Why does everyone hate call of duty 5.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Red_sox_fans
Red_sox_fans

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Red_sox_fans
Member since 2008 • 466 Posts
Okay yeah COD3 sucked hard and alot of people are tired of WWII but still it could be an awesome game. Plus it's world war 2 in Iwo Jima so it's not exactly what we've all seen before.
Avatar image for hellmonster
hellmonster

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 hellmonster
Member since 2008 • 103 Posts

you wrong not everyone i love it but i liked the modren warfare so much

Avatar image for Messiah_xXx
Messiah_xXx

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Messiah_xXx
Member since 2006 • 778 Posts
because treyarch(spell check) f'd COD3 up and why change a good thing with the modern warfare. i do like the 4 player co op ill give em props on that
Avatar image for ncderek
ncderek

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 ncderek
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
im looking forward to it, i love the ww2 setting, i got tired of cod4 quick and bought cod3, now i'm tired of both ahah
Avatar image for Zcrimson07
Zcrimson07

3493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#5 Zcrimson07
Member since 2004 • 3493 Posts
i dont think cod3 sucked at all...a lot of people confuse games that arent amazing with games that are crap...its not the same
Avatar image for Avenger1324
Avenger1324

16344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Avenger1324
Member since 2007 • 16344 Posts

Because I don't want another WW2 game. COD4 with Modern Warfare was soo much better.

I like the choice of new weapons rather than being stuck with same-old same-old that come with every run of the mill WW2 shooter. Oh what a surprise its the Tommy gun and the M1 Garand - how imaginative :|

Avatar image for phil1472
phil1472

340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 phil1472
Member since 2008 • 340 Posts
Iwo Jeema man should be dope cod4 was amazing mostly for the online however had an amazing campaign too.
Avatar image for shaunchgo
shaunchgo

4605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 shaunchgo
Member since 2006 • 4605 Posts

because treyarch(spell check) f'd COD3 up and why change a good thing with the modern warfare. i do like the 4 player co op ill give em props on thatMessiah_xXx

What do you mean "why change a good thing with modern warfare". Shouldn't we want something that could possibly be better? Developers shouldn't settle for COD4 standards... they should try to give us something even better. That's a challenge every developer should face and as a consumer, I want better.

Avatar image for KGB32
KGB32

4279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 KGB32
Member since 2007 • 4279 Posts
i dont really see all the hate you are talking about Red_sox, other than the fact Treyarch is doing it
Avatar image for destef
destef

435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 destef
Member since 2004 • 435 Posts
I dont care. CoD 5 better be at least twice as long as CoD 4 though.
Avatar image for sirkoj
sirkoj

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 sirkoj
Member since 2005 • 87 Posts
Dude, it looks sick! Hopefully they have another awesome campaign, albeit a little longer, and have similar multiplayer but with vehicles and buildings/terrain that is destructible.
Avatar image for sirkoj
sirkoj

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 sirkoj
Member since 2005 • 87 Posts
Dude, it looks sick! Hopefully they have another awesome campaign, albeit a little longer, and have similar multiplayer but with vehicles and buildings/terrain that is destructible.
Avatar image for gdogghenrikson
gdogghenrikson

3028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#13 gdogghenrikson
Member since 2005 • 3028 Posts
because they are I.W. fanboys
Avatar image for gamerfreak1991
gamerfreak1991

2501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 gamerfreak1991
Member since 2005 • 2501 Posts
I don't HATE Call of Duty 5, I'm just not wow'ed by it. The only reason being is that it has perks in it. Perks are the reason why Call of Duty 4 wasn't as good as it could of been.
Avatar image for theunloved
theunloved

1441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#15 theunloved
Member since 2006 • 1441 Posts
I'm looking foward to it. I really can't wait for the co-op features as well. I always thought the COD games would be so much better with it.
Avatar image for wwervin
wwervin

10274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#16 wwervin
Member since 2003 • 10274 Posts
I think it looks like a pretty good game, however I do have a gripe with all these WWII games, and that's the lack of weapon choices. M1 Grand, standard shotgun, old school sniper, WWII pistol... honestly the weapons are always the same and it gets boring. A lot of people liked CoD4 because it introduced a new class of weapons to keep things fresh.
Avatar image for pygmahia5
pygmahia5

7428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 pygmahia5
Member since 2007 • 7428 Posts
you can't hate a game that hasn't come out yet. but I'm really looking forward to it.
Avatar image for sonic0491
sonic0491

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 sonic0491
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts
cod 3's online was great! the single player was bland though, im sure theyll pull through with no5, ill buy it and most probarbly enjoy it. people just need to say dirt about something....
Avatar image for Cyberfairy
Cyberfairy

5180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Cyberfairy
Member since 2003 • 5180 Posts

COD3 was thrown together in 8 months. COD5 has been in development for over 2 years by now. COD 5 is simply bound to be better.

Avatar image for mazdero
mazdero

1754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 mazdero
Member since 2002 • 1754 Posts
WW2 is played out already. It's a step backwards to redo a WW2 game after COD4.
Avatar image for kroxfire
kroxfire

189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 kroxfire
Member since 2006 • 189 Posts

dude that would be way to much like battlefeild bad company

the modern settingi s much more appealing to me and they ve struck gold with it but now they just goin back and making something like cod 1 2 and 3 with a facelift

Avatar image for deactivated-660c2894dc19c
deactivated-660c2894dc19c

2190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-660c2894dc19c
Member since 2004 • 2190 Posts

because treyarch(spell check) f'd COD3 up and why change a good thing with the modern warfare. i do like the 4 player co op ill give em props on thatMessiah_xXx

Treyarch had only limited time to make COD3, so I can understand why it wasn't so great. Now they've more time to polish COD 5. Also I like the more brutal and realistic aproach I have seen in videos. I'm getting tired of all this games showing that war is fun. It seems like the army is paying developers, that they'll show war as fun and pretty bussiness.

Avatar image for gamegod
gamegod

2497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 gamegod
Member since 2002 • 2497 Posts

until treyarch can prove that they can make a game that is worthy of the call of duty name ever installment they make will be met with skepticism.

Avatar image for shaane
shaane

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 shaane
Member since 2005 • 191 Posts
Cause modern combat scenario is so much better than WWII
Avatar image for V1nnyUK
V1nnyUK

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 V1nnyUK
Member since 2008 • 185 Posts

I cant wait 4 thhis game :)

Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#26 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
Because I didn't realize how tired I was of the WW2 era set of shooters until I got to play CoD4 and see how much better it felt that they finally changed the setting. And instead of rolling with it like any sensible gaming company WOULD HAVE DONE, they want to bring us right back to boring world war 2 AGAIN! :evil:
Avatar image for Pugberto3122
Pugberto3122

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Pugberto3122
Member since 2006 • 217 Posts
Call of Duty 4 sucked as well, didn't offer anything new to the table.
Avatar image for FunkyHeadHunter
FunkyHeadHunter

1758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 FunkyHeadHunter
Member since 2007 • 1758 Posts
I would rather play WWII game any day. COD4 is ok but its getting really old really quick. I dont like the whole shaking of the screen and rubble of the controller...Just takes my mind out of the game.
Avatar image for andyrae11
andyrae11

694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 andyrae11
Member since 2005 • 694 Posts

It funny because 'most" of the "WHY WWII?! TREYARCH SUCKS" threads have been vanishing after COD 5 gameplay and trailer videos have been released.

I like the fact its going back to WW II its what made the entire COD series great.

Avatar image for Sacif
Sacif

1830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#30 Sacif
Member since 2006 • 1830 Posts
I dont hate CoD5, so this thread is pointless and false...I bid you good day
Avatar image for nemesi609
nemesi609

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 nemesi609
Member since 2007 • 570 Posts

[QUOTE="Messiah_xXx"]because treyarch(spell check) f'd COD3 up and why change a good thing with the modern warfare. i do like the 4 player co op ill give em props on thatshaunchgo

What do you mean "why change a good thing with modern warfare". Shouldn't we want something that could possibly be better? Developers shouldn't settle for COD4 standards... they should try to give us something even better. That's a challenge every developer should face and as a consumer, I want better.

aloot of people dont like it because a different developer is in charge, and the last time they were in charge they screwed up the series. and wwII is getting old... and by dont change a good thing, i think he means dont go back to wwII, not necacarrily making a call of duty 4 2.0. i just hope call of duty 6 is a modern warfare, but i kind of want the armor customization of rainbow six vegas, and get rid of the cheap perks, I.E. juggernaut and martyrdom. but other than that call of duty 5 could be fun, just not the fun ive gotten used to with the more modern games. lets leave WWII to wolfenstien, i think we can only take one WWII game a year or two, not a billion(slight exaggeration):D

Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#32 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

Okay yeah COD3 sucked hard and alot of people are tired of WWII but still it could be an awesome game. Plus it's world war 2 in Iwo Jima so it's not exactly what we've all seen before.Red_sox_fans

Possibly because Treyarch claims to reform the WWII experience by just pitting us on the other side of the world were it was the exact the same thing as in COD 1 2 3 except that the enemies now are japs with yellow skin, different language and honor codes. just meaning a few different weapons and then again the old rusty garand, carbine, thompson and B.A.R guns, which we unfortuneatly all have seen before. Of course its a nice try but new enviroments and a katana or 4 player co-op won't save that we still know the entire story of the game, despite we are in a hot jungle now, covered in sweat and weird looking plants. It certainly doesn't help with the feeling that a game company that barely have developed any good game now is sitting and trying to make money off our great grandfathers deaths in WWII for the fourth time.

Answer enough?

Avatar image for franky_babylon
franky_babylon

1117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 franky_babylon
Member since 2008 • 1117 Posts

until treyarch can prove that they can make a game that is worthy of the call of duty name ever installment they make will be met with skepticism.

gamegod
I concur
Avatar image for GrammarKills
GrammarKills

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 GrammarKills
Member since 2008 • 887 Posts
Im not against this game but I do not plan on getting it when it first comes out, I am playing a lot of COD 4 right now.
Avatar image for twopic58
twopic58

3710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#35 twopic58
Member since 2007 • 3710 Posts
First when I heard about the WWII setting I was like not again. But now after seeing all the previews I want this game bad.