What i've learned from this and other camping threads:
Story 1 - campers suck because they sit in a corner and kill you when you run by and you barely have any way to get them because they find a spot that's hard to clear
Story 2 - I don't mind campers at all because I can flank them and then kill them easily
Story 1 - campers have no skill, they just sit and wait for there kills to come to them
Story 2 - I don't mind campers because once I know they are camping I can simply go around them
I could go on, but you get the point. The bottom line is that I don't understand how some people complain about campers while others seem to have no problem with them. Is it because the complainers simply aren't skilled enough to beat the campers?
I don't even have to put a counterpoint to this as the arguement that camping is boring is just stupid, here's why... wait for it....Because it's only boring to some. Some people prefer to play that way and find it more fun than Spray and Pray killing but no one seems to complain about them. I'm not sure if anyone knows this but in real life it would be tactically sound and advisable to
1. find a spot were you're relatively safe and stay there until there's a reason to
2. camp a chokepoint to cut off your enemies progress and to hinder there movement
3. (sniper camping) stay as far away from the battle and danger as you can and kill as many as you can while again controling the battles movement.
I'm for both types of play but man you anti campers complain a lot. Some people find it fun and it's just as right as the way you want to play it. The maps, weapons and common sense say your wrong in thinking it's not legit.
As mentioned earlier and I agree with, some people consider the only "skilled" way to play that of twitch gaming... my finger is faster at aiming than yours therefor I'm better. Well I hate to tell you this but for the amount of time it took you to see others and aim is probably the amount of time that lag has changed the dynamics of that shoot out anyway. Yeah people can say I play with no lag at all, really? Cause i'd be willing to bet that a lot of people that think they have no lag actually have lag, just not enough that theyrealize it's effecting there game. In a twitch shootout i'm willing to bet that the milliseconds add up quickly. Therefor the most "skilled" gamers in that type of game are the host and the ones with the fastest/cleanist connection.So at this moment I declare that the host is always the most skilled gamer and should be viewed as such.
If I were someone would was getting say 100 to 130 ms connection in my game i'd probably be more weary of the run and gun type of game as there's bound to be people playing in the 60 ms range that should always have the advantage over me.
Don't believe me, I get a seemless and smooth connection that I would say doesn't hinder my game at all. But why then does the killcam always show something different than what I see happining. Maybe not by much but hey even 1 bullet is a world of difference when you're up in someones face being "skilled".
Yeah, I said I was only gonna post once .... I got bored.
Log in to comment