Heya. Simple MP3 or W2? Im already geting ME3 and Skyrim aswell, so rpgs are covered, but im concered MP3 wont last long.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Heya. Simple MP3 or W2? Im already geting ME3 and Skyrim aswell, so rpgs are covered, but im concered MP3 wont last long.
Well if you are getting ME 3 then you are sorted for a while so get MP3.
Really really fun and stylish.
Get The Witcher 2, lot's of content in it...Max Payne 3 may be longer than your average TPS/Action game but still it's not worth the full price imo
Max Payne 3 has a pretty good singleplayer (although a bit overrated), but the multiplayer went to crap for me. I thought it was awesome at first, but then the glitches, lag, and certain unlocks at high levels sort of ruined it for me. That being said, it has some interesting concepts in its multiplayer, with bullet time being used and Gang Wars being a mode unlike any other I've played before. I'd say rent that game instead of spending $60 on it. Or at least wait for it to drop down in price.
I can't comment on The Witcher 2, but I only hear good things about it.
I am voting against Witcher II. That's a rent in my opinion. I played through it and some aspects of it were disappointing in my opinion. It is a lot more linear than you might be expecting. And there isn't much replay factor for it after you beat it.
Max Payne 3 is an overly-scripted, on rails, cutscene shooter with a CoD-esque multiplayer.
You're better off with the Witcher 2. Although I don't know how the 360 version fares, but it's got a lot more, and better, content than MP3.
It has way more replay value than Max Payne 3.. The Witcher 2 you can play it from two different sides.. I enjoyed The Witcher 2 more, but neither one would I warrant a purchase... Both have good single player, with Witcher 2 being better, but Max Payne has mediocre or less multiplayer with it..I am voting against Witcher II. That's a rent in my opinion. I played through it and some aspects of it were disappointing in my opinion. It is a lot more linear than you might be expecting. And there isn't much replay factor for it after you beat it.
MaddenBowler10
[QUOTE="MaddenBowler10"]It has way more replay value than Max Payne 3.. The Witcher 2 you can play it from two different sides.. I enjoyed The Witcher 2 more, but neither one would I warrant a purchase... Both have good single player, with Witcher 2 being better, but Max Payne has mediocre or less multiplayer with it..I am voting against Witcher II. That's a rent in my opinion. I played through it and some aspects of it were disappointing in my opinion. It is a lot more linear than you might be expecting. And there isn't much replay factor for it after you beat it.
Warablo13
Max Payne has multiplayer though.
Max Payne 3 for sure. It has great gameplay, a great story with witty dialogue, it's lengthy for a tps, and is overall great. The Witcher 2 on the other is alright, I found it really hard to get into the story, but the gameplay was intresting enough to keep me playing.
thanks guys, im starting to lean towards TW2, also i was wondering can some tell me the length of both games? And how long W2's main stroy takes to finsih.
thanks guys, im starting to lean towards TW2, also i was wondering can some tell me the length of both games? And how long W2's main stroy takes to finsih.
megaprime33
Witcher 2 is anywhere between 20-35+ hours storywise. Max payne 3 is 10-15 hours storywise.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment