Why does it ALWAYS have to be the American millitary

  • 95 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MEOWWW123
MEOWWW123

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MEOWWW123
Member since 2008 • 870 Posts

You guys ever notice how 99% of big modern/ ww2 shooters have you play in the U.S millitary everytime? Why not use a different country in the world for once.

Im not whining because i live in Canada and hate the states, i have nothing wrong with our neighbors to the south but seriously im getting sick of playing the same marines/ rangers every single time.

When MOH was first revealed i heard that it was going to be set in Afghanistan, i hoped for a little while that we would be a part of a different country. Britain, Canada, Australia, France etc. Those countries were at one point or still are in Afghanistan. Also, im assuming when i post this im going to get some 15 year old kid saying LOLOL CANADAS MILLITARY IS SUCKS HAHA so if your one of these people then dont even bother posting, you just make your self look like an idiot.

Oh well, hopefully MOH will be kick ass :)

Avatar image for bessy67
bessy67

1734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 bessy67
Member since 2007 • 1734 Posts

Does it really make any difference? Other than a few minor weapon and equipment differences and the accents of the characters, I really don't see how it matters.

Avatar image for TheHighWind
TheHighWind

5724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TheHighWind
Member since 2003 • 5724 Posts

Yeah I thought it was cool in world at war when you got to play as the Russians.

Avatar image for kaze347
kaze347

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 kaze347
Member since 2006 • 1270 Posts

This is like asking why a large portion of protagonists in video games are white males. Because thats what the developers are, and thats what the largest target audience is.

Avatar image for MEOWWW123
MEOWWW123

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 MEOWWW123
Member since 2008 • 870 Posts

Does it really make any difference? Other than a few minor weapon and equipment differences and the accents of the characters, I really don't see how it matters.

bessy67

To be completley honest after a long time it starts to get to me, but maybe thats just me.Im not hating the U.S, its just a little variety in that certain part of gaming would be nice.

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

COD4 was good with the SAS, that first mission was just spectacular, I know what you mean, they followed it up relatively poorly with MW2 with the whole TF141 instead of SAS. I geuss being a brit i'm a little biased but man just love the whole spec ops SAS jazz.

I just loved how the SAS brought a different gameplay feel to COD than the standard, and i can say for sure that when playing through MW2 I dreaded the US military segments. I would like to see some russian spec ops too, those guys are bad-ass. But I think the cause of all the Americanness (if thats a word lol) in games is simply because Americans are generally VERY patriotic.

I am wishing for a vietcong segment in Black ops but...I don't know if it will be there

Avatar image for DumbDubya
DumbDubya

668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DumbDubya
Member since 2009 • 668 Posts

Most of the developers for war games are AMERICAN. That's why the games tend to be from an American prespective. If you have a problem with it, then start your own company in your native land from your native perspective.

Avatar image for jarvis008
jarvis008

518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 jarvis008
Member since 2008 • 518 Posts

Yeah the CoD games where you got to play as nationalities other than Americans in WW2 and in the modern warfare games was very welcome.

Avatar image for MEOWWW123
MEOWWW123

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MEOWWW123
Member since 2008 • 870 Posts

Most of the developers for war games are AMERICAN. That's why the games tend to be from an American prespective. If you have a problem with it, then start your own company in your native land from your native perspective.

DumbDubya

Still shouldn't stop you from trying something new

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

[QUOTE="DumbDubya"]

Most of the developers for war games are AMERICAN. That's why the games tend to be from an American prespective. If you have a problem with it, then start your own company in your native land from your native perspective.

MEOWWW123

Still shouldn't stop you from trying something new

Why would you want to try something new?

The American military is the strongest and most advanced in the world, what's not to make anyone on the planet want to use them for a game?

Who starts off with a game and says "ok this has to be great so let's start with the 5th best military on the planet"?

No, you take the number one to be the leader, then if you want some squads lower on the list you flesh it out with the 2nd best, 3rd best, 4th best....

Avatar image for DumbDubya
DumbDubya

668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 DumbDubya
Member since 2009 • 668 Posts

[QUOTE="DumbDubya"]

Most of the developers for war games are AMERICAN. That's why the games tend to be from an American prespective. If you have a problem with it, then start your own company in your native land from your native perspective.

MEOWWW123

Still shouldn't stop you from trying something new

No I agree with that. They should add variety and playing as other military forces would be nice, but really that is the reason why.

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

Most of the developers for war games are AMERICAN. That's why the games tend to be from an American prespective. If you have a problem with it, then start your own company in your native land from your native perspective.

DumbDubya

DICE is Finish, I believe, and they make America vs. Russia.

Avatar image for MEOWWW123
MEOWWW123

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 MEOWWW123
Member since 2008 • 870 Posts

[QUOTE="DumbDubya"]

Most of the developers for war games are AMERICAN. That's why the games tend to be from an American prespective. If you have a problem with it, then start your own company in your native land from your native perspective.

HavocV3

DICE is Finish, I believe, and they make America vs. Russia.

Swedish :p

Avatar image for Trinitarian
Trinitarian

1407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#14 Trinitarian
Member since 2007 • 1407 Posts
America has the strongest military force in the world so why not? On the other hand some countries, like britian i guess, have world renown sniper schools and such, but America is still the leading military force in the world and the fact that i live in the states and have severed in the armed forces i would not want to play as anyone else for the most part. However, if i was from another country i guess i could see how i would want my counties contributions to a war, no matter how small it maybe because we know who is paying the grunt of the work in afgan, i would like to see if reflected in my games. So i guess my view is bias but it doesnt matter to me cause the way it is i like it.
Avatar image for TrapMuzik92
TrapMuzik92

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 TrapMuzik92
Member since 2009 • 3424 Posts
America's military is the finest in the world
Avatar image for TheHighWind
TheHighWind

5724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 TheHighWind
Member since 2003 • 5724 Posts

Then why did they switch out the .45 for 9mm?

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="DumbDubya"]

Most of the developers for war games are AMERICAN. That's why the games tend to be from an American prespective. If you have a problem with it, then start your own company in your native land from your native perspective.

MEOWWW123

DICE is Finish, I believe, and they make America vs. Russia.

Swedish :p

knew it was something 'ish.

Avatar image for penpusher
penpusher

3573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 penpusher
Member since 2004 • 3573 Posts

You guys ever notice how 99% of big modern/ ww2 shooters have you play in the U.S millitary everytime? Why not use a different country in the world for once.

Im not whining because i live in Canada and hate the states, i have nothing wrong with our neighbors to the south but seriously im getting sick of playing the same marines/ rangers every single time.

When MOH was first revealed i heard that it was going to be set in Afghanistan, i hoped for a little while that we would be a part of a different country. Britain, Canada, Australia, France etc. Those countries were at one point or still are in Afghanistan. Also, im assuming when i post this im going to get some 15 year old kid saying LOLOL CANADAS MILLITARY IS SUCKS HAHA so if your one of these people then dont even bother posting, you just make your self look like an idiot.

Oh well, hopefully MOH will be kick ass :)

MEOWWW123
there are plenty of games that feature and infact star the armies of other nations,,,but mind you I do get what you mean how it tends to be america saving the world, even in sci-fi, take halo for instance your in the 26th century in an army thats meant to be consisted of the united NATIONS (emphasis on the plural) space command and yet just about every soldier seems to sound very american ... it does get a bit annoying for those of us of other naitons sometimes but over all it doesnt mean to much in the long run
Avatar image for Trinitarian
Trinitarian

1407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#19 Trinitarian
Member since 2007 • 1407 Posts
[QUOTE="penpusher"][QUOTE="MEOWWW123"]

You guys ever notice how 99% of big modern/ ww2 shooters have you play in the U.S millitary everytime? Why not use a different country in the world for once.

Im not whining because i live in Canada and hate the states, i have nothing wrong with our neighbors to the south but seriously im getting sick of playing the same marines/ rangers every single time.

When MOH was first revealed i heard that it was going to be set in Afghanistan, i hoped for a little while that we would be a part of a different country. Britain, Canada, Australia, France etc. Those countries were at one point or still are in Afghanistan. Also, im assuming when i post this im going to get some 15 year old kid saying LOLOL CANADAS MILLITARY IS SUCKS HAHA so if your one of these people then dont even bother posting, you just make your self look like an idiot.

Oh well, hopefully MOH will be kick ass :)

there are plenty of games that feature and infact star the armies of other nations,,,but mind you I do get what you mean how it tends to be america saving the world, even in sci-fi, take halo for instance your in the 26th century in an army thats meant to be consisted of the united NATIONS (emphasis on the plural) space command and yet just about every soldier seems to sound very american ... it does get a bit annoying for those of us of other naitons sometimes but over all it doesnt mean to much in the long run

Well, i dont know why it would be annoying for anyone to play or play something that sounds too Americanish when in fact if games did exist and America failed in WWII you'd be complaining about everything sounding too German lol. And if you got caught speaking against Germany you'd probably be gased...so be thahnkful you can be annoyed and speak your mind versus the, well you know...
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I'm American, I like playing as Americans. But I can see where our friends in other countries might get tired of it.

Avatar image for TheHighWind
TheHighWind

5724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 TheHighWind
Member since 2003 • 5724 Posts

The Russians beat the Germans, we beat the Japanese.

Avatar image for metroidprime55
metroidprime55

17657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 metroidprime55
Member since 2008 • 17657 Posts

I see what you mean but look at CoD, if you play CoD:WaW you switch between the Marines and the Red Army and many of the levels are about the Red Army, I think it's just a matter of who was most active in the war at the time, America is usually the good superpower and if your wondering about Canada I would think Canada would genearlly be fighting with the Americans because of the fact that they both are on the same continent and border each other. Personally, I feel that the real cliche is the idea of placing Russians as the bad guys.

Avatar image for Trinitarian
Trinitarian

1407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#23 Trinitarian
Member since 2007 • 1407 Posts

The Russians beat the Germans, we beat the Japanese.

TheHighWind
We let the Russians capture the captial of Berlin from the East, the American forces were right at the door step and we could have plowed them down. However Stalin wanted the repuation of sacking that city because thier Nation wanted revenge, first of all, for all the carnage the Germans wrought upon their cities. If it wasn't for D-day, the turning point in the war, and other key victories by the Americans Germany would have not only beaten the Russians but would have controlled all of Europe.
Avatar image for mirwave
mirwave

46

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 mirwave
Member since 2009 • 46 Posts

If the american military is the best in the world (and im not disputing this), then it might make for a more challenging game to be playing AGAINST them.

Other than the odd game with rogue americans you don't really seem to see this much.

Avatar image for Agent-Zero
Agent-Zero

6198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Agent-Zero
Member since 2009 • 6198 Posts
Because America has the best Army ever?
Avatar image for Trinitarian
Trinitarian

1407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#26 Trinitarian
Member since 2007 • 1407 Posts
[QUOTE="mirwave"]

If the american military is the best in the world (and im not disputing this), then it might make for a more challenging game to be playing AGAINST them.

Other than the odd game with rogue americans you don't really seem to see this much.

Not true, most games pride themselves on being balanced. If anything, the way we play american is underpowered. The only game i can think that conveys the truth of playing as Americans is on Sid Meiers Civilation Revelution. And if you play the Over Powered Americans people hate you for it. So just beccasue yu can play against the americans don't think youll like it lol
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

I don't think a game where you kill Americans will go over very well here. Especially if it isn't war related. I don't mind playing as SAS or anything, Just the accents are different.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

Grand Theft Auto has a Niko Bellic and he isn't American. Although, it isn't a war game.

Avatar image for penpusher
penpusher

3573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 penpusher
Member since 2004 • 3573 Posts
[QUOTE="TheHighWind"]

The Russians beat the Germans, we beat the Japanese.

Trinitarian
We let the Russians capture the captial of Berlin from the East, the American forces were right at the door step and we could have plowed them down. However Stalin wanted the repuation of sacking that city because thier Nation wanted revenge, first of all, for all the carnage the Germans wrought upon their cities. If it wasn't for D-day, the turning point in the war, and other key victories by the Americans Germany would have not only beaten the Russians but would have controlled all of Europe.

not quite true, russia was doing very well by that point, infact the germans were as good as defeated by D-day....
Avatar image for metroidprime55
metroidprime55

17657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 metroidprime55
Member since 2008 • 17657 Posts

Because America has the best Army ever?Agent-Zero

That's a bit nieve, even though people like to drill that into peoples heads doesn't mean it's the truth, as far as tech we are highly advanced but an army is not solely based on the stuff it has or the training of it's soldiers, in the end it's whoever could use the lives of the men their commanding, if you have a bad commanding officer it could turn the tides of the battle and just because it is listed in an officers portfolio that he is good doesn't mean he isn't prone to mistakes. Many soldiers and officers succomb to the stresses of their job or just can't handle the level of violence in war, I'm not even sure how America has won so many wars, there have been many militaries through history that have been reviered for their combat effectivness and lost to the underdog, how did Napoleon lose or the Spartians at the Battle of Marathon, they all lost because in one way or another their opponents found a way to beat them and America should be no exeption.

Avatar image for Raiden004
Raiden004

1605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#31 Raiden004
Member since 2009 • 1605 Posts

Does it really matter? In games like COD modern warfare u actually spend most of the game as a british SAS.

Avatar image for penpusher
penpusher

3573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 penpusher
Member since 2004 • 3573 Posts
[QUOTE="Trinitarian"][QUOTE="penpusher"][QUOTE="MEOWWW123"]

You guys ever notice how 99% of big modern/ ww2 shooters have you play in the U.S millitary everytime? Why not use a different country in the world for once.

Im not whining because i live in Canada and hate the states, i have nothing wrong with our neighbors to the south but seriously im getting sick of playing the same marines/ rangers every single time.

When MOH was first revealed i heard that it was going to be set in Afghanistan, i hoped for a little while that we would be a part of a different country. Britain, Canada, Australia, France etc. Those countries were at one point or still are in Afghanistan. Also, im assuming when i post this im going to get some 15 year old kid saying LOLOL CANADAS MILLITARY IS SUCKS HAHA so if your one of these people then dont even bother posting, you just make your self look like an idiot.

Oh well, hopefully MOH will be kick ass :)

there are plenty of games that feature and infact star the armies of other nations,,,but mind you I do get what you mean how it tends to be america saving the world, even in sci-fi, take halo for instance your in the 26th century in an army thats meant to be consisted of the united NATIONS (emphasis on the plural) space command and yet just about every soldier seems to sound very american ... it does get a bit annoying for those of us of other naitons sometimes but over all it doesnt mean to much in the long run

Well, i dont know why it would be annoying for anyone to play or play something that sounds too Americanish when in fact if games did exist and America failed in WWII you'd be complaining about everything sounding too German lol. And if you got caught speaking against Germany you'd probably be gased...so be thahnkful you can be annoyed and speak your mind versus the, well you know...

dont start the "be thankful for america" rubbish please...I didnt say that games in general sounding to "americanish" was an evil thing or anything like that ... I was talking about when the characters being only american makes no sense like, as stated in my example, youre supposed to be part of a multi national force but its only made up of americans,,,if the forces in halo were called the united states space command I could understand...but not when when its united nations just instance like that which pop up all too often, and sometimes the fact that america is always portrayed as the good guy, the one who didnt fire first etc when certain countries like russia are allways the evil ones, the ones who started the cold war, the ones that spawn rogues etc We're not in the cold war anymore its not like american devs need to be massively pariotic all the time, I'd be quite interested in seeing a game where america is the aggressor for once, like for example in a world war 3 game america can be the one to snap and fire the first shot or something like that
Avatar image for Trinitarian
Trinitarian

1407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#33 Trinitarian
Member since 2007 • 1407 Posts
[QUOTE="penpusher"][QUOTE="Trinitarian"][QUOTE="TheHighWind"]

The Russians beat the Germans, we beat the Japanese.

We let the Russians capture the captial of Berlin from the East, the American forces were right at the door step and we could have plowed them down. However Stalin wanted the repuation of sacking that city because thier Nation wanted revenge, first of all, for all the carnage the Germans wrought upon their cities. If it wasn't for D-day, the turning point in the war, and other key victories by the Americans Germany would have not only beaten the Russians but would have controlled all of Europe.

not quite true, russia was doing very well by that point, infact the germans were as good as defeated by D-day....

Russians would have not been able to defeat Germany without the Americans. However, I will acknowledge that America isn't the "savior" of europe out of good will. The Ameican people didn't want to or would support going to war with Germany. In fact, even after Japan attacted us during peral harbor, most historians aggree that the American people would have been fine with the fact that our war was in the Pacific with Japan and Europe;s war was with Germany if is wasn't for Japan taken sides with Germany, since they thought Germany was going to be vicotories, and consquently, Germany declaring war on the U.S. Nevertheless, America turned the tides of war with the invasion and air superiority. Otherwise Germany would have prevailed at best, or at worst, would have been a very long stalemate which most historian aggree with the former.
Avatar image for penpusher
penpusher

3573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 penpusher
Member since 2004 • 3573 Posts
[QUOTE="penpusher"][QUOTE="Trinitarian"] We let the Russians capture the captial of Berlin from the East, the American forces were right at the door step and we could have plowed them down. However Stalin wanted the repuation of sacking that city because thier Nation wanted revenge, first of all, for all the carnage the Germans wrought upon their cities. If it wasn't for D-day, the turning point in the war, and other key victories by the Americans Germany would have not only beaten the Russians but would have controlled all of Europe.Trinitarian
not quite true, russia was doing very well by that point, infact the germans were as good as defeated by D-day....

Russians would have not been able to defeat Germany without the Americans. However, I will acknowledge that America isn't the "savior" of europe out of good will. The Ameican people didn't want to or would support going to war with Germany. In fact, even after Japan attacted us during peral harbor, most historians aggree that the American people would have been fine with the fact that our war was in the Pacific with Japan and Europe;s war was with Germany if is wasn't for Japan taken sides with Germany, since they thought Germany was going to be vicotories, and consquently, Germany declaring war on the U.S. Nevertheless, America turned the tides of war with the invasion and air superiority. Otherwise Germany would have prevailed at best, or at worst, would have been a very long stalemate which most historian aggree with the former.

how do you figure russia wouldnt have defeated germany? by the time of d-day the russians had already blunted the german advance, got their act together and were rapidly grinding down the german forces ... they were knackered on that front, true they could have regrouped if it werent for a combination of hitlers incompotency and D-day itself but russia was doing fine... Though to avoid this turning into a historical debate on a gaming forum,,,the russian front would actually make a very good game :D makes ya wonder why relic never added it to their company of heroes games
Avatar image for Trinitarian
Trinitarian

1407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#35 Trinitarian
Member since 2007 • 1407 Posts
[QUOTE="Trinitarian"][QUOTE="penpusher"] there are plenty of games that feature and infact star the armies of other nations,,,but mind you I do get what you mean how it tends to be america saving the world, even in sci-fi, take halo for instance your in the 26th century in an army thats meant to be consisted of the united NATIONS (emphasis on the plural) space command and yet just about every soldier seems to sound very american ... it does get a bit annoying for those of us of other naitons sometimes but over all it doesnt mean to much in the long runpenpusher
Well, i dont know why it would be annoying for anyone to play or play something that sounds too Americanish when in fact if games did exist and America failed in WWII you'd be complaining about everything sounding too German lol. And if you got caught speaking against Germany you'd probably be gased...so be thahnkful you can be annoyed and speak your mind versus the, well you know...

dont start the "be thankful for america" rubbish please...I didnt say that games in general sounding to "americanish" was an evil thing or anything like that ... I was talking about when the characters being only american makes no sense like, as stated in my example, youre supposed to be part of a multi national force but its only made up of americans,,,if the forces in halo were called the united states space command I could understand...but not when when its united nations just instance like that which pop up all too often, and sometimes the fact that america is always portrayed as the good guy, the one who didnt fire first etc when certain countries like russia are allways the evil ones, the ones who started the cold war, the ones that spawn rogues etc We're not in the cold war anymore its not like american devs need to be massively pariotic all the time, I'd be quite interested in seeing a game where america is the aggressor for once, like for example in a world war 3 game america can be the one to snap and fire the first shot or something like that

Ok i see what your saying about the muilti-task forces you alluded to in Halo, sorry for misunderstanding you. For the most part i think its hard to portray Americans as an aggresser since we are supposed to be a democratic lol. Althought some would argue that our invasion into Iraq was all about oil, thus the case was built upon false intel suggesting a conscpiracy. Or even better, we know that the U.S. is a debter these days but we still hold mililtary power. So built upon that premeise we can definitly see a party such as the republicans rise to power and justify war on the bases of terror to take over oil rich nation to usher in WWIII, but what kind of form would the resistance take? Muslims? They are ones most idelogical oppsed to the U.S. or how about the dictatorships of Vennsala, or Communisim. I wouldn't play any of those so what else would be the greater good? Anyhow, i wasn't going to go down to the thank me i'm american path casue i think the best of american values is has been and is slipping away, but if you were being annoyed as i thought you were, then i was suggesting merely to acknowledge the facts in what roles historical American played in crafting the world as it is today.
Avatar image for TheHighWind
TheHighWind

5724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 TheHighWind
Member since 2003 • 5724 Posts

All you gotta do is elect George W. Bush to make us the bad guys.

Avatar image for Trinitarian
Trinitarian

1407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#37 Trinitarian
Member since 2007 • 1407 Posts
[QUOTE="Trinitarian"][QUOTE="penpusher"] not quite true, russia was doing very well by that point, infact the germans were as good as defeated by D-day....penpusher
Russians would have not been able to defeat Germany without the Americans. However, I will acknowledge that America isn't the "savior" of europe out of good will. The Ameican people didn't want to or would support going to war with Germany. In fact, even after Japan attacted us during peral harbor, most historians aggree that the American people would have been fine with the fact that our war was in the Pacific with Japan and Europe;s war was with Germany if is wasn't for Japan taken sides with Germany, since they thought Germany was going to be vicotories, and consquently, Germany declaring war on the U.S. Nevertheless, America turned the tides of war with the invasion and air superiority. Otherwise Germany would have prevailed at best, or at worst, would have been a very long stalemate which most historian aggree with the former.

how do you figure russia wouldnt have defeated germany? by the time of d-day the russians had already blunted the german advance, got their act together and were rapidly grinding down the german forces ... they were knackered on that front, true they could have regrouped if it werent for a combination of hitlers incompotency and D-day itself but russia was doing fine... Though to avoid this turning into a historical debate on a gaming forum,,,the russian front would actually make a very good game :D makes ya wonder why relic never added it to their company of heroes games

Well for one Americas air superority, we bomb so many factories, air ports, infastuctor, cities, that it weakened Germany's resolve agaisnt Russia. Second, American destroyer's basically saved Britains economy because Germany's U-boats were sinking a large amount of imported supplies to sustane the econmoy. Without us taking out those U-boats Britian would have feel. And maybe you have some other's historians perspective on D-day but all agree that without it Germany would not have fallen. But who am i to say i wasn't there i'm just an American boy who Grandfather was on the Anizo beach invasion, just as important but did not recieve any as much meida attention as Normandy, so i wasn't there lol. However, I do know that Hilter was expecting an american beach invasion and he didn't know when or where. Thats when we had all that spy work going on and making Hilter think Pattons armies was coming from the East and other spys fed hilter false intel that a beach invasion was going to occur farther east. So hitler was moving the majority of his force in response to the americans. Now, do you really think that Russia alone could have taken out Germany without any of our contributions of Air, Navl, intel, and ground forces. Wasn't D-day the largest land based invasion in the history of the world? Would we wasted our time with that if we knew Russia would have just wiped them out. Its hard to believe, but hey, some Americans think the our own government planned 9/11 so i guess anything goes right lol.
Avatar image for N7v1K0
N7v1K0

5755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 N7v1K0
Member since 2009 • 5755 Posts

[QUOTE="TheHighWind"]

The Russians beat the Germans, we beat the Japanese.

Trinitarian

We let the Russians capture the captial of Berlin from the East, the American forces were right at the door step and we could have plowed them down. However Stalin wanted the repuation of sacking that city because thier Nation wanted revenge, first of all, for all the carnage the Germans wrought upon their cities. If it wasn't for D-day, the turning point in the war, and other key victories by the Americans Germany would have not only beaten the Russians but would have controlled all of Europe.

The turning point was Stalingrad, actually

Avatar image for VoodooHak
VoodooHak

15989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 VoodooHak
Member since 2002 • 15989 Posts

The American military have become iconic, not just in videogames, but in movies, the news and on the world stage in general. They are what most people are familiar with when the subject of military power is concerned. CoD gives people a good flavor for what other military forces are like. Hopefully, we'll see more of that.

Avatar image for pablohammy
pablohammy

488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 pablohammy
Member since 2009 • 488 Posts

im pretyy sure that in cod 3 u got to play as canada

Avatar image for Hakud0ushi
Hakud0ushi

7613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#41 Hakud0ushi
Member since 2005 • 7613 Posts
In the end it is still an FPS game. I don't see any relevant point.
Avatar image for DumbDubya
DumbDubya

668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 DumbDubya
Member since 2009 • 668 Posts

America does have the most powerful mitiliary in the world, there is NO ARGUMENT. But it's because we spend more money on the military than the next 5 military power combined.

Also regarding World War 2, defeating Germany was a group effort. Defeating Japan was mostly a US effort.

Avatar image for Ghost_702
Ghost_702

7405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 Ghost_702
Member since 2006 • 7405 Posts
Well, I guess you could always play the losing side instead...
Avatar image for Gen007
Gen007

11006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 Gen007
Member since 2006 • 11006 Posts

yeah im gonna have to say its the fact that we have the most powerful military with all the best gadgets and in real life we have played a big role in different wars. Its not like other countries are never represented though.

Avatar image for telefanatic
telefanatic

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 telefanatic
Member since 2007 • 3008 Posts

[QUOTE="TheHighWind"]

The Russians beat the Germans, we beat the Japanese.

Trinitarian

We let the Russians capture the captial of Berlin from the East, the American forces were right at the door step and we could have plowed them down. However Stalin wanted the repuation of sacking that city because thier Nation wanted revenge, first of all, for all the carnage the Germans wrought upon their cities. If it wasn't for D-day, the turning point in the war, and other key victories by the Americans Germany would have not only beaten the Russians but would have controlled all of Europe.

You are so wrong, if it was not for the Russians there would be no United States.

Avatar image for laliberte11
laliberte11

4246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#46 laliberte11
Member since 2008 • 4246 Posts

lolz fail, the task force is the british army...and im an american and like playing as the task force more...i think it has something to do with ghost

Avatar image for XenoLair
XenoLair

4758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

#47 XenoLair
Member since 2006 • 4758 Posts
I believe its cause USA goes to war in almost every opportunity.

America does have the most powerful mitiliary in the world, there is NO ARGUMENT. But it's because we spend more money on the military than the next 5 military power combined.

Also regarding World War 2, defeating Germany was a group effort. Defeating Japan was mostly a US effort.

DumbDubya
Define powerful... One cant just say who has the most powerful armed forces; China, Russia, UK, US - its one of them, but it always comes down to how you use that power.
Avatar image for bphan
bphan

1666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 bphan
Member since 2005 • 1666 Posts

Because America is the greatest and most powerful country on earth. Everything that happens here matters to the world. We invented the Internet and you are posting on an american gaming site.

Avatar image for laliberte11
laliberte11

4246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#49 laliberte11
Member since 2008 • 4246 Posts

Because America is the greatest and most powerful country on earth. Everything that happens here matters to the world. We invented the Internet and you are posting on an american gaming site.

bphan
wow, um so many corrections to be made, firstly, right now, China is the most powerful country in the world, almost everything made comes from China, and also there is a uk version of this site, so who said he is from the US?
Avatar image for XenoLair
XenoLair

4758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

#50 XenoLair
Member since 2006 • 4758 Posts

The internet huh, I think its safe to say u'r talking about the world wide web (www) which is a product of Sir Tim Berners Lee, a Brit. No Britain, no www.