I want to see: A split-screen campaign mode that isn't visually skewed like in WAW. If you can do full-screen for all players in split-screen competitive modes, why not do the same for campaign? I also suggest that we need to go into massive "limb-o" whenever an enemy is killed by a particularly nasty explosion. You want an accurate depiction of war, you got it.
The two things recoil and no auto-aim/ sticky reticle... It aint happening.YoungSinatra25
I hate when you get a bead right on the head of some idiot peaking around a wall and his friend goes running around him and you stick to the running idiot. And then I usually get killed by the guy I was originally aiming at. The auto-aim pisses me off on a regular basis so I agree with you on the subject.
[QUOTE="RAMRODtheMASTER"]Guns. lots an lots of new guns. [QUOTE="YoungSinatra25"]The two things recoil and no auto-aim/ sticky reticle... It aint happening.STurn21
I hate when you get a bead right on the head of some idiot peaking around a wall and his friend goes running around him and you stick to the running idiot. And then I usually get killed by the guy I was originally aiming at. The auto-aim pisses me off on a regular basis so I agree with you on the subject.
Since when has there been auto aim in multiplayer?
You've never noticed that when your aiming at someone and they move, your aim will slightly move with them. It's screwed me over on more than one occasion so it's definitely there.
[QUOTE="ThePRAssassin"]An IQ test. I'm tired of getting kids on my team who have no idea what they're doing and somehow they're on their 4th or 5th prestige. Rank means nothing. NOTHING.
[QUOTE="RAMRODtheMASTER"]Guns. lots an lots of new guns. [QUOTE="YoungSinatra25"]The two things recoil and no auto-aim/ sticky reticle... It aint happening.STurn21
I hate when you get a bead right on the head of some idiot peaking around a wall and his friend goes running around him and you stick to the running idiot. And then I usually get killed by the guy I was originally aiming at. The auto-aim pisses me off on a regular basis so I agree with you on the subject.
Since when has there been auto aim in multiplayer?
[QUOTE="ThePRAssassin"]An IQ test. I'm tired of getting kids on my team who have no idea what they're doing and somehow they're on their 4th or 5th prestige.RobboElRobbo
Rank means nothing. NOTHING. Actually it means that some people have nothing better to do than play CoD. That's about it.
[QUOTE="RobboElRobbo"][QUOTE="ThePRAssassin"]An IQ test. I'm tired of getting kids on my team who have no idea what they're doing and somehow they're on their 4th or 5th prestige. Rank means nothing. NOTHING. I know it means nothing. I think there's a thread on here where I say that. Only reason I brought it up is because if you've played the game that much, you should kind of know, when four of your teammates die in one area, it's a pretty good idea to not go near there. As much as I despise COD4 (I like my modern games to have some realistic elements to them) I would've played it more if my teammates knew what they were doing. There's games where nobody even tries to shoot down an enemy helicopter, they don't know how to defend a point. It's just a bunch of Rambo's running around trying to make a montage, yet failing miserably.
A quality singleplayer. Co-op for the campaign (but only IF the story warrants or would allow it w/o creating some massive plot hole), or even a separate co-op campaign set. Upgradeable weaponry, and more (creative) death animations. It's funny how the new Wolfenstein has this and has gone a long way to keeping me from getting tired of the fact that it is back in the World War 2 setting. Or if we really want to flip people's **** how about playing from one of the opposite sides? Like playing part of the story *AS* one of the Axis forces? I'm tired of repeating the same "let's revisit D-Day, now from soldier #2572556q23452^254's point of view!" ****... Or better yet, focus on a different war? Vietnam? Civil War? Even the Revolutionary war if they wanted to be **** historic about it.
Since when has there been auto aim in multiplayer?
You've never noticed that when your aiming at someone and they move, your aim will slightly move with them. It's screwed me over on more than one occasion so it's definitely there.
I pretty much only play hardcore, snipe often, and I naturally lead my target anyways. It cant be that big of a deal though..it's still outrageaously easy to do well in public games.
It always happens to me where I'm aiming at someone and my aim all of a sudden follows the guy who moves past him. It scews me over a lot and I can't believe it's never happened to you before.
The story of COD4 is awesome, I hope they can make it even more awesome. As for multiplayer, if it was somehow possible to stop the frickin' spawnkilling, they should stop it. Also I hate killcam, they should DEFINITELY take that out. What good is it if you find a good spot to snipe from if everyone knows where you are after you have killed them once!? Stupid, I think.
[QUOTE="ThePRAssassin"]An IQ test. I'm tired of getting kids on my team who have no idea what they're doing and somehow they're on their 4th or 5th prestige.sivasiva
Yea, totally agree with you. YEAH... Pisses me off when there's a 5year old in the lobby just yelling "hellooo! hello??? heeeelllooooo!!!??? anyone there!? helloooo!!!" -.-' I mean... OH MY GOD..............
The story of COD4 is awesome, I hope they can make it even more awesome. As for multiplayer, if it was somehow possible to stop the frickin' spawnkilling, they should stop it. Also I hate killcam, they should DEFINITELY take that out. What good is it if you find a good spot to snipe from if everyone knows where you are after you have killed them once!? Stupid, I think.
valttu
It's there to avoid (and/or detect) those that are using wallhacks or aimbots. And to reduce the number of accusations of better players using these cheats to win.
The story of COD4 is awesome, I hope they can make it even more awesome. As for multiplayer, if it was somehow possible to stop the frickin' spawnkilling, they should stop it. Also I hate killcam, they should DEFINITELY take that out. What good is it if you find a good spot to snipe from if everyone knows where you are after you have killed them once!? Stupid, I think.
codezer0
It's there to avoid (and/or detect) those that are using wallhacks or aimbots. And to reduce the number of accusations of better players using these cheats to win. Yeah... But still I hate it, because I don't cheat!!! :( I'm not a bad person! :'( Don't punish me!!! (lol)
[QUOTE="ThePRAssassin"]An IQ test. I'm tired of getting kids on my team who have no idea what they're doing and somehow they're on their 4th or 5th prestige. My God, yes! You are a genius. We need to have some sort of multiple choice, adult-related questions (or questions that require an IQ of at least that above a kitchen stove). There are some pretty dull and ignorant people on the Call of Duty servers that need to be sterilized... but since that's too extreme (to some), I'll settle with an IQ test.
Would like to see some new weapons of course... maybe make your own camo on them and you would be kinda cool... Also im not positive but im pretty sure you can turn AIM ASSIST off if you are really having a problem... im like 90% sure on that one. A map editor would be an awesome addition to the game for us console users. Maybe some game modes like in counterstrike with hostages and such... Thats my opinion.
Log in to comment