This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="seankane"][QUOTE="craigalan23"] Less campers? You must be very lucky a good 40% of the games I join are nothing but one side camping and the other getting slaughtered. Anyway I personally like MW2 the most.craigalan23
Thats a huge exaggeration.
So why would I be lying? Half of the maps seem to be nothing but camping or at least the ones that I play. I only play Mercenary Team Deathmacth by the way. Estate is nothing but people hiding in the house and the other team trying to take it. Which guess what? Gets them slaughtered most of the time. I have only owned the game for a few days but that's my experience so far.I'm pretty sure its not an exaggeration, especially on estate, A bunch of people camp in the house, then as soon as you go into the house you get killed by a random camper, or there hole team is in the house EXCEPT 1, who happens to kill you while your getting shot at by a bunch of other campers. anyway, I definetly don't think the camping has gone down, but they definetly made camping easier on mw2.
So why would I be lying? Half of the maps seem to be nothing but camping or at least the ones that I play. I only play Mercenary Team Deathmacth by the way. Estate is nothing but people hiding in the house and the other team trying to take it. Which guess what? Gets them slaughtered most of the time. I have only owned the game for a few days but that's my experience so far.[QUOTE="craigalan23"][QUOTE="seankane"]
Thats a huge exaggeration.
Wakanoid
I'm pretty sure its not an exaggeration, especially on estate, A bunch of people camp in the house, then as soon as you go into the house you get killed by a random camper, or there hole team is in the house EXCEPT 1, who happens to kill you while your getting shot at by a bunch of other campers. anyway, I definetly don't think the camping has gone down, but they definetly made camping easier on mw2.
Heartbeat sensor and camping =(CoD4 for me. MW2 is fun and all but Idk... there is something that bugs me about it.
Childeater10
same here
COD4. Either bullets did less damage or you had more health, either way it was better because you have the ability to pull of a clutch triple kill or something.
In MW2, the only way you're getting a double/triple/multikill is with a grenade or if you're camping like everyone does.
CODs formula is run and gun, MW2 tries to be tactical and it just doesn't work. It's stupid how Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction was rated poorly for "identity crisis" but MW2 is praised. It doesn't know what it wants to be. It's just an unbalanced mess that provides no fun, only for people who are new to shooters.
[QUOTE="James161324"]
MW2.
but i hate how unbalanced the guns are.
rawr_xd
Uhh... WHA!!!?
Modern Warfare 2 is the first game that IS balanced. I love all of the COD's, but MW2 is completely balanced. There is no overpowering M16 or MP40 type gun. I mean, what gun is cheap? None.
The M16 is a one shot kill still, WITHOUT stopping power.Akimbo Rangers or Model 1887's are unbalanced, as is the ACR and SCAR. All these guns require you to press RT once and you got a kill.
The game isn't balanced, maybe you think the guns are but there's much more to balancing than just guns. The spawn system is atrocious, on most maps one team usually always gets the advantageous spawn to get map control.
I was just playing some COD4 last night, there's not an area that you have to control or you won't win. It's also really easy to break setups. In MW2, it's really difficult, and there's areas on the map that if you control, you win. It's really stupid and unbalanced, especially on Rundown. Where A would be in Domination, that building that gives you a viewpoint on the entire other side of the map, is so unbalanced. I watch my friend's back while he camps and gets nukes/EMPs.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment