All im saying is. What will we do when a year will pass and sony still have free accounts and have finally reached the Xbox Live quality. For me im afraid when that day comes. We will have to pay to play while the ps3 owners play for free. please post
i will continue paying and will play online games lag free for soooo many different games...games designed for online gaming. see if you could play cod3 with 24 players in the game on ps3's servers.
Sony has said xbl is not their goal and home is proof over that. An overgloried chatroom with sims graphics and a 30 person limit. That really beats out xbl unified friends list and intgrated messenger support. that's sarcasm btw.
The XBL service is pretty amazing for the price, so i'm content with it. Granted, there are a few problems, but it's clearly much better than Sony's service.
i don't give a **** bout PS3, besides i don't think PS3's online will be as good as Live because live's been on for awhile (more experience, unless they totally copy)
Also I've played my friend's PS3 with Resistance and it's not that great, i think the first step to make PS3 online better is to have voicechat
well XBL is trying to make some things free on it like providing gamerpoints based on the amount of gamerscore you unlock. They have to try and do this to compete with sony. But also remember, sony players had to pay 600+ to get their system...the least they deserve is free online
i think its kinda stupid that we have to pay, because were hosting, ao no servers are hosted my MS, saveing themmoney, but its working system, so why not payfor it, personaly i dont think every ps3 gamethat will come out will be online, like the 360, even all the arade games are online, the 360 ismade for its online, ps3 isnt, its just shiny, on the outside, slow inside, whats with the installing of games aswell? 5GB for RR7 justso it runs faster, umm my 360 dont need that, we have 12xspeed, isnt wii faster than ps3 at loading, i hardly notice wii loading times
Log in to comment