Should I get R6:V or COD3 ,If...........

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Xbox360gamer1
Xbox360gamer1

8575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Xbox360gamer1
Member since 2005 • 8575 Posts
COD3 is $20 cheaper

Ok,

COD3 for $40
or
RS:V  for $60

I can only get one
Avatar image for TheRFour
TheRFour

279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TheRFour
Member since 2006 • 279 Posts
Where can you get cod3 for 40 smackers? Last time i checked, they were the same price. But, vegas fo sho. best game ever.
Avatar image for timmay9021
timmay9021

211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 timmay9021
Member since 2003 • 211 Posts
RS:V. call of duty 3 is okay, but its not that good. the multiplayer sucks and takes forever to join ranked matches; the single player is the only good thing about it. RS:V has awesome multiplayer and singleplayer and tons of replay value.
Avatar image for Xbox360gamer1
Xbox360gamer1

8575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Xbox360gamer1
Member since 2005 • 8575 Posts
Quick I need more opinions
Avatar image for zidura
zidura

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 zidura
Member since 2003 • 341 Posts
RS:V is without question the best multiplayer game on Live and few will debate that.  Perhaps a few Gears of War folks might argue, but GOW has worn thin for me personally.  Definitely get RS:V.  Don't be surprised if you find the single player campaign to be a bit boring though.  Once I started playing RS:V on Live I never touched the single player again.  I've also quit playing all my other multiplayer shooters since they're so boring in comparison.  RS:V has so many different online game modes and so many different tactics that it has great depth and replayability.  It's definitely worth the extra $20.