "No DRM!!!" then a full 60 second applause What Microsoft hasn't been vocal enough about is the benefits of locking the game to a account. Steam uses DRM but people actually prefer it because it gives them easy access to their games
Avatar image for DecadesOfGaming
DecadesOfGaming

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#69 DecadesOfGaming
Member since 2007 • 3100 Posts

Im pleased they finally got it right.. I was starting to dislike these muppets in their suits

Avatar image for P1xxel
P1xxel

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 P1xxel
Member since 2013 • 69 Posts
It's funny cause people are complaining about the kinect watching them XD your iPhone can spy on you more than the kinect can guys. XD they are just making up excuses now LOL
Avatar image for jetjetjaguar
jetjetjaguar

192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 jetjetjaguar
Member since 2011 • 192 Posts

Great news from MS.  I'm taking complete and full credit for this reversal :D.  I now plan to keep my pre-order for XBOX one in place.  I knew that they had to reverse this and yes we have Sony to thank at least a little bit.  We need two horses in this race...

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#72 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

[QUOTE="dominer"]

Since you pity me, please enlighten me on the negative changes.

dominer

Microsoft's policies were going to revolutionize digital content and rights.

The whole "well digital content is different" argument would have been thrown out because as this grew people would have the same control over their digital content as their physical content.

Know how you buy a digital game but it's stuck forever? With Microsoft's system you could resell it. That in turn brings value to digital only games. There's not a feeling that when you buy a digital game it's an anchor on your account.

Sharing games with up to ten people, instead of someone buying 4 games for themselves and their kids you bought one title and shared it.

We're back to the old backwards system when it comes to retail and digital.

Consumer rights were going to be expanded, now it's back to the old close minded ways that inherently punish consumers

I can understand some people liking that. But me, and I'm pretty sure many other gamers, don't care about digital games on their consoles from M$ especially. I've never had a digital game and probably never will outside XBLA games of course.

I don't get sharing your point. You saying you would rather be able to share games with a limited amount of people online and be restricted beyond that than buying a disc an doing whatever with whoever?  

 

XBLA games are digital and the Xbox One doesn't differentiate between arcade, indie, big budget games, they're all just games.

The old plan allowed users to have full control over all the games they own. It gave users more power over what they owned. You can buy, lend, and sell all of your games, nothing was locked to you forever if you didn't want it to be.

As for the game sharing? There's no doubt that the ability to share your game with someone and play it at the same time is far and away better than having one copy that needs to be passed around and only played by one person at a time. If you have two gamers in the house you buy one copy of a game and both people can play it at the same time. A family with three kids can do that. Or you and a friend (you trust) can do the same.

Avatar image for rgsniper1
rgsniper1

9398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 rgsniper1
Member since 2003 • 9398 Posts

Too little too late. They didnt care at all about the outcry a month ago but now that they see its costing them hard cash in terms of preorder numbers they wanna get in our good graces. Microsoft just told us a week ago that if we dont want 24hr check ins the 360 is for us. So forget them and their smug arrogance. They basically told us tough poo a week ago and are now saying oops. Maybe they should be asking us to forgive them and apologizing and not putting out some garbage "thanking us" You needed E3 and millions of rants to tell you DRM and online checks were a bad idea. THe 300 people that bought bionic commando 3years ago would tell you how terrible drm is let alone what happened with simcity just this year!captainzornan

Well to be fair, the minute I gave up on Sony was when they Kaz stated that it didn't matter if the PS3 released with any games or not, kids would still mow lawns all summer long to buy it on launch day just because it had the Playstation brand name. Just saying, the compitition isn't any less arrogant. It just so happens that MS is now in the limelight showing their arrogance with this whole debacle.(side note: killzone fake demo from J. Trenton didn't help Sony either.)

I grew to respect MS more when Peter Moore was there because he basically told you how it was, and in the end that's all I think most of us want is just to be told honestly what's up. I know i'm in the minority, but I even pre-ordered an xbox one knowing how crappy it was going to be (DRM - always on) because I at least had the facts and knew what I was getting myself into. I'm not holding it against the compition, but I suspect there's more crap they didn't say about DRM on their system as to not upset the consumers. When the next gen launches i'm pretty sure developers are going to be laying on the DRM crap pretty thick to protect there I.P.'s. You can call me naive but there's no way that MS would have put themselves out there like they did if the compititions systems were not going to be have something in place that produced a similer outcome. Maybe not by the console developer, but they would be planning on how they could impliment it themselves.

Avatar image for Talldude80
Talldude80

6321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#74 Talldude80
Member since 2003 • 6321 Posts

I may be psychic, but I saw this coming.  I knew there was a VERY good chance that M$ would change their mind and do a 180.  They'd be stupid to let Sony just win that easily.

Avatar image for buccomatic
buccomatic

1941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 buccomatic
Member since 2005 • 1941 Posts

Two steps in the right direction - now sell me a version without Kinect for $400 and we've got a deal. 

Vari3ty
damn straight, bro! it would lower the price point (like you mentioned) and, at the same time, widen the demographic of potential customers. this would translate into a larger install base. and since that's the goal (fight for biggest install base) then IMO there should be no reason why the wouldn't do this. as soon as i hear or see "$400.00 non-kinect version available", i'm buying one immediately.
Avatar image for Angel_Belial
Angel_Belial

1147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 Angel_Belial
Member since 2005 • 1147 Posts

Microsoft still requires a one-time online connection, though. That's not a good thing for anyone without convenient internet access - how many people are going to buy an Xbox One and not be able to play games on it because they've never taken it online before? And why is this one-time connection even necessary?

It's funny cause people are complaining about the kinect watching them XD your iPhone can spy on you more than the kinect can guys. XD they are just making up excuses now LOLP1xxel

No, I and others have been unhappy about a mandatory Kinect from the beginning. Last time I checked, an iPhone couldn't read your skin to determine your heartbeat, nor read your intricate facial expressions to tell your emotions. Many games won't even be making use of the Kinect, so you have to wonder why Microsoft is forcing it on consumers - they have it so the console won't even function without it.

As long as Kinect is mandatory for the Xbox One, I won't be buying one.

Avatar image for Mickeyminime
Mickeyminime

1595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#77 Mickeyminime
Member since 2008 • 1595 Posts

[QUOTE="Mickeyminime"]for me, i'm 100& solid on PS4 now, but will decide whether or not to get X1, if i do, it will prob be a while, i for one will not forgive MS for what they did and if they can just take it all off, what if they put it all back on?. Not that they would of course, but i no longer trust MS, but thats just mexhawk27

Yeah but what happens if Sony puts in DRM. Let me guess Sony are the Saints of gaming they would never do that. Please grow up. 

I have grown up, but please, do call me any time when you reach that point too :)
Avatar image for TheRealArtlover
TheRealArtlover

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 TheRealArtlover
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Not sure why everyone is so excited about this news. It's a farce. They are only doing this for now so they can sell some consoles. Then all this garbage will be slowly reintroduced with future system updates. :roll:

 

Region free will most likely be one of the first to go. That is a publisher thing and a localized government content restriction thing, not a console maker thing. Eliminating region locking means publishers can no longer charge different prices in different regions. No tears for that. But it also means publishers can not meet the different content restrictions different countries have. The is the bigger issue as it means either some games will never be legaly sold in some countries and subject to import confiscation, or those games will be censored according to the maximum level of compliance even when sold in countries that have no such content restrictions. So who is ready for COD Green Blood Edition where 'swastikas' are replaced with 'smiley faces' and 'nazi' is replaced with 'enemy'? :roll:

 

Then again, maybe that is why they aren't to concerned about pushing for world wide sales. The Germans and Ausis probably won't be able to play the console anyways, so no need to worry about their countries' stupid content restriction laws. :question:

Avatar image for robybaggio
robybaggio

562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 robybaggio
Member since 2004 • 562 Posts

Not sure why everyone is so excited about this news. It's a farce. They are only doing this for now so they can sell some consoles. Then all this garbage will be slowly reintroduced with future system updates. :roll:

 

Region free will most likely be one of the first to go. That is a publisher thing and a localized government content restriction thing, not a console maker thing. Eliminating region locking means publishers can no longer charge different prices in different regions. No tears for that. But it also means publishers can not meet the different content restrictions different countries have. The is the bigger issue as it means either some games will never be legaly sold in some countries and subject to import confiscation, or those games will be censored according to the maximum level of compliance even when sold in countries that have no such content restrictions. So who is ready for COD Green Blood Edition where 'swastikas' are replaced with 'smiley faces' and 'nazi' is replaced with 'enemy'? :roll:

 

Then again, maybe that is why they aren't to concerned about pushing for world wide sales. The Germans and Ausis probably won't be able to play the console anyways, so no need to worry about their countries' stupid content restriction laws. :question:

TheRealArtlover
It won't happen, but if they do reverse it it will be a win to gamers.
Avatar image for elchiquilin
elchiquilin

1318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 elchiquilin
Member since 2005 • 1318 Posts
This made me think about it, honestly I went with all 3 last gen, I was gonna skip X1 because my 360 lies untouched on the cabinet, and has been for the past 6 months, however, I might now get it, but not at launch. For me its gonna be PS4 on launch day (Already own a wii u) and X1 maybe a month later or two, maybe I get it as an uber XMAS gift for myself and the bro. But do you guys think we will get the failure rates of last gen?, our 360 had t be replaced twice, whereas our other consoles still work and are launch day units/ Also, I think MS was a lil too "I dont care about you mr. customer" approach, maybe had they tried to sell the DRM stuff differently we would have another bird singing. Anyways to those who will get the X1, be sure to add me and my bro come december. (We will post on the mandatory sticky post, lol)
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#81 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

But do you guys think we will get the failure rates of last gen?, our 360 had t be replaced twice, whereas our other consoles still work and are launch day units/ Also, I think MS was a lil too "I dont care about you mr. customer" approach, maybe had they tried to sell the DRM stuff differently we would have another bird singing. Anyways to those who will get the X1, be sure to add me and my bro come december. (We will post on the mandatory sticky post, lol)elchiquilin

Not worried about failure rates, the Xbox One has architecture that Microsoft is great on, not like the Xbox 360 that was rushed to market because Microsoft was stopped from making anymore of the original Xbox.

As far as their approach Microsoft tried to give consumers more power over their games than ever before but idiots who didn't understand ruined things because not only were they idiots but they were loud idiots.

Avatar image for catderpillar
catderpillar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 catderpillar
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
I'm really glad they went this way instead of what they planned before. But I think the damage was already done and not many are whilling to change their minds about not getting the xbox one anymore
Avatar image for WinsteadVolve
WinsteadVolve

366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 WinsteadVolve
Member since 2011 • 366 Posts

Well microsoft being well... microsoft, they will probably weed their policies back in, after all they are that powerful.