Too Human... No Way.

And for those of you STILL beefing it, saying "no one is your daddy, you have your own mind, reviews don't matter" please, please tell me why you participate in a game REVIEWing website, surrounded by people who review games on their own?

Magebane

I don't care about the scores. Actually I think reviews shouldn't have them at all. I just want a more or less detailed description of the games and then I'll decide if I'm interested or not.

[QUOTE="Magebane"]

And for those of you STILL beefing it, saying "no one is your daddy, you have your own mind, reviews don't matter" please, please tell me why you participate in a game REVIEWing website, surrounded by people who review games on their own?

nethernova

I don't care about the scores. Actually I think reviews shouldn't have them at all. I just want a more or less detailed description of the games and then I'll decide if I'm interested or not.

That wouldn't be much of a review then.

Too Human is an absolute insult to Humanity.

Burn it with fire and holy water.

is the guy that review the game on drugs ?? my god gamespot is going from bad to retarded , i got my copy of too human , and is not a 5.5 i can't believe it in my opinion the game is an 8.5 can't go under that , from now on im staying away from gamespot , 5 years old kids on youtube do better reviews than this retarded biatch

Instead of worrying about what these reviewers or in this case "reviewer" has to say, why not the people that actually bought the game tell us how it is, I really stopped paying to much attention about these reviewers since the old xbox days.

[QUOTE="Magebane"]

And for those of you STILL beefing it, saying "no one is your daddy, you have your own mind, reviews don't matter" please, please tell me why you participate in a game REVIEWing website, surrounded by people who review games on their own?

nethernova

I don't care about the scores. Actually I think reviews shouldn't have them at all. I just want a more or less detailed description of the games and then I'll decide if I'm interested or not.

/agree. I actually think that more gamers would benefit from a "pros and cons" list instead of a number. Unfortunately there isn't a great way to do that. The number is a quick reference to the overall performance, and a "pros and cons" list would require more than a quick glance for a final "opinion". Overall, giving gamers a list of "why it's good" and "why it isn't good" would allow gamers to decide for themselves what kind of score it has, because something that is "bad" might not apply to everyone. For example, i found the camera to be a non-issue most of the time in too human. Does that make it a 5.5 still? Probably not, it might jump a point or so. Eliminating the number system would greatly increase user interpretation, instead of author interpretation. Granted a review is still opinion, so something that doesn't work for the reviewer might still be reflected heavily on the negative side, and at that point you will have to try the game for yourself to decide whether you like it...Thank the lord all mighty for demos!

Too Human got a 5.5 recently from Gamespot. And as we all know, anything below a 7.5 is forgettable. I mean there is very few games under a 7.5 from Gamespot that I still like. (For instance, Army Of Two)... Now, I was excited for Too Human until I played the demo. I hated the demo. I was going to get this game, but too many signs point to no. Who's still getting Too Human?RD1109

lol at too human fanboys first they were complaining that game informer needs to score better now its gamespot its like every bad score is unfair.do they ecpect a 9.0 or 10N0-

LOL @ guys like you. What the hell is a Too Human fanboy? Anyone that likes the game?

[QUOTE="N0-"]lol at too human fanboys first they were complaining that game informer needs to score better now its gamespot its like every bad score is unfair.do they ecpect a 9.0 or 10DZBricktop

LOL @ guys like you. What the hell is a Too Human fanboy? Anyone that likes the game?

wow

It got a 7.5 from IGN. That's the score I take into consideration...not the people who gave Assassins Creed a 9.0.

I think both reviews were handled bordering on the unprofessional side. We don't need to point out the fact that the medic would be useless in a game with a max of 2 players. It seems like the reviewers just wanted to throw it back at Silicon Knights because they expected better...and they made some mistakes with Too Human.

I can't even believe they commented on cutscene length in a negative way...These were the people that gave MGS4 a 10? I'm wondering if they've played MGS now.

[QUOTE="DZBricktop"]

[QUOTE="N0-"]lol at too human fanboys first they were complaining that game informer needs to score better now its gamespot its like every bad score is unfair.do they ecpect a 9.0 or 10N0-

LOL @ guys like you. What the hell is a Too Human fanboy? Anyone that likes the game?

wow

Wow indeed. Looks like you've been spending too much time in system wars. I didn't know you could be a fanboy of a game now...and here I thought it was just brands.

The demo pointed to a bad score, I am not surprised at all. I think we'd all be better off forgetting this game. Toriko42

Agreed, I cant believe some of you actually thought this game was going to be good. Let it go..... It was an Epic Fail from start to unfinished...

[QUOTE="N0-"][QUOTE="DZBricktop"]

[QUOTE="N0-"]lol at too human fanboys first they were complaining that game informer needs to score better now its gamespot its like every bad score is unfair.do they ecpect a 9.0 or 10Mau-Justice

LOL @ guys like you. What the hell is a Too Human fanboy? Anyone that likes the game?

wow

Wow indeed. Looks like you've been spending too much time in system wars. I didn't know you could be a fanboy of a game now...and here I thought it was just brands.

your saying i im on the boards to long when you have a higher level than me:lol: